The Intelligence Community's Official Whistleblower Channel Is Going To Start Hunting Down Leakers
from the prepare-for-the-worst-of-both-worlds dept
The Inspector General for the Intelligence Community is finally implementing long-resisted whistleblower-related reforms. The IG has previously buried reports indicating whistleblowers were being greeted with retaliation for going through the proper channels. Despite this, government officials continue to claim the only whistleblowers they'll recognize are those who use the internal options -- options that allow the government to control the narrative and, in many cases, do as little as possible to address complaints.
The Inspector General's office is one of the official channels. After turmoil that consumed most of last year -- including the ouster of Dan Meyer, the head of the IC's whistleblower outreach program -- a new Inspector General is in place. Michael Atkinson promised to get the IC IG's house in order after news surfaced of its burial of a damning whistleblower retaliation report earlier this year, but so far it's unclear what improvements have been made.
What does appear to be in place is the IG office's participation in the Forever War on Whistleblowers. National security reporter Jenna McLaughlin noticed this disturbing development in the IG office's latest semiannual report [PDF]:
Beginning in June 2018, the Investigations Division began to take steps to permit the ICIG to fulfill its responsibilities under Intelligence Community Directive 701, Unauthorized Disclosures of Classified National Security Information (ICD 701). In December 2017, the DNI revised ICD 701 to improve the IC’s efforts to detect, deter, report, and investigate unauthorized disclosures. The revised ICD imposed new responsibilities upon the ICIG to report and investigate unauthorized disclosures.
The office will somehow protect whistleblowers while hunting down those who operate outside official channels.
Under ICD 701, the ICIG will:
Review unauthorized disclosure cases where the FBI decides not to investigate or the FBI investigates but the Department of Justice declines prosecution, in coordination with the other Office(s) of Inspectors General involved, to determine whether an Inspector General administrative investigation is warranted.
Now, even if the FBI and DOJ decide a disclosure case isn't worth pursuing, the IG will open its own investigation and, apparently, see if it needs to talk the DOJ into taking another look at it. The IG is limited to administrative investigations, but there's no reason the DOJ can't turn it into a criminal investigation after receiving more info from the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
Oddly enough, this is followed directly in the report by the ICIG's announcement of a "Center for Protected Disclosures." This is the IG's belated compliance with whistleblower protections enacted during the Obama administration. Coming along too late to do people like Ed Snowden any good, the new hotline connects whistleblowers to the IG's office, hopefully in a way that keeps their complaints confidential and shields them from retaliation.
Hopefully, this new Center works better than the IG's old whistleblower business model, which saw all but one case resolved in favor of the government and the single outlier allowed to drag on for more than 700 days without resolution. But the IG's plan to get into the leak-hunting business tempers this mild good news, suggesting it may utilize its resources to hunt down those who bypass an office some IC employees justifiably believe won't protect them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ed snowden, inspector general, intelligence community, leaks, official channels, whistleblowing
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"We PROMISE it's not a trap, now just stand right there..."
Well, I'm sure having the same agency that is supposedly the 'authorized' way to report problems actively hunting down 'unauthorized' leaks will in no way lead people to think that going to them to report problems will just paint a huge target on your back by making you known, should they feel that brushing the problem under the rug is preferable to dealing with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "We PROMISE it's not a trap, now just stand right there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "We PROMISE it's not a trap, now just stand right t
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "We PROMISE it's not a trap, now just stand
"hunting down 'unauthorized' leaks"
In my depraved mind the above implies there are authorized leaks. I couldn't resist the comment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: why now?
No they haven't. We knew Kelly was on his way out before it was announced; we've heard about several of the candidates Trump approached to replace him who turned him down, we've heard he was fuming after last week's meeting with Pelosi and Schumer, and that he's been showing up for work around noon. None of that's really whistleblowing, but it's certainly leaking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: why now?
So the "leak" is that Trump is unprofessional, quick to anger, and likes to fire people, and for some reason people don't want to work for him?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: why now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who do they think they are?
And given the fact that they nominally work for us but don't view us as part of their stakeholder group is arrogant beyond means.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Every Nation eats the Paint chips it "desrves!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just...
Please, stand on this tarp. We are under construction!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ill tell you why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Besides who is going to offer up the articles of impeachment when all of Congress has been indicted for all of the laws they;ve been breaking for decades?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
leaks? I thought this had already been taken care of...
The White House's Special Investigation Unit, nicknamed the "Plumbers," had been established by John Ehrlichman to prevent information leaks from the White House and were also involved in various activities perpetrated against Democrats and antiwar protesters.
The Plumbers had their own hierarchy, separate from that of CREEP - the Committee to Re-elect the President.
Sound familiar?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]