Content Moderation Case Studies: Coca Cola Realizes Custom Bottle Labels Involve Moderation Issues (2021)
from the content-moderation-is-everywhere dept
Summary: Content moderation questions can come from all sorts of unexpected places — including custom soda bottle labels. Over the years, Coca Cola has experimented with a variety of different promotional efforts regarding more customized cans and bottles, and not without controversy. Back in 2013, as part of its “Share a Coke” campaign, the company offered bottles with common first names on the labels, which angered some who felt left out. In Israel, for example, people noticed that Arabic names were left off the list, although Coca Cola’s Swedish operation said that this decision was made after the local Muslim community asked not to have their names included.
This controversy was only the preamble to a bigger one in the summer of 2021, when Coca Cola began its latest version of the “Share a Coke” effort — this time allowing anyone to create a completely custom label up to 36 characters long. Opening up custom labels immediately raised content moderation questions.
Some people quickly noticed some surprising terms and phrases that were blocked (such as “Black Lives Matter”) while others that were surprisingly not blocked (like “Nazis”).
As CNN reporter Alexis Benveniste noted, it was easy to get offensive terms through the blocks (often with a few tweaks), and there were some eye-opening contrasts:
For example, "Black Lives Matter," is blocked. But "White Lives Matter" isn't. Coke included a special rainbow label for pride month, but you can't write "Gay Pride" on the bottle. However, you can write "I hate gays." "Hitler" and "Nazi" are banned, but users can customize bottles with the phrases, "I am Hitler" or "I am a Nazi." — Alexis Benveniste
The fact that “I am Hitler” was allowed while “Hitler” by itself was not suggests that Coca Cola was using a filter that included blocking entire phrases, rather than just a list of words (enabling simple adjustments to get through — which might explain why “Nazi” is blocked but “Nazis” apparently was not).
Coca Cola insisted that the automated blocks in its web tool were not the only system of review, just the first filter before being passed on to production, and that “actual bottles are not made with words that are inconsistent with the program's intent.”
Company Considerations:
- What kinds of tools, systems, staff, and processes should be put in place to deal with potential “abuse” of a custom labels program?
- How should the “intent” of the program be communicated to consumers who want their own bottles, but may ask for problematic content on the labels?
- How could the website more clearly inform consumers that the final text will still be reviewed by staff before production, so as not to let the public assume that if a word or phrase was not rejected in the web form, it will be printed?
Issue Considerations:
- Customization systems are often put in place because they are considered fun and engaging, and a way for consumers to connect with a brand. How should companies weigh such benefits against the likelihood of abuse?
- How should companies wishing to use these types of customization options consider the potential consumer backlash to what those users believe is both over-moderation and under-moderation?
- As it becomes easier to mass produce customized products, how should companies set up campaigns to minimize possible abuses, while balancing the backlash if they disallow certain words or phrases that are important to certain groups?
Resolution: Coca Cola admitted to CNN that the process is constantly being adjusted. “We're continuously refining and improving our Share A Coke personalization tool to ensure it is used only for its intended purpose." The company also noted that it added language to the preview screen to say that “proposed language may require further review.” The company did not explain why terms like “Black Lives Matter” were not approved.
Originally posted to the Trust & Safety Foundation website.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: content moderation, custom content, customization, filter lists, soda bottles
Companies: coca cola
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Now with 100% more Section 230
Hey Koby, I'll buy you a coke if you turn in your homework a day early.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Now with 100% more Section 230
Disclosure: Not Koby, but I'll give it a whirl...
What's wrong with this? Coke is just exercising it's property rights. Why should they allow just any message to be on their labels? Coke owns their labels.
If you want to print a message that Coke doesn't like, open your own soda bottling company, create a recipe that is loved worldwide, establish your own shipping partners, and send out your own vending machines. Simple. Quit demanding that third parties exist in the same world with a message that they hate.
/s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reminds me of the time Mountain Dew held an online contest in 2012 named "Dub the Dew".
It left the naming open for Internet submission and polling. Unmoderated of course.
4chan's /b/ found out.
I'm sure you can imagine the winners.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Well, obviously 4chan won... moot is God.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Well, 4chan did have all top 10 winning names. The marketing team had the final say on what their drinks actually got named so classy names such as "Diabeetus" didn't get their own Mountain Dew flavor sadly!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Hitler did nothing wrong.
Gushing Grannies.
See also: Know your Meme - Dub the Dew
I don't want moderation so find your own damn links.
4chan did it, Bronies did it, 4chan drove the Bronies out of the top 10, then the actual hacking of the site adding a rickroll & 911 conspiracy theories.
Anyone who puts one of these things forward as a marketing idea needs to be fired.
The internet will always win, you aren't smarter than the last 7 idiots who did this same thing & ended up shutting it down after Hitler came to town.
The execs who approved this going forward should have to return any bonuses they earned because this was stupid & all they needed to do was ask a 14 yr old to look for any flaws.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What about word PEPSI?
And what about foreign words? I was able to get POCHVA (sheath/vagina) printed on my can of Coke. :-D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Now with 100% more Section 230
Or, you know, just print a label at home and glue it to your bottle.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about word PEPSI?
It blocks trademarks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Now with 100% more Section 230
Surely pasting your own label on Coke's distinctive bottle would lead to some massive trademark suit. You can't really think peasants have the right to say things!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: What about word PEPSI?
How well? A plumber might order up a bottle of PIPES and get the entire Coca-Cola company sued for trademark dilution.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Over 50 trademarks on Black Lives Matter, fighting to the death
https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/brand-management/controlling-black-lives-matter-the-battle-trad emark-movement
I think we see now why "Black Lives Matter" is banned. Maybe Techdirt can file a trademark on White Lives Matter to see how long the site takes to block it? (I don't think it actually has to stand up in court ... trademarks are all about the fight; there is no truth)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about word PEPSI?
Scroll the bottle post linked.
“Share a Coke with Pepsi”
Lol.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about word PEPSI?
Scroll the bottle post linked.
“Share a Coke with Pepsi”
Lol.
[ link to this | view in thread ]