As Press Freedom Dies In Turkey, Twitter Is There To Help Dig Its Grave
from the enablers dept
Turkish president Recep Erdogan figures the best critic is a silenced critic. Determined to "earn" the respect of people worldwide, Erdogan and his government have engaged in unprecedented censorship. This goes far beyond the punishment of its own citizens. Erdogan has tried to secure charges and prosecutions from other governments against their own citizens for having the temerity to not take him as seriously as he takes himself.
Erdogan takes down newspapers and platforms with equal aplomb. He does this to stop things like the following from circulating:
It doesn't work, of course. Nothing gets censored worldwide and whatever censorship hits home can be circumvented. But of all the internet targets, Twitter is Erdogan's absolute favorite. The Committee to Protect Journalists has done the math. Its excellent article on Erdogan's censorship activities makes it clear that all other countries are merely pretenders to the throne when it comes to talking Twitter into doing their dirty work.
Over 1.5 million tweets have been withheld in Turkey by Twitter, thanks to Turkish government demands. Frequently targeted by removal requests are citizens who would normally be afforded extra speech protections in countries not run by a thin-skinned thug. And an American company playing ball with an authoritarian doesn't leave much room for recourse.
When CPJ reviewed a Buzzfeed News database of over 1,700 accounts withheld in one or more countries, along with court orders uploaded by tech companies to Harvard University's Lumen database, tweets, Twitter lists, and news reports, it was able to identify at least 59 Twitter accounts that belong to journalists and media outlets censored using the CWC tool in Turkey. As of late July, those 59 accounts had a combined following of over six million, in a country of about 11 million Twitter users.
Journalists whose accounts have been censored by CWC [country withheld content]requests told CPJ that Twitter is inconsistent with its compliance with such requests and complained about the lack of remediation options.
Journalists tweeting about the decline of press freedoms in Turkey are seeing their tweets removed by a compliant Twitter. And this is all Twitter has to say about its compliance in the decline of press freedoms in Turkey:
Colin Crowell, Twitter's head of global public policy, told CPJ, "If [we] don't use CWC, then the alternative is to remove [the content] globally [then] nobody can see it."
But that simply isn't true. Twitter has to know there's a third option: no removal at all. Even if the request is lawful in Turkey, Turkey's speech laws are terrible. Twitter doesn't have to make things worse by letting the Turkish government steamroll critics via removal requests. Sure, that means it might lose access to an entire country, but it shouldn't be so willing to be an extension of an abusive government.
It's not just a Twitter problem. Google's decision to help build the Chinese government a censored search engine is unacceptable, no matter how many more millions of users Google might reach.
Turkey's government may drive the content removal business on Twitter, but there's censorship everywhere from authoritarian regimes being aided by US companies that should act as a bulwark against tyranny. At the very least, there should be constant pushback against demands like these, rather than acquiescence under the disingenuous theory that blocking content worldwide is the only alternative.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, free speech, recep tayyip erdogan, takedowns, turkey
Companies: twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"There goes Techdirt, shilling for Google again."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Keep shouting..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Keep shouting..
Yes, ones that make economic decisions. Sometimes stupid ones. Sometimes ones they shouldn't. Sometimes ones that might come back and bite them in the ass down the road.
Twitters marketing team might make the decision that they are for free speech. Well, at least speech that does not denigrate others. The economic value of keeping Turkey...shall we say onboard...might outweigh their 'other ethical values'. Then again, they have a board of directors and a CEO who might overrule them.
Oh, and the rules here in the US, are not the same as in Turkey. Twitters choices are to pull out, and lose revenue, or stay and fight with the government, or do what they did, which retains what revenue is left. If they have no equipment in the country...well the government has other ways to control them, whether or not they are a Turkish company.
Their behavior does have a lot to say about their ethics, though. Whether the rest of the world cares about their ethics will be communicated through the marketplace. If Mastodon has any kind of marketing effort, I would think they would take serous advantage of this incident.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Keep shouting..
In fairness, Mastodon is a protocol rather than a platform, but word of mouth has been spreading about Masto ever since Jack decided to be a dumbass about Alex Jones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Keep shouting..
There, word of mouth. If any of the Mastodon users also had Twitter accounts...
Or, for that matter, any other social media accounts...
Get the word out. Make Twitter another insignificance, like MySpace. It might be a good thing. Then again, it might be a very bad thing. We will know, sometime.
I looked quickly at their 'rules and terms'. If they work like Techdirt does, then great. If not, then there may be problems. I hope for the former. I understand that there are various forums, and that each might respond differently, but they should be in some form consistent in how they go about moderation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FYI, while mastodon.social is the “flagship” Mastodon instance, it is by no means the only one. Other instances generally customize their own rules and terms of service. (oulipo.social, for example, forbids the letter e from being used in any post, save for any usage within URLs.) Lots of people have started out on m.s before moving on to an instance that better aligns with their interests or personality.
And believe it or not, lots of Masto users either have or had accounts on other social interaction networks. m.s had a couple of influxes in the past couple of weeks that were driven by Twitter fuck-ups, so the word is getting out where it matters, at least.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Keep shouting..
There, word of mouth. If any of the Mastodon users also had Twitter accounts...
Or, for that matter, any other social media accounts...
Get the word out. Make Twitter another insignificance, like MySpace. It might be a good thing. Then again, it might be a very bad thing. We will know, sometime.
I looked quickly at their 'rules and terms'. If they work like Techdirt does, then great. If not, then there may be problems. I hope for the former. I understand that there are various forums, and that each might respond differently, but they should be in some form consistent in how they go about moderation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Erdogollum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's hard to blame Twitter for making the their choice in favor of maximum reach. Erdogan isn't a known as a big tweeter. Cutting off all access to Twitter in Turkey would only hurt the people. Not censoring any of the flagged tweets would only result in Turkey blocking Twitter entirely. There really are only two choices here.
Tim, somehow I doubt you'd make a different choice if you were in their position.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Still, they apparently re-elected him. That is if the elections were actually free. Hard to tell from here, and hard to believe Erdogon's (or his minion's) assertions. We need to hear more from the Turkish people. All the Turkish people (even the Kurds), not just those 'approved' for communication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sounds more like you're speaking of yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
At least they are consistent...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tell us what you really think, if you can...doubtful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: At least they are consistent...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: At least they are consistent...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: At least they are consistent...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They just following the USA's lead
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They just following the USA's lead
the floodgates will open and they have .
Like don't like the guy so what . Once speech is regulated to the winds of change it will soon blow your way also.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: They just following the USA's lead
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: They just following the USA's lead
herd
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: They just following the USA's lead
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: They just following the USA's lead
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How would you feel if you operated a social interaction network like Twitter and the government told you that you would face legal consequences if you refused to host anything published by Alex Jones?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
actually had a spine ? water waiter club gate ?
Now media today is but a puppet for leftist filled propaganda .
Great job of portraying the illegal Mexican as the victim only trying to take his wife for a C section and big bad ICE
just had to harass the helpless victim .
Oh wait BTW he was only a wanted felon for murder in mexico .
damm didn't fit the narrative again .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Troll alert
Someones trying change your preconceived notions
Troll alert
Troll alert
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh, your talking about yourself? Self identification is good. Especially when you're right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You are failing at that. You are, however, succeeding at looking like a troll and a racist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
lots of panties up in a bunch this evening.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you didn't believe in censorship why would you use Twitter? Anyone against censorship is just a hypocrite for relying on Twitter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
The only real difference I can see between Twitter's behavior in the US vs. it's behavior in Turkey is that in one case the pressure comes from social pressure, mostly grassroots, while the Turkish actions come at the behest of the government and Erdogan himself. Rooting for the underdog and rebelling against government tyranny are natural for Americans, but those aren't necessarily _rational_ arguments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone can both defend Twitter’s legal right to moderate content and disagree with Twitter’s moderation choices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So...
What is it, exactly, that you are trying to say?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So...
Oh, we're doing the "in other words" thing?
"So..." -- in other words, "I'm about to make a strawman argument."
And...you don't see that difference as significant?
Really?
You don't understand the difference between private moderation and government action?
I'll bite.
In what way is it irrational to say that social pressure by private citizens is fundamentally different from a legal mandate by a government?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Basting Erdogan's Turkey Ambushed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Basting Erdogan's T
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doesn't help that twitter stopped being "cool" to anyone under 50 about 2 years ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wonder if Erdogan can get Senator Wyden to work for him?
Quote:
“What I’m gonna be trying to do in my legislation is to really lay out what the consequences are when somebody who is a bad actor, somebody who really doesn’t meet the decency principles that reflect our values, if that bad actor blows by the bounds of common decency, I think you gotta have a way to make sure that stuff is taken down,” he added.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]