I'm not sure if this cop has a dash cam but mot all cars do I have been pulled over three times and only one of them had a dash cam.
Also the article did not say that the dash cam was not working in this case for HIM but in the other wiretapping case.
"Police also claim dashboard camera videos of her arrest aren't available because the equipment wasn't working that night. Hipple said police don't have maintenance records to prove the cameras weren't working."
States that you could be charged with wiretapping if you do not have consent of the officer:
California
Connecticut
Florida
Illinois
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Montana
Ne vada
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Washington
Re: Re: The police record you with both video and audio...
Actually yes.
See http://www.rcfp.org/taping/quick.html for information on if you can record a conversation. The federal law says that you must have the consent of one member of the conversation but if the state law is stronger then it is what is enforced.
New Hampshire you need consent of all parties and if not then: "However, it is only a misdemeanor if a party to a communication, or anyone who has the consent of only one of the parties, intercepts a telecommunication or oral communication. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 570-A:2-I. Misdemeanors are punishable by imprisonment up to one year. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 625:9."
So when pulled over he should have stated that he was recording this conversation and asked for the consent of the officer. If the officer says no he cannot, he should have simply stated that "I also refuse to consent to being recorded by a party that is not myself."
Alternatively he could have requested to have a second officer to be called in to witness the traffic stop.
After challenge the charges and press additional charges against the officer for wiretapping if the box is checked that the car has a video camera recording the stop.
You could create an account and find out or you could think. If the user ever said that they worked for the USPTO and just look at the icon next to the user name.
"Yes, because an unarmed (or poorly armed) civilian is likely to take over a relatively powerful government with a heavily armed army that outnumbers the civilian by a huge margin with absolutely no trouble at all. It's like taking candy from a baby."
You do realize that even though the military owns its soldiers that those soldiers are still citizens of the country and may be sympathetic to the civilians.
If citizens are unarmed and have no means to fight what do they do? They have large groups join the military and start the revolution from the inside, taking over the military or parts of it enabling them to fight and get the means to its civilians.
We did the same thing in my 2nd grade class in 1992. At least 98% of the automotive bolts are metric, and damn those 2% that I need an english socket for or some half sized metric socket. Who the hell has a 9.5mm socket?
This is not even about adding the feature back but exposing those who have looked at the information on doing it. I would have looked at the info even thought I do not own a PS# nor do I own any S0ny junk.
On the post: Apple Tries To Convince Trademark Board That App Store Really Means Apple Store
Re:
If they do try to block the use of App Store then start using "App Cashe"
On the post: Apple Tries To Convince Trademark Board That App Store Really Means Apple Store
Re: Re:
On the post: Librarians And Readers Against DRM [Updated]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Logo by Nina
On the post: Should Governments Mandate Cookie Transparency?
Re: Re: But...
On the post: New Hampshire Police Charge Man With 'Wiretapping' Because He Made A Phone Call During Traffic Stop
Re: Put the town of Weare
On the post: New Hampshire Police Charge Man With 'Wiretapping' Because He Made A Phone Call During Traffic Stop
Re: Re: Re: Re:
A situation like this might be the time to use "But officer if you have nothing to hide then you should not mind me recording you." :)
On the post: New Hampshire Police Charge Man With 'Wiretapping' Because He Made A Phone Call During Traffic Stop
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Also the article did not say that the dash cam was not working in this case for HIM but in the other wiretapping case.
"Police also claim dashboard camera videos of her arrest aren't available because the equipment wasn't working that night. Hipple said police don't have maintenance records to prove the cameras weren't working."
On the post: New Hampshire Police Charge Man With 'Wiretapping' Because He Made A Phone Call During Traffic Stop
Re: Re:
California
Connecticut
Florida
Illinois
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Montana
Ne vada
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Washington
12 more states on my do not fly list.
On the post: New Hampshire Police Charge Man With 'Wiretapping' Because He Made A Phone Call During Traffic Stop
Re: Re: The police record you with both video and audio...
See http://www.rcfp.org/taping/quick.html for information on if you can record a conversation. The federal law says that you must have the consent of one member of the conversation but if the state law is stronger then it is what is enforced.
New Hampshire you need consent of all parties and if not then: "However, it is only a misdemeanor if a party to a communication, or anyone who has the consent of only one of the parties, intercepts a telecommunication or oral communication. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 570-A:2-I. Misdemeanors are punishable by imprisonment up to one year. N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 625:9."
So when pulled over he should have stated that he was recording this conversation and asked for the consent of the officer. If the officer says no he cannot, he should have simply stated that "I also refuse to consent to being recorded by a party that is not myself."
Alternatively he could have requested to have a second officer to be called in to witness the traffic stop.
After challenge the charges and press additional charges against the officer for wiretapping if the box is checked that the car has a video camera recording the stop.
On the post: No Surprise: Senate Approves Useless Patent Reform
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Facebook Comment Leads To Arrest In Zimbabwe
Re:
You do realize that even though the military owns its soldiers that those soldiers are still citizens of the country and may be sympathetic to the civilians.
If citizens are unarmed and have no means to fight what do they do? They have large groups join the military and start the revolution from the inside, taking over the military or parts of it enabling them to fight and get the means to its civilians.
I hope this comment does not get me arrested ;)
On the post: Facebook Comment Leads To Arrest In Zimbabwe
Re: Re: Re:
Liquid Snake, Go!
On the post: GAO Suggests It's Time To Ditch Dollar Bills For Coins
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: GAO Suggests It's Time To Ditch Dollar Bills For Coins
Re: Re: Re: Other Mints
.25+ .25+ .25+ .10+ .10+ .1+ .1+ .1+ .1 =0.99
On the post: GAO Suggests It's Time To Ditch Dollar Bills For Coins
Re: Re: Re: Other Mints
On the post: Does President Bush Speaking Out Against Julian Assange Prejudice The Case Against Him?
Quote of the day.
- Thomas Jefferson
On the post: How To Get Elected Officials To Actually Hear Our Worries About Censorship: Speak Up!
Re: Some help for those who don't know where to look
On the post: Judge Says No Anonymity For Anyone Who Visited GeoHot's PS3 Hacking Website Or Watched YouTube Video
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Judge Says No Anonymity For Anyone Who Visited GeoHot's PS3 Hacking Website Or Watched YouTube Video
Re:
There I fixed it for the anonymous hypocrite.
On the post: Massachusetts Apparently The First State To Let You Officially Register As A Pirate Party Member
Re: Re: Re:
Next >>