Monster Energy Loses Trademark Opposition As UK IPO Mentions That The Letter 'M' Isn't Distinctive
from the m-kay dept
Monster Energy: is there no trademark opposition they can't lose? The drink company, which might be more well known at this point for its trademark bullying than its beverages, has been handed loss after loss after loss after loss in trademark oppositions to everything from industrial paint manufacturers to the NBA and on to other beverage companies. Why the company spends so much time opposing trademarks is literally anyone's guess, but the losses all amount to the complete lack of potential confusion in the disputed trademark applications, as well as Monster Energy believing it can control words and images that it most certainly cannot.
The latest of these, in yet another opposition Monster Energy lost, has the UK's IPO explaining to Monster Energy that it cannot prevent other companies from using the letter "M" prominently in their logos.
In a decision on Wednesday, March 6, the UK IP Office ruled that Monster Energy could not stop Robert Marchington from registering a trademark, finding there was no likelihood of confusion.
In its opposition, Monster relied on its earlier registered marks (EU numbers 2439068; 3227041; 12924973 and 14226765) which depict animal or monster scratch marks that create the letter ‘M’. The mark was for a pair of legs which took the shape of the letter ‘M’ and seemed to be taking a step forward.
In its decision the IPO said Marchington’s applied-for mark and Monster’s trademarks were visually similar only to a low degree. It said that the presence of the letter ‘M’ in both parties’ marks “does not convey any particular meaning”.
The fact that Monster Energy needed to be told as much serves as a wonderful barometer for how ridiculous Monster Energy trademark oppositions generally are. Again, when it comes to trademark law, the entire point is to prevent public confusion as to the source of goods. Monster Energy's logo is indeed distinctive, as it makes the letter "M" out of claw marks. This does not somehow grant exclusivity to the letter "M" to Monster Energy, however. Legs and clawmarks, in other words, are different.
As are the markets of soft drinks and alcohol, according to the IPO.
“Whilst soft drinks and alcoholic drinks are similar in nature in that they are both liquids for consumption, consumers will consider them to be different categories of goods,” the IPO said.
Additionally, it said that “syrups and preparations”, covered by Machington’s mark, cannot be considered a finish drink product, and therefore will not be in competition with Monster’s beverages.
I continue to be baffled as to how paying all of these billable hours, or the salaries and benefits for the in-house legal team, just to handle the load of trademark oppositions that routinely end up as losses, makes any financial sense.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: m, robert marchington, trademark, uk
Companies: monster energy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Gentlemen, leash your lawyers
And this is why you always keep your lawyers on a tight leash, not only can they easily rack up the billable hours, they can also make it so that any time someone thinks of your company the first thought to come to mind isn't your product, it's your history of legal thuggery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gentlemen, leash your lawyers
Considering the litigious history of Monster Cables, you have to think they consider this money well spent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Gentlemen, leash your lawyers
POPCORN on Standby!
Can't wait for Monster Cable v Monster Energy.
Watch out there General Cable! https://www.generalcable.com/eu/en/products-solutions/industrial/low-voltage-power-cable/energy-cabl es
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Gentlemen, leash your lawyers
Yes, the ultimate Monster mash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gentlemen, leash your lawyers
Corporations are impressed by big offices stocked with well-dressed, highly-paid lawyers and staff. That money has to come from somewhere. Then there is the cost of, um, "due diligence," which includes "legal investigators" and, um, "internet researchers."
Kind of like actors want producers who have limousines and big expense accounts, not realizing that the money came from the previous ones they (according to this site) screwed over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Financial sense for whom?
While you are likely correct that this continued legal action doesn't make sense for the company as a whole or it's shareholders, there is one group for whom it almost certainly does make financial sense - the lawyers themselves. Odds are that any halfway competent lawyer would have the skills to "explain" that either the courts are wrong to rule against them and/or that they need to take on these fights regardless. What is likely harder would be to explain why they need their job if all they do is occasionally report to management that everything is fine and they don't need to sue anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hamilton and Jhon Smith losing their shit in 3, 2, 1...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bloge
I wish you could post such blogs on the almost daily basis. But such good blogs obviously take some time to be written. I will keep on visiting your blog on a daily basis.
https://surveyhelper.net
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: bloge
Much spammage. Very Bloge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trademark a single letter?
Reminds me of the color orange.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]