At Long Last, NSA Finally Recommends Its Bulk Phone Collection Program Be Put Out Of Its Misery
from the DNR-please dept
Early last month, it appeared the NSA was ready to shut down its bulk phone records collection. The subject of the first Snowden leak was argued to be an essential part of the national security process, but as it underwent significant modifications, the NSA seemed willing to sacrifice a program of dwindling value to save its more intrusive collections.
This perhaps inadvertent revelation came via a podcast, which is just the way things are done these days. Appearing on the Lawfare podcast, national security advisor Luke Murry had this to say about the Section 215 phone records collection:
Mr. Murry brought up the pending expiration of the Freedom Act, but then disclosed that the Trump administration “hasn’t actually been using it for the past six months.”
“I’m actually not certain that the administration will want to start that back up,” Mr. Murry said.
NSA abandonware. That's one for the history books. This comment has now received official backup from the NSA, which has informed its oversight that it's not really interested in continuing this surveillance program.
The National Security Agency (NSA) has formally recommended that the White House drop the phone surveillance program that collects information about millions of US phone calls and text messages. The Wall Street Journal reports that people familiar with the matter say the logistical and legal burdens of maintaining the program outweigh any intelligence benefits it brings.
The program's alterations -- courtesy of the USA Freedom Act -- now require the NSA to provide reasonable, articulable suspicion prior to asking for records from phone companies. The phone companies simply return responsive records, rather than hand over call data on all calls to the agency for it to sort through at its leisure. The NSA claims "logistical and legal" issues make this program not worth continuing. Perhaps it's actually the evidentiary burden that's making this too much of a hassle -- more "legal" than "logistical."
Whatever the case, it's up to Congress to officially dump the program. The NSA may not be currently collecting anything, but its guidance could be ignored by non-national security experts on Capitol Hill who may be less willing to shitcan domestic surveillance programs.
In a recent interview, Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said, "If we have technical problems or challenges that NSA has to take into account, that's okay... It's not something we easily shelve."
If the NSA wants to kill the program, it behooves Congress to preside over its funeral. The best eulogy for the mostly-useless program would be codification of its overdue mortal coil offloading.
A group of bipartisan lawmakers on Thursday introduced a bill that would end the National Security Agency's (NSA) mass collection of U.S. phone data.
The bill's introduction by a group of civil libertarian lawmakers comes weeks after a national security aide to House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) revealed that the NSA has shuttered its call-detail records program.
The Ending Mass Collection of Americans’ Phone Records Act would end the program for good, taking away the NSA's authority to restart it. The bill was introduced by privacy hawks Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.).
It seems like an easy sale. The NSA isn't going to be pushing back on this one. The only opposition will be reps like Burr who seem to think they know national security better than the National Security Agency.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bulk surveillance, mass surveillance, metadata, nsa, phone records, richard burr, section 215, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Horray!
Now they're just trampling over all of your other rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Horray!
If you live within 5000 miles of the US border, you have no rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Horray!
The al-Awlaki family wasn't within 5,000 miles of the US border.
Better make it 25,000, to be safe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Foreign intelligence agencies can fill gap-- if they wish
For counterterrorism, NSA can probably get the phone records they want from Chinese or other foreign intelligence agencies that share our opposition to that particular kind of terrorist. No legal red tape or legal hazards. On the other hand, if we wish to track a suspected Chinese espionage network, we are SOL.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't Be Naive
Best not to be naive. The only reason the NSA would publicly give up a program such as this is that they have a super secret program to replace it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't Be Naive
The reason they have a super secret program to replace it is:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Put out of its misery
I think you mean:
NSA Finally Recommends . . . Program Be Put Out Of OUR Misery
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think about this....
...that program costs tens of millions every year on collection, storage, searching.
Is the NSA going to give that money back?
Hell no. They're going to spend it on other "projects" that have a much higher ROI than bulk data collection.
And I doubt we'll see another Snowden to tell us about the new program.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An oddly lucid bill name
This title is oddly lucid for Congress. I wonder what is hidden in that bill. Spending increases for the sponsor's favorite corporations? Payouts for families of Congressoids?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great.......now only another god knows how many more amount of offences to go.......in that one department
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A) they've finally admitted that they have no real way to analyze the flood of data in a timely fashion, and don't want to get caught out again like they did on 9/11
or
B) they'll still keep doing it, but they'll call it something else, likely some data-related term since almost all phone is VIOP somewhere along the way
or
C) they have no intention of stopping (and, for that matter, phone monitoring is part of their freakin' charter), and they're just running out some disinformatsya in the hope that their enemies are even dumber than they are
or
D) their hackers have come up with something so much better than phone tapping, tapping is now a waste of their time (not likely, but hey, might as well cover all the bases)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They get everything they could ever want from Google/Facebook/Amazon/etc anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What to do, what to do
Since many of the big cloud providers seemed interested in dealing with the government, maybe they would be interested in the data center from hell in Utah, aka Saratoga Springs, UT.
Not like NSA needs it now. Best to check if the sweetheart water deal is on the table.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If a US Tri-Letter spy agency is shutting down an old surveillance process willingly, then 5-will-get-you-50, that agency has a brand new and far better surveillance process already secretly in place and in use. That's history.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]