California Police Officers Used Self-Destructing Messaging App For Years
from the TigerText-also-destroys-reputations! dept
The Long Beach Police Department has bravely struck a blow against police accountability. An investigation by Al Jazeera uncovered use of self-deleting messaging by the department.
Current and former officers from the Long Beach Police Department in Southern California have told Al Jazeera that their police-issued phones had Tiger Text installed on them.
The Tiger Text app is designed to erase text messages after a set time period. Once the messages have been deleted, they cannot be retrieved - even through forensic analysis of the phone.
The police officers who spoke with Al Jazeera said the confidential messaging system was used to share details of police operations and sensitive personnel issues.
This may be true. But even if this was the full extent of TigerText usage, it's still a problem. Personnel issues can become matters of public interest, especially in civil rights lawsuits. Details of police operations are normally inaccessible to the public, but in rare cases, these too become matters of public interest.
On top of that, there's a good possibility some of these vanished discussions may have been pertinent to criminal trials. Defendants should have the chance to obtain relevant discussions that may help their defense, but Tiger Text ensures information that prosecutors might be obligated to turn over to the defense is now completely inaccessible.
In fact, the Al-Jazeera article quotes two former officers as claiming their superiors told them to use TigerText specifically to prevent conversations from being discoverable. The department has denied giving officers these instructions, but former officers claim the PD's participation in the discovery process is anything but "on the up and up."
The Long Beach PD had more than 100 officers using TigerText to preemptively destroy possible public records and/or evidence. The use of self-destructing messages, if nothing else, violates record preservation laws. Depending on what disappeared into the ether, there's a good chance criminal cases were also affected by the rolling destruction of communications.
It didn't take long for the Long Beach PD to reverse course after having its shady texting exposed. The LA Times reports the department has already officially ditched TigerText.
The Long Beach Police Department has suspended its use of a mobile texting application that permanently erases messages after civil liberties advocates and media outlets raised concerns that the app could be used to hide evidence useful to the other side in criminal and civil court cases.
In a statement, the city said the decision to halt the use of TigerText came “pending further review of whether the use is consistent with the city’s record retention policy and administrative regulations for the use of mobile devices.”
The PD claims it used TigerText as a stopgap solution when it moved away from Blackberry phones. Supposedly the search for an encrypted messaging system led the LBPD to this program, despite there being plenty of other options on the market in 2014. I guess the built-in autodelete feature was a pleasant bonus. TigerText was originally developed for the medical industry to allow care providers to send sensitive patient information to each other. The self-destruct feature helped hospitals comply with HIPAA regulations -- both by encrypting communications and ensuring records no longer needed were removed from issued phones.
To its credit, the swift abandonment of TigerText means future violations will be minimal. The PD has also promised to release more info about the department's utilization of the messaging app, including which officers and commanders used the app. But the damage that has been done probably can't be undone. If no messages were archived, the last four years of TigerText communications no longer exist. Nothing can be proven one way or another and taxpayers who paid $10,000 a year to help the PD destroy public records will just have to take the department's word that nothing illegal or unconstitutional occurred while TigerText was in use. That's a giant leap of faith most people won't make. If the Long Beach PD didn't have a trust issue before, it definitely has one now.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: disappearing messages, evidence, long beach, long beach police department, police, public records, transparency
Companies: tiger text
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Except that this doesn't apply to police.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Tree of Deception (not disapeared)
The thing is, those communications are public records, they work for the public, and with some limitations they KNOW that they are required to be able to produce those records.
Now, since that app came from higher ups, and with instructions on how to use (which could mean technical or practical, without more detail who knows?) the app, there is culpability not just at the user level, but in the chain of command. How high up does it go? When who writes the budget, and who approves the budget and the product get bought, how could any of them be left out?
Since the messages are legally required to be available if needed, then there is no question about whether a law has been broken. What remains is politics. Where does the blame get put? What does the blamee get in return for accepting that blame (extra pensions, under the table payments, something from the union rather than the department)? And, let us not forget, those who should have been in the know, and were likely in the know (whether they share blame or not) are actually as guilty as the end users who texted things they KNEW would not be discoverable, and managed, somehow, to escape blame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Tree of Deception (not disapeared)
The public outcry when some of those convicts are released ideally will cause a few officials to lose their jobs.
Unfortunately, that's an ideal...most likely the judges tossing the convictions will have re-election problems instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Big Deal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
There are other things that might be 'discoverable' for the defense. All of them must be available.
There are some things that are not our business. There is some difference between what we think is our business and what they think is our business, but they work for us. The difference between what we think and what they think is not for them to decide. It is up to a court. Not them, not their union, the court. What is the court going to decide against? Things not pertinent to the instant case. The case might be criminal or the case might be about how the agency conducts their business. Depending on the case in front of the court, all communication are pertinent until determined not to be.
Otherwise, we give in to them, and that is just not acceptable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
Listen to scanner of any police department for a few hours..listen how many times someone radios someone else to "call me on my cell..or "lets meet in parking lot X to chat". Do we make them record their personal cell phones? Or maybe we dont let them speak verbally to one another? Are civil rights being violated? Is this how cops go corrupt and then we give in to them? Ridiculous. And yes...they are public servants..they are not public slaves nor does a public servant work for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Big Deal
I have to assume that you're joking there, given the number of "malfunctions" of cameras and recorders that have happened during the past few years whenever something questionable involving officers has occurred.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
"Officer, were you violating my client's rights when you were concealing evidence and being a corrupt asshole when you used that messaging app?" "No sir..i was telling my boss I have to take a shit." "are you certain you were not concealing evidence that would exonerate my client?" "not unless the evidence was concealed in my double onion enchilada ass blow I was squirting out.."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Big Deal
You cannot get around body cams anymore
Funny how platoons of policemen still manage to have all their body cams fail at the exact same time then, isn't it?
Its not recorded and its not against policy
You say that like it's not also one of the shittier practices to get someone to confess which are criticized.
Funnily enough, "cops have to take a shit" was used to criticize the usage of body cams too. Because $2 field tests falsely flagging tea leaves as weed and sugar as crack from rummaged garbage is acceptable, but it's the fucking end times if a cop is caught on camera.
Maybe you should have thought more instead of touting your mantras of "if you have nothing to fear you have nothing to hide" and "fuck citizen-accessible encryption", huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Big Deal
Let them talk about taking a shit in peace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Big Deal
You can stop lying any time now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Meatheads"
Right there is where you lost me. If you have no respect for those with opposing views, how do you expect them to have respect for you?
While your argument (that anecdotal data is weak) is valid, it raises the matter that we don't have statistical data from an impartial source, largely due to efforts by the Department of Justice to obfuscate what data exists (and regarding this we do have statistical data going as far back as the mid 20th century).
Government by the people depends on transparency. As we have nearly zero transparency, a clear data trail that shows proper procedure was followed at all times, that public rights were considered always. Without that, the public can't govern, and the state agencies are in control.
That's what a police state is. Autocracy by state agents.
Law enforcement officers are treated by the US legal system entirely differently than civilians, and for that we do have statistical data. It's clear they are regard as a higher caste than the rest of us proles. This just isn't disputable given the data we have.
It's time to go back to school So What.... to learn what makes an argument or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Big Deal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Big Deal
written as a slam piece on police officers simply because they have the capabilty to speak to each other privately
Congratulations, you just summed every single argument used to justify encryption backdoors in civilian gadgetry.
wild assumptions about officers and how they operate
Like every single time the worst is assumed of a civilian because, horror of horrors, his mobile phone uses password protection! Or maybe his computer uses CCleaner, he must have downloaded pornography!
There is simply no branch of government anywhere in the USA at any level that is fully transparent
Ah, the old "nothing is fully transparent therefore nothing has to be" excuse.
Yet we are nowhere near a police state. I lived in one for a long time. The USA is fucking heaven.
You don't magically stop being a pile of shit just because your shit is smaller than the bigger pile of shit you come across.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
What would you rather read about? There are ways of finding reading material that suits your desires.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
Given that fact, why would we expect them not to take advantage of this potential?
Yes it would likely waste time and money to force police to use other communication tools, but that can be argued about other stuff.
Body cams can be argued a waste of time and money because officers can easily get around them. Police testimony can be argued a waste of time and money because officers may chose to lie about some aspects, meaning it can drag out the case if those lies may be disproven.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lies, failing cams, destruction of public record
What we're establishing here (in that they do all these things and it is evident) is that the common law enforcement officer is no better a witness, and has no better a code of honor than the common street criminal, despite that they are held in higher regard by our courts of law.
Just because they have the job of keeping peace and enforcing laws and the motto to serve and protect doesn't mean they actually do these things. In fact, it seems more often they're serving entirely different intentions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Deal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Big Deal
I agree that this seems fishy on the surface, but then I realize that officers can have face-to-face conversations too. And this might be viewed as just a technological extension of face-to-face conversations.
What the situation reeks of, imho, is a situation where we need to have clearly defined standards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Big Deal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Big Deal
I guarantee that the moment the department eliminated the encrypted app on the official cell, the officers just switched to talking to each other on their personal phones, either by voice phone calls or using the same self-destructing text app.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The proper recourse then...
Might be to retroactively acquit anyone convicted if an officer involved in the arrest or investigation of the case used the Tiger Text app for work communication during the interim the case was open.
Use of the app during this period indicates an agent of state was destroying evidence. That said evidence might have been incriminating, exonerating or neither becomes irrelevant once it can no longer be reviewed. It's gone.
When correct police protocol is not followed, and the rights of the public are ignored, it is the state -- including its taxpayers -- who must suffer the consequences, which means letting potentially dangerous people go free, so that innocent lives are not falsely imprisoned.
Of course nowadays, we believe none of that Blackstone's formulation business anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fired
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]