Monster Energy Loses Again, This Time To The NBA
from the losing-streak dept
Longtime readers here at Techdirt will be familiar with Monster Energy's trademark bullying ways, but even relative newcomers will have had the opportunity to witness what has become an impressive losing streak in trademark disputes. This comes with the bullying territory, where the quick trigger finger on the threat letters and oppositions means that many of them are going to be losers. Still, one would think the sheer volume of these cases would mean quite a bit of billable hours going to the legal team that certainly could be spent better elsewhere.
But the losses keep coming. Monster Energy recently lost an opposition filed by the NBA for the Toronto Raptors team imagery in Singapore, of all places.
Monster Energy argued that the Toronto Raptors logo is too similar to its “claw device mark”, and consumers would likely confuse Monster’s three vertical slashes with the NBA Toronto Raptors’ circular logo of a basketball with three horizontal raptor claw marks out of it.
Here are the images Monster Energy said would cause confusion in the public.
Confused yet? No, of course you're not. Now, Monster Energy and the Toronto Raptors both have a lengthy roster of variations of these images and branding, but absolutely none of them come remotely close to resembling one another and, even any of them did, there is still no chance for actual confusion in the public about any of this. Fortunately, the adjudicator of the opposition agreed.
The adjudicator presiding over the case said: “[The] mere similarity in the subject matter of the competing marks (for example the three-pronged claw-shaped devices with jagged edges) was not sufficient to establish visual similarity for the purposes of opposing the registration of a trademark.” The adjudicator went on to add that consumer knowledge of both brands would mean that confusion would not occur.
I get that bullies are gonna bully, but I still fail to see how any of this has been productive for Monster Energy as of late.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: basketball, energy drinks, monster, singapore, trademark
Companies: monster energy, nba, toronto raptors
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Confused? Yeah!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I wasn't aware that Monster Energy was fielding an NBA team, though. Or making British pizza. Or liquor. Or software in Japan. Or aquariums. Or movies.
You only have a right to defend your mark in a very narrow and specific market.
It also helps if the company you sue is small. Coffer size is probably the only reason the two giant Monsters (Energy & Cable) haven't attacked each other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IP has become a weapon to extract cash from people unable to afford to fight back. This isn't what was intended but hey why not, every type of IP needs a lawsuit seeing billions in damages over really stupid things...
Like a comics convention...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re
How about an Energy 'Light' drink that only puts you on half a jagged edge, but gives you enough energy to get the laundry done?!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the bright side, at least it ain’t another Monster Cable story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I've worked out their strategy
The primary consumer of Techdirt? Computer nerds.
The endless stream of pointless lawsuits is a deliberate attempt to leverage the Streisand effect to reach their target market through Techdirt. YOU are providing them with free* advertising.
*Free does not include millions in wasted legal fees.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Toronto Raptors will do for the 2018-19 season
How is that working out?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bullies gonna bully
"I get that bullies are gonna bully, but I still fail to see how any of this has been productive for Monster Energy as of late."
It's not productive to the company but you also kind of answered your own question -
"...the sheer volume of these cases would mean quite a bit of billable hours going to the legal team..."
Who wants to bet that the board member(s) that recommended these suits go forward is a lawyer?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bullies gonna bully
That litigation would be favorable over paying taxes is disgruntling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Monster Mash
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]