This Week In Techdirt History: We Finally Start Testing Responsive Design!

from the it's-about-time dept

Sat, Dec 1st 2018 12:00pm — Leigh Beadon

Try out Techdirt's new responsive design on our beta site »

It hasn't escaped our notice that the design of Techdirt is a little... behind the times. There was a spate of high-profile redesigns a few years ago, with many blogs transitioning to a more "magazine"-esque style, and although they looked great, it wasn't always the most useful choice for readers — and that's part of why we didn't end up going along with the trend. We've heard from various readers over the years that they appreciate our adherence to a traditional blog format with a chronological list of posts, and the fact that we don't force the use of photos and imagery when they don't actually add anything to the content. We're also a very small and very busy team, so when we tinker with the site, we try to focus on adding streamlined features that are immediately useful, like the ability to expand posts on the front page instead of clicking through, or to hide all ads on Techdirt. We've also tweaked the appearance of the site in small ways from time to time, and in general we prefer this incremental approach over making a splash with a big redesign.

That being said, there's something very important that we've been neglecting for far too long: how Techdirt works on mobile devices. Our "lite" format is much too basic — a holdover from an earlier era of the mobile web — while our default site is extremely inconvenient on a small screen. And so today we're happy to announce that we're almost ready to launch a new responsive framework for Techdirt, enabling the default version of the site to perform well on devices of all shapes and sizes, and we'd like your help with the beta test. We built this framework ourselves using fairly basic responsive CSS, since so many pre-packaged solutions are overly complex and/or unnecessarily reliant on JavaScript.

Click this link to switch to Techdirt's beta site and try out our new responsive design! Your preference will be saved in a cookie, and you can go back to the regular version of the site at any time via your user preferences or the prominent "Exit Beta" link in the header of every page.

You'll notice a few small tweaks to the layout of our posts, but the main change is that every page should now respond nicely to any viewport size and organize itself to be easily readable and navigable. Please give it a try on your phones and tablets (or by resizing your browser window) and let us know how your experience goes. If you encounter any bugs, or have any general suggestions or comments, get in touch using our contact form or by reaching out to us on Twitter (or here in the comments!)

If all goes well, we hope to roll this change out to the site very soon, and we've got a few more adjustments (plus a general tidying-up of the visual design) in the pipeline.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: design, web

69 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Daydream, 1 Dec 2018 @ 1:01pm

We built this framework ourselves using fairly basic responsive CSS, since so many pre-packaged solutions are overly complex and/or unnecessarily reliant on JavaScript.

Neat. I have JavaScript turned off on my mobile, after a bazillion crashed pages and ad redirects and so on, so I'm glad this site doesn't rely on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 2:22pm
  
  Re:
  "JavaScript turned off ... so I'm glad this site doesn't rely on it."
  
  But it does, if you ever find yourself curious enough to actually want to read the "troll" comments that regularly set off everyone in a frenzy replying to. But at least all text is contained in the page code, unlike many javascript sites which embargo script-free browsers.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:19pm
    
    Re: Re:
    I think we could probably make it possible to expand hidden comments without javascript and without reloading the page, though I'm pretty sure it'd only be possible to have one comment expanded at a time (and there might be some other weird behaviours like the comments collapsing when you try to reply) due to the limitations of pure-CSS for that kind of interactivity. Or we could potentially do it using the HTML5 summary/details tags, although those have no support in Microsoft browsers. In any case, we'll look into it!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 4:16pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      How about an option to just show all comments, perhaps having a separate page without that code (maybe dust off the old Techdirt page code)? If the idea for hidden comments was to keep people from ever seeing troll comments, being triggered and clogging up the page with unnecessary rebuttals, that strategy has obviously not been working perfectly.
      
      Or how about this suggestion: every time a comment gets hidden, then all replies to it get hidden as well (and unhiding it restores the entire thread in one click).
      
      Anyway, it's always seemed a bit ironic that for a site with such an ideological and unwavering anti-censorship stance as Techdirt, the default opt-in choice is ... comment censorship. (not that it's necessarily a bad thing, as virtually every country in the world, with one notable exception, believes in and practices censorship for the "greater good")
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 4:39pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        We've considered collapsing entire reply threads before, it's something we may revisit.
        
        I do think the "irony" you're seeing is rather imagined though. Our comments are actually among the most open of any blog on the web. How many sites do you know that even allow fully anonymous comments without requiring you to so much as enter an email address? Or that has a reporting system that never results in any comments actually being deleted (apart from spam)?
        
        As for our unwavering stance, that has always been in favour of the first amendment and against censorship by the government. Meanwhile, though we believe leaning towards openness is the right choice in many situations, we've always maintained that it is perfectly acceptable, often preferable, and essentially inevitable that almost all online forums will employ some level of content moderation.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 5:02pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Collapsing all the comments to a flagged comment has some benefits (and I am actually sorta for this), I should point out that some of the weekly most insightful and funniest comment come from those that would be collapsed. On the other hand, were those comments voted most insightful/funny because of their relationship to the flagged comment or would they have been insightfult/funny if posted freely. Then would they have been thought of if not for the discussion of the idiocy that got flagged. Hard to know.
        
        And I should point out that one of my comments was removed this week, the one where I pointed out about how inconsistent you were with removing actual spam comments. Not that I care much, but the hypocrasy, given your statement to the contrary, is a bit much.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 5:49pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I'm not sure what comment you're referring to but I'll look into it. If it wasn't actually spam, it shouldn't have been deleted. In what way are we inconsistent about removing spam? Unless you just mean that sometimes stuff slips through the cracks and we don't notice it for a while.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 6:38pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Well, my comment was surrounded by two spam comments. They were not deleted.
        
        It may be error, or lack of checking each flagged comment, but I have noticed that flagged spam comments are not always deleted. They were flagged, so they were not a problem, but the opportunity to update your spam filter seems to be missed.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 6:55pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        FYI, my deleted comment came from this article and it appears that both the spam comments have been removed now.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 7:06pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        FYI, my deleted comment came from this article and it appears that both the spam comments have been removed now.
        
        Yes, we remove spam comments. If we miss some, we miss some, and I'm sorry about that I guess. And if you submitted a comment that was intentionally masquerading a spam comment, and we deleted it as spam, well... what did you expect? As I said, we only delete spam comments - not sure why you're accusing me of hypocrisy over that.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 7:27pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Accusing you, no. But my comment was a critique of Techdirts inconsistancy with removing spam comments, noticed over some time. The hypocracy comes with removing a critique of Techdirt (no individuals named or intended). It was not in any way masquerading as spam. It was a critique of Techdirt and responding to one of the comments in this thread
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 8:45pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Accusing you, no. But my comment was a critique of Techdirts inconsistancy with removing spam comments, noticed over some time. The hypocracy comes with removing a critique of Techdirt (no individuals named or intended).
        
        Once again, this did not and would not happen. We do not ever remove criticism of Techdirt. As I stated earlier, I went though the comments that we've marked spam over the last week and none of yours are in there.
        
        And, again, we would not and do not remove comments critical of us. The ONLY comments we remove are pure spam comments.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 6:56pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        the opportunity to update your spam filter seems to be missed
        
        What opportunity was missed? I don't really know what that means...
        
        We operate several concurrent spam filters that catch hundreds of spam comments every day - and we're not aware of any superior alternative that we should be installing instead. There's no such thing as a perfect filter.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 7:05pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Sorry, I assumed, maybe incorrectly, that you could update the spam filter with new, known spam.
        
        Would it be possible to hold for moderation any comment that has a url included with the username? And maybe a whitelist for those that use a url with their username but are not spam. Thad, I think, for example, uses a url with his username, but his is not spam.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 7:07pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        FYI, my deleted comment came from this article and it appears that both the spam comments have been removed now.
        
        I will have to double check how exactly our filters respond to username URLs right now - we've tweaked that in the past when there were specific bursts of spam getting in at various times, but not sure the current status.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 8:44pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I have noticed that flagged spam comments are not always deleted.
        
        We do our best, but sometimes, as with anything, we don't catch all the spam. It's an impossible task. And over the past few weeks I was on vacation, so I'm sure more spam than usual lasted longer than at other times.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 8:41pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        And I should point out that one of my comments was removed this week, the one where I pointed out about how inconsistent you were with removing actual spam comments. Not that I care much, but the hypocrasy, given your statement to the contrary, is a bit much.
        
        I do most (not all) of removing any actual spam comments, and I can assure you I did not remove one of your comments. I just went and looked at the comments that we moved to spam this week (we keep them for a while) and there are no comments by you in that list. None of your comments were removed.
        
        Furthermore, we would NEVER remove a comment from someone merely criticizing us. Hell, someone else this week threatened to kill me and we left that comment up.
        
        So I'm a bit confused about your claim of hypocrisy. We are entirely consistent in our position.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Christenson, 2 Dec 2018 @ 10:44am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: SPAM and filtering
        For me, the filtering (actually moderation, but not in the traditional sense) seems to work pretty well. SPAM does not last, our least favorite commenters get flagged for their BS, and those with a morbid fascination can respond to it.
        
        oh, and the half-formed comments that my phone posts sometimes also seem to get deleted, which is also good. Those are a function of some unintended motions on Chrome on iOS amounting to hitting the "submit" button before I am ready, and the difficulty of seeing what I have typed while I am typing it. Hopefully the site upgrade for mobile will help with that.
        
        ****
        I see Techdirt's moderation as driving away those that would use the comments for things besides discussing Techdirt's material.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 8:17pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        
        "How many sites do you know that even allow fully anonymous comments without requiring you to so much as enter an email address?"
        
        I never understood the point of requiring an email address to post, as most such sites seem happy to accept fake ones.
        
        Sites that allowed fully anonymous guest posts used to be very common years ago, but sadly it's fallen out of fashion, due to a wide variety of reasons. To name one such site, frequently referenced here on Techdirt, TorrentFreak allowed anonymous guest comments for many years. Even Wikipedia today is largely closed off to guests.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - ryuugami, 1 Dec 2018 @ 8:23pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      
      I think we could probably make it possible to expand hidden comments without javascript and without reloading the page, though I'm pretty sure it'd only be possible to have one comment expanded at a time (and there might be some other weird behaviours like the comments collapsing when you try to reply) due to the limitations of pure-CSS for that kind of interactivity. Or we could potentially do it using the HTML5 summary/details tags, although those have no support in Microsoft browsers. In any case, we'll look into it!
      
      You could check how SoylentNews is doing it. There, you can open or collapse entire (sub-)threads or individual comments, and as many of them as you want. It works pretty great.
      
      IIRC that functionality is written entirely in CSS. I'm certain that at least it doesn't use JavaScript -- I have it blocked and everything works flawlessly :)
      
      You could inspect it in the browser as usual, or check it out on GitHub, as the entire site code is open source (GPLv2). If you have any questions about the implementation, you could drop in to the site's IRC channel (which does need JS, of course) and try asking the devs.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 8:43pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Ahh very clever, they are using form elements (checkboxes) masquerading as buttons. Not a bad idea - I'll give that some thought.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Killercool (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 1:42pm

Bug reporting button?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Killercool (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 1:43pm
  
  Re: Bug reporting button?
  Whoops. Read to the end and hit enter instead of closing the window.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Devonavar, 1 Dec 2018 @ 1:47pm

Tweaks
I like it. Fast and functional.

I feel like "expand all collapse all" isn't as relevant for mobile, so I would hide this element.

Also, a lot of the touch spots are quite small... The menu and expand post buttons could be larger. Putting the menu on the same vertical plane as the search bar would work better visually and save space. I also miss the pull down to access menu feature that some sites have... But maybe that requires JavaScript?

Visually, a bit more left margin for the text would be nice... It hugs the left side of the screen very closely and make the text look off centre.

Other than that, it still feels like TechDirt, which I like. I wish other blogs had stayed closer to the blog format like you have.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 2:04pm

Thanks for keeping the old site up (hopefully for a long time) since the beta version is barely readable due to margin & formatting craziness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 2:06pm
  
  Re:
  Can you describe what you mean? Sounds like you might be experiencing some sort of bug.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:28pm
    
    Re: Re:
    zero left margin (first letter on every line cut in half), almost column-width right margin, and the right sidebar is almost as wide as the main text column.
    
    Ignore the part of being unreadable, this browser momentarily hung up and showed a discombobulated page (changing the text size on one page automatically changes text size on every page, no matter how many open browser windows exist ... a rather thoughtless "feature")
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:31pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Hmm - definitely sounds like some sort of bug. Is this on desktop, or mobile? On desktop you shouldn't see any change to the page margins on the sidebar size - and on mobile, there shouldn't be a sidebar since it gets pushed to the bottom instead (nor should there be a giant right margin).
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 4:38pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        neither, laptop with 600x800 resolution ... less than most smartphones. Many sites annoyingly auto-forward to the mobile site. The regular techdirt site does not have the beta's margin and column width issues.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 2:13pm

Where's the submit story button?My Top 10 SNES Games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 2:54pm

Last week Google Translate changed its format as a result I changed to Yandex.

So far the beta format looks good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:10pm

Oh god I prefer the current site to the beta by far thanks bye.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:15pm
  
  Re:
  Apart from the responsiveness, the changes are fairly minor. What in particular don't you like?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:19pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Everything is too huge. Also, and unrelatedly, a lot of the user icons are broken.
    
    And as I mentioned in a different comment, now that I've clicked opt in it won't stop redirecting me to the beta! Even though I've told it I want out at least five tines!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:20pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      *times
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:22pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Hmm, it should be letting you out - after clicking Exit Beta, make sure you aren't on a "beta.techdirt.com" URL.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:24pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        it keeps redirecting me even when I specify otherwise.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:27pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Hmm there do seem to be certain links that are funneling back into the beta when they shouldn't be. Is it happening for you everywhere? I can only seem to get it to happen when interacting with the comments on *this* post, which is strange... we are looking into it.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:28pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Happens when I go to this article at all. I'll test others and get back to you.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:30pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Doesn't happen on other posts.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:33pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Doesn't happen on other posts.
        
        Hmm, yeah, looks like something strange is happening with this post specifically. We'll figure it out soon - and let me know if it ends up happening to you anywhere else.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:39pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        It appears to *not* happen if you don't opt in to the beta. I opened this page in incognito and it's fine again.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:23pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      We noticed the user icon bug - will have that fixed soon. The size change is fairly minimal, though it's possible you're getting something weird happening with the stylesheets - are you viewing it on a mobile device or a desktop browser?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:25pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Mobile. It seriously feels like you put a 2x zoom on literally everything, though.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:31pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Like, I wouldn't mind if the expand and comment rating buttons were longer, but this is too much.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:32pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Were you using the lite version on mobile before, or just zooming in on the regular desktop version? Is it possible you have some sort of zoom or text-size-adjustment still applied? The font *is* larger on mobile now, but only because it was previously unreadable mouseprint until you zoomed in on it...
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:38pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        It's *possible* but also I'm that person who has everything mouseprint-sized anyway.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:41pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yeah I think Chrome double(s/d) text size and then didn't *stop* when the text size went up or...something, based on how certain headers look.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:37pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Specifically, I would upsize anything that's interactive and currently one line in height to have two lines of height via either directly resizing it or padding, but feel like everything else is fine.
        
        Then again, I have a huge phone, so I might not be your best test case.
        
        Also in the regular form, I think something about Chrome causes the text box to expand ~2 lines into the checkboxes beneath the input, on regular mode.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:15pm

HELP IT WON'T STOP REDIRECTING ME TO THE BETA MAKE IT STOP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:21pm
  
  Re:
  Have you clicked the "exit beta" button at the top of the page? If that doesn't work try changing it in the user preferences page: https://www.techdirt.com/preferences.php
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 3:23pm
    
    Re: Re:
    ...yeah no I tried that and it's still broken. It works only if I stay on the main page with the list of articles.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Daydream, 1 Dec 2018 @ 4:05pm
    
    Re: Re:
    It looks to me as though when clicking on the link to Preferences, it automatically changes to the beta site instead of the 'normal' site.
    From there, clicking any link takes you to the beta equivalent instead of the 'normal' equivalent.
    The 'Exit Beta' link up the very top of the main page still works to return to the original site, though.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Killercool (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 4:58pm
    
    Re: Re:
    I had to clear both cache and cookies to actually exit the beta. The button was sending me to the main Techdirt page, but I was being redirected to the beta site again afterwards.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Leigh Beadon (profile), 1 Dec 2018 @ 5:50pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Yeah there definitely seem to be a few strange things happening for some people with regards to getting into/out of the beta - we'll try to resolve it ASAP, but for the moment it seems like most of it happens when interacting with this post, so hopefully it doesn't cause too many problems for folks who just want to stick with the normal site for now.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 6:57pm

Yeah, don't like, but then, on mobile I always browse in landscape with a browser extension which forces the desktop versions of sites...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2018 @ 6:58pm
  
  Re:
  This whole not being able to opt out no matter how many times you click "exit beta" needs fixing though.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
fairuse (profile), 2 Dec 2018 @ 4:35am

Beta layout: Desktop Chrome(has flash), iMac osx 10.6.8
Not much different looking - nice. Page load snappy. Doing well for me.

Need to try on HTC mobile, iPad mini, Kindle Fire HD. All devices will select proper form for their screen as I understand the new layout.

Thanks. Nap time for critters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Dec 2018 @ 9:28am
  
  Re: Beta layout: Desktop Chrome(has flash), iMac osx 10.6.8
  Very similar platform here. I don't really see any difference at all apart from this "add a reply" box. I was kinda hoping the layout would be different. Not a huge fan of the expandable in-line articles and how they lose my place when hitting the back button after reviewing the comments. Also, tons and tons of wasted white space on the left and right. "Responsive" generally means the content reformats to fit your screen and, well, this doesn't.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Leigh Beadon (profile), 4 Dec 2018 @ 11:03am
    
    Re: Re: Beta layout: Desktop Chrome(has flash), iMac osx 10.6.8
    Are you sure you've switched to the beta? You should definitely be seeing the page respond to your screen size, and there shouldn't be extra white space. Or are you just referring to the desktop version? This update is focused on mobile, no major changes to the desktop site.
    
    I'll think about anything that might mitigate the back-button issues with post expanders (could possibly add expanded posts to a URL-string so they remain expanded when you return to the page that way) but overall the expanders are a very popular feature.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
PIXELATION, 2 Dec 2018 @ 6:20am

So far, works great for me. Thanks for the hard work!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MrTroy (profile), 2 Dec 2018 @ 5:43pm

Still fixed width by default
I was going to comment to ask whether you could make the site full-width in the responsive version, then I decided to log in to comment... and et voila the site was full width, then I remembered when you made that an option.

So I'll still ask if you'd consider making the site full-width on large screens by default, but there's a workaround so there is that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Your biggest fan or so I bet at nearly 500 pounds!, 3 Dec 2018 @ 10:48am
  
  Re: Still fixed width by default -- Zombie alert!
  "MrTroy" has 435 comments, average of 59 per year, BUT a 16 month gap, AND and even more definitional 33 month gap with name change after a few in 2011. This "account" skipped 2012 and 2013 entirely!
  
  Just ODD, like so many. I see only one conclusion.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
tom (profile), 3 Dec 2018 @ 7:39am

I find the slightly denser text/font/spacing of the old version easier to read.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your biggest fan (or so I bet, at nearly 500 pound, 3 Dec 2018 @ 10:44am

Great! Cosmetic changes are ALWAYS death knell!
Seen it dozens of times (mostly in print). Readership falls off, so "management / editor / publisher" try a new format, which the regulars despise simply for being new, and which in any case does not address the orders-of-magnitude more important problem of interesting CONTENT.

I've always found Techdirt to be GLARING and TOO SLICK. -- By the way, pro-tip: host out "ii.techdirt.com" or whatever it is, turn off javascript, and I think you'll be able to see all of front page without clicking in...

Have advised you several times to just glance at Drudge and then write whatever damn foolishness occurs. You call this a "blog", then write to an agenda. -- But you never take my advice! You haven't been since I advised 9 or so years ago now to actually Moderate your nasty little fanboys, NOT "hide" those who dissent. -- Again, central problem is lack of interest here (by vigorous disscussion), NOT lack of unavoidable banners and flashing adverts.

You will simply make true my prediction that 2017 was Techdirt's last full year. It's so visibly attenuated this year that I declare victory on the point.

So you conflict me: more fun if you quicken the collapse with new format, or take my advice of more interesting content in same old dull layout? Hmm. Either way, I win!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Gwiz (profile), 3 Dec 2018 @ 11:47am
  
  Re:
  Please tell us, O' Great Disseminator of Unwanted Knowledge, where to find your Holy Grail of a website, so us mere mortals can learn for ourselves how to please you.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 4 Dec 2018 @ 11:04am
  
  Re: Great! Cosmetic changes are ALWAYS death knell!
  Why would we ever take your advice about anything. Are you seriously that deluded? Wait, what am I saying, of course you are...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coward Anonymous (profile), 19 Dec 2018 @ 3:40pm

I miss the "filed under" tag cloud below the byline
The tag cloud for the post could easly fit belove the byline, I´ve seen no article too short for a tag extended byline. I really miss to notice what tags are set for deeper reads
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MindParadox (profile), 19 Feb 2019 @ 1:38pm

can't get out of beta mode?
Help! can't go to the site anymore unless I click on specific article links only from outside techdirt.com, as typing in techdirt.com automagically still redirects me to beta.techdirt.com, which then wants an admin login and password, which i obviously don't have :P

any fix for this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]