Ross Ulbricht's Lawyers Were Told About Corrupt Investigators, But Barred From Using That During His Trial

from the hello-due-process-problems dept

We already wrote about Monday's unsealed criminal complaint against two government agents who were key players in investigating Silk Road -- but who used that position to steal Bitcoins and a lot of other questionable behavior. Now it comes out that the Justice Department revealed the existence of this investigation to Ross Ulbricht's lawyers five weeks before Ulbricht's trial -- but then blocked Ulbricht's legal team from using that information, even as the Justice Department continued to rely on evidence from both of the apparently corrupt federal agents. Ulbricht's lawyer, Joshua Dratel, has put out a statement pointing out some of the problems here:

In addition to keeping any information about the investigation from the defense for nearly nine months, then revealing it only five weeks prior to trial, and then moving to keep sealed and secret the general underlying information so that Mr. Ulbricht could not use it in his defense at trial, and then stymying the defense at every turn during trial when the defense tried to introduce favorable evidence, the government had also refused to agree to the defense’s request to adjourn the trial until after the indictment was returned and made public – a modest adjournment of a couple of months, since it was apparent that the investigation was nearing a conclusion.

Throughout Mr. Ulbricht’s trial the government repeatedly used the secret nature of the grand jury investigation as an excuse to preclude valuable defense evidence that was not only produced in discovery, independent of the investigation of Mr. Force, but also which was only at best tenuously related to that investigation. In that manner the government deprived the jury of essential facts, and Mr. Ulbricht of due process. In addition, the government failed to disclose previously much of what is in the Complaint, including that two federal law enforcement agents involved in the Silk Road investigation were corrupt. It is clear from this Complaint that fundamentally the government’s investigation of Mr. Ulbricht lacked any integrity, and was wholly and fatally compromised from the inside.

Dratel suggests that the corrupt behavior of Force and Bridges raises questions about nearly all aspects of the Ulbricht case, especially since they have already showed that they abused their access to the Silk Road platform in a way that could change the site and account information.

Additional information shows that Force not only acted as "Chief Compliance Officer" for CoinMKT while still employed as a DEA agent (and abusing his ability to use government databases for the job), but as a report from Sarah Jeong at Forbes shows, he also reached out to Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles: And then even asked about working with Mt. Gox as well, with this bizarre "American government and economy will crash in the next five years" statement: Just about a month later, when Bridges was the affiant on helping the government seize millions of dollars from Mt. Gox (just days after withdrawing the money he himself allegedly stole from Silk Road), Force emailed Karpeles again, saying "told you should have partnered with me!" And that doesn't even get into the fact that the whole "murder plot" that was such a headline grabber in the original criminal complaint only happened after Bridges apparently took the money and Ulbricht reached out to Force to get him to put out a hit on the guy he thought had stolen the money (who had actually been cooperating with the government, which allowed Bridges to get the info to steal the money in the first place).

As we noted in our earlier piece, the criminal complaint shows that Force himself abused his power as a DEA agent to fake a subpoena against Venmo trying to get his own account unfrozen -- and it appears that when that didn't work, Force tried to further abuse his power to seize Venmo's bank account in response. A snippet from an email he sent to a colleague:

Venmo has since registered with FinCEN, but I want to know if they have state money license remitting licenses in California and New York. Can you check? If not, I want to seize their bank accounts (need to identify them) a la BRIDGES and [M.M.’s] seizure warrants for Mt. Gox.

And here's the big question: were Bridges and Force really just two "bad apples" in the investigation? Or could it have gone much deeper? As Jeong notes in her report:

During the trial, the defense kept trying to introduce the character of “mr. wonderful,” a Baltimore DHS agent who coerced a Silk Road moderator into giving her account over to law enforcement. Although many of Force’s aliases are listed in the criminal complaint against him, none of them are “mr. wonderful.” (In any case, Force is a DEA agent, and “mr. wonderful” is DHS). Who is mr. wonderful? What exactly did he do?

In other words, whether or not you believe that Ulbricht was DPR, the investigation and trial against him was a complete and utter mess, and these new charges raise an awful lot of questions about the fairness of that trial.

Filed Under: bitcoin, carl force, dea, doj, joshua dratel, mark karpeles, ross ulbricht, secret service, shaun bridges, silk road
Companies: silk road

Ross Ulbricht's Lawyers Claim That Mt. Gox CEO Was The Real Dread Pirate Roberts

from the behind-this-curtain... dept

It's pretty rare that a trial has a real "surprise" unveiling or twist. It happens all the time in TV and movie courtrooms, but in real courtrooms... not so much. Most people know the basics. Someone may admit something surprising, or testimony can go awry, but the "big dramatic reveal" isn't so common. Yet in the trial of Ross Ulbricht, concerning whether he was or wasn't the "Dread Pirate Roberts" behind the Silk Road hidden market, things are already off to quite a start. We'd already mentioned his "some other dude did it" defense (while he admits that he did create the site, he argues he handed it over to someone else long before that). However, during yesterday's testimony Ulbricht's lawyer revealed who they believed the "other" Dread Pirate Roberts really was: Apparently they believe it was Bitcoin pariah and Mt. Gox CEO, Mark Karpeles.

If you don't follow the Bitcoin space, you might not recognize the name. However, in the Bitcoin space, Karpeles is widely despised. For a long time, Mt. Gox was the Bitcoin exchange for people who wanted to buy or sell Bitcoin. However it mysteriously shut down over a year ago under questionable circumstances -- with Karpeles arguing that Mt. Gox had all its Bitcoins stolen, while many people claimed that the evidence didn't suggest that at all, and that there may have been a lot of other fraud going on. In short, if you wanted to pick someone who is widely hated among Bitcoin supporters, Karpeles is the perfect "villain." And Ulbricht's lawyers make the case that the Homeland Security Investigator who infiltrated Silk Road and helped nab Ulbricht, Jared DerYeghiayan, originally suspected Karpeles:

"I have a wealth of evidence to prove that [Karpeles] is Dread Pirate Roberts," the agent wrote at the time.

Karpeles, who is from France, ran what was once the world's largest Bitcoin exchange, Mt. Gox, which was based in Tokyo. DerYeghiayan's theory was that Karpeles wanted to create a market that used Bitcoin in order to keep the price of the semi-anonymous cryptocurrency robust, which he believed was probable cause for Karpeles's arrest. (Mt. Gox went bankrupt in early 2014.)

"[Silk Road] would be a device for leveraging the value of Bitcoin, and if he could create a site independent of Bitcoin, you could control the value of Bitcoin," Dratel said, reading from DerYeghiayan's emails.

DerYeghiayan believed his evidence was so strong that he even drafted a search warrant for Karpeles's email in May of 2013.

Later, prosecutors objected to this effort, but the judge, Katherine Forrest, correctly pointed out that the idea was to "raise reasonable doubt that the defendant is the real DPR."

Karpeles, not surprisingly, is denying that he is DPR. According to Ars Technica:

"This is probably going to be disappointing for you, but I am not Dread Pirate Roberts," Karpeles told Ars via e-mail. "The investigation reached that conclusion already—this is why I am not the one sitting during the Silk Road trial, and I can only feel defense attorney Joshua Dratel trying everything he can to point the attention away from his client."

He also posted this to Twitter: During the trial, the prosecution did also reveal that other investigators, in Baltimore, had seized a site that was run by Karpeles. The Vice article doesn't name that site, but Sarah Jeong points out that it was SilkRoadMarket.org. In his denial to Ars Technica, Karpeles discusses that domain:

"I have nothing to do with Silk Road and do not condone what has been happening there," Karpeles continued. "I believe Bitcoin (and its underlying technology) is not meant to help people evade the law, but to improve everyone's way of life by offering never thought before possibilities. As for the silkroadmarket.org domain, it was registered by a KalyHost.com customer and paid in Bitcoins (KalyHost is a service of Tibanne that has been up since 2009)."

Tibanne was Karpeles' company that supposedly purchased Mt. Gox. However, his argument here seems a bit questionable, as the Feds have released the seizure warrant showing that Karepeles was directly involved. As another article on Ars Technica summarizes:

Homeland Security used a confidential informant, based in Maryland, to conduct the investigation. The informant simply created accounts with Dwolla and Mt. Gox, bought bitcoins, and then changed them back into dollars. Tracing that money, HSI was able to see that the money passed through a Wells Fargo account, number 7657841313, which was created by a single authorized signer: Mark Karpeles, the president and CEO of Mt. Gox. The Dwolla account shows transfers to Dwolla going back to at least December 2011, according to the warrant.

That account was registered to Mutum Sigillum LLC, which is the company that supposedly registered the silkroadmarket.org domain. And the reason Karpeles got in trouble: Mutum Sigillum, when it opened the account, denied that it was in the money services business, even though it clearly was. All of this is a bit of a mess. Either way, the point here isn't to necessarily prove that Karpeles absolutely was DPR, but rather to show reasonable doubt to get Ulbricht off the hook. While a fascinating turn of events all around, this still seems like an uphill battle for Ulbricht's lawyers.

Filed Under: dread pirate roberts, mark karpeles, reasonable doubt, ross ulbricht, silk road
Companies: kalyhost, mt. gox, mutum sigillum, silk road, tibanne