Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Online
from the watching-you-watching-me dept
Another day, another company leaving massive troves of consumer data openly accessible to the internet.
One of the darlings of the holiday tech marketing season was Wyze Labs, which provides significantly cheaper ($20) in home internet-enabled cameras compared to competitors like Ring. While both Wirecutter and CNN put Wyze's cheap camera on their holiday must buy shopping lists, the company's customers got more than they bargained for under the tree this Christmas.
The folks at Twelve Security discovered that camera information, Wi-Fi network details, email addresses, Alexa tokens, and even biometric data of 2.4 million customers was inadvertently left available to the open internet from December 6 to December 27. Security researcher "Ghost" stated he'd "never encountered a breach of this magnitude," and noted that a significant, major breach had already impacted the same company about six months ago. A second post by the firm notes how the cameras are largely just rebranded Xiaomi cameras from China, funneling much of this collected data back to Alibaba cloud servers.
Wyze, which sells the cameras largely through its relationship with Amazon, told the New York Times that an "employee error" was to thank for the massive breach:
"The first Wyze breach occurred after an employee created a flexible database to quickly pull user analytics, such as camera connectivity rates, user growth and the number of devices connected per user, Mr. Crosby said.
That employee removed the security protocols on the new database, exposing customers’ personal information. Customers’ passwords were not saved on the breached database, so hackers could not access live camera feeds, said Dongsheng Song, a co-founder at Wyze."
Yeah, whoops. Prompted by the data leak, the company began a complete head to toe security audit (why this hadn't already been done isn't clear) and found another, second breach on December 27 -- the details of which haven't yet been made public and continues to be investigated by the company. On the plus side, the company at least acknowledged the need to do better, which doesn't always happen:
"“We didn’t properly communicate and enforce our security protocols to new employees,” Mr. Song said. “We should have built controls, or a more robust tool and process to make sure security protocols are followed,” he added. Wyze executives said that the employee who made the mistake is still employed at the company. “It was an accident,” Mr. Crosby said. “We are very, very sorry and taking it very seriously."
Most IOT vendors don't prioritize privacy or security because it erodes revenues. The consumers who buy these products only care about cheap tech. And government regulators remain uninterested in seriously penalizing companies that fail to secure their systems. As such, the breach highlights why in this vacuum there's such a growing push to begin including security and privacy warnings in user hardware reviews so consumers are at least fleetingly aware of the companies they're getting into bed with.
But it also again highlights how dumb tech (like say, a dog) often remains the smarter option.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: data breach, iot, security
Companies: wyze
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I guess we now know why they were so much cheaper, I mean, security experts are expensive, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wyze cameras aren't funneling data to Alibaba cloud servers, that part has already been refuted. You should update the article accordingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not that I know one way or the other, but do you have a source for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Something that i find very disturbing and not just with Wyze is that governments want everyone, everywhere to use cloud storage for everything. Considering the frequency of this type of 'Data Breach', the danger to privacy and freedom is obvious just as it is also just as obvious why governments want us to use these services. Forcing the storage companies to build 'backdoors' giving governments and their security forces constant access to everyone while denying keeping any data themselves is like having Xmas everyday!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I trust the cloud a lot more than those with whom I'd share a home or office.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"I trust the cloud a lot more than those with whom I'd share a home or office."
Why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This. Totally unnecessary cloud (or simply remote) storage and processing for things which should only ever be done locally. Because some asshole wants an analytics dashboard or whatever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
and some asshole(s) want their OS to be a subscription service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My dog is notoriously unreliable in explaining how the bag of treats was removed from the shelf, opened, and emptied.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It was the Cat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wyze cameras aren't funneling data to Alibaba cloud servers, that part has already been refuted. You should update the article accordingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Online
That is not very wise of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Online
If only people were required to suicide for honor over fuckups of such magnitude.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Onl
Not much of a joking matter there; extreme workaholicism and some of the highest rates of suicide in the world are the dark side of modern Japanese tech dominance.
People make mistakes. It's part of being human. Why crucify people for mistakes that they acknowledge and attempt to fix, when there are people out there (looking specifically at you, Ring) who do similar things intentionally, and cover it up or lie about it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Onl
I guess the joke was not funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I gotta agree with the guy saying how unprecedented this is. That it went unaddressed for three weeks is inexcusable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]