Cable Industry Hypes Phony '10G' When 5G Isn't Even Available Yet
from the fluff-and-nonsense dept
We've repeatedly noted how while fifth-generation (5G) wireless should someday deliver faster, more efficient wireless networks, the technology itself has been embarrassingly over-hyped, largely thanks to network vendor and cellular carrier marketing departments. It's going to take years before users actually see a healthy selection of actual 5G devices in the wild (Apple's 5G iPhone won't launch until 2020 or later). And despite carrier promises, deploying these upgrades to traditionally ignored rural and less affluent urban markets will take years. 5G also won't magically fix the vast dysfunction in the telecom sector.
With 5G hype running amok, the cable industry thought it might be a good idea to inject another entire layer of confusion into the proceedings. At CES, cable operators have started marketing something they're calling 10G, despite the fact that 10G isn't actually a thing. The cable industry's top lobbying and policy organization, the NCTA, announced the not-really-a-thing advancement over at their website, where former FCC boss turned cable lobbyist Mike Powell proclaimed that the cable industry's 10G network plans would somehow be a game changer:
"With groundbreaking, scalable capacity and speeds, the 10G platform is the wired network of the future that will power the digital experiences and imaginations of consumers for years to come,” said NCTA President and CEO Michael Powell. “As an industry, we are dedicated to delivering an exceptional national infrastructure that will power digital advancement and propel our innovation economy into the future."
In reality, this is not new technology. Cable's simply referring to the ongoing updates to the DOCSIS 3.1 standard the cable industry has used for years. One update in particular, full duplex tech, was unveiled by CableLabs a few years back, and should eventually allow the cable sector to deploy speeds upwards of 10 Gbps to consumer homes (and more importantly, provide faster upstream speeds). But again, this tech isn't new, isn't really "10G," and most consumers are still waiting for 1 Gbps downstream speeds the industry promised years ago.
And while the cable sector is planning trials for this faster cable technology in 2020, there's no truly solid timeline on deployment, and even then, consumer speeds may never actually reach 10 Gbps at any real scale. The current DOCSIS 3.1 standard is already theoretically capable of 10 Gbps downstream, but most users see at best 1 Gbps down, 35 Mbps up in areas its deployed, making it notably less exciting than full, symmetrical fiber broadband. And that's of course before you mention the high prices and unnecessary usage caps that tend to undermine cable sector speed advancements.
Undaunted, cable industry PR folks not only crafted a new logo for this nonexistent standard, it's somehow trying to claim that it will somehow protect an "open internet" and consumer privacy, despite the cable industry having just spent millions upon millions of dollars to crush consumer protections on both fronts:
It appears the cable industry saw all the hype wireless carriers were generating with 5G, and simply decided to try and piggyback on the hype parade by calling its existing, long-standing, and arguably boring cable technology something else. It then tried to claim this nonexistent standard would magically protect net neutrality and privacy. And while some telecom trade mags were quick to parrot the hype, the announcement was otherwise met with justified yawns and skepticism directed at an industry that just can't seem to understand why the majority of Americans don't really like them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 10g, broadband, cable, lies, made up standards
Companies: ncta
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
5G + 5G = 10G
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 5G + 5G = 10G
Verizon did an update so I now have 5g X 2G X 3G = 30G
or at worst
5G + 2G + 3G = 10G
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 5G + 5G = 10G
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
10G? Bah, that's so last year.
Now wireless needs to respond by pointing to the 'imminent rollout' of 15G, claim it provides a free kitten and/or puppy each time you connect, wired can shoot back by pointing out that their 'just around the corner' 20G provides customers with winning lotto tickets for every installation...
I figure in a couple of months we'll be in the triple digits of hype, paired with world peace and elimination of cancer for even thinking of signing up, as all the while the current networks(and customers) are treated with the indifferent disdain they always have been.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 10G? Bah, that's so last year.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 10G? Bah, that's so last year.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They're playing games and I say ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they don't have enough bandwidth as it is, (Which is B.S.) but their excuse to have CAPS, then having even faster speed would just be dumb as it would really overload their network.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'5/10G: Now you can hit your monthly cap even faster!'
Isn't it delightful how their own actions shoot their hype in the back?
Saying a car can hit 120 mph in 6 seconds is meaningless if it's built to shut the engine down once it tops 60 mph after all. Likewise advertising even faster speeds('almost as good as what other countries already get!') is meaningless if the connection is capped and you'll be paying through the nose for actually using that 'fast' connection.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: '5/10G: Now you can hit your monthly cap even faster!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: '5/10G: Now you can hit your monthly cap even faster!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: '5/10G: Now you can hit your monthly cap even faster!'
I'd love to see truth-in-advertising laws force them to list a "minimum time until you hit your monthly cap". Which is under 15 minutes for a 1 TB cap at "10G".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: '5/10G: Now you can hit your monthly cap even faster!'
A more apt analogy would be an electric car that can hit 120 mph in 6 seconds, but the battery runs out before 30 miles.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guiness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess 10G will have similar marketing hype, but it will be twice as much Gibberish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There seems be a broken link or something that isn't work properly here:
"And while some telecom trade mags were quick to parrot the hype, the announcement was otherwise met with justified yawns and skepticism directed at an industry that just can't seem to understand why the majority of Americans don't really like them."
The link in the word "skepticism" either leads me to a 404 error, or back to this article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
running in the us .Even when 5g is avaidable
most american networks will probably have a limited
amount of data you will be able to use per month .
So consumers may hardly be even better off than they are now except they might be able to load videos
faster if they are close to a 5g tower .I predict most networks will default
to 4g speeds outside citys and urban area,s ,
since the 5g spec requires a lot more cell towers to be built than 4g ,
eg 5g has a limited range compared with a 4g signal.
Ssomeone will have to pay for the billlions it will cost to build a 5g network.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Broken link
Looks like it was supposed to be:
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/01/envious-of-5g-hype-cable-cos-unveil-potent ially-confusing-10g-trademark
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Could have been better
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Call it what it is
Will they ever be punished or is it going to have to be a mob armed with leaf blowers and weedwhackers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
10G isn't actually a thing
ITU has provided some preliminary protocols for radio and fiber, but that's it.
THERE IS NO 5G STANDARD
It's all hype.
The link is a house-organ puff piece, but it does show where ITU is at on developing a 5G standard.
https://news.itu.int/5g-transport-new-clarity/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hah, check the pictures.
"Unleashing connectivity and entertainment" is an almost-deserted street, so it's dreadfully boring and almost no-one is using it to get anywhere.
"Supporting an open internet" is another road. A city road, which are as closed as it gets with public roads.
But my favorite is the last one, "protecting consumer privacy", with a photo of a user's computer screen plastered over billboards or wherever they're putting those. Yup, that sounds about right :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Taking Lessons from AT&T
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
10G
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pointy-haired bosses...
https://dilbert.com/strip/2011-05-10
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forget AT&T. . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]