Asus Goes Mute As Hackers Covertly Install Backdoors Using Company Software Update
from the supply-chain-shenanigans dept
According to new analysis by Kaspersky Lab, nearly a million PC and laptop owners may have installed a malicious ASUS software update that embedded a backdoor into their computers without their knowledge. According to the security firm, state-sponsored hackers (presumed to be China) managed to subvert the company's Live Update utility, which is pre-installed on most ASUS computers and is used to automatically update system components such as BIOS, UEFI, drivers and applications.
The malicious file was signed by a legitimate ASUS digital certificate to hide the fact that it wasn't a legitimate software update from the company, with an eye on a very particular target range:
"The goal of the attack was to surgically target an unknown pool of users, which were identified by their network adapters’ MAC addresses. To achieve this, the attackers had hardcoded a list of MAC addresses in the trojanized samples and this list was used to identify the actual intended targets of this massive operation. We were able to extract more than 600 unique MAC addresses from over 200 samples used in this attack. Of course, there might be other samples out there with different MAC addresses in their list."
According to Kaspersky, over 57,000 Kaspersky users have downloaded and installed the backdoored version of ASUS Live Update at some point in time. And while Symantec has confirmed the problem and stated it found 13,000 computers infected with the backdoor, Kaspersky estimates the total number of impacted PC users could be as high as a million.
For its part, Asus isn't helping matters by going entirely mute on the subject. Motherboard was the first to report on the hack (in turn prompting Kaspersky's acknowledgement). But Asus apparently thought that silence was a better idea than owning the problem, confirming the data discovered by researchers, or quickly and accurately informing the company's subscribers:
"This attack shows that the trust model we are using based on known vendor names and validation of digital signatures cannot guarantee that you are safe from malware,” said Vitaly Kamluk, Asia-Pacific director of Kaspersky Lab’s Global Research and Analysis Team who led the research. He noted that ASUS denied to Kaspersky that its server was compromised and that the malware came from its network when the researchers contacted the company in January. But the download path for the malware samples Kaspersky collected leads directly back to the ASUS server, Kamluk said.
Motherboard sent ASUS a list of the claims made by Kaspersky in three separate emails on Thursday but has not heard back from the company."
Yeah, hiding your head in the sand should fix everything. While this hack specifically focused on supply-chain issues, Asus is no stranger to privacy scandals. The company was given a hearty wrist slap by the FTC a few years back for selling routers with paper-mache-grade security. As part of that deal, Asus was required to agree to establish and maintain a comprehensive security program subject to independent audits for the next 20 years. Apparently that didn't help much.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: breaches, cybersecurity, hacks, response, software updates, supply chain attack
Companies: asus
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This is odd...
...What were the 600 systems targeted? That's an awful lot of work to gain access to only 600 machines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is odd...
It all depends who the owners are and what company or government facility they work for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is odd...
Which is why I asked which 600 sites were targeted.
If they're government, major corporations, etc. it would go a long way to discovering who may be behind it.
Don't forget that the cracking of that "uncrackable" DRM protection for game software was one guy with a grudge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is odd...
We will likely never know.
Kaspersky is unlikely to tell anybody but law enforcement, as doing anything else might put the targets into more danger.
My personal guess is that the targets were used by cryptocurrency exchanges; this is the place where large sums of money, lack of regulation and people used to use "gamer" hardware for everything meet.
Another option would be mining pool central servers; being able to direct 25BTC to your own wallet every so often would be damn lucrative!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is odd...
ASUS is hardly "gamer hardware". Though ASUS machines may be used by people who work at or operate cryptocurrency businesses none of this explains how they collected the MAC addresses used as the target list. If the attacker had enough inside knowledge and access to the machines in question such that they could get the MAC addresses from each they could have just planted the malware at the same time. Hacking into ASUS' servers, or getting an employee on the inside to do so, is a huge undertaking for a malware attack.
This sounds more like the culmination of a long-term information theft operation aimed at much more lucrative targets than a BTC operation. The resources required to pull this off are fairly extreme, including the slow accumulation of MAC addresses -- information not readily available without access to the hardware. From my own experience, this level of attack is almost always state-sponsored and frequently Chinese. It has all the right fingerprints.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This is odd...
Good point on the MAC addresses.
My guess would be that they're from a single production run, and were targeted because of who or where they were shipped to.
Which thickens the plot - I doubt ASUS makes that kind of information public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is odd...
Side note:
Kaspersky has an enormous database of past malware. Comparisons of this new malware against that database more than likely pinpoints the source, or at least the authorship. That's far more interesting to me than who was targeted. After all, if you have something of value on a server then you are a target. Who's interested in that something of value tells a much richer story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is odd...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Virus spreaders should be put to death.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You and everyone you know are virus spreaders. That is a horrible idea. Perhaps virus creators are what you intended.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yeah that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Getting a taste of your own medicine
Nah, you want to really twist the knife you either prohibit them from using a computer or other similar digital device, or you make it so that they are prohibited from using any form of anti-virus or computer security on any device they are allowed.
If they are willing to subject others to viruses, then it's only fair they get to experience what it's like themselves after all.
Over.
And over.
And over again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I hate all that damned crapware.
I have an acer, and it's control center seems to be almost unkillable. Every time I disable it, or remove the process or disable the service, it restarts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Can you do a clean Windows install, or is that disabled by the bootloader?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
that would, at this point, take mroe effort than it's worth.
plus it's not my laptop, it's my eldest's (I don't like laptops), its just the one I use when I'm on-site on a video job, to dump camera footage onto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Yeah, I hear you. Takes me days to get everything back the way I wanted it after I do a clean install.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
And then two months to get used to the "new look" because something is missing, but you can't figure out what.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Damn ill have to check my pc, i think i didn't install live update, does any abti virus software remove this backdoor or do i specifically have to get kaspersky?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
ASUS has posted an update with a tool to diagnose and remove a possible infection.
Check here: https://www.asus.com/News/hqfgVUyZ6uyAyJe1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I get "Access Denied" from that link. If it worked, how would users know whether it's a real Asus update?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
That's strange. Just verified that the link is valid.
Regarding the update, it would require some amazing internet ninja-moves to publish a press release as Asus and compromise their site to publish some new malware without anyone picking up on it.
If you are unsure you can always upload the update to https://www.virustotal.com to get a comprehensive virus check. Caveat: It' doesn't have a 100% detection rate which no anti-virus scanner have, but it's better than just depending on anything you happen to have installed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Compromising a site, even a high-profile one, does not require "amazing ninja moves". It happens every day. And this story is literally about someone impersonating Asus to publish malware, with a valid certificate and everything, and until people noticed that, no virus-scanner would have caught it.
BTW, the press-release aggregators have little authentication. See the antics of The Yes Men.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unless you have one of the targeted MAC addresses then you have nothing to worry about. If you work for the government, one of the national labs, Boeing, etc., then you probably should worry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Love ASUS equipment but never truster in update utilities. The closest I come to a convenient update utility is Ninite's website.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bullet dodged
Curiously I never installed ASUS live update. (Should I?) One of the side effects of a home grown system is the tedious chore of having to install all the bits and pieces individually.
The Motherboard AI suite has the USB 3.0 drivers and a bunch of other bundled utilities. It didn't install live-update, so I didn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given a hearty wrist slap by the FTC...
Oh no! It's the FTC! Everybody run!
Not.
If you're a little guy, the FTC might come down on you. If you're big and important though, they're more likely to go down on you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So avoid ASUS like the plague, no? Problems happen. Deafening silence must not happen. Ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]