Game Jam Winner Spotlight: Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening to Steal Treasure
from the gaming-like-it's-1923 dept
Yesterday, we announced the winners of our public domain game jam, Gaming Like It's 1923. We had a lot of great entries that deserve to be played, so for the next few Saturdays we're going to highlight some of the winning in the various categories.
This week, it's our winner for Best Digital Game: Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening to Steal Treasure by Alex Blechman.
Most of you are probably familiar with the Robert Frost poem, Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening, which was published in 1923 and as of this year is officially in the public domain. Well, here's what the introduction of this tongue-in-cheek game adaptation has to say about that:
Robert Frost's classic poem about stopping in the woods for no reason is very well written, but it's also pretty boring.
Not much happens. A dumb guy stops to look at some snow, and his horse gets weirded out by him. Dull. Yawn. Snoozeville.
Maybe that was considered an action-packed poem back in 1923, when Frost wrote it, but it's overdue for an update.
That's where you, the player, comes in. In this simple browser game, you are tasked with updating Frost's poem to sate a modern audience's craving for action, adventure, and... treasure! Verse by verse, you are presented with the poem and given the ability to swap out various nouns, verbs and adjectives for more exciting alternatives. So this:
...becomes something like this:
With some prompting and encouragement, you'll edit the entire poem in this fashion, until finally gazing upon your finished creation. Yeah: it's a very simple game, but one that made lots of us crack a smile and give it a second playthrough to see if we could do an even better editing job. It's funny, well-written and succinct, and we're thrilled to call it our winner for Best Digital Game. Check it out now on Itch, and share your best poem in the comments!
Next week, we'll take a look at another one of the winners, though you can always explore them all right now as well as all the other entries that didn't quite make the cut.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: game jam, public domain, video games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Is there somewhere we can post our final results for people to vote on? Some sort of a leaderboard?
r/SWSEST seems appropriate if there isn't anywhere else; or he could add the feature to the game :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sweet
How can Robert Frost be incentivized to create new works if we take his poems like this??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nintendo, Sony, and Xbox are shaking in their boots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nintendo, Sony, and Xbox are shaking in their boots.
This is a good point. Why do we need the power of law - overburdensome government regulation - to protect 100 year old works?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It is quite, quite interesting that it's always the copyright maximalists who claim to be about "helping artists" and "encouraging creativity" who are the ones slamming creativity and mocking artistic works. Quite, quite interesting.
Meanwhile, just to make the point that you either already know (and therefore are being a disingenuous prick) or are completely ignorant of (which makes you unqualified to comment): game jams are just that. A quick and dirty setup to allow people to create barebones experiments on ideas. Not fully formed games or ideas. Nothing in a game jam is supposed to compete with "Nintendo, Sony or Xbox."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
One can be for creativity and recognize garbage at the same time.
A few games based on 1923 stuff doesn't exactly rival the professional games made today (which of course is only possible through copyright protection).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You had me right up until that last sentence. Which is of course complete and utter bullshit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Which game lets you hit that straw man?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
A few games based on 1923 stuff doesn't exactly rival the professional games made today
It's bizarre that you think this was the goal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You say that like copyright protection automatically means your stuff isn't garbage.
In fact copyright protection incentivizes garbage, because one could then blame poor sales on piracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
A few games based on 1923 stuff doesn't exactly rival the professional games made today
A few games built during a game jam, which is purposefully designed to be about quick and dirty game design and NOT about creating a mega platform game. So, you've set up a comparison that makes no sense.
This is like saying the quick and dirty novels written during NaNoWriMo aren't making Penguin/Random House shutter. Yeah. They're not supposed to. That's not the point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Since you said so, I'll take your word for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yes, there we have it. The people who claim to be only thinking about those poor artists will immediately crap on any independent work that fall in line with what a handful of corporations want you to consume. It doesn't matter how much true creativity is on display, it doesn't count if it can't be sold as a "AAA" title with lootboxes and DLC, art be damned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Every time I scrolled past thos headline, the words keep compressing together to look something like "Stopping James Woods" and I wonder who that shitheel is attacking this time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I actually earn roughly $6,000-$8,000 each month through the internet. I lost my job after working for the same company for years, I needed trusted earnings, I was not researching for the "get rich quick" home packages as you can see online. Those are usually pyramid schemes or stuff in which you need to sell to your friends and relatives. I basically wanted a trustworthy way to earn a living for me and my family. The best part of working on the net is that I am always home with the children and also enjoy time with family on different beaches of the world. All you have to do is fill out a simple form to obtain front line access to the Home Profit System . You don't have to be a computer whiz, but you should know how to use the internet. If you can fill up forms and browse web-sites, you can do it easily, You don't need to sell anything at all and nobody has to buy anything .Here's how to begin>>>> https://tatt.at/Q0HER
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nobody cares about your scam book, Jhon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I rolled my eyes at his comment and then laughed way too loud in public when I read yours.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, good, it actually uses the 1923 version, not the subtly changed (posthumously?) later version.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]