Twitch Takes Steps To Make It Even Easier To Issue DMCA Strikes Against Streamers
from the here-we-go-again dept
If you've been following along with us, the past several months haven't gone great for streaming platform Twitch. It all started with Twitch's decision to simply nuke a bunch of streamer content as a result of a massive influx of DMCA notices it received. While Twitch streamers and some in the public went ballistic over this, the company decided to try to distract the world with bright shiny objects like emojis, only to continue to let the DMCApocalypse continue even after it apologized for its lack of transparency. Then Amazon, which owns Twitch, put on Twitch's GlitchCon and spent a pretty penny on it, while streamers on the platform wondered why Amazon didn't just spend that money on the licensing needed to keep streamers out of copyright jail. Fresh into 2021, Twitch then gave creators tools to help avoid copyright strikes, which mostly consisted of convenient ways to delete a bunch of their own content while not bothering to put in a method for policing DMCA abuse.
And now it seems like a near certainty that this is all going to get way, way worse. Twitch, without notice, recently released a new tool on its site to make it even easier to issue DMCA notices on creators.
Twitch Just launched a new page to DMCA strike people faster and more easily and also possibly get them bannedhttps://t.co/YvIcyNDwhk
This is meant to strike someone that steals your videos/emotes/music/clip but possibly people reacting to your content too if you ignore fair use pic.twitter.com/gX6n7wAhYq— Saysera (@Saysera69) May 4, 2021
Now, it is worth noting that this approach is somewhat different. Because this page requires a Twitch login in order to submit a claim, this appears to be less about giving industry rightsholders a way to DMCA the hell out of Twitch and more about giving fellow Twitch creators a way to DMCA the hell out of each other. Now, nothing prevents anyone who wants to use this tool from just creating a Twitch account to do so, so there is certainly the potential for abusing this new tool.
And it seems Twitch knows that, as this tool forces anyone looking to issue a DMCA notice to affirm that they're doing so rightfully.
Users must also fill out their contact information and agree that the claim is filed in good faith. However, seemingly to prevent abuse of this feature, Twitch also states that users must state they are “authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed” under penalty of perjury.
Viewers seem a bit mixed on the new feature, with some suspecting it will result in more bans and reports than we’d see otherwise.
Of course it will. This is going to make things measurably worse on the DMCA front, with the only real question being just how bad this is going to get. And, mind you, this is all done instead of Amazon investing in the licensing Twitch creators would need in order to be relatively safe from being DMCA'd to hell.
Now, we can argue all day long whether our dumb copyright culture has ballooned into a scenario where all these licenses and all of this enforcement of copyright is really silly and counterproductive for all involved. I'm way into that discussion. But given the current reality, Amazon is simply not doing right by Twitch's most valuable asset: it's creative community.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, dmca, streaming, takedowns
Companies: twitch
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I was getting worried there for a second...
However, seemingly to prevent abuse of this feature, Twitch also states that users must state they are “authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed” under penalty of perjury.
Well now, if people are required to state that they are filing in good faith and are authorized to file the claim under penalty of perjury all concerns have been laid to rest, with that requirement I'm sure there will be nary an abuse of the system will occur and any claims that might step over the line will be nothing more than honest mistakes, just like it works with DMCA claims in general which have the same requirements.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I was getting worried there for a second...
And the lack of any captcha or human interfacing verification means it won't be abused by automated bots at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I was getting worried there for a second...
I think signing up for a Twitch-account would alleviate much of the bot-bombing of DMCA complaints, but it's not fool-proof.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I was getting worried there for a second...
Whaaat? It's fine. Nothing could possibly go wrong.
I mean. Twitch's user base is notoriously chill, and highly respectful to one another.
I mean it's not like anyone would, hypothetically, False DMCA all the streamers they don't like in order to drive them off the platform! That'd be just as absurd as, well, as users uploading footage of mass shootings to the platform.
No, I think this tool is in responsible hands!
At least so long as they keep it just to us 'real gamers'. Not those 'Just Chatting' attention seeking, hot-tub fake gamer girl THO....<Insert stream of mysoginistic abuse here>
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You'd think platforms that depend on independent creators would show some respect and support for their talent. But it's easier and cheaper to just delete and ban to keep the lawyers happy and they know there will always be more to replace the ones they ban, so they don't give a damn.
Everyone's a creator these days...for better and for worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's an amazon company, employees are replaceable so people who give them content for free stand no chance of decent treatment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A little friction....
The big issue with all these automated DMCA systems is the total lack of friction....
automatable takedowns
No penalties for bad faith...Lenz v Universal Studios
No registration requirements
If it's worth protecting, it's worth registering, and if you are gonna take it down, you really should have to state that registration number. Simple due diligence, puts criminal penalties in for fraud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"'under penalty of perjury"
I know why this is completely toothless!!
Whens the last time you heard about a cop busted for perjury?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Brooklyn. Joseph Franco.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As Twitch dies...
Will the corpse twitch?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nah, it’ll go all Resident Evil Village and calcify before breaking apart.
(And that’s probably the most merciful death in the game. 👀)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will this make clear that Amazon, like Google, is not on the independent creator's side and is more concerned with keeping the legacy media industries happy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This, the legacy media industries already "believe".
This, the legacy media industries continue to insist doesn't happen despite all appearances to the contrary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
People know, people just have to.deal with it unfortunately. Legacy media have had decades to sculpt the law in such a way even that if Google and Amazon dug their heels in and fought they're unlikely to get a clearcut decision that music in streams is fair use.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They might do now, but there were more then enough people, who insisted that Twitch is much better than Youtube in those regards, when Youtube went through the same issues.
The idea that Twitch only flew under the radar so far, was easily dismissed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Classic...
"Give me the power, but I promise not to use it."
Sure, buddy, sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]