Patent Troll That Sued EFF And Lost... Now Loses Its Bullshit Patent As Well
from the trolling-karma dept
Remember GEMSA (Global Equty Management (SA) Pty. Ltd.)? That's the Australian patent troll who "won" a Stupid Patent of the Month award from EFF for its silly patent (US Patent 6,690,400 on "virtual cabinets representing a discrete operating system." GEMSA sued a bunch of companies, including Airbnb and Zillow for supposedly violating the patent. Oh, and then it sued EFF in Australia, getting an order from the court demanding that EFF take down its article and barring EFF from ever publishing anything about any GEMSA patents.
That kinda thing is not going to fly in the US, and so EFF went to court in the US, seeking declaratory judgment that such an Australian court order was totally unenforceable in the US under the SPEECH Act. Late last year, the court gave a thorough and complete victory to EFF, making it clear that GEMSA could not, in any way, hope to enforce its Australian order in the US, as it clearly would violate EFF's First Amendment rights.
And now, the US Patent Office has basically killed GEMSA's patent that EFF called out in the first place, via the all important inter partes review system that is currently being challenged at the Supreme Court (ruling coming soon...).
The ’400 patent described its “invention” as “a Graphic User Interface (GUI) that enables a user to virtualize the system and to define secondary storage physical devices through the graphical depiction of cabinets.” In other words, virtual storage cabinets on a computer. E-Bay, Alibaba, and Booking.com, filed a petition for inter partes review arguing that claims from the ’400 patent were obvious in light of the Partition Magic 3.0 User Guide (1997) from PowerQuest Corporation. Three administrative patent judges from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) agreed.
The PTAB opinion notes that Partition Magic’s user guide teaches each part of the patent’s Claim 1, including the portrayal of a “cabinet selection button bar,” a “secondary storage partitions window,” and a “cabinet visible partition window.”
The opinion demonstrated this graphically as well:
The PTAB laughed off GEMSA's argument that the original owner of the patent, Flash Vos, somehow "moved the computer industry a quantum leap forward in the late 90's" by pointing out that GEMSA "has put forth no evidence that Flash Vos or GEMSA actually had any commercial success." Ouch.
I'm curious if GEMSA will now seek to sue the US Patent Office in Australia as well...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, inter partes review, ipr, patent troll, stupid patent, virtual cabinets
Companies: eff, gemsa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
A few more victories on scale of this and you'll have...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
scotus
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/04/supreme-court-upholds-important-weapon-in-the-fight -against-bad-patents/
BAM!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: scotus
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would guess that their luck might be down-and-out there, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know it's really bad when...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Much like how if somebody were to create an e-mail implementation but subsequently produce no evidence that anybody else ever used it as a basis for standardized e-mail protocols, that person would not have a reasonable claim to be the inventor of e-mail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But who would ever do such a heinous thing? 🤔
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So the court just told GEMSA to EFF off
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given its a 2 bedroom house, GEMSA couldn't comprise of more than 2 people.
https://www.realestate.com.au/property/458-morphett-rd-warradale-sa-5046
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A quantum leap
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
before you start traveling on a travel trailer, make sure you have a towing hitch. Thanks for sharing a great article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Computer
Thanks for your sharing! https://ngocminhlong.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank
It would seem like patent trolls should be required by https://keomacao.com/truc-tiep-bong-da-k/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks
Thanks for your sharing...
https://thuany.vn/am-thanh-xe-hoi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you very much for this great post
website: http://keo79.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
xoc dia online
I need to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: xoc dia online
http://xocdia79.com Visit me here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]