T-Mobile Merger 'Synergies' Culminate In Massive 12 Hour Nationwide Outage
from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept
For much of the last year, T-Mobile and Sprint insisted that their $26 billion megamerger would result in untold amazing "synergies," lower prices, and better service. You know, pretty much the complete opposite of what US telecom merger history indicates and antitrust experts had predicted. And so far, the antitrust experts have had it largely right; the company has been busy laying off employees at its prepaid division (despite repeatedly claiming this wouldn't happen), and the DOJ's attempt to cobble together a fourth replacement carrier out of Dish Network appears to be bogged down in infighting.
This week, T-Mobile's wireless network experienced a massive, twelve hour outage that left users unable to call or send text messages:
"In our own tests in New York and Seattle, we found that making calls from a T-Mobile phone would fail almost immediately after placing the call. We also found that the cell service on our phones was intermittent, with bars occasionally dropping to zero or losing access to high-speed data."
Initially, since telecom giants love to avoid explaining (or giving any transparency whatsoever into outages), rumors falsely suggested that the outage was due to a massive DDoS attack. Experts like Brian Krebs later speculated that the cause of the outage was at least partially due to efforts to integrate the Sprint and T-Mobile networks:
I have found no indication these outages are DDoS related. Rather, there may be Sprint/T-Mobile issues related to a wonky update in the systems from the Sprint side to help merge with T-Mobile. Not sure what may be up w/ other carriers. See: https://t.co/jM6OAvmyfI https://t.co/WN1l8Fu1bp
— briankrebs (@briankrebs) June 16, 2020
Obviously combining the massive footprints of two major US wireless carriers is going to come with some headaches. But it's worth repeating that this wouldn't be happening if regulators had heeded experts' warnings and not rubber stamped the merger in the first place. The outage was enough to warrant a stern Twitter talking to by FCC boss Ajit Pai, who called the outage "unacceptable" and insisted the source of the outage would result in an FCC investigation:
The T-Mobile network outage is unacceptable. The @FCC is launching an investigation. We're demanding answers—and so are American consumers.
— Ajit Pai (@AjitPaiFCC) June 16, 2020
Again though, there are a few problems here. The outage wouldn't have happened if the FCC hadn't ignored all warnings and objective data and rubber stamped the gigantic, cumbersome, and unnecessary job and competition eroding deal (before commissioners had even read their own staff's impact analysis, no less). Pai has spent the last three years pandering to the telecom industry by giving it everything it wants, including the death of privacy and net neutrality protections, merger approval, and a few feckless wrist slaps for one of the biggest privacy scandals in modern internet history.
Now comes a point when he's supposed to actually "investigate" a problem, and there's not much faith that anything will come of it. T-Mobile won't willingly admit the merger integration caused the outage, and given he has a vested interest in defending his merger approval, Pai isn't likely to admit as much either. T-Mobile could very easily lie here and provide a reasonable-sounding alternative explanation for the outage, and the FCC--beholden as they are--wouldn't challenge this in the slightest. The only way to determine T-Mobile was telling the truth would be a full investigation--the kind this FCC would never actually do because it conflicts with Pai's hands off ideology.
Regulators don't always need to actually regulate. Often it's beneficial if they don't. But they need to retain the impression that they're tough, objective, and could take action at any time so that companies know that there are penalties for malfeasance and incompetence. But when you spend three years mindlessly pandering to an industry you used to work for, the message is sent loud and clear: you will face no serious repercussions for pretty much anything of note.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fcc, integration, merger, network outage, synergies
Companies: sprint, t-mobile
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That wasn't an outage - that was a planned suppression of Free Speech. I have evidence, I can prove it beyond a doubt. Watch my show tomorrow.
www.bonginoreport.com
UTube: DanBongino
Twitter: @DBongino
Parler (the best): @BigMoneyForMeBongino
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Please try framing an argument not based in rampant ignorance.
(It's not possible to "suppress free speech" by having a problem with a corperations services any more than it is possible to "suppress free speech" by staying home sick)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It's not rampant ignorance, it's rampant dishonesty - because that is all he got.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I was trying to view their post in the best (reasonably) possible light.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
OK, look, you're an uninformed idiot and I am a testifying expert that was on Capital Hill this week, because my opinion COUNTS more than YOURS!
JUST look at Hannity and you will see that I had to SHOUT over HIRALDO RIVERIA because this OUTAGE was PLANNED to DEPLATFORM me and I HAD TO use a FUCKING CELL PHONE to SCREAM MY OUTRAGE!
I wasn't sick, I'm not sick, and I'm not taking any time off. I 'm HERE FOR THE FIGHT!
YOU CAN'T SUPPRESS BONGINO! THER EIS ONLY ON!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I get the impression someone's reading comprehension is low (or they read too fast)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Look, there are three kinds of people in the world. Nice normal people like me, strong and brave policeman and soldiers, and fucking BLM Criminals like YOU that say RIDICULOUS SHIT practically EVERY DAY and WE ARE TIRED OF IT!
We are going to ROAST your BLM asss in the next election. We are going to serve FRIED BLM IN A BLANKET at our Pancake Breakfasts at the FIRE HOUSE!
THE WHOLE COUNTRY is united to SMASH and CRUSH and PUT AN END to BLM and ASSHOLES like YOU and Techdirt and your STUPID GLOBALIST ASSHOLE FRIENDS and your DISGUSTING FUNDERS and SOROS and RUSSIA and CHINA and ALL OF YOU COMMUNIST ANTI-FA COMMIE RAT BASTARD TRAITOROUS COWARDS and ANARCHISTS and ARSONISTS and CRIMINALS and very poor writers who use the third person too much altogether.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It might be alright if copyright locked that away.
I'm thinking his post might be due to that awkweird period between police refusing to help the mentally ill and mental health services stepping in.
On the positive side, Navy text-yelling seems to be making a comeback.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Ok, look, I know you mean well, everyone means well. Well, not everyone means well. Like this fucking attorney I know, he never meant me well at all. My wife met him, after they tried to lock me up, and she wanted a divorce. Really not a nice fellow. I told him my wife was a slut and would fuck anybody and everybody, and what happened? He fucking married her before she was even done divorcing me! Bifrucated, that what they called it, and it really sucked. Well, she really sucked HIM and NOT ME and I had to PAY FOR SEX and she got FREE LEGAL SERVICES and IT was NEVER FAIR OR RIGHT and sometimes I miss her when you write stuff like that. Not much, though, really, now I have a young beautiful wife that takes perfect care of me every day, helps me with my medicine too. Now she says I need a nap, I think she wants to SUCK MY DICK but she NEVER tells me DIRECTLY they NEVER DO she MAKES ME FORCE HER but I know she wants it just like all the rest of them. Except mom, of course, she never wanted it. But she made a mean bowl of cereal and milk!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Are you related to a John Barleycorn, over at the Simple Justice blog?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Bring it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"there are three kinds of people in the world"
I think your blinders have blocked your vision, or perhaps you suffer from tunnel vision, idk. Anyway ... there are many more kinds of people out there, you are just not aware or do not care.
Is it possible for you to calmly explain each issue you have and why you think everyone is out to get you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You misunderstand. He just messed up the punch line. The joke goes,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No the line is:
There are 10 kinds of people in the world.
Those that understand binary and those that don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So that's a 'no' on the original request for coherent arguments?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How bored do you need to be to roleplay gimmickpost as a D list right wing talking head from the failed NRA TV channel?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Have you ever seen that show with the guy who puts together a whole package, I mean, the outer layer of leather and then pork ribs and then oranges all wrapped up in a package to simulate lungs and flesh and bone and tissue and then SHOOTS it repeatedly from different angles and at different distances and then SHOWS YOU how the Oranges are OBLITERATED and that means if you shot someone their LUNGS would be GONE and you would WIN and everyone would LOVE YOU and then you would be PRESIDENT? Have you seen it? Totally cool.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They were able to communicate their layoffs tho
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's almost like Richard Bennett was lying when he said the merger was a good thing. Who'd've thought?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The troll quality is too damn low!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brian Krebs has long been an excellent source for information on a wide range of telecom and Internet-related security issues. You can count on his finger being pointed in the right direction. Give him some time to dig into this, and we will likely see an article on the nuts and bolts of what happened. Karl has explained why it happened.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Look, tell the truth, "Upstream", you've never been in a serious Fight in your life! You are a coward and hide behind a fake name on a fake web site and spout your shit without any skin in any game at all. I've been in fights! I once knocked an asshole like you RIGHT into a MUD PUDDLE when I was like 12! And I learnt what it was to FIGHT! Your pulse RACES, your vision NARROWS, you FOCUS on KILLING and EATING and SMASHING and FUCKING and THEN you want MORE AND MORE AND MORE and then, well, then you (eventually) have to calm down and come back to reality and be like other people. That's pretty much my story and the story of anyone who's EVER been in the Military or anyone who's EVER been a COP So FUCK YOU My RAGING VOLCANO WILL PUT AN END TO YOU if you dare cross me. Other than that, thank you for your consideration and maybe next time you can be a little more polite, please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You've never been punched in the face once in your life and it shows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not true. I once had this lady who could suck my dick like there was no tomorrow but then I was tired of her and she had a new boyfriend who was old and I was underage and went to a dancing bar and got drunk off my ass that that bad lady told that old man that she hated me and he PUNCHED me right in my NOSE, blood and everything, but then Donald Trump (who was the bouncer) knocked that man on his ass and I've been his BEST IMAGINARY friend every since.
Whew. I feel better. Haven't told that story in a long time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You've actually told that before?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Sadly, I've been asked to recall that story time and time again. Usually from assholes like you that want to fight. I don't like fighting. I like winning. And WINNING and WINNING and WINNING. Did I mention I AM RICH and I first CAME HERE when TRUMP WON THE ELECTION and I bet ALL MY MONEY on AMERICA and now I am RICHRICHRICH!
Did I mention that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
How incredibly boring.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My Sprint bill went down
Right after the merger, we started getting a local Sprint store that we had never gone to, cold calling us to try to sell us some a new phone or plan. We told him not to call us again yet he kept doing it over and over until we had to block the number. We ended up leaving Sprint and now we have 2 lines for far less per month than we ever had with Sprint. Now it would take 2 or 3 months' worth of bills to equal just a single month of billing from Sprint. Their merger saved us money, just not the way they were hoping it would.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The one thing this post does show is Karl's hatred of all thing T-Mobile.
Did they cut you off for non-payment?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nah, he has a much better explanation for it. Did you happen to read the article?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Of course I read it, that's why I commented. If you can't see that the tone of this and every other article Karl writes about T-Mobile reflects a genuine hatred of the company, then you are trying not to see it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
It's hard not to hate things that suck.
Sorry you imagine that it's the other way around, like your own logic apparently is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I blame the breakup of Ma Bell
We would never have had this wireless outage if regulators hadn't broken up the Bell Telephone Company.
Why? Simple! No wireless network, no wireless network outages!
-- from my wall-mounted Princess telephone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I blame the breakup of Ma Bell
You... wall-mounted a Princess? Pretty sure that's an unauthorized mode of use per Bell System / AT&T / Western Electric.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's not jump to conclusions
Maybe the outage was related to the layoffs/merger, maybe not.
We don't know yet. At least some people seem to think it was some kind of DoS attack.
If it was due to the layoffs or merger, by all means castigate T-Mobile for their incompetence. Let's wait and see.
Let me remind everyone - all things being equal, layoffs after a merger are a good thing, if service quality doesn't deteriorate.
Successfully delivering the same service with less people is an indication that efficiency has improved - this is progress.
Of course it sucks if you're one of the people laid off, but the losses to those people are, in the long run, smaller than the gains to society. (Those who get laid off eventually get other jobs.)
(To be clear - I'm not defending the lack of competition in the US mobile market - that sucks.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let's not jump to conclusions
No, it's not progress, as the merger was a bad thing all around.
Most mergers and takeovers and acquisitions are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but... imagine how long it would've been without the merger?
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]