Appeals Court Denies Immunity To Bored Cop Who Decided To Turn A Natural Death Into A Murder

from the nothing-more-dangerous-than-someone-with-more-power-than-usefulness dept

What happens when you add a bored cop to a cold case? Bad things. Very bad things. That's the moral of the story conveyed by this Seventh Circuit Appeals Court decision [PDF].

Actually, calling it a decision is overstating the conclusions. Apparently, the plaintiff, the defendants, and the lower court all made matters far more confusing than they needed to be, leaving the Appeals Court with a muddied record, unclear assertions from all parties, and open questions as to whether qualified immunity on Fourth Amendment claims had actually been denied.

But the path to the procedural shitshow is a full-blown horror show. An unfortunate death, a full autopsy, no sign of foul play, and yet some officer put out to pasture by his department decided he was the second coming of Columbo and mounted a concerted attempt to ruin a person's life.

Curt Lovelace's wife, Cory, died in her bed one morning while Curt was getting their children ready for school. Almost any death in a person's home will trigger an investigation. This tragedy was no exception.

Because Cory was relatively young when she died, the City of Quincy police, along with several Adams County officials, conducted a thorough investigation of her demise. All the physical evidence pointed toward a natural cause of death. It turned out that Cory was severely alcoholic, bulimic, and had been sick with flu-like symptoms for several days before she died. An autopsy revealed that Cory had been suffering from “marked steatosis of the liver.” Severe steatosis—significant fat throughout the liver—can cause the liver to become inflamed and riddled with scar tissue; at that point the person has cirrhosis of the liver, which can lead to liver failure and death. This evidence could not establish a single, indisputable cause of death, but it was more than enough to suggest an array of plausible natural explanations—chronic alcoholism, when combined with other medical conditions, can itself be fatal. Moreover, Cory’s body bore no signs of violent trauma. She had a small patch of redness under her nose, but it was more consistent with a cold or acne than with violence. And she had a small cut inside her mouth, but because it was already healing when Cory died, it was determined to have predated her death.

Curt's accounting of the events was corroborated by his children.

Investigators also verified Curt’s account of the morning in question by comparing his story to the physical evidence indicating time of death. Curt recounted that Cory was supposed to take their three school-aged children to school that day, as Curt was scheduled to teach a class at a local university. But Cory was still unwell when she woke up. They decided that Curt would cancel his class and take their children to school instead. At one point Cory came downstairs to help get the children ready, but she was feeling very weak, and so Curt helped her back upstairs and into bed. Curt then took the children to school at around 8:15 am. He was back at the house by 8:35 am, but he did not go upstairs until around 9 am, when he discovered that Cory had died. The police interviewed Curt’s three oldest children; all three corroborated this timeline. In particular, all three confirmed that they had seen their mother alive and moving about on the morning in question.

The autopsy, as noted above, saw no evidence of foul play. There was a question raised about the level of rigor mortis observed by the doctor performing the autopsy, but responders to the scene saw nothing out of the ordinary, noting the body was still warm, pliable, and displaying a minimum amount of lividity. An EMS attendant was able to raise Cory's arms to a position above her heart so he could attempt to revive her. Her arms remained in the position the EMS tech had moved them to as rigor mortis set in. The investigation was closed shortly thereafter with law enforcement concluding this was a tragic death, not a homicide.

For most of a decade, the case remained closed. But then a cop with too much time on his hands turned his idle hands into the devil's cold case unit.

There the story should have ended. But seven years later, Detective Gibson set in motion a second act. Formerly one of the Quincy police department’s canine officers, Gibson had been reassigned to elder services after his dog retired. But the new role did not keep him busy, it seems, and so to pass the time he made a habit of reviewing files from old cases. One photo of Cory’s body in the Lovelace file caught Gibson’s attention in November 2013. In it, her arms were raised in what appeared to Gibson to be an unnatural position. He concluded that Curt had suffocated Cory with a pillow the evening before her death was reported, that rigor had set in overnight, and that her arms had stayed put when the pillow was removed sometime the next morning. This was, as we already have noted, wild speculation; Gibson was simply looking at photos that were taken after [the EMS tech had] repositioned Cory’s arms.

Unfortunately, the Quincy PD did not tell the detective to get back to his real work and stop trying to turn closed investigations into ongoing investigations. Detective Gibson managed to rope in a coroner who had spent a few minutes at the home moving Cory's body. Coroner Keller -- years after the fact and prompted by Detective Gibson's enthusiasm for refusing to leave the past unmolested -- made a number of claims supportive of the detective's murder theory.

[Keller] claimed, apparently without notes or other corroboration, to recall that Cory’s body had been in full, not partial, rigor, and that the room had smelled bad, as if her body had already begun to decompose. Those claims, if true, would have supported Gibson’s alternate timeline and contradicted Curt’s account. But no other eyewitness, including several who had spent far more time on the scene than Keller, had reported a similar degree of rigor or mentioned any strong odor. Moreover, Keller made no effort to explain how someone could have moved Cory’s arms if Keller was correct.

Detective Gibson and his coroner co-conspiracist discarded everything that didn't agree with the "Curt killed Cory" theory. They began shopping this narrative around to other medical examiners, hoping to obtain an autopsy report that turned the grieving husband into his wife's murderer.

They started in early January 2014 with Dr. Derrick Pounder. But after hearing Gibson’s theory, Dr. Pounder explained in an email that “rigor is not a reliable method of estimating time of death.” And he advised Gibson that Cory could have spoken to her children that morning, just as Curt claimed, and then been dead with her arms at some stage of rigor 90 minutes later. Gibson did not write up a report memorializing Dr. Pounder’s conclusions.

In late January, Gibson and Keller consulted Dr. Scott Denton. Like the original investigators, Dr. Denton quickly dismissed the redness above the lip and small cut in the mouth as irrelevant. And he, too, homed in on the liver as the most likely cause of death. In February, Gibson met with Dr. Denton in person, but again he made no record of Dr. Denton’s opinions. Nor did Dr. Denton himself submit any report at the time.

They also went back to the person who had performed the original autopsy and tried to get her to change her mind about the cause of death. This effort failed. So did their fourth attempt to secure a medical report in their favor from Dr. Shaku Teas. Teas not only agreed with the other medical experts the pair had approached, but was so troubled by Detective Gibson's actions, she testified on behalf of Curt Lovelace during his trial.

Fifth time was the charm.

Gibson and Keller’s fifth and final attempt to secure a favorable expert opinion took place in April and May, when they presented the case to Dr. Jane Turner. That time, they took a more aggressive approach. Rather than providing Dr. Turner with an accurate and complete picture of the evidence and allowing her to draw her own conclusions, they provided her with selected background “facts.” They told Dr. Turner that Cory was in full rigor before the paramedics arrived (not mentioning that this was at least disputed), told her about the minor injuries to Cory’s lip and mouth but omitted any mention of the benign explanations for those injuries, and falsely suggested that another expert—Dr. Denton—had already all but confirmed the suffocation theory. Most damningly, they told Dr. Turner about the position of Cory’s arms, but not that the arms had been repositioned by the paramedics. Dr. Turner, making it clear that her conclusions rested solely on the information that had been presented to her, prepared a report supporting the suffocation hypothesis.

Using this, Detective Gibson had Curt Lovelace arrested. Lovelace was incarcerated for 21 months because he was unable to make bail. His first trial ended with a mistrial because of a hung jury. Prosecutors went after Lovelace again, but he was more prepared for the second trial. Documents obtained through FOIA requests uncovered a lot of Detective Gibson's attempts to build a murder case out of a previously undisputed natural death. This time around, a jury acquitted Lovelace after two hours of deliberation.

The lawsuit followed. Unfortunately for Curt Lovelace, he might not be able to hold Detective Gibson and his coroner buddy liable for wrecking his life. There are questions about whether or not Fourth Amendment claims were preserved for appeal. There are also questions as to whether the lower court has even made a decision on the qualified immunity the defendants are seeking. A lot of this mess will return to the lower court to get sorted out, which means there's still a chance the detective and the coroner will be able to utilize qualified immunity to have the case tossed.

There's a credible Fourteenth Amendment claim that survives completely intact, though. This appears to have been argued somewhat poorly at the lower level, but the Appeals Court says there are enough facts in dispute that the lower court should not have awarded qualified immunity on that count. That's reversed, which means both claims will hopefully be handed over to a jury to sort out just how badly these government employees fucked over Curt Lovelace and how much it should cost them. But that also means any closure -- much less compensation -- is still probably years away for the man one cop decided might be a murderer.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: 7th circuit, bored cop, police, qualified immunity


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Pixelation, 5 Jan 2022 @ 9:35pm

    Well...

    Do we hang him or learn to live with assholes like this? It seems like every cold case that gets solved now needs an extra level of scrutiny and an extra level of punishment for crooked cops.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      anon, 6 Jan 2022 @ 3:16am

      Re: Well...

      Based on the number of should-never-have-been-hired law enforcement officers, I think that every case should be reviewed, the question is: how do we know that the reviewing party isn't just another corrupt/dirty/incompetent cop?

      Remember that this is just a single case. What about every other case that this officer worked? Also, there is precedence for dismissing every case touched by corrupt officers.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 6 Jan 2022 @ 12:35pm

        Re: Re: Well...

        Indeed, prosecutors actually took the case, which is a thing that did not have to happen at all. Sherlock's department could have stepped in at any point as well.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 5 Jan 2022 @ 10:17pm

    Well on the upside I'm guessing any busts this cop ever made will end up being reviewed.
    He withheld the truth from the coroner he shopped his story to, so obviously not the first time facts haven't mattered to him.

    The coroner needs to be slapped simply for being willing to issue a finding based on word of mouth instead of the case file itself, the whole well if they way to told it to me means your right isn't a fig leaf to hide behind.
    You issued a finding in your professional role based solely on what a 3rd party told you that put a man in jail on charges not supported by ANY actual evidence, expect your cases to be reviewed as well.
    Your finding was taken as fact and you fully admitted it was based only on what was told to you so ummm enjoy the civil suit.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 6 Jan 2022 @ 12:37pm

      Re:

      How they gat a warrant with what coroner 5 said is the real issue, i think. But certainly she should have not offered a legal opinion at all, with the qualifiers she gave, or not.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        That Anonymous Coward (profile), 7 Jan 2022 @ 6:21pm

        Re: Re:

        Well there were not notes or mention of coroners 1-4 had to say because it didn't fit the imagined narrative.

        I have a feeling that much of what she said was filtered when explained to the DA to get the charges going.

        This is a complete shitshow but has anyone stopped and asked the obvious question being ignored in this??

        How often do cops go shopping for those that only bolster the narrative they decided is correct, how often do they withhold evidence to get a finding... how many people are in prison right now for no reason other than a cop decided they HAD to be guilty & ignored all other evidence?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Wyrm (profile), 5 Jan 2022 @ 10:33pm

    Dr. Turner, making it clear that her conclusions rested solely on the information that had been presented to her, prepared a report supporting the suffocation hypothesis.

    That's the worst part here.
    Dr Turner should have just given verbal agreement that the theory is plausible given the facts she's been given... then stopped here. Actually writing an actual report without actually seeing the proper reports and initial autopsy is taking a step into fabricating evidence (even unwillingly). She green-lit a re-trial, years after the facts without having seen the body or read the original documents, purely based on a stubborn bored cop's story. No expert should be willing to do so, which means her credibility is now tainted.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Stephen T. Stone (profile), 6 Jan 2022 @ 4:17am

    Even though I know the answer, I have to wonder aloud: How the hell do courts not see the obvious violations of civil rights involved with the cops arresting and jailing someone for crimes they didn’t commit based on one or two bits of (effectively) fabricated evidence?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    me, 6 Jan 2022 @ 5:25am

    He got as far as he did by deliberately misrepresenting facts

    Minimally.... he should be fire without pension or hope of rehire anywhere, and found guilty of perjury and witness tampering.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    k, 6 Jan 2022 @ 6:54am

    21 months for this? Horrific :-(

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ed (profile), 6 Jan 2022 @ 9:09am

    ACAB

    Gibson and Keller should hang for this, they've lied, cheated, and stolen the life of an innocent man. So typical for "police".

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.