LAPD Sees Your Reform Efforts, Raises You $20 Million In Bullets, Snacks, And Surveillance
from the reading-cards-like-they're-reading-a-room dept
The Los Angeles Police Department is reform-resistant. This isn't the same as reform-proof, but more separates "resistant" from "proof" in this case than the misleading labels promising varying degrees of water resistance placed on watches and cellphones.
The LAPD has endured decades of bad press with barely an uptick in performance or community orientation. The LAPD is best known for beating minorities until riots happen. With a wave of police reform efforts sweeping the nation -- many of them looking to spend less on police violence and more on things that actually help the community -- the LAPD has issued a tone-deaf demand for more money to spend on things residents are complaining about.
The LAPD has filed a massive proposal requesting more than $18 million in budget increases in order to pay for surveillance programs, bullets, and … snacks.
The Stop LAPD Spying Coalition released a letter on Monday blasting the 183-page report. The proposal requests nearly $18.44 million to support many of the things that the community has spent recent years protesting. The letter, which was co-signed by Black Lives Matter Los Angeles and the National Lawyers Guild of Los Angeles, describes the LAPD’s list of demands as a “disgusting insult to hundreds of thousands of people who took the streets last summer."
What else in the LAPD's "more please" proposal? $2 million to spend on social media monitoring, something it's asking for right after it was reported LAPD officers are demanding social media information from people they've accosted or otherwise harassed into a "consensual" conversation. That's in addition to $450,000 in licenses for social media monitoring software to better make use of this new data officers are collecting while out in the proverbial field.
The letter [PDF] from the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition doesn't pull any punches. It compiles a long list of the stupid, counterproductive demands the department is making -- ones not connected in any way to improving relations with the communities they serve.
In true Newspeak, here's the fucking news: the LAPD wants more money to be thrown at its desire to throw bullets at people.
Over $12 million for new trainings in addition to $461,850 in bullets at $17 per round to shoot away at trainings and $492,850 in “overtime funds to address field jail training” for mass arrests
This won't make the LAPD more efficient killers. And it won't make them better guardians of people's rights, starting with the right to protest. What it will do is encourage pulling the trigger until clips run dry and mass processing of people arrested for (the most part) expressing their displeasure with their current police force.
And who wouldn't applaud the blending of police officers and the military like so much corn and gasoline?
$348,130 for a new staff officer whose full-time role will be to permanently coordinate with “military” forces and facilitate their local deployment
And perhaps the most "police" thing of all, the guys are getting kind of hungry:
$100,000 for snacks that “personnel can grab quickly and take with them,” apparently enabled through new “emergency use credit cards”
Love to see "snacks" and "emergency" linked together in a sentence asking for $100,000. It sounds like an insulin request but it's actually about propping up the Frito-Lay Economy.
Once you get past all the "screw your rights and please catch bullets" parts of the LAPD's proposal, you get to the part where the LAPD claims to be saving money by spending money… or something.
Chief Moore’s cover memo raises many questions about the cost of these proposals. As he notes, LAPD previously claimed these same reforms required over $66 million. He writes that this larger figure “counted all costs – even if the resources were currently available” (p. 5) which presumably means LAPD double-counted the cost of resources that it already possessed. But one sentence later, Chief Moore claims the $18.44 million estimate amounts to a $48 million “reduction in cost projection.” It is unclear whether the $18.44 million is in fact a “reduction” or simply accurate accounting. But LAPD’s comfort switching numbers so large without real explanation speaks to how little financial scrutiny they expect from you. Additionally, it is unclear how much of the $18.44 million are yearly versus one-time costs.
Good luck sussing that out, whether you're an activist group or city oversight. The LAPD is used to asking questions, not answering them. A sea change in public receptiveness to cops being assholes doesn't appear to have had any effect on LAPD (and I use this term super-loosely) leadership. Cop business will proceed as usual, recent public antipathy notwithstanding.
So, what else is new? Nothing. But it needs more money. The LAPD says its cool with alleged transparency efforts like body cams, but only if it gets to keep harvesting data from tons of automatic plate readers and its take on stop-and-frisk, which now apparently involves requests for social media info.
And it appears the city did what it could to ensure the LAPD could have its millions without too much interference from the hoi polloi.
The proposals were made public in an 183-page document sent late in the afternoon on Friday, September 24, and the proposals will be voted on the morning of Tuesday, September 28. This is just over one business day to digest and respond to the 183-page proposals, and even that time period is only for people who happen to have received the proposal immediately because they subscribe to this board’s agenda by email. The public’s only opportunity to comment would be if they received that online agenda and then responded either by emails sent before 5 p.m. on Monday, September 27, or by becoming one of the dozen or so individuals who happen to secure a brief public comment slot during this board’s 45-minute public comment period, before the agenda item is even introduced.
Only in the government can you give the finger to your employers (taxpayers) and end up better off during FYWhatever. The LAPD likely knows what the public is asking of it. But it also knows that not caring what they think will at least give it the same budget it had in 2020 and do little to curb its surveillance excesses. At some point, the LAPD's city oversight will have to actually do its job. Until then, it's just signing off on the same law enforcement bullshit that has kept the city in constant turmoil since the Watts riots nearly five decades ago.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: budget, lapd, police reform, reform, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Like cops need more snacks. A good number of them couldn't run 10 steps chasing a perp before dropping over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's why they want the bullets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The really good $17 ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The only $17 bullet I could google ... had 10 different vibration modes. And... um... it's not something you put into a .. gun...
If the LAPD burns through one of those per round, well... to quote "The Quiet Man" : Homeric!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The public would object so the public isn't asked
Yeah the only reason to dump a budget proposal that sizable literally days before it's voted on is to avoid public scrutiny and pushback. They know the public wouldn't agree with the money they are asking for(and given what's in it it's not hard to see why) and so are trying to cut the public out of the process entirely so they can rush it through.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The public would object so the public isn't asked
Every parent knows this ruse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$17 a round? What the hell are they shooting? 20mm canons? Oh, wait. I think I know why. I'm sure some of their retired buddies are ammo dealers so they're letting them get away with 1000%+ markups. I'm sure I could find them ammo at less than $2/rd even for the most expensive sniper cartridges. Waste, fraud, abuse, repeat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hopefully the latter, I've got some lunar land to sell them
No doubt whatsoever at those prices a friend/family member is planned to be awarded a very 'generous' sales contract to supply ammo, it's either that or the LAPD is the worst sales negotiator in existence and someone managed to pull an amazing con on them by convincing them that of course bullets cost $17 a round.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A lot of these departments are using military surplus toys, so I don't think it's surprising if they also inherited the "creative" billing structures the help inflate the military budget.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I wonder how long it'll take for police departments to begin directly funneling former military toys they never needed to far right groups like the oath keepers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As I understand it there's a lot of military and police membership in the Oath Keepers (or at least, "former" members) so i wouldn't be surprised if they're not already getting them through various sources. On Jan 6th, Oath Keepers had organised caches of weapons to be available nearby, it wouldn't be shocking if they were military grade hardware.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's strange, I'm sure I remember a comment from the recent article covering the Oath Keepers asking what the big deal with law enforcement joining them was since they were just super-duper interested in following the constitution and protecting the country from tyranny, 'weapon caches near a failed insurrection' sure doesn't seem like it would fit either of those but since the AC couldn't have been wrong I'm not sure what to think now...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Have you not noticed that those who would protect you from tyranny usually have extreme tyrannic tendencies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Some of those that work forces...."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Have you not noticed that those who would protect you from tyranny usually have extreme tyrannic tendencies."
Oh, indeed. The main issue with organizations like the Oath Keepers and similar terrorist groups is that they're always interested in using force of arms to "rescue" you from "Tyrants" the vast majority elected and are pretty happy with. Usually in ways which will favor some local equivalent of Dear Leader.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Rubber bullets, teargas rounds, and "specialty" (novelty) 12 gauge rounds are in that price point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]