New York Times Decides Kids Are Playing Too Many Video Games During The Pandemic
from the sigh dept
One of the most predictable things in the world is that if anything is going on in the universe, people will try to find some way to make video games into a villain over it. This is doubly true if there are children within a thousand miles of whatever is going on. Notable when these claims arise is the velocity with which any nuance or consideration of a counter-vailing opinion is chucked out the window.
Meanwhile most of the world, and the United States in particular, is suffering in all manner of ways from the COVID-19 pandemic. Hundreds of thousands dead. Millions falling ill. Economic fallout for large swaths of the public. High tensions due to all of this, compounded by a mad would-be-king inciting violence in the house of government. And, even for those not suffering health or massive economic crises, there's the simple matter that we're all more isolated, all home more often, and all mired in a severe lack of socialization and life-affirming activities.
And it's in this environment, apparently, that the New York Times has decided to chide parents for letting their kids play video games and allowing more screen time more generally.
The article, which ran on January 16, quoted some experts and presented a lot of “scary” numbers about screentime. But it also glossed over the fact that video games and the internet have helped many people, kids and adults, stay connected and sane during this terrible time.
The whole post is also oddly bookended by a random small family that is currently struggling during the pandemic. Their son plays a lot of video games as a way to connect with his friends. His father and mother are concerned about how much time he spends in front of the screen, but also know it’s one of the few ways he has to safely socialize while covid-19 runs wild across the world. This is a hard situation I imagine many parents around the globe are going through right now. But highlighting only kids and how much screentime they are using ignores that all of us, not just children and teens, are dealing with increased screentime and a lack of real human interaction. Instead, the article goes on and on about how potentially unhealthy and dangerous all this screentime could be for kids. How kids need to disconnect more. How kids are playing too much Roblox.
This whole diatribe is off for a number of reasons. First, let's start off with the obvious: these are not normal times. If experts want to make arguments or present data that one amount of screen time or another, or even certain amounts of video game playing, is harmful to children, I'm open to those arguments. They need to come with actual scientific data, but I'm open to them. But during a pandemic, when most children are incredibly isolated form their normal activities -- team athletics, outdoor play with other children, school and after-school activities, etc. -- someone is going to have to tell me how increased time playing video games or in front of a computer screen is somehow more harmful than the void of any affirming activity. There are only so many books a child is going to read. Only so many games of cards. Only so much time in imaginative play, or in discussion with his or her parents. Now is not a normal time, so why are we grading parents by normal rules?
Hell, even the experts on the matter have made their recommendations for screen time during the pandemic a moving target.
Dr. Jenny Radesky, a pediatrician who studies children’s use of mobile technology at the University of Michigan, said she did countless media interviews early in the pandemic, telling parents not to feel guilty about allowing more screen time, given the stark challenges of lockdowns. Now, she said, she’d have given different advice if she had known how long children would end up stuck at home.
“I probably would have encouraged families to turn off Wi-Fi except during school hours so kids don’t feel tempted every moment, night and day,” she said, adding, “The longer they’ve been doing a habituated behavior, the harder it’s going to be to break the habit.”
It's also very much worth keeping in mind that discussions on recommended limits to screen time and, even more so video games, are relatively new things given the rapid pace with which technology has been developed. And those recommendations regarding screen time for children have been moving targets over the years. New studies come out all the time on the topic and recommendations from experts likewise get updated.
Moving targets upon moving targets. If you're getting the sense that what experts say about all of this during the COVID-19 pandemic has a make-it-up-as-we-go quality to it, ding ding ding!
And instead of any nuance afforded to the fact that video games have changed wildly to become multiplayer social platforms as much as games, and what that means for children who need to socialize during a pandemic, the article instead just further vilifies game-makers.
Children turn to screens because they say they have no alternative activities or entertainment — this is where they hang out with friends and go to school — all while the technology platforms profit by seducing loyalty through tactics like rewards of virtual money or “limited edition” perks for keeping up daily “streaks” of use.
“This has been a gift to them — we’ve given them a captive audience: our children,” said Dr. Dimitri Christakis, director of the Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development at Seattle Children’s Research Institute. The cost will be borne by families, Dr. Christakis said, because increased online use is associated with anxiety, depression, obesity and aggression — “and addiction to the medium itself.”
To give the Times an ounce of credit, that quote is immediately followed by an acknowledgement that Christakis' claims aren't actually born out by anything other than association metrics. In other words, correlation rather than causation. So why bother even including the quote at all?
To conclude: these are not normal times. An over-indulgence of video games in lieu of other healthy activities is surely not optimal for the health and growth of children. But right now there are severe limits on those other healthy activities. And if some gaming gets children in touch with their friends who they can't see otherwise, vilifying video games makes zero sense.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, kids, moral panic, pandemic, video games
Companies: ny times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
A missed opportunity
I wish the NYT had gone with the angle about predatory economic systems in gaming instead. That deserves far more coverage than it gets in non-gaming media.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A missed opportunity
Indeed. As one data point, I'll say my kids have had increased screen time during the pandemic, but that has included a complete ban on any system using predatory economics -- not just games, but social media and other "online" activities as well. The hardest place to fight this battle has been with the schools, which were sometimes sending kids to online services that I had already banned during "home" time.
My kids seem to be handling it well. Along with increased screen time, they've had increased book reading time (Amazon has got rich off of us over the past year, with libraries not being an option), increased listening to FM radio time and increased "going on walks with parents" time. They've had decreased "messing around with other kids" time and "organized sports and extracurricular classes" time.
Kids also tend to increase their screen time as they get older, and this is generally healthy. My kids have, of their own volition, spent more time learning computer-aided things like history, computer programming, chess, politics, and art. Sure, it uses a screen... but it's not sitting down in front of the TV for hours every evening like I did as a kid. Seems to me they're being more creative and developing more socially than I did, and they aren't being bombarded with continual twisted notions of what is "good" and "normal" from TV ads and kid's soaps. In fact, they now will avoid any game with loot boxes or other predatory systems because it's not as fun as their other activities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Active entertainment beats passive entertainment every day of the week. 👍
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A missed opportunity
You might want to check and see if your local library system integrates with Hoopla. Mine does and just about every book that they can lend digitally I can get from there. I have still bought more books in the past year than I usually would though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A missed opportunity
Years ago when my company was looking at monetizing our mobile app we did some digging into what made the top grossing mobile apps and at the top were free to download games targeted at very young children with very easy to access in app purchases and very hard to access refund processes...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A missed opportunity
That would require actual you know research and domain knowledge experts instead of grinding their axe which started as a great gleaming labris and has been reduced to a rusty hatchet. The old media have been openly deranged luddities for decades in an extinction burst ever since their cheese was moved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A missed opportunity
I wouldn't say predatory. Those systems are there to sell. At the end of the day, I would check the games my kid wanted to download. If it contained in app purchases, I would tell them "do not press that or else.." to let them know it would charge us money. Eventually they pickup on what's free and not, and well, then at that point you get "can you buy me this?". Lol like I said, there to sell :-P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I wouldn't say predatory."
It's predatory in that it capitalizes on the same human compulsions that gambling does (and now, after complaints from the industry we didn't know it for certain, we have actual studies showing that human responses between gambling stimuli and microtransaction stimuli align.)
And the gaming ratings committees refuse to adjust ratings for microtransactions in games, because they like kids emptying their parent's bank accounts trying to get a favorite footballer by lootbox purchases.
So yeah, it's totally predatory, and the industry goes to lengths to make sure accidental purchases are easy, but safeguarding against accidental purchases is difficult.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Am I the only person in the world who is a functioning adult and spent almost every waking, breathing moment in my formative years (6-12th grade) in front of a computer or a console?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm sure most adults who spent all their free time playing video games are functioning adults. I haven't seen ANY convincing evidence of, and exactly how much is too much.
The "experts" have to earn their keep somehow and this is just more BS so the "experts" can look busy during the pandemic.
It would be nice if they were getting a real and relevant education but nobody ever talks about that beyond adding even more testing to the curriculum.
I pity the children whose parents fall for this nonsense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If they didn't would have demographic level problems even for something relatively minor and those who lacked the resources to afford them doing better at a population level in spite of the advantages of relative wealth and priveledge.
Look at the Opiod deaths for an extreme example - while legitimate users show some improvement like fewer of them deciding to suicide is the answer at a demographic level they were using refrigerated morgue trailers and expanding morgue size disproportionate to community size and age.
If something works or is a great problem where the hell are the rises or falls is always the ultimate question. If there is a fountain of youth where are all of the retirees who trigger social security fraud investigations because they look like college students? If swimming soon after eating leads to drowning where the hell is the death or near drowning spike from teens who try defying the rule?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You're not. My doing that in the '80s and '90s accidentally led to a lucrative career. Although I wonder whether that would be true today. In those days, when we'd exhausted our very limited supply of video games, and the family needed the phone line, there wasn't much to do other than learn how to use/program the computer—with very little outside help (no internet, maybe a few BBS textfiles, very rarely a book: technical books were expensive and not so easy to find). TV could command limited attention, with the small number of channels, constant ad-breaks, and lack of user control over scheduling.
Now, we have instant access to every video game, book, TV show, movie, plus a constant stream of news and gossip. Personally, at least, I feel distractions are much more of a factor. It could just be my age. I wonder whether kids still have hours of deep focus on extracurricular interests that may turn out to be useful. Perhaps that was always rare. I do still occasionally run into impressive projects done by very young people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
From my experience the ammount of distractions grew - including advanced knowledge and professional level tools. They aren't /popular/ distractions as most prefer mainstream culture productions but those who do can "savant" themselves better than ever and make you at their age look like a goddamned moron in comparison because say you only managed to figure out 3D graphics in your twenties and this kid set up a 3D game before they hit double digits. The outliers didn't start out as "more genius" than the previous generation of outliers but they had better tools than you did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm guessing most of us here have spent a lot of time in front of screens.
How many of us are functioning adults is left as an exercise for the reader.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What? We must do excercise? Boo!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Between work and leisure, I still spend the vast majority of my time in front of a computer. It's odd that parents are still wondering about screentime. Aren't most parents of primary-school-age children in their thirties (like me)? Do they remember how much time we'd spend playing video games or watching television? Do they think that they turned out badly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hell, I'm an adult and I'm in front of a screen this very second.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In front of a computer as a kid.
I had to spend my time in front of other people's computers until I was fourteen, at which point my dad got me an Apple II+, but otherwise yeah, I did that thing.
Though college I volunteered at the Computer Resource Center as tech help, because I couldn't yet afford to upgrade my own stuff for a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey it looks like we are having a pandemic, people are more depressed, anxious, aggressive and obese AND they are also playing more video games! coincidence? Obviously increased video game playing is causing the pandemic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A recreation of how things probably went down at the NYT
Manager: “Oh shit! Trump just left the White House yesterday and we need a new scapegoat!”
Writer: “Why not more news on the GO-“
M: “That’s ain’t news no more!”
W: “what about... the Capitol riot-“
M: “That’s already outdated, son.”
W: Section-“
M:”Naw, we already have a story for that tomorrow. I need something familiar, but new!”
(Suddenly a janitor walks by. Mumbling about video games)
M: “Wait janitor! Could you repeat that?”
(And so was birthed the article that chided parents for letting their children play too much video games.)
(NOTE: I actually don’t hate the New York Times. I actually like them, but like other newspapers, once and a while they produce a really stupid article like this one.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
games are no longer single player, many games are online social spaces,
you play fortnite, call of duty , to spend time with friends, talk, socilaise,
in a pandemic it may not be safe to go outside,
people are working and going to school through zoom and other app,s .
this is not a normal time.
in the 80,s, 90,s kids watched tv or played games on nintendo or an xbox.
The difference now is most games have online multiplayer modes
with voice chat as standard.
before video games there were panics about comicbooks and rock and roll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Stop right there. There are still many single-player games being made today, mostly by independent developers. I think you mean "The most popular and lucrative games are no longer single-player".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The Last of Us is single player.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dead Cells is single-player.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Single Player games
Terraria and Subnautica are staples here, both single player. Though Terraria can do both co-op and PVP and has some elements for football / CTF, which I've never tried.
Yeah, I live on single player with some rare exceptions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not Hip Anymore
Stand around the water cooler at work and talk about the sports games that happened last weekend? That's okay!
Hang out with your friends in Discord chat while playing Fortnite because the city is on lockdown? Bad, bad bad!
My take is that the writers are jealous that their preferred activities in NY are currently closed down, and they're hoping that everyone else is as miserable as them; but they're not, and they're demonstrating that they don't need nightclubs or whatever social activities the older generation enjoyed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not Hip Anymore
I can't speak on on the NYT's behalf, but I can speak on my own behalf and as a New Yorker: I still have a job which never left, my gym closed down and then it reopened. I still can go to physical book stores (including my independent book store) and a physical cookware store.
So while I can currently not go to a movie theater, Broadway show, or concert, there's still a lot I can currently do, such as the things that the NYT is so worried about. This is just the NYT acting élitist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not Hip Anymore
Typical Koby: always assuming the best in people (not to mention the projection, of course).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ok
Even if we took out the child labor laws..
What the hell is there to do?
Chop wood
Hang laundry
Feed the cattle, pigs, sheep, dogs, cats, llamas?
Make chairs? there isnt enough room for all the equipment.
Play ball? Which ball? And how many ball games can keep you about 6' apart at all times.
I know, Teach the kid how to make Cheap wine. Its done indoors, he can make more then 1 per day, and at the end of 4-6 weeks, His parents can get Drunk. Or teach him to Distill the wine to something abit stronger.
How long to teach them to clean the rooms, Wash clothing, Vacuum, sweep, play Board games, card games, Poker, backgammon, Chess, .
This dont count that the parents are probably working, or NOT.
I KNOW, lets get them out into the country, and teach them FARMING, RANCHING, FORESTRY, and how to grow MJ.(hemp, sorry)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Has anyone blamed the Jan. 6th insurrection on video games yet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Kinda. A small section of the Twitter-sphere have tried to argue that there's a straight line from Gamergate to the riots. I really wish that was an Onion-article.
https://boundingintocomics.com/2021/01/07/gamergate-to-blame-for-washington-d-c-prote sts-claim-mainstream-video-game-media-personalities/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On one hand: “Gamergate was at least partially responsible for the riots” is a flawed argument. On the other hand: Bounding Into Comics is alt-right-adjacent hackery.
What’s that headline again? Oh yeah, it’s “Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point”.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's reductive, but G*mergate is part of the story of the rise of the alt-right. Steve Bannon has been quoted as saying "You can activate that army. They come in through Gamergate or whatever and then get turned onto politics and Trump."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moral panics about our children
When I was a kid, our moral guardians tried scare parents off from Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (and tabletop RPGs in general), and despite all my efforts, I couldn't find a real Satanic cult to take me in and teach me real magic. (🕯📚🔔Ia! Fhtagn!🐙) I still hold a grudge.
But the New York Times has repeatedly opined about evils without thinking clearly about them (including the diabolical phonograph) The New York Times, despite its reputation as a bastion of news fit to print, has demonstrated time and again it's not willing to actually investigate the perils our children face, and instead is willing to offer moral panics for cheap scares.
I grew up a latchkey kid, as both my parents had to work, and this only redoubled my interests in the unknown and esoteric. Ultimately, without supervision, I delved unflinchingly into unlocking the dark arts🌩 and over years of neglect, with madness closing in, I was etched and carved into the monstrous abomination you see before you today.
However, all of the mischief our children can get into can be tempered greatly by actual parenting. If we, either a) Provided well-funded schools with highly-paid professional teachers to mind them and teach them holistically about things like critical thought (Maybe we could use Cookie Monster's sometimes-foods idea for sometimes-activities? Moderation in all things?), or b) allow parents to earn a family-living working only part-time so they still have time and energy for rest, recreation, civic responsibilities and parenting.
This was a known problem in the seventies, and we're still not doing it. We may love our children, but we love capitalism and profit more.
Until we, as a society, choose one of these two options (both would be swell) we're going to have to live with future generations of dysfunctional drug-addicted cyber-kids who have to spend much of their adulthood sorting out their own psychodrama and addicted to gaming and social media.
From a harm-reduction perspective, leaning on video games isn't terrible. We've taken parents and actual social engagement from our kids. Taking away their video-game coping methods will probably result in them seeking out (and finding) other coping methods, say, getting baked every day, or exploring abandoned industrial parks, or torturing animals, or a bit of the old ultraviolence.
If your kids are leaning heavily on video games, they're not leaning heavily on something else. Ia! Cthulhu! Fhtagn🌩
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moral panics about our children
Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn! Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
<ahem>
I agree with you completely, I just couldn't pass up a chance to "say" that line in public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Moral panics about our children
You need to use the right font, though:
.
T̷̢̳̫͉̥̝͍͇̦̲̙͓͒͆͊̀̎̀̾̾͜͝ō̶̢̭̫̯̠̲̦̱͚͈͙̖̐͐̈́͛̅̏͝ ̞ ̸̡̢̮̳͕̰͓̬̯̹̾̌ȋ̸̢̧̢̡̞̰̮̘̝̞̜͎́̃̓̆͒̚̕͜ń̶͇̫̾̐̒̓̌̀̒͂́͐ ͉͓̳̮̹̩v̵̝̲͚̓̽̈́̔̿̽̐̿̕͘͝o̸͕̼̺̠͇͇̥̓̅̈́͂́͛̊̿̽̃͋̑̅̀͝k̷̍͘͝� �͍̲̜̤̃͂̐ḛ̶̡͖͙͇̈́̎̈́̒̏͋̄̈́̽̍̀̂̊̚̕ ̵̢̟̦͉̼͐͌̽͑͌͒͐̏̐̉͘t̸̨̠͔͇̭̙̙̙͖̖̜̻̝̕h̷̢̧̻͕̦̟̉̆͑̅̈̌̂͂̕̕ ̰è̸̛̳̗̳̖̣̹̘̤͖̹̭̬̖̞̘̍͐͂͊̄̌̾͋̕̚͝͠ ̴̧̦̼͙͈̽͘ͅh̸̞̓͋̇̃̓̐̿̽͒͘ǐ̵̠̱̫͚̒̊͘͝v̴̧̥͈͍̎̆̂̑͊e̵͛̅̿̀̋̉ ͓̣̻̥͙̝̇̎̿́̃̄͠-̸̨̲̩̤͉̠̯̪̞̫̻̮̞̝̣̉̔̿̄̊̈́̋͝m̶̛̛͊͊̿̿͂̏̔̑̄ ̩̠̳͍͍̹̠̱̟̻̥̟̀̒í̷̠͒͠ņ̴̛̭͚̣̜̍̀̆́̀̚̚͜d̴̨̢͕͎̺͔͉̓̀̉̏͝͝� �̢̤̹̖͇̘ ̴̡̨̬͍͕̱͈̬̭͇͉͒̑̽͒̆̾̒̈́͐͗̇̚r̷͙̣̥̗͖̝̞͚̋̈͆̽̅̅̅͛͛̏̕e̵̥̘̍̇ p̸̛̣͈͖͖̝̤̔̆̓̿͌̅̚͝r̸̢̛̩͓̹̳͍͙̬̺̦͇͙̐̽̐̈́̽̽͋͐̍̀͑͝͝ẻ̵͔̩͘� �͎̪̣̱̪̮̼s̷̤̃̃́́̉̈̋́̃͆̔̕͝͝ḙ̷̢̺̞̖̫͔͚̠̮͚̄̑̒̈́̀̔͊̒̽̍͑̽̚� �n̴̨̨̧̖̙̖̺͍͓̥̝͂̂͆͊t̷͕̣͖͖͖͐̈̈́̍̄̐̌i̵̛͚͌̌̀̊̏̏͂͘͝n̷͋͐̏̐̌� �̢͚̗̗̟̳͉̬ͅg̶̨̫͚͉̰͎͚̤̹̦̬̖̹̤̻͛̎̅̆̾̌͂͌̽̓̍͆͝͠ ̵̢̳̙̈̾̈́̍ĉ̴̠̹̓̓̄͌̓̃̈́̔͝ͅh̴̨͌̀́ą̷̧̮͍͕͙̫̘̹͎̩͗͊o̴͒̃̌̋͝͝ ̢̡͔̣̯̲͓̖̼͍̰̥̑̀̒̕͝ṩ̷̢̫̲͔̲̖̼͈̤̬̳͎͆̒͌̍͘̚.̴̛̿̑͂͆͛̂͊̀̾ ̰̘̱
̷̨̥̘̯̦̽̌͂́͐͑̐͘͝Ị̸͇̪̣͈͇͑̑̎͋̋̅̎̏̒͘͝n̸̡̨̦͖̤̲̦̔̊̎̓� �̗͔̯̯̞̯̲v̴̢̬̣̥̺̹̝͍̫̠̱̹͑̑̽̈́̀o̴̢̝̪̩̞̮͚̭̯̥͔̲͆͗͑̓̑͊̀͜͝k̷ ̡̨̛̳̙͔̗͍̬͒̏͗̇̃̒̊̒͠͝ḯ̵̡̥̦̘͔͚͈̘̰̦̠̯̰̿̎̿̾̓̇͌̕͝ͅn̸͑̄̆͝ ̧̲͈͎̜͚̪̥̻̅̒̀g̷̡͉̥̮̰̭̰̒̍̋͗͗̓̈̐͜ ̸̧̬̗̫͉̺̤̞̣͍͖͔͈̉̏͐ṯ̴̨͍̗͙̗̠̭̱̲͚̰̟͕́̿̀̏̑̌̇͐͘̕̕̕h̶̽̒̎̔ ͇̦̖̠͉̙̓̈̃̿ȩ̵͖͕̲͓̩͔͚͔͙̲̊̎̂͂̍̆̀͐̀̚̚͝ ̴̻͊͛̍̎͛͗͂̌̔̏͠͝f̴͈̲͕̞͎͔̤̣̗̹̟̏̒̔̾̑́̅ȇ̸̡̡̛̞̙̭͎̙͐̐ͅè̸� �̡̧̛̲̺̳̬̲͇͚̹̟͈͇̺̋̀̃̉͐̆̂̔̑̉̕͜͝l̸̤̟͎̺̅̾̔̅̓̆̇̎̿̈̊̂̌̐̕ͅ ̡̜i̶̥̬̫̝̞͔͈͕̹̠͑̒̒̒̓̀̕͜n̸̦̘͖̣̝̩̙͉̲̱̳̅g̸̡̢̧͇͓͔̪͈̥̹͇͔̿� �͎͔ ̸̡̧̫̭̟̩̅ố̵̧̨̢͖͕͓̖̦̗̞̲̙̘̫̏̏̊̔̐͒̒͌̇͘͠f̷̧̧̨͎̲̮̞̼̹̰̘̑ ̨̫ ̴̘̣̳͙̖͇̫̲̲͉͖̦̿͊̉̉̀̈̂̐̾̈́̈́̆̽́͜͠ć̵̝̣͖̲̎̄̇̿̈́̑̂͒̽̋̄̂̉͝� �̥̣̞̜ḩ̴̧͔̞̜̺̹̞̬̱̖̙̤̳̮̊̈́̀̆̽̊̔̄̽̔̅̈͘a̵̛̠̭̪̥̰̜̪͇͉̋̌͌ͅ� �͇͍ͅo̷̢̦̼͚͕̩̝̥͓̘̬͍͇͐̂s̷̡̯̙̍̈́̽̾͒͛̇͘̕͝.̸̦̖̭̪̅̉̓̎͗̐͗͂̊̚ ̨̻̘̜̭̻͇͈̫͖͜
̴̧̛̠͓͈̘͓̣̙͚͊͝ͅẄ̵͓̯͍̞͚́̓̋̀i̴̧̙͙͛̈́̂̈́͐͋͝t̵̓ ̧̧̢̘̜̣̣͎̤͓̲̱͎̲̎͂h̷͕̲̠̯̞͈̻̹́̎̆̕̚o̵̱̞̖̬͉̬̮̕ͅǘ̸̧̖͆̈́̈́͘� �͎̪̞̥ͅt̸͉̮́̈́̏̍͗̔̑͊͑͛͘͠͠͝ ̵̛͎͓͎̤̺̝̗̹̠̙̩͖̖͒̃͆́̂͛͆̑͂͛̓o̸̧̘̪̬͑̉̇͐͐́̓͜͝͝ŕ̶̂̌̓̊̈́͝ ̢̡͓̬̣̲͎͍̓͌̈́͊̓ͅd̸̠̥̟̠͉̖̃̔̇͊̓̓̂͋̂̋ḛ̷̡̡̢̥̮̩̯̔̍̿͌̾̽͘͝͠ ̢̠̬̬r̸̨̡̨̦̟̓͗̀͋̃̈.̴̛͙̬̑̈́̔͑͆̾͝
̷̗̯͍̩̯͉̺̟̎̓͌̈́̀͑̒̂T̴̛͐͂ ̧̘̠̠ḩ̴̡͎̪͇̫͖͇̭͈̹͚̹̔͜e̴̪̽̀͛́́̀̑͛̂ ̸̛͔̮̪̘̩͋͆͋̓̃̓̅͗͆̇̒̃͆͝N̸̢̛͖̜̱̪͖͔̳̱̘͇̯͗͐ͅe̷̋̃́́͛̇́̽͘͠ ̨̢̬͙̗̺̼̗̖̙̔̀̇̎͜͜z̷͚̳̝̭̩̲̺̀̾͛̄̐̃͜͝͝p̷̛̭̀̆̿̿̒̅͐́͝ė̶̽� �͈͖̱̳̩̗̘̖̓͛̍̇̇̕̚͝ͅŗ̴͇͚͙̠͇̞͚̻̣͔̪̉̌́̀̉̐̒d̷̀͐́͊̑̃͛̽̕̕� �̩͙̓i̷̧͙͑̀͊́͘ȁ̵̛͓͕̠̰̜͂͌͑̉n̸̡̨̤̥̳̳̫͂̅̌̈͑̾͛̎͛̓͜ ̶͍̦͚̝̫̪͉͇̳͉̙̬̘̫̿̄̆͑̂̈͌̋̓͘͝h̵̛͎̣̫̫̮̫̞̉̅́̃̎̌̏͗̅̈́͊̇̂̊� �̘̞͉i̸̧̛̛̠̫͎͑̌͌̿́̓v̶̧̧̼͖̉͒̒͌͘͠ĕ̷̯̺͉̲͚͔͖̣̫͇̗̄͋̈́̅̃̅̚̕ ̳̤͓-̶͕͚͖̲͆m̵̨̭͇͚̰̮̚i̷̟̰͙̥̥͔͍̖̙̘͎͚̅̉͂͑̔͊̅̈́̚̕͜͝n̷̡̮͔̯̆ ͓͇͇̻̝͎d̴̨̮̭͛͛̊̆͂͒̽ ̴̱͉͕̫̬̈́̈́̽̇̌͘ͅỏ̸̧̡̺̫̟͙̗̃̑̍̽́̾̀͂̇̚͜ͅf̸̡̹͇͖̟̝̼͍̝̝̽͋̽͝ ̝͕ ̴̤̭̖̲̥̜̯̃̉̀̆͐̀͌̕͝c̷͉̣̯̦̓̓̊͒̑͠ḧ̸̛̛̜͖̹͍͖͙̣͖͇́̓̉̏̃̀͘͘͝ ̗̱̲ͅạ̶̇̓̀͐͛͗̆͠ȯ̵̗̓̑͠s̷̛̛͕͇̎̎̈̐̒̈.̸̢̦̼̈̽̽̈̆̏͒͛̀́͒͌͝ ̧͓͉̤̞͖͜ ̷͇͆Ẑ̴̧̳̦͙̯̱̝̞͕̣̼͈͓̩̰͐a̴̛̛̱͍͙̘͚̼̗̯̙͎̗̱̱͛̑͋͋̿̏̈́̈́͝l̷͛� �̡̛̱͉͈̠̐ͅg̴̘͉̹͕̼͇̳̽͌̔̉o̸̢͍͓͉͖̠͙͙̬̽͌́͑͋̍͆̐́͑́̏͑͌̚͜͜ͅ� �̮̻.̶̡̡͉̺̼̹͍̦̮̰͆̂̐͌̓͒̒̿̾̚͘ͅ
̶̣̫̞̭̹͚̟̹̥̺͚̤͉̂̾͊̔̂͛͜͠H̸ ̧͚̮͎̳͇͕̖̗̜͔̻̞͈̈́̋̈́̂̀͗̀̓́͋͘̕͘͜é̶̡̨̧̡̛̪͚̫̝̫̥̲̻̈́̓͐̏͂͝� � ̶̰̈́̀͊̽̅̒͂̿̎̓͘͘w̷̰̲̥̬̱̱̆̅͌̋͋̂̉͆̄͆̀̏̕͝͝h̵͎͓̥͍̖̘̖̃ͅo̶͠� �͔͈̝̩̮͍̺̦̬̹̪͈͂̀͌ ̶̢͚̖̮̥̖͎̹͔̣̭͚̯̈́̅̈́̃̆̂̎̋̔̃͆͜͜Ẃ̴̺͕̰̭̘̟͓̹̘̈å̸̢̟̰̆̈̀i̴� �͖͕͂̓͌̑͌̇̚t̷̢̩̰̼̭͙̠̋̽͂̀s̵̡̢̩̳̙̝̫͒̓͗̍͑́́͊̒̇̇͜ ̷͎̣̪́B̷̛̝̟̞̱̪̯̺̦̘̈́̀͊̽͋͌͜ȩ̷̥̭̫̝͙̺̗̯̹̂̃̊̉͒̑̓ḧ̵͒͂͋̑͘� �͔͙̺̝͒͐̔̈́͋͠͝i̷̧̢̢͚̟̙͓͔̥̤̥͛̽̈́́̋̐͋̈́̿͒͗̇̈́͜͝ń̵͆́͒͊̏̕̚͝� �̺͙̳͓̞͇̱ḑ̴̡̠̉̌͊͛̄̚͠ ̴̛̬͖̩̙̼̽̀͋̇̈́͆̀͛̕͝T̵̢̺͒̀̑̃͒͐͌͗̓̔̎͊̚h̶̜́̉͆͊̋́̀̾̌̾̏̕͝e� �̘̱̬̞͇͌̆́̏̌̑́́̃͌͝ ̴̨̡̭͍͎̰͍̭̝̬̝̠̮͆͐́̋͛̎̈́̈́̑̋͗̿͐̃͝W̴̞͚̣̭̩͇̉̄͐͝a̸̜̝̍̒̃͌̓́ ̢̨̨͔͉͓̞̖͍͉͈̯l̸͉͐̄̀̋͠ļ̴̺͇̱̲͖̟̟̳̲͕̮̞̥̗͆̍̽͐͊͑̔͋̊͆̾̆̔͠ ̴̦̥̫͈̪̲̘̤̤̹͑͌ͅͅö̶̡̧̲̹̗̤̙̫̣̽̐̊͆̿̋͐̂͂̚̕͜͜͝͝͠f̴̑͂͑̌̉̈ ̡̥͍̻͎͎̖̠̮͖̘͍͔̅͐̀̃̈́̈́̀͜ͅ ̷̡̺̪͓̰̥̩̐̈̓̍̆̑͊͌͌̓̏̒̎̓͝t̷̢̻͚͙͕̞͗̒ơ̶̡̡̻͈̻̪̂̆̈́͆͆̎́̕͝ ̨̦͙̗̥̯̗r̸̮̯͔̭̩̺̲̙͙̮̬̪͕̩̉̇̏̌̎̉ṱ̷̡̹͖͎͈͍̰̰̇̀̈́͋̂̈̇̓̑u̷� �͉̗̙͈̙̈́̊͐͌͛͑̓̂̅͛͜͝͠r̴̨̼̖̱̪̺̯̰̣̥̝͕̝̥̝̈́͌̋̀̍͊͒̽̏͗̕e̵̅͗� �̩̰̖̬̝̄̊̾͛͆̓̂͂̿̏̕d̸̡̨̧̡̞͉̩̬͍̝̥̓͒̒̓̈́̎͛̍̊͝͝ ̸̧̺̪̣͈͖͒̈́͂͗̐̄̎̂́͝͝g̶̡̝͚̱͔̘̞̗͇̻͚̺̈́̉̉̒̄̀̂̿̌̐ͅĺ̴͍͉̑̄͝ ̱̲̝̻̖͎̲͍̬a̷̖̯͖̖̥͕̤̼͙͋̉̂̇̓̎̉͌̓̈́̇ͅs̵̟̦̺͈͕̩͕͖̹͉͐̐͒̿̌̈s� �̤̺̠͐̃́̓̀̔̉̔̌̏͑̓̎.̸̨̰̰̰̈́̔̍̉̎̆̄͘͝͝
̴̣̪̙̜͍͚͓͛̀̅̉̄͂̔͠ͅ� �͖͎̫ͅH̸̨̠͙̞͕͔͎͚͇̗̜͚͋̏̆̆̐͊̔̚̕͠o̷̧̙̰͎͑̃́̈́̍̿͗̍́̏̕͠l̷̈́̌͂ ̡̣͚̤̳̪̻ͅd̶̫̱͕̩̳̖͍̜͚͖́̂̏̚ę̵̫̺̠͎̺̱̹̰̗̝̝̓͂͑̿͂̎̏͗̓̈̓͠͝ ͈ŕ̵͚̤̣̅ͅ ̷̨̟͙̺͍̼͓̔͜o̶͓̓͆̈́́̆̈́̑̀͌͒̊̕͠f̴̡̝̠͔̪̼̣̯͖̟̪̔̄̿̀̕̚ ̸̗̭̦͉̼̪̞̼̙̹͓͇͆͒͜ẗ̸̢̡̢̤̺͙̳̱̣̜̦̩̫́h̷͇̙͔̓̽̒͒̊̀̆̃̀͌̆̍̂ͅ ̳̗̰͇͍͔͈e̷̛̹̯͉̪̙̒̄̊͆̀̒͝ ̸̡̲̦̼͈̬̰͍͚͍̯̜̤̰͗̔͌͜͝c̵̡̛̱͕̟̫̼͉̓̑̽̈̏̀̿͂̿̈́̆̓͗̈́ͅã̸̔͊̎ ͇̗̫̪̦͝n̸̡̝̫̻̣̯̩̯̞͎̝̱̯̱̞͌̃́̏͗̔̽͝d̵̤͓͔͇̟̗̼́̋̑͂̑̓͗̌̈́́̕ ̝̪̹̬̲̜̪l̸̻͐̽e̴̼̻̘͕̤̓̓̏̈́̌͜ ̷̡͔̠̜̲̼͈̖͖̘̠͉̟͆͊̂̌͗̇̌͊̒̆͆͑͜͝w̵̢̳̯̩̩͈͆̍̏̀͐ȟ̶̨̙̲̘͈̊͋ ̖̠̲͕̪̫̹̟̪ö̷̢̱̮̫̱́s̸̫̪̣̅̀͆͗̉̓̿̚̚͠͠e̵̤͓͓̣̓̆̅̆̅̿͋̋͋̍͐̚� �̢̞̭͍̺̩ ̴̨̘̠͓̟̫̉͛͑͛͆ļ̸͈̯̱̦͊̇̑̍̈̅̑̈͐i̶̢̩̹̜͓̗̳͍̹̗͙͋́͒́͌̈́͌̓͘ͅ ̰g̶͙̤̳͙̏̍̈́̅͋̚͘͜ḩ̴̨̰̳͉͉̙̭͙͓͉̠͒͂̉̔͝ͅt̷̢̧̫̠̹͕̠̖̻̹̜͔͌͝ ̴̨̧̛̯̗͓̬̭̲̖͐̄̒̌̈́̀̉̓͛̉͜͜ǐ̵͔͇̜̦̱̈͆̒s̶̈́̏͗͑̉̈̇̓͗̌̌̐̈́̒̕ ̨͔̬̹ ̶͍̰̘̗̺͒́̍̆̆̋̿̓̃̍̀̇͐̀͠ś̸̨̮̣͎̦̮͚̜̺͉̦͖̂̀̾̀̀̉̓̂͐͆͛̋̏̏� �̤͓ḩ̴̖̞̱̞̬͕͒͛̋̌̽͌̒̇̍͑̂̕͝a̷̡̛̤̝͓̯̒̀̃͛͋̔͒̌̍̾̕͝͠d̸̔̃̒̀ ̪̤̹̖̿̏̃̑̌͌͌͛ö̵̰̣͈̻̠̝͎̱͍̗̈́͂̅̋̓̈̂͂̌͂͜͝ẃ̴̠̠̦̂.̴͐̍́͛̈́� �̡̨̬͈͉̖̲͔͗̚͝ͅ
̶̛̻͔̦̗͇̼͉̙͖̅̓̂͊̎H̷̨̛̞̭̹͛̐̂̃̌͌͌̈̑̍̊̈́͋͝� �̢̰̥͍̱͚͜e̷̱͚̘̠̥̽̈́͊̄̓̈́̈͐͗̈́̅̑̋̅ ̴̣̼̗͓͉̤̥̱̯̺̺͔̯̥̂C̷̡̡̤̬̟̹̬̓̓ó̴͖͈̘̦͖̎̋̑̊͒͗͊̈́̉̊̇̀̕m̵͒� �̧̡̹͈͍͇̫̼̫̩̣͕ͅe̸͕̱͝s̷͚̞̣̮̯̩̠̬̦̮͎̠̑̅̓̈́̐̌ͅͅ.̶͆̇̇̉͗̒̎̍͝ ̢̭̹͕̱̹̐͑̽͘͝ͅͅ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moral panics about our children
Love capitalism.
When even Both parents need to work, Just to pay rents from land owners making a small fortune, and living in another state.
The optimization of Profits to befit those that get to GO HOME, Get Days off when they wish, get medical as they wish and can afford a Vehicle purchase About every 2-5 years.
It would be remarkable that persons that DONT worry about money, NOT to have money.
Yes, I lived in a small town(14,000) and in the farming areas, and in the past it was interesting that IF' you had an idea there were Allot of people with TIME, to give and help abit. You could even find abit of metal or wood to do interesting things. NOW days you cant even find a Skein of yarn to make anything to make a Blanket at a reasonable price.
Its fun to look at the things around you happening. Like everything made of Cotton, converted to Cheap Plastic(rayon, polyester, and so forth) and NOW those plastics cost more then Cotton, if you can find cotton.
The problem with the capitalists tends to be DOING things as cheap as possible, and selling it at prices WE cant afford, until its on sale at 1/2 off. Its not that pollution is a problem, its that THEY dont want to change HOW they do things. Ask the oil corps Why, and they will answer "ITS CHEAP".
But after you have created/bought something Cheap and selling it, HOW do you make More money. Cut every corner you can. Take out the 100 stores in a metro area, and make 1-2 LARGE ones. Still not allot of selection, just allot of CHEAP stuff. After all those stores are closed, you have gotten rid of 100 stores of employees, bills, rent, utilities. THEN what?
Everything gets Cut except those top wages? but what of the Stockholders? Arnt the corps SUPPOSED to buy those back? NOT any more. its a long term Cheap Loan that lasts forever.
The Corruption of capitalism.
If anyone has problems with this, Go look at what France has done. Even most of the EU, has less hours working, Less days working, Higher wages, and DAYS OFF, you would not believe. But how do they do that? WHY arnt the corps taking over(they are trying). Does it have anything political happening?
I wont post the info, just give you an idea of whats happening compared to HERE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Moral panics about our children
Ok, so I can agree that too many businesses fail to ensure living wages and good benefits for most of their workforce. And shareholders shouldn't be insulated from the effects underpaying and under insuring the workforce. And while the US should look to other Western countries to model more equitable compensation laws, we have to be careful not widen the chasm between the rich and poor from unintended consequences and failing to account for the inevitable resistance.
But I don't understand the rest. I'm a very crafty person with very, very little disposable income. Usually just $10-20 a month, which I also have to stretch to cover things like a new item of clothing, make-up, or shoes. Sometimes I have to wait for a special occasion or carefully budget to get something like a tool, but overall I have an abundance of supplies and materials for a range of projects. I get a significant amount of cheap stuff at the big box stores you are decrying, like the dollar store, and Walmart. And I reuse/repurpose all kinds of, well, trash basically, into some damn cool stuff. Heck, Bernie's famous mittens are made from old sweaters!
And cotton is not the end all, be all fabric fiber, which I have no trouble finding either. Synthetic fibers are not just (or always) cheap either. They have specific qualities that cotton doesn't, such as resistance to shrinking, moisture wicking, or can be spun into incredibly soft material like Minky. The oil companies have been allowed to get away with far too much for too long, and they should be held to account. But we don't have alternatives developed yet to just cast these synthetics aside.
It's not the corruption of capitalism for the bigger more successful companies to devour the littler ones. Capitalism is corrupted when the big companies lobby for laws that protect them from competition and the natural process of creative destruction.
Also, one of the most significant causes of wage stagnation in the US comes from the rise of healthcare costs. After WWII, the government instituted wage caps to try to combat inflation. Unions turned to securing benefits packages, including health insurance, creating the horrible employer based insurance system we have today. In addition, the government created insurance for the elderly and poor; in exchange for restrictions on the number of new doctors able to complete school and enter the field, in order to keep doctor pay from possibly dropping, the AMA agreed to let doctors accept reduced rates for Medicare and Medicaid patients. However, the increased life expectancy, baby boom, and innovation in safety and medical care stretched doctors too thin, leading to malpractice and the skyrocketing costs for malpractice insurance, causing doctors to increase their fees while the quality of care decreased. So there's plenty of corporate greed, but that's not the only reason people struggle to earn a living wage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wha??
I suppose by "relatively new" you mean "things that have only been happening since the very early '80s," since that's when I got Atari and my mom -- and the media -- started bitching about kids spending too much time watching TV and playing video games.
Whatever the case, forty years isn't really "relatively new."
I don't really care enough to do the real research, but here's a Times article from '83 that references the fears of video game addiction: https://www.nytimes.com/1983/10/17/business/video-games-industry-comes-down-to-earth.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kids want to have fun. Many things are fun. Many companies make entertainment.
But what if kids make their own entertainment?
Old school stuff like theater and carpentry. New stuff like videoclips and robotics.
Many parents just buy kids a smartphone and let them hit the play button, rather thsn encourage them to be creators.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well, that's one way to falsely pretend that people can't be creative in videogames, and that no kid who plays games would ever be interested in creating them themselves. Whatever makes you feel superior, I suppose...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can be creative within videogames. Just take a look at Minecraft!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Look, if you want the New York Times to give you a byline, you should ask them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Priorities
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moving target
Maybe instead of research money being spent on studies that are predetermined to find that yes, whatever activity children are interested in today that isn't the same as what older generations did, (or seem to have imagined they did, when in fact, they were not doing those idealistic childhood activities of bike riding and climbing trees, they watched TV and talked on the phone like everyone else because it was the 70s and 80s, not the 50s and 60s) and therefore a destructive force of evil that is precisely the reason for what's wrong with kids these days, we could actually study the best ways to teach kids how to self regulate and moderate themselves. Probably adults could use some tips, we are overindulgent too. The solution of "turning off the wifi during non-school hours" doesn't teach kids anything but that you are an authoritarian dick, and a hypocrite that doesn't trust them (hypocrite because all parents take their phone to the bathroom and play games or scroll social media, kids eventually figure out it doesn't take that long to poop).
Better advice would be, before arbitrarily determining that all screen time not related to school work is inherently bad and rotting your kids brains, have an open mind, and try to cultivate a shared interest by asking your kids to show you how to play (and don't ruin it with your adult lameness). Instead of setting strict limits, aside from bed time, and time to complete chores and school work, offer to introduce your kid to something you enjoy not screen related, or to take up an activity that you both might enjoy, like yoga or stargazing, or geocaching, which is kinda like Pokemon Go (of course based on your available time and money) and see how it goes. If you decide to put strict limits in place anyways, be prepared to come up with and put together pandemic safe activities that everyone will actually enjoy; normally a parent shouldn't be responsible for constant entertainment, but the pandemic puts so many limits on activities that it makes you an asshole to take away the main source of entertainment left without coming up with viable alternatives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pandemic
Oh, it looks like we have a pandemic, people are more depressed, nervous, violent, and obese, and more video games are also being played! Only a coincidence? The pandemic is clearly being triggered by increased video gameplay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kids Can with the toys during the Pandemic
From here - https://www.kidstoys.us/collections/toys you can find the best toys for your kids like Baby Dolls, stuffed toys, Games, Drones, Maternity Accessories, and unique kid's toys. For the best price, you can Buy Kids Toys online in the USA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]