For Some Reason, BMW Is Asking For More Time To Oppose The Latest Gwen Stacey Character Trademark
from the two-car-monty dept
If you feel like you're about to get a silly trademark story, your spidey-sense is working. We'll keep this short and sweet, but this whole thing centers around Gwen Stacy, otherwise known as Spider-Woman. But because this is Marvel we're talking about, there is also something of an alternate universe version of Gwen Stacy, in which she went by the name Spider-Gwen, but has more recently had that character rebooted as Ghost-Spider.
Confused yet? Well, it's about to get worse.
When Marvel applied for a trademark on the Ghost-Spider name, two different companies asked for more time to oppose the marks. One opposition likely makes some sense and might be rather limited to the sports equipment and apparel markets that Marvel asked for in addition to comic books. That one comes from golf club manufacturer Taylor Made, which happens to make a putter line called Ghost Spider, with the apparel to match it.
It's not an objection to the comic book trademark, but rather to the more wider ranging products that Marvel is claiming a trademark for. Maybe Marvel might agree to a change in category or working?
Basically, Marvel applied for the Ghost-Spider mark for every market under the sun and Taylor Made appears to only want to challenge the registration for the markets in which it operates. Makes a fair amount of sense.
So why is BMW also opposing the mark?
John G. Froemming and Jessica D. Bradley, lawyers at Washington DC legal firm Jonas Day represent Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft – better known as BMW. And they have issued a request to the United States Patent and Trademark Office for an extension of time to oppose the trademark.
There's no real detail to go on, so we're left to speculate exactly what BMW's problem with the Ghost-Spider name would be. The folks at Bleeding Cool think they've figured it out. But if they're right, BMW doesn't have a valid opposition.
BMW has the Spyder models. And it owns Rolls-Royce, with the Ghost models.
Two different brands under two different makes of car does not customer confusion make. If that really is the story here, it would be much better if the folks at BMW didn't waste everyone's time, because that's the kind of opposition that will get tossed immediately.
Meanwhile, maybe the folks at Marvel can dream up a few more alternate realities, including one where trademark law wasn't so completely busted.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ghost spider, gwen stacy, spider woman, trademark
Companies: bmw, marvel, taylor made
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Minor nitpick to the story: While the character was colloquially referred to Spider-Gwen (for obvious reasons), her in-universe superhero name was Spider-Woman.
Do I get a No-Prize for my pedantry? :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How is it we don't wonder about the lawyers who are the only ones who seem to be confused by the marks???
[ link to this | view in thread ]
BMW
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
/LawyerJokes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tired of the search engines censoring your conservative thought? Well, I've got the solution for you - Ghost-Spider will crawl the web looking for conservative thought and present same to you in easily read format which allows filtering on any conservative topic.
No more having to wade thru all that liberal crap they lie about in their fake news. Now you will have your very own connection to the echo chamber of conservative thought.
Lock her up !
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: nitpick
The character was from an alternate reality where Gwen got bitten by the radioactive spider instead of Peter Parker (and Peter ends up dying later on instead of her). She was merged over to the main Marvel universe later on, and since they already had a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Woman_(Jessica_Drew)] (Spider-Woman) character there, they've relabeled her as Ghost Spider.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I can easily envision the possibility that Rolls is working on a Spyder version of the Ghost for the future, perhaps along the lines of their Vision 100 concept design. And of course, they'll want to sell apparel. Keychains, polos, etc.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pot/Kettle?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Note that that BMW is not alone in having "spider" or "spyder" models.
FIAT, Porsche and Alpha Romeo (among others probably) have had models with such designations, generally for convertible or open-top cars.
And as noted by another poster, car companies are selling (and people are buying, for reasons that are beyond me) apparel and knickknacks branded with their car names, which could conflict with Marvel's copyright, in the same way that the Taylor Made apparel might.
I think BMW could possibly have a decent objection here, rather than "for some random weird copyright reason".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
First of all, you're confusing copyrights with trademarks. This case is about trademark. It has nothing to do with copyright.
Second, trademark protection is only good for a specific market segment. Taylor Made has a good case for blocking Marvel's Ghost Spider trademark for sports equipment, because it owns the Ghost Spider trademark for sports equipment. Taylor Made does not have a good case for blocking Marvel's Ghost Spider trademark for action figures, because Taylor Made does not sell Ghost Spider action figures.
Similarly, BMW can block Marvel from using the "Ghost Spider" name in any market that might compete with BMW. But it's unclear to me what market that might be.
[ link to this | view in thread ]