The End Of The Absurdity: Iceland, The Country, Successfully Invalidates The Trademark Of Iceland Foods, The Grocer
from the for-food-and-country dept
Way back in late 2016, we asked the same question that has been on the minds of all of humanity for eons: who gets to trademark Iceland? If that seems like an odd question to you, perhaps a little context will help. See, Iceland has been a sovereign nation since the early 1900s, whereas Iceland Foods has been a grocery chain in the UK since the 1970s. And, yet, somehow the latter managed to get an EU-wide trademark for the term "Iceland" and then went around bullying companies from Iceland out of using that term in their own names, even when they weren't competing in the grocery marketplace. How did the EU manage to think it would be okay to grant this trademark in the first place, you ask? By not putting a whole lot of thought into it, would be my guess.
Well, when Iceland, the country, applied for a trademark for "Inspired by Iceland", only to have it blocked by Iceland Foods, it apparently represented the last straw. Iceland petitioned the EU to invalidate this absurd trademark, leading to reps from Iceland Foods trekking to meet with the nation's officials. The outcome of that meeting was apparently Iceland Foods being totally confused as to why Iceland wasn't just being cool, maaaaan.
Well, this story has finally reached its conclusion, and that conclusion is the EU reversing its original error and invalidating the trademark.
Now, years later, EUIPO has ruled in favour of Iceland – the country – and invalidated the supermarket’s trademark entirely, noting that “It has been adequately shown that consumers in EU countries know that Iceland is a country in Europe and also that the country has historical and economic ties to EU countries, in addition to geographic proximity.”
Foreign Minister Guðlaugur Þór Þórðarson said he welcomed the ruling, but was not surprised by it. “…[I]t defies common sense that a foreign company can stake a claim to the name of a sovereign nation as was done [in this case],” he remarked.
Well... yeah. That's right. The idea that the EU granted a trademark for the name of a nation within the European Economic Area is the kind of thing that proves it's impossible to write parody any longer. Sure, Iceland isn't officially in the EU, but trademark law has always cast narrow eyes at applications for terms that represent geography. None of this is new. Or difficult. Yet, for years Iceland Foods has been able to wield its absurd trademark against other businesses from Iceland, and against Iceland's government itself.
Now, Iceland Foods has the option to appeal the ruling over the next couple of months. I can't imagine it will do so, though I wouldn't have guessed one could trademark "Iceland" to begin with, so...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: iceland, trademark
Companies: iceland foods
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Wasn't there a recent story about South American countries complaining about the trademark of the name "Amazon"? I'd love to see what impact this decision has on that discussion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Amazon isn't a country, it's a river and a rain-forest. So it's not remotely the same thing. Now if they called their company "Brazil", then you'd have a point. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pirate Party Indeed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This reads like the jokes about some country losing the name "Tanzania" to a chain of fake sun-tanning studios... are you sure this isn't a parody or joke?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Off topic, but…
…why is the comments counter off by one on many posts?
The only posts that ever show zero comments before
someone submits a comment are Daily Deals.
All the others show "1 Comments" before then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Off topic, but…
I don't see that at all. In fact, the counter seems to lag the actual comment count even when I refresh the home page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Off topic, but…
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Off topic, but…
Weird, every new topic I see before anyone posts always says "leave a comment" for me if there's no posts. Maybe the display acts differently if you're anonymous?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iceland sovereign??
Iceland sovereign??
The Fact that Iceland had to go upon bended knee to the Lords of EU to petition for redress indicated that Iceland really isn't all that sovereign anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Iceland sovereign??
Iceland (the country) had to take it to the EUIPO because Iceland (the company) had a trademark granted by the EUIPO to be used in the region governed (for trademark purposes) by the EUIPO. Iceland (the country) does not rule the EU (nor does France, Germany, the UK, or any other EU member nation), and therefore when there are issues about trademarks in the EU, the EUIPO is the ruling body.
Within Iceland (the country) is absolutely able to block Iceland (the company) from having any trademark protection.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Iceland sovereign??
Iceland isn't even in the EU. And is very much a sovereign nation. As are countries that are part of the EU. But hey, who cares about facts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iceland is part of the Schengen-space
Which means there are no border controls between Iceland and most other European countries (including Norway and Switzerland, which are also not part of the EU). Except Britain, of course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Iceland is part of the Schengen-space
"Except Britain, of course"
Because the UK is not, and has never been, part of the Schengen space. That's one of those massive special deals the EU regularly give us, that the people dumb enough to vote Brexit claim we never get.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Iceland is part of the Schengen-space
Actually, I even believe that not being part of the Schengen space helped Brexit.
Because the rest of Europe suddenly realized they could travel everywhere. Not just foreigners were coming in, but they themselves could live and work wherever in Europe. Which produced a feeling of "belonging together", at least in the younger generation.
Of course, Idiot lawmakers in the EU (and Switzerland too) are now threatening everything; because people start to see the EU as a vehicle of their own governments forcing unwanted laws down their throat. Can't get it past the people in your own country? Make the EU do it. Oh, and Switzerland will follow, sometimes even before it's law in the EU (https://www.parlament.ch/press-releases/Pages/mm-wbk-s-2019-02-12.aspx sorry, not in English, basically it wanted the same Article 11 as the EU, 7 days before the end of the EU deliberations. It's now postponed, but this will rear its ugly head again).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Iceland is part of the Schengen-space
"Because the rest of Europe suddenly realized they could travel everywhere. Not just foreigners were coming in, but they themselves could live and work wherever in Europe."
Despite what the ignorant will tell you, this is perfectly possible for Brits as well. In fact the one major reasons why I, as a Brit, chose to live in Spain rather than look further afield was the fact that I could just turn up and work legally with a minimum of paperwork. There are a great many people who did the same because it was their right to do so.
The right to work and of free movement is an EU benefit, not a Schengen one. The only functional difference for most people is that you have to show your passport travelling to and from mainland EU, while travel within it usually doesn't involve a check at the other side.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Iceland is part of the Schengen-space
I wonder whether I'll see the EU renamed as Germany in my lifetime. My son certainly will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's just "grocer". "Grocerer" is a made-up word by people who think the more "er" you have, the better. Sort of like using "preventative" instead of "preventive" (because more syllables make you sound more educated, I guess).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
made-up word
Unlike those other words that god created on the 8th day right after he finished making the universe...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Grocerer" seems to be in fairly common use in the UK. Likewise "preventative". Both are valid words despite your peevishness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So is "grocer", one who sells "groceries". Do UK "grocerers" sell "grocers"?
That would be betterer than plain old foodstocks...
FWIW, searches on several engines return "Did you mean grocer?", so it's usage is not all that commonplace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Common enough that it's become an accepted form of the word. Like it or not, language evolves. The major dictionaries add tons of new words every year.
I agree that "grocerer" sounds dumb (and is even highlighted as I type this as a spelling error) but that doesn't change the reality that many use it and it has become accepted. If you click that little link to really search for "grocerer" you'll get lots of UK hits -- and plenty more for people apparently named Grocerer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How about "disoriented" and "disorientated"? Don't they both mean being confused or dizzy? Or is one fancier since it has more syllables?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
There are additional property substrings. Flammable and Inflammable are another example from the opposite end of redundancy from being based on inflame instead of flame. That thing happens in languages - expecting redundant synonyms to not exist is irrational really.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sense
Why do writers invoke common sense so often?
Common sense is not good sense.
If it was then the Darwin Awards wouldn't have to keep raising the bar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simple iceland had to go to the trademark committee to cancel the trademark, since they are they only ones who can do so.
Imagine some english company had the trademark for France and
was taking legal action against companys that had the word france on the label.
Certain things should not be trademarked ,for obvious reasons
i doubt if a private company has the trademark for The Catholic church
or the US marine corps .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Methinks you doubt the entrepenuity of society too much.
https://www.catholiccompany.com/
https://www.marineshop.net/
https://marinecorpsdirect.org/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iceland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iceland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]