Judge Hits District Attorney Who Issued Fake Subpoenas With A $50,000 Penalty For Blowing Off Records Requests
from the I-guess-laws-are-something-only-little-people-have-to-follow dept
Orleans Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro continues to get himself in legal hot water. Back in 2017, New Orleans journalistic outlet The Lens uncovered his office's use of fake subpoenas to coerce witnesses and crime victims into showing up to provide testimony and make statements.
The documents weren't real. They had never been approved by a judge. But they still had the same threat of fines or imprisonment printed on them. Just like the real ones. But these threats were also fake -- no judge had given the office permission to lock these witnesses/victims up.
Once this practice was exposed, the lawsuits began. The DA's office was sued multiple times by multiple plaintiffs. One suit -- filed by the MacArthur Justice Center -- demanded copies of every bogus subpoena issued by the DA's office. Another -- filed by the ACLU -- sought the names of every DA's office attorney who'd signed or sent one of these bogus subpoenas.
Yet another lawsuit targeted the DA's office and the DA directly for violating the law and citizens' rights by issuing fake subpoenas. That one is still pending but DA Cannizzaro and his attorneys were denied immunity by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, making it far more likely someone will be held personally responsible for cranking out fake legal paperwork.
The MacArthur Center lawsuit continues. And it's more bad news for the DA, which has spent nearly a half-decade dodging the Center's public records requests.
An Orleans Parish Civil District Court judge has issued a $51,000 judgment against District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro for his office’s failure to turn over bogus subpoenas under a public-records request filed two years before the practice was exposed by the Lens.
Judge Ethel Julien said in a Monday ruling that Cannizzaro acted “arbitrarily and capriciously” when he failed to fork over documents requested by an attorney for a nonprofit law firm who was probing the practice in 2015.
Cannizzaro's defense of his stonewalling has changed over the years. His office first denied the request back in 2015, claiming it was too "burdensome" to hand over copies of witness subpoenas issued by prosecutors. Then The Lens broke the news about the fake subpoenas. The DA's office then claimed it didn't have to fully fulfill the request because the Center hadn't asked for any fake subpoenas.
In its defense, the District Attorney’s Office said the fake subpoenas weren’t covered by Washington’s request -- because they weren’t the genuine documents for which Washington specifically asked.
The DA is appealing the decision, of course. His office likely would have appealed it anyway, but this appeal might be more personal. The MacArthur Center says the $50,000 penalty issued by the judge may end up being applied against Cannizzaro himself, rather than his entire office, because the judge found the DA himself had "acted unreasonably."
The saga continues, with the DA and his office looking worse and worse with every new court ruling. True, it's sometimes difficult to secure cooperation from witnesses and crime victims. But the solution isn't to bypass the court system and threaten people with bogus legal documents. Prosecutors are supposed to help enforce laws, not break them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: district attorney, fake subpoenas, leon cannizzaro, orleans parish, records requests, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
At somepoint you should just realize you are screwed, there is nothing you can do to stop it. That train has left the station.
Trying to hide it will make everything 100x's worse in the end, better to just hand it all over & take the lumps.
But then these lumps might take decades to pay off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unless you are a narcissist that believes you are smarter than everyone else and can get away with anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm invincible.
Tis but a scratch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know, this guy and Richie Liebowitz should get together. It sounds like a match made in, well some place I wouldn't want to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Earth 2020?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Ow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now if that idea can go from exception to the norm...
The MacArthur Center says the $50,000 penalty issued by the judge may end up being applied against Cannizzaro himself, rather than his entire office, because the judge found the DA himself had "acted unreasonably."
And that is how you make someone like that care. Hit their personal bank account rather than just soaking the taxpayers for it and financial penalties go from something that will just be shrugged off to a very real incentive to change behavior, because if the guilty party doesn't have to pay the fine then they have no reason to care about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now if that idea can go from exception to the norm...
That should be combined with bribery investigations/due dilligence as well as otherwise the fines can become business expenses with deep enough pockets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You left something out...
... The solution is to use the court system and threaten people with real legal documents!
ftfy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You left something out...
That presumes, of course, that the judge will sign off on the documents, but saying so in one post ruins any remaining funny.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Their next step?
So when they get a request to turn over 'fake' subpoenas, will they appeal on the basis of self incrimination? Any chance there's other criminal behavior which will be exposed by these subpoenas, and they're hoping to delay until the statue of limitations has expired?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Their next step?
the statute of limitations doesn't matter here because the suit has already been filed. once that happens, the SoL is only relevant to the question of when was the suit filed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I hope he keeps resisting
Perhaps he'll get some jail time for it. Much deserved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How, if at all, does this differ from police lying to people?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Police get qualified immunity because their hiring criteria include mental capacities not able to sufficiently understand and apply legal precedence and legal mandates.
You cannot sensibly make that a hiring criterion for district attorneys. However, "sensibly" stopped being a thing in this area, so a brave new future lies ahead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chutzpah
"We are not going to honor FOIA requests for our subpoenas since they were fraudulent."
That's close to the "your honor, have mercy on an orphan" line for parenticide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typo
I think your copy editor missed one:
Compare:
His office first denied the request back in 2015, claiming it was too "burdensome" to hand over copies of witness subpoenas issued by prosecutors.
And:
His office first denied the request back in 2015, claiming it was too "burdensome" to hand over copies of witless subpoenas issued by prosecutors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WTF!
why hasn't this POS DA been fired? or given some vacation time in the graybar hotel!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]