It'a lile that moron claiming the Washington Post is unreliable because the Reich wing media makes baseless false accusations against it like "Russiagate was a hoax."
"Bart" thought that Lead Stories called BMJ's peer-reviewed medical journal a "news blog." (When what actually happened was LS accuratly used that label to refer to The BMJ's "thebmj" news blog on which the article appeared.)
I think that shows the ignorance and illiteracy of this commenter.
Least insightful comment of the week goes to "Trying to overthrow the foundation of the US government with violence and fraud isn't trying to overthrow the foundation of the US government with violence and fraud!"
At least the "insightful" and "funny" tags inspire more of us to make valuable comments that earn them than there are bobmails, lostinlodoses, ToiletPapers, and Kobys that aim in the opposite direction.
His arguments have exclusively been that he's been hopelessly programmed by extremist-right disinformation propaganda, and his replies serve as a reminder he's also illiterate.
On the post: Josh Hawley Was The Democrats' Partner In Trying To Regulate Big Tech; Then The Public Realized He Was A Fascist
Re: With Friends Like This...
America's friend (The First Amendment / Section 230) is the enemy of America's enemy (Josh Hawley).
On the post: Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment
Here's some of what actually happened at the capitol during the Jan 6 terrorist attack, courtesy of the Proud Boys' comrades-in-arms the Oathkeepers:
https://i.imgur.com/3vR2kKV.png
https://i.imgur.com/6xppwMP.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/LDU MBCk. jpg
Contrast this evidence with the false narratives you see above.
On the post: [UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Re: Re: Re:
It'a lile that moron claiming the Washington Post is unreliable because the Reich wing media makes baseless false accusations against it like "Russiagate was a hoax."
On the post: Tenth Circuit Appeals Court Says Fourth And Sixth Amendment Rights Are Meaningless When National Security Is On The Line
Here's some of what actually happened at the capitol during the Jan 6 terrorist attack:
https://i.imgur.com/3vR2kKV.png
https://i.imgur.com/6xppwMP.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/LDUMBCk. jpg
Contrast this evidence with the false narratives you see above.
On the post: [UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Re: Re:
So, as expected, you're just lying.
On the post: [UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Re: Re:
[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
On the post: [UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Notice how Techdirt is quick to post a visible correction on the rare occasion that new facts come to light that invalidate its reporting.
On the post: Josh Hawley Was The Democrats' Partner In Trying To Regulate Big Tech; Then The Public Realized He Was A Fascist
Re: Re: Why Techbribe why?
Remember that what Jhon wants is the freedom to defraud courts into punishing people who say true things.
On the post: Josh Hawley Was The Democrats' Partner In Trying To Regulate Big Tech; Then The Public Realized He Was A Fascist
Re: Why Techbribe why?
[Hallucinates facts bearing not the slightest resemblance to anything in reality]
On the post: Big Tech 'Antitrust Reform' Agenda Sags, Revealing Mostly Empty Rhetoric
Re: Re: Re:
[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
On the post: Please Join Techdirt In Celebrating 'National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day!'
This will trigger fascist/bigot defender btr1071.
On the post: Twitter Asks Court To Reconsider Order To Unmask Anonymous Critic Of A Billionaire Over Questionable Copyright Claims
Re: some variation on the name Brenda Diaz.
Do you smell toast?
On the post: Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process
Avira is now introducing cryptominers as well.
On the post: A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation'
Re:
"Bart" thought that Lead Stories called BMJ's peer-reviewed medical journal a "news blog." (When what actually happened was LS accuratly used that label to refer to The BMJ's "thebmj" news blog on which the article appeared.)
I think that shows the ignorance and illiteracy of this commenter.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Least insightful comment of the week goes to "Trying to overthrow the foundation of the US government with violence and fraud isn't trying to overthrow the foundation of the US government with violence and fraud!"
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re:
Note that their comrades, the Boogaloo boys, absolutely are.
On the post: Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: FTFY
As usual, those do not not mean what you pretend in bad faith they mean.
On the post: NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Memo to Dems
You mean, besides the whole Trump-crafted "Fauci lied" meme?
On the post: Techdirt 2021: The Stats.
At least the "insightful" and "funny" tags inspire more of us to make valuable comments that earn them than there are bobmails, lostinlodoses, ToiletPapers, and Kobys that aim in the opposite direction.
On the post: NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas
Re: Re: Re: Memo to Dems
His arguments have exclusively been that he's been hopelessly programmed by extremist-right disinformation propaganda, and his replies serve as a reminder he's also illiterate.
Next >>