$3.2 Billion FCC Program Helps The Poor Afford Broadband, But...
from the unfinished-business dept
Last week the FCC took the wraps off a new $3.2 billion program designed to help struggling Americans afford broadband during the pandemic. The program was required by Congress as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, and will, once fully operational, dole out $50 a month for broadband service to lower-income American families that qualify. That number jumps to $75 on Tribal lands (a stark reversal from the Trump/Pai era, where the FCC was interested in pulling back on tribal broadband subsidies). The program also doles out up to $100 for a tablet or computer.
With COVID-19 showcasing broadband's essential nature in more ways than one, it's a welcome program that should deliver some immediate relief to the estimated 42 million Americans with no broadband whatsoever, and the estimated 18.5 million households that lack broadband access specifically due to the high cost of service. There's no reason children in the wealthiest country in the history of the planet should have to huddle in the dirt outside of Taco Bell, something interim FCC boss Jessica Rosenworcel was quick to highlight:
"This is a program that will help those at risk of digital disconnection,” Acting FCC boss Jessica Rosenworcel said of the new program. “It will help those sitting in cars in parking lots just to catch a Wi-Fi signal to go online for work. It will help those lingering outside the library with a laptop just to get a wireless signal for remote learning. It will help those who worry about choosing between paying a broadband bill and paying rent or buying groceries."
That said, there could still be a few issues here if the FCC doesn't do a good job monitoring the program. Under the new broadband benefit system, the money first goes to the ISPs, who'll then be tasked with making sure the money goes to the appropriate individuals. That hasn't always worked out that well with the FCC's existing Lifeline program, which doles out a measly $9.25 monthly benefit that low-income homes have to use on phone, broadband, or wireless service. Companies from AT&T to Sprint have been repeatedly dinged for taking money for people that, well, didn't actually exist.
The other problem is that this is a temporary fix for a permanent, and much larger issue. An issue that the United States repeatedly doesn't even acknowledge, much less do anything about. It's the primary reason why US broadband is so pricey and mediocre on nearly every metric that matters: corruption and monopolization. 83 million Americans have the choice of just one ISP (aka a monopoly). Tens of millions more only have the choice between a fairly apathetic cable giant (usually Comcast), and an even more apathetic telco that (usually) refuses to meaningfully upgrade or repair its aging DSL lines.
Republican administrations are literally incapable of acknowledging this is even a problem. Democratic administrations are more likely to acknowledge this problem, but not often, and usually not clearly. It's much more politically advantageous to discuss the problem in generalities with terms like the "digital divide," as not to offend companies like AT&T that are not only holding the purse strings, but are literally tethered to our law enforcement and intelligence gathering systems and therefore largely immune from any serious culpability for 100 years of monopolistic behavior.
Again it's great that the FCC is doing something to tackle the immediate needs of desperate Americans. And the agency in many ways is prevented from doing much more due to the fact the Biden administration still hasn't appointed a new FCC boss (breaking the current 2-2 Commissioner deadlock). But even when at full power, keep an eye on those willing to acknowledge why US broadband is so expensive and aggressively mediocre, and those (including many in the press and Congress) who enjoy pretending that this problem exists in a miraculous vacuum free of any direct causation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, digital divide, fcc, funding
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
what are the odds
That they dont have, and wont hire anyone to Run around checking things out and will (as they always do) Listen to what the corps say in their reports?(again)
I dont know if the FCC is lazy, or dont have enough people to do the job.
I will be I could get Enough Geeks together to scan this whole country in < 1 year. Just need the equipment to test the lines and access. And give them a CARD that tells the services to let them do their job and Assist with anything they ASK.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's very nice.
Now, break up the data monopolies, enhance competition, require sharing of trunk lines, and eliminate bans on municipal ISPs. Otherwise, you're just giving tax dollars to AT&T, Comcast, et al...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We handed them a big pile of money last time & they screwed us.
We should hand them another big pile of money, they wouldn't ever screw us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm not sure if call anything about this "great"!
As the rest of the article points out, this initiative cannot be much more than a sticking plaster on the gaping wound that is US broadband dysfunction.
For sure, it's better than the less than nothing the previous administration was prepared to do. But only really in the same sense that some STDs are better than quaternary syphilis...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Your first two links are twice indirect by grifters!
go.skimresources (the very name openly admits it's skimming!) and vice.com BOTH try to get traffic off FCC / gov't PDFs.
Why didn't you strip off the TWO grifters? -- A new and subtle Link Tax? Just helping Techdirt's mania for surveillance capitalism?
OR did you ADD them? -- Is Techdirt trying to get income by linking in third parties to tap / track readers?
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-370324A1.pdf
It's just a one-page (barely useful) press release.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Your first two links are twice indirect by grifters!
Yes, a one page Press Release that is labeled not official.
Go to the full text document located somewhere.
[ link to this | view in thread ]