Judge Says Parents Can Continue With Lawsuit Against Police Officer Who Helped Kill Their Son
from the Officer-Gafford-loses-the-QI-lottery dept
Five years after the Mesquite PD ended 18-year-old Graham Dyer's life, his family is being allowed to move forward with its lawsuit against one of the officers involved. Dyer was picked up for public intoxication after a 911 call. The 5'4" 110-lb. Dyer had been observed by friends acting strangely, stumbling and nearly walking into traffic. What should have been a simple arrest escalated into a horrific series of events that ended with Graham Dyer lying dead in a jail cell.
Dyer was tased repeatedly by officers while laying unrestrained in the back seat of their cruiser. Very little effort was made to calm Dyer down as he thrashed around the back seat slamming his head repeatedly on the cruiser's door and seat. Officer Gafford -- the only defendant remaining in the Dyers' lawsuit -- tased Dyer directly in the groin twice (Gafford claims he was "aiming" for Dyer's thigh) and also told the teen, "Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you."
The cruiser's interior camera caught all of this on tape. The cruiser's dashcam caught officers standing around the jail's sally port doing nothing to ensure Dyer, now laying on the ground with an officer's foot on his head, was healthy enough to be booked. These videos were obtained from the FBI, which opened its own investigation into the arrest. The Mesquite PD refused to release documents to Dyer's parents, claiming an arrest for public intoxication that ended in their son's death was still somehow an open criminal investigation.
The state AG upheld its denial, stating that PDs can withhold files even when the arrest doesn't lead to a prosecution. This denial served double duty. It kept files out of the Dyers' hands and it kept involved officers from being criminally charged. Even though the DA saw enough in the recordings to support charges, the stonewalling allowed the clock to run out on the statute of limitations.
It's these recordings that have been central to the Dyers' fight for closure. Their federal civil rights lawsuit is inching forward again, thanks to a recent decision by the judge, which pares down the Dyers' claims even further, but does not end their attempt to secure some sort of justice.
[Judge Jane] Boyle determined that the other officers could not be sued for their actions. However, she agreed that the Dyer family’s claims against Gafford could proceed. In her ruling, she rejected police claims that Graham needed to be shocked because he posed a threat to officer safety.
Noting that Graham had been arrested only for the minor offense of public intoxication and was not attacking any of the officers while handcuffed in the back of the police cruiser, she wrote, “A jury could reasonably find that tasing Graham in the crotch for eight seconds could not have been reasonably calculated to protect any officer from harm.”
This allows the Dyers to seek damages from Officer Graham personally, should a jury side with their claims. It's not much, but it's far more than they had five years ago. All they had was a dead son officers refused to let them see and zero information as to how he ended up that way.
And there's this: on top of all the stonewalling and lying the Mesquite PD engaged in prior to the lawsuit, the officers being sued actually tried to get their own recordings tossed out of court. This footnote from the ruling [PDF] is a jaw-dropper:
The officers have objected to the video’s authenticity. Federal Rule of Evidence 901(a) “merely requires some evidence which is sufficient to support a finding that the evidence in question is what it proponent claims it to be.” United States v. Jimenez Lopez, 873 F.2d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1989). In their depositions, the officers identified what the video represented, and the officers have provided no reason to believe the video is inauthentic. Moreover, the officers themselves produced the dashcam videos and “sallyport” video, which further corroborates those videos’ authenticity. The Court OVERRULES the officers’ objection to the video.
I guess when your credibility is already permanently damaged, there's little to lose arguing your own camera systems can't be trusted.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: civil rights, graham dyer, mesquite police department
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Limitations...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Limitations...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Limitations...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comes to mind: https://youtu.be/AcU8O5AudTM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We have ample evidence that the cameras can't be trusted to capture important video when needed, so it's not much of a leap to assume that the cameras are haunted and would invent incriminating video of things that never happened.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Police "body camera" EDITED YES OR NO?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Love it..
AND allot more rules that we cant even find a good copy of..
And these folks are given a few stipulations..and STILL SCREW THEM UP..
Can we threaten them with the same rules as the brits, and many other nations..and NO GUNS/weapons CARRIED by law enforcement??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Less than Zero at the Mesquite Texas Police Department
“A jury could reasonably find that tasing Graham in the crotch for eight seconds" is torture and depraved indifference to human life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Graham Dyer article error
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Graham Dyer article error
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Graham Dyer article error
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Techdirt's hero is the drug-crazed idiot who literally
beat his brains out.
Yup, kid, I choose anyone who's doing a job even in evil ways over you mindless, self-destructive nihilists.
Your remark is just the way you senselessly and uselessly beat your brains out while rational people watch in horror. You're already so far along on the process that won't do you any good to stop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Techdirt's hero is the drug-crazed idiot who literally
What your heroes did was lie to a judge to mask their "rational" behavior, and they got called out for it. Nice going, jackass!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Techdirt's hero is the drug-crazed idiot who literally
out_of_the_blue just hates it when due process is enforced.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: @ "Why is family not allowed to sue being tased to death?
Because cause of death was clearly the self-inflicted beating he gave himself. So coroner has ruled, for start, and so will a jury conclude.
Police are not morally or legally responsible for actions of drug addicts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: @ "Why is family not allowed to sue being tased to death?
Police are not morally or legally responsible for actions of drug addicts
Except for the judge who just said they are. Or are you going to chalk this one up to another anomaly, too?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Various illness (not to mention head injuries) can cause people to behave in a way that they appear "drunk".
Although you can often reasonably assume a person acting "drunk" is intoxicated in some way, other causes cannot be 100% ruled out and appropriate care should be taken in how such individuals are handled.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: @ "Why is family not allowed to sue being tased to death?
"Because cause of death was clearly the self-inflicted beating he gave himself. So coroner has ruled, for start, and so will a jury conclude.
Police are not morally or legally responsible for actions of drug addicts."
Because you are a police? Because tasing an 18 year old who weighs 110-lbs and is 5'4" tall while he is handcuffed behind his back sitting in the back of a police cruiser while telling the teen "Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you." is something only a police officer would enjoy.
But lets not stop there. I mean the officers tried to get their own recordings tossed out of court citing them to be inauthentic because hey, its their own police dash cam recordings.
To serve and protect with integrity and dignity. By hiring criminals for our police force.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: @ "Why is family not allowed to sue being tased to death?
"Because cause of death was clearly the self-inflicted beating he gave himself. So coroner has ruled, for start, and so will a jury conclude.
Police are not morally or legally responsible for actions of drug addicts."
Because you are a police? Because tasing an 18 year old who weighs 110-lbs and is 5'4" tall while he is handcuffed behind his back sitting in the back of a police cruiser while telling the teen "Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you." is something only a police officer would do.
But lets not stop there. I mean the officers tried to get their own recordings tossed out of court citing them to be inauthentic because hey, its their own police dash cam recordings.
To serve and protect with integrity and dignity. By hiring criminals for our police force, nationwide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: @ "Why is family not allowed to sue being tased to death?
You utter and complete fucking idiot. He had involuntary muscle spasms due to being tased. Calling it a "self-inflicted beating" is the most asinine excuse you can make.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Should have been arrested?
Uhh... why? That seems like more a medical problem than a crime, and probably a fairly common one. The judge rejected the idea he was a threat; a medic should have been able to handle this, maybe take him somewhere (other than a cell) where they can keep an eye on him till he sobers up.
(You'd also want someone who can differentiate drunkenness from, say, a stroke.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not likely the parents get anything from this.
Drugs are bad, kids. Don’t be a dummy, mkay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I could have done something, but eh."
Ignoring the fact that he was in custody at the time, and therefore his welfare was the responsibility of the police who were getting a kick out of torturing him via taser, sure, totally his fault.
Seriously, take a good, long look at yourself and ask yourself what is wrong with you that that is your response to what happened.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"The kid killed himself by repeatedly smashing his head into metal and concrete. Almost 50 times. Not likely the parents get anything from this. Drugs are bad, kids. Don’t be a dummy, mkay?"
Thats because you work for the Nassau county police, the Nassau county narcotics department. These are detectives who are immoral. Don't care about society and the people they serve. Because they only serve themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It strikes me that the same thing could be said of a person who was pushed down a long flight of steel-railed concrete steps. Who would be at fault, the pusher or the pushee?
Or are you holding that the pusher is responsible if a civilian, but if the pusher is a cop then the pushee MUST BE responsible? That cops are above all law?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Primarily with the the help from the jackboots, you mean.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How to stop police brutality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How to stop police brutality
Which does neatly result in avoiding any direct incentives for the officers to change their behavior; the best you can hope for is indirect incentive, by first applying enough pressure to convince the department to change, and having the department then put pressure on the individual officers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm...
> Dyer was tased repeatedly by officers while laying unrestrained in the back
> seat of their cruiser.
Then there's this:
> Noting that Graham had been arrested only for the minor offense of public
> intoxication and was not attacking any of the officers while handcuffed in the
> back of the police cruiser
Something doesn't add up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legal Issues by Tim Cushing Mon, Jul 2nd 2018 1:29pm Filed
from the Officer-Gafford-loses-the-QI-lottery dept
[ link to this | view in chronology ]