The FCC Mysteriously Retreats From Sinclair Cronyism, Potentially Dooming Controversial Merger
from the about-face dept
If you've been paying attention, you've probably noticed that Sinclair Broadcast Group's $3.9 billion merger with Tribune Media has been widely derided as terrible. The company, already under routine fire for content that's more lobotomized pablum than news, hopes to seal a deal that would give it ownership of more than 230 local broadcast stations reaching more than 72% of the nation. Given Sinclair's inflammatory and facts-optional reporting, that's generally seen as a problem for a country where daily discourse is already a raging dumpster fire, and local reporters are already struggling to survive.
For much of the last year the FCC has been going to comical lengths to pave the way for Sinclair's deal. From attacking the law that prohibits any one broadcaster from dominating more than 39% of local broadcast audiences, to restoring obscure bits of discarded regulation (like the UHF discount) simply to let Sinclair bullshit its way under said limit, the FCC has been making it very clear it hoped to rubber stamp the deal. It was so clear, Ajit Pai found himself the subject of a nonpartisan corruption investigation by his own agency into whether he coordinated the effort with Sinclair.
But the obvious cronyism came to an abrupt and strange end Monday morning, when Pai announced that he suddenly developed some reservations about Sinclair's justifications for the deal, and stated he'd be launching an order that would put the merger under additional scrutiny by an administrative law judge:
Based on a thorough review of the record, I have serious concerns about the Sinclair/Tribune transaction. I have shared with my @FCC colleagues a draft order that would designate issues involving certain proposed divestitures for a hearing in front of an administrative law judge. pic.twitter.com/WnCTGiC7Da
— Ajit Pai (@AjitPaiFCC) July 16, 2018
You have to think the FCC investigation into Pai's behavior here played more than a small role in him suddenly and uncharacteristically caring about factual data. Pai, who has pretty obvious post-FCC political aspirations, must have seen some pretty damning evidence to engage in such a stark reversal from a full year's worth of merger cheer leading. The deal's allies at the agency had previously tried to claim that a long list of rule changes perfectly timed to aid Sinclair (one of which occurred three weeks before the deal was even announced) were all just entirely coincidental.
Sinclair had been pushing hard for the FCC to eliminate the ownership cap entirely (which the FCC isn't legally authorized to do, but showed interest in attempting anyway). But Sinclair had also been engaged in all kinds of gamesmanship to try and sneak in below the line if that gambit failed, including trying to offload some stations to subsidiaries, shell companies and partners to make it look like they were adhering to the law. Reuters obtained a leaked version of the draft order which indicates that even Pai was forced to admit that Sinclair engaged in rampant "deception" to try and railroad the deal through:
"Sinclair’s actions here potentially involve deception” in its application to acquire Tribune and in reference to the divestiture of WGN, a TV station in Chicago, according to Pai’s draft order, not yet public but seen by Reuters.
The draft order said “this question of misconduct does not bear” only on the WGN transaction but on the entire merger application."
In short, it looks like Sinclair was so immeasurably full of shit during their merger sales pitch and various law-dodging shell games that even Ajit Pai couldn't rubber stamp the proposal, which is saying something about the depths Sinclair was likely willing to sink to. It's likely we'll see more details in the wake of a court fight over the FCC's UHF discount move, and the inquiry into Pai's behavior.
Again, if you've watched Pai try and twist the fabric of reality itself to make AT&T and Comcast happy, this is a pretty shocking about face. For much of the last year it seemed clear Pai was blisteringly-eager to rubber stamp the deal with the usual 3-2 partisan agency vote. But an order shoveling merger review toward an administrative hearing is traditionally seen as a death knell for such deals, meaning Sinclair's multi-year bid to lie its way to market domination may have just hit a dead end -- courtesy of the most unlikely of sources.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ajit pai, cronyism, fcc, local news, media ownership, merger
Companies: sinclair
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It’s a Christmas in July miracle!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Ajit Pai is smarter than Prenda Law and probably knows when to quit but I do hope this is a turning point and there will come a day when we can look back on this as the point where things started going south for the corrupt official.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Just like he did for the change to submit comments to the FCC, which now requires over $200, even as he claimed just the day before it was voted on that he wouldn't do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Not a bad theory, but nope; the FCC has unanimously voted to refer the merger to an administrative law judge, which will almost certainly prevent it from happening.
A stuck clock is right twice a day. Pai did the right thing on this one, and so did the other four commissioners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It is indeed strange that a man willing to subject his family to the fall-out of removing net neutrality is backing down here. Apparently the callusness is self-serving.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The Check bounced.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Short term vs long term
I suspect he looked at a very real pending investigation, realized that if he was outed via that he would't be able to keep cheerleading for a certain industry, and that if he was removed from office or even censured companies in said industry be much less likely to pick him up right away to avoid a PR beating, and decided that it was better to throw Sinclair under the bus to avoid that.
Possibly scrap one potential merger in exchange for being able to greenlight for a good while to come any and all actions by the companies he's all but officially working for already? Not a hard trade at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
His next employer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RICO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RICO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any risk in ALJ referral?
Maybe Pai's not trying to slow it down or stop it, but just wants to cover from an allegedly impartial (but in reality handpicked) administrative law judge?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/07/13/trump-order-risks-politicization-o f-administrative-judiciary/?utm_term=.79d54ec2c687
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kiting?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pai's Check Didn't Clear?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]