This Week In Techdirt History: March 18th - 24th
from the looking-back dept
Five Years Ago
This week in 2013, EA/Maxis was dealing with the fallout from its disastrous SimCity launch, which was ruined by always-online DRM (which, it turns out, was also disastrously hackable), by offering up tonedeaf responses while giving away earlier versions of the game as a weak apology. They were drawing ire from other developers, and then things got worse as a security hole was discovered in EA's Origin platform itself. Meanwhile, we were digging in to copyright boss Maria Pallante's call for comprehensive, forward-thinking copyright reform, which included some good ideas like not seeing personal downloading as piracy, but was still largely focused on bad ideas.
Ten Years Ago
This week in 2008, the makers of e-voting machines were doing everything they could to avoid scrutiny, so while machines in Ohio were declared a crime scene, Sequoia was trying to keep Ed Felten away from reviewing its machines and succeeded in scaring officials into backing down — all while a new study showed a massive error rate in e-voting.
This was also the week that the world lost Arthur C. Clarke.
Fifteen Years Ago
It was this week in 2003 that the US invaded Iraq. Though the war didn't dominate our writing on Techdirt, we did take a look at the businesses rapidly moving to explore whether this would help or hurt them, and the discussion around how this was the first true war of the internet era and the implications of that for journalists. And it didn't take long for "war" to oust "sex" and "Britney Spears" as the top internet search.
Also this week: the RIAA moved into the suing-companies phase of its anti-file sharing crusade; a Texas congressman wanted to throw college students in jail for file-sharing, though surveys of students showed they had a much more modern understanding of the issues at stake; and MIT's tech review continued sounding the warning bells about America becoming a surveillance nation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Link To Arthur C Clarke?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Link To Arthur C Clarke?
Maybe this is the article you meant to link to?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Link To Arthur C Clarke?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My Favourite Clarke Quote
The only true path to religious tolerance will lie through giving up the idea that right and wrong comes from what some fictional God tells you. Believe what you like, but right and wrong has to come from something we all share in common as human beings.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: My Favourite Clarke Quote
I also believe that 'God' is an entity that is the same being as described above, but is described by various religions to meet their particular bent. The Sumerians, and probably the Mayans though of 'god' as an explanation for causing events, such as storms, lightening, sun, dark, moon, etc..
I also believe that religion, as we know it today, and probably for the last hundred or so centuries, is a method and system for enabling control over others. As in exerting control over others. To that extent it has worked pretty good. That it is right, or that they are right, or that there is only one right is another matter.
But that is just me. You are free to think whatever you want. Just don't try and foist it upon me. Or us. The idea that proselytization is a good and necessary end is just wrong. Believe what you want, but don't expect that everyone should believe as you do. Killing people because they don't believe in the fictional god you believe in is just an excuse for murder.
All gods are fictional. Don't buy that? Give some solid proof that some 'God' exists.
Wait, we are going to need something other than your beliefs. I stated my beliefs above, but I cannot prove them. The folks in the adjoining universe won't allow it. Then there are the folks in the parallel universe whom have a different point of view. And if you are not warm and fuzzy with those concepts, think about how you might be living in a conceptualized paradigm made up by some stoner hackers trying to invent another world using code we don't know exists yet. Then there are the other dimensions. Whoa...wait till ya see what they have in store for us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: that entity ... that caused the big bang
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: that entity ... that caused the big bang
So, my imagination started to flow, just like the Sumerians who tried to explain lightening or day vs night or seasons. Could it be the end of the previous universe? Could it be a parallel universe? Could it be alternate dimensions, ones we haven discovered or defined yet? Was it some entity? Was it some group of entities? Could it be something else? Was this the first time? Could it be the last time? Or are we someplace in the middle of a streak, or as you put it an infinite streak of bangs. Then there is relativity, not necessarily the the sense the Einstein struggled with, but maybe. Does time run at the same speed for all universes and dimensions? Could a second of 'their' time be eons of ours?
So many questions, fortunately we have imaginations so that we can make up excuses. Now if we could only get those organized religions to stop trying to force their imaginations upon the rest of us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: that entity ... that caused the big bang
So, my imagination started to flow, just like the Sumerians who tried to explain lightening or day vs night or seasons. Could it be the end of the previous universe? Could it be a parallel universe? Could it be alternate dimensions, ones we haven discovered or defined yet? Was it some entity? Was it some group of entities? Could it be something else? Was this the first time? Could it be the last time? Or are we someplace in the middle of a streak, or as you put it an infinite streak of bangs. Then there is relativity, not necessarily the the sense the Einstein struggled with, but maybe. Does time run at the same speed for all universes and dimensions? Could a second of 'their' time be eons of ours?
So many questions, fortunately we have imaginations so that we can make up excuses. Now if we could only get those organized religions to stop trying to force their imaginations upon the rest of us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: My Favourite Clarke Quote
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Which I don't believe exists. Maybe you just mean you'd like to impose your morality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]