Cubs, Nationals Launch Another Trademark Opposition Over A 'W' Logo
from the wins-and-losses dept
Back in 2015, we wrote about a really dumb trademark dispute between a financial services firm and two Major League Baseball teams, the Washington Nationals and Chicago Cubs, over the letter "W." This insanity went on for years, with the MLB teams claiming there would be some sort of customer confusion in the public between professional baseball teams and a company that provided money management.
Well, in case you thought that this was insanity of the one-off variety, both baseball clubs are back at it with an opposition for the trademark of Starwood Hotels and Resorts, whose logo is, you guessed it, a "W."
At the end of November, the Nationals and Cubs filed an opposition with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board against Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide. The Nationals and Cubs are apparently upset with Starwood’s pending trademark application to register “W” in connection with “Entertainment services, namely, planning, conducting and hosting music festivals, concerts and performances by musical groups and individuals.”
Starwood claims to have started using “W” in connection with the aforementioned services as early as January 2005. The Nationals and Cubs could care less. They say that if Starwood gets its wish of registration, then Starwood will be given permission to confuse people into thinking that its services are in some way approved, endorsed or sponsored by the Nationals and/or Cubs.
This is the type of situation that calls for people to recognize the subtle differences and to keep their eye on the ball for trademark law, which is customer confusion. Yes, all three trademarks in question are versions of the letter "W." Yes, all three entities in question are in some segment of the entertainment industry, two being baseball teams and the third wanting to use its trademark for music concerts and performances. That, however, doesn't equate to Starwood's use somehow resulting in public confusion. Just to be clear, this is one of the many iterations of hotel logo we're talking about.
Really makes you think of the Cubs and/or Nationals, right? And, with just a brief moment of thought put into this, it becomes clear that fear of confusion makes no sense. A member of the public is going to go to a Starwood property to see a concert, see the "W" logo, and... what? Think the Cubs are affiliated with the concert? Or maybe the Nationals? Both? These baseball teams are somehow putting on concerts at Starwood properties?
Fortunately, the general consensus appears to be that the MLB teams aren't going to prevail.
This seems like a stretch of a case for the Washington Nationals and Chicago Cubs, since Starwood is very widely known for its “W” brand of hotels and no reasonable person is confusing said hotel brand with the baseball clubs. Further, Starwood already owns trademark registrations for the “W” brand, including one in relation to providing hotel services, food and beverage and bar and cocktail lounge services. Unless the Cubs and Nationals are also going to attempt invalidating those registrations, this new opposition seems half-hearted and destined to fail.
So, strike two?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: baseball, entertainment, hotels, trademark, w
Companies: chicago cubs, starwood hotels, washington nationals
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Too little, too late
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Nationals and Cubs could care less.
How much less could they care?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Nationals and Cubs could care less.
I wasn't going to say anything though. If I picked on all the spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors I see in Techdirt articles (or indeed, many online publications), I wouldn't have time to torrent massive amounts of porn. Er, I mean watch movies on Netflix.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The Nationals and Cubs could care less.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait, why?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait, why?!
Wrigley Field, I think, which was named for a former owner of the Cubs, also known for chewing gum.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wait, why?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But what the hell do the Chicago Cubs have to do with the letter W?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But what the hell do the Chicago Cubs have to do with the letter W?
I've always associated the Cubs with the letter L.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And yes, that's basically the same dumb joke I made in the article from three years ago as an AC. (At least I'm only ripping myself off here, instead of repackaging a John Oliver joke like I usually do.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Certified Moron in a Hurry here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A "block" W -- take a look at Walgreens W
This is Nats https://goo.gl/x4G2qG
You gotta be kidding with the block W being close !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A "block" W -- take a look at Walgreens W
Gosh, here's another ODD "account" in a Timmy piece
This "dave blevins" has the characteristic name change from ""d blevins", (slight, but there it is like so many apparent zombies), sparse commenting (only 10 per year), and mainly a 26 month gap after first, all the way back to 3 Sep 2004!
Oh, and "Gorshkov" up there is another sparse, only 34, with the characteristic gap after first, though only 16 months.
Just nearly every Timmy piece I find characteristically ODD "accounts": name change, sparse, and LONG gaps.
The dozen or so times I've pointed this out is far past correlation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are Starwood Hotels going into the sex business?
Whotels = ***** + hotels
(Full disclosure: these clowns just leaked my personal details so I'm really pissed off with them).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This particular Starwood brand... one of many... has been named "W Hotels" since the brand's inception; hard to believe that any rendering of its name, which happens to be one letter, would be acceptable to these idiotic teams.
I predict rough times ahead for the Yankee Inn of Lenox, Mass., and the Padre Hotel of Bakersfield, California.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not so fast...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They wanna watch out who they go after next...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]