Iowa State Tells Students To Piss Off And Continues Its New Trademark Policy Despite Their Concerns
from the IS-R-U-kidding-me? dept
We've been discussing Iowa State University's bold attempt to twist itself into a knot over its trademark policy for some time now. This all started when the school attempted to bow at the alter of certain Iowa state government reps to disallow a pro-marijuana alumni student group from using school iconography. For its efforts, the alumni student group beat the school in court on First Amendment grounds, eventually resulting in a $600k judgement against the school. Rather than learning its lesson, the school reacted to all of this by rewriting its trademark policy for student groups, pulling back permission of all kinds for groups to use the school's name and symbols. This, predictably, led to a full on revolt by students, with all kinds of groups refusing to associate themselves with the school at all. The student government, meanwhile, pointed out that the policy was written with zero input from students or student representatives.
In other words, ISU managed to piss off its own students by trying for iron grip control for... reasons?
With the revolt in full swing, you might have thought that perhaps this would be the thing that caused ISU to wake up and reverse course. Noooooooope. Instead, the school's administration simply penned what reads like a canned letter to its students about the trademark policy, explaining its reasoning for doing whatever the fuck it wants and brushing student concerns aside.
“Thank you for your interest and concern regarding the recently modified Guidelines for University Trademark Use by Student and Campus Organizations (Guidelines),” the opening of the letter sent by the university trademark office reads. “We value your input as representatives of the student body.”
The letter explains the purpose, process and means through which the policy was implemented, going through the Trademark Advisory Committee (TAC) of which one current member of Student Government was present.
The letter did promise to expand the TAC to include more student representation, but that pledge is little more than tripe given that the policy has already been written and put into practice as of the first semester of school. On top of that, a big part of the frustration on the part of students has been the school's nonstop claim that the policy change had nothing to do with the court battle it recently lost, whereas the letter admits that it was.
Whereas University Counsel Michael Norton had said the court case between the Iowa State chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws’ (NORML) and the university had nothing to do with the implementation of the policy at a Student Government meeting in August, the letter said the policy was “certainly influenced” by court cases across the country, including the NORML lawsuit.
“It seems to have made student organizations more angry, it is getting worse not better,” Woodruff said. “The university still hasn’t apologized for their miscommunication, they still haven’t claimed any responsibility … This response is more of the same, telling students they are just associated with the university. We aren’t associated with the university, we are the university.”
Frankly, you would think the school would want to boast of a robust student organization landscape. That's one of the draws in campus life that brings students in. Prospective students as of this moment, however, have to be scratching their heads wondering why the school is in some stupid, needless intellectual property war with its own students.
And, honestly, why at every turn in this saga of stupid, Iowa State has managed to do exactly the wrong thing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alumni, students, trademark
Companies: iowa state
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ISU Aerospace....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sorry, kids
Sorry, but that's not so. You're a part of the university. The part that pays tuition.
Unless you, the speaker, and a significant portion of your fellows stop being that part of the university, the other parts are unlikely to pay much attention to you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry, kids
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sorry, kids
The kids aren't forced to attend that school, which is a business. If you don't like the way the business is treating you, go somewhere else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sorry, kids
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bad people and bad attitudes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
School rules and associates
This is one of the ways state-operated universities can ban students from possessing guns on campus even though no other government agency can enact such a ban -- students are considered by the courts to be a form of employee of the school, and employers can have rules like that for employee conduct.
But if the students are merely associated with the school rather than a part of it, that sort of argument falls apart.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: School rules and associates
I am not sure how it works for the schools and colleges however.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: School rules and associates
Maybe the ISU student association should develop its own Logo, trademark it and use it exclusively for all student scheduled activities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: School rules and associates
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Register Now at: https://searchuttarakhand.com/
#classifieddehradun
#onlineclassified
#freeadposting
#freeclassified
#busi nesslistingsite
#businesslistingsite
#onlineads
#freeonlineclassified
#promotebusinessonline
#promotebusi ness
#freeadvertisement
#freeonlineadvertisement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder though... what do these admin folk have against alumni expressing their Constitutionally-protected views? Do they have something against marijuana specifically** (which launched this particular brain-dead behavior)? Inquiring minds want to know!
**maybe getting a little "mellow" would help 'em out...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ISU will respond when asked to in the correct context, that context is money (as it always is).
Alumni groups cut off funds....students withdraw and don't re-enroll...
It's a financially backed university, change them financially.
I mean ISU? surly there are more exciting schools to attend.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Students are temporary
Policies are implemented to benefit the staff and admin. with just enough giveaways to students to keep them from revolt. Just my experience...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easy Solution!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re Iowa State Stupidity
That's because the Administration views students as a source of funds and wants to do nothing other than advance their individual careers.
The only care about their graduation rate enough to protect their reputation.
They don't give a fuck about quality, quality costs a lot of money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would think that one open house with all the clubs/groups ganging together to put out a negative image of the school would be enough to have the administration rethinking it's approach.
I mean, what are they going to do? Have an open house with no student groups/clubs/activities? That won't make them look very good compared to the competition...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]