Amazon's Idea For A Mesh Network Is Cool; Its Method Of Rolling It Out Is Not
from the c'mon-guys dept
Over the weekend there was a bit of a reasonable fuss raised after Ars Technica noted that all of the various Amazon connected devices (including Alexa, Echo, Ring, etc.) would become part of a mesh network called Amazon Sidewalk, in which the devices would be sharing a tiny tiny bit of bandwidth across the network of devices. The idea behind the mesh network is kind of cool, and there are some clear benefits to using it.
But, of course, this is Amazon we're talking about -- a giant company, and the method of rolling this out seems to have caught a ton of people by surprise: namely opting everyone into the program with a short timeline to opt-out. That seems less than ideal. Lots of privacy folks are concerned, in general, with two aspects of this: the fact that people may be suddenly sharing data with their neighbors without necessarily realizing it, and the tie-in to Amazon, which is (again) a large company that tends to collect quite a bit of data on people. To its credit, Amazon released a pretty comprehensive whitepaper exploring the privacy and security protections they've built in to Sidewalk, and my guess is that for many consumers the benefits of easier setup and better connectivity via Sidewalk will seem worth it to them.
The real issue, then, is forcing everyone into the network. Obviously, it's no surprise why this was done. A mesh network really only works if you have enough nodes on the network to make it useful. So it makes sense that Amazon would want as many of the devices to be on the network on day one as possible. However, given the company and the public scrutiny it has received of late, it seems like it should have anticipated these concerns a lot more, pushed for an opt-in setup (perhaps with incentives), rather than jumping to the "hey, we're adding this automatically" approach.
While it's possible that Amazon is betting that the concerns over this will blow over, and having so many nodes on the network will make it worthwhile to take the short-term heat, it still surprises me that the big internet companies don't take more steps to alleviate these kinds of concerns up front, including taking a more cautious approach. But, perhaps that's why I don't run a giant internet company.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alexa, amazon sidewalk, echo, iot, mesh network, opt-in, opt-out, privacy, ring, sharing
Companies: amazon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Don't most internet service providers have terms in their service contract that forbids you from sharing your internet service with neighbors and other people outside your household?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I no longer think that is a thing in the US at least.
I think nowdays its the rules after MaBell was broken up, once its inside your home you can have 500 handsets if you want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It's still a thing for comcast at least:
"use or run programs, devices, or equipment from the Premises that provide network content or any other services to anyone outside of your Premises LAN, except for your personal and non-commercial residential use"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
sorry, wrong copy/paste
"resell the Service or otherwise make available to anyone outside the Premises the ability to use the Service "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
They mainly care about you reselling, if you had an open wifi (which hey all of their boxes ship with for comcast customers) they aren't going to care or come looking to make sure.
Its mostly leagalese to cover ones behind.
I pay for the service, I can do what I'd like with the service except profit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
My Service Provider explicitly prohibits open networks in their Terms, despite their provided routers being unsecured by default.
So, there's that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I look forward to Amazon getting subpoenas from Copyright Trolls to unmask the users who accessed the mesh & the user providing it so they can be threatened with a crime for allowing their internet to be used.
One also wonders how any consumer protection things might like to fine the hell out of Amazon.
If you dunno you were opted in & the mesh manages to push you over your bandwidth cap and you incurr fees... who's fault?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How to achieve separation??
That is, I want a simple way to set up the wifi so my wife and kid has the password and everyone else goes on the open public channel.
And, let's see, it's all mesh, so my, now I have 48 neighbors using my exit node to the fiber??? Prenda, here we come again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think it gets even better than that....
"Your Honor, sir, my wi-fi connection to the internet is locked down the way a bunch of websites tell me I should do it, so it should be secure against intrusion. At least, that's what they tell me on the "techie" sites. But recently Amazon opted me into a mesh network, and I don't know how anyone could've accessed my router, and thus my internet connection, except via that new mesh thingie. That means it could've been any one of my 4 dozen neighbors, and I certainly don't have the knowledge to figure out who it might've been, but I can guarantee that it wasn't me who downloaded that porn!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not unlimited
We do not have an unlimited WiFi account, so in Canada we could sue Amazon for stealing our data. In Canada, opt-in is the only legal option for Amazon. Opt-out is illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not unlimited
Think there are reasons Sidewalk is rolling out in the US first, doubt they could get away with the "you must take action to opt-out" approach in Europe either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sleazy
This thing pissed me off. The fact that you have to opt out and they aren't asking. I hope they get sued and lose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Letting strangers use your bandwidth is all fun and games until someone uses your network to commit a crime and you get raided at midnight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like Stadia, it's a great idea in theory, but the internet infrastructure is not up to it in the US, a mess of slow connections and capped broadband whose users won't be happy to find themselves exceeding because of a service they never agreed to.
Outside of the US, opt out is something that probably won't fly for them legally in many major markets so it won't be much use there either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Good article! Amazon has long understood that the more loyal the user, the more money he gives you, and the less he looks towards competitors."
No Spammy McSpammer. The article is about the dumpster fire of privacy breaches in the making.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Limon says...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I might not mind sharing my bandwidth with my neighbors but I certainly would object to giving it away to Amazon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How it works
[ link to this | view in chronology ]