or just send a drone strike then say they were a terrorist after the fact.
Just wait until it comes out they are openly assassinating people because they don't like them and not because they are a criminal or a terrorist or whatever.
To any rebuttals about the US government not killing off people that portray them in a bad light.
Awful lot of murder suicides happening lately to the most vocal of critics. As well as "the USA does not torture people, we condone torture" well, up until about several months ago when people found they were lying yet again to save face and hide their war crimes.
Re: I certainly hope the outrage in response to case isn't limited to TechDirt.
I though when Eric holder committed perjury and refused to prosecute known criminals because they were too big to jail was when the DoJ proved it was hopelessly corruppt beyond the point of fixing.
that sounds more like something out of a dystopian graphic novel. I was thinking something more in line with a batman villain. Legion of Doom would work too.
dissent is terrorism to the power hungry elite. if new yorkers are not 100% for whatever the NYPD does they are the enemy in his eyes, and must be suppressed with lethal force until they get back licking his jackboots clean
First there is Godus where Molyneux used the funds to create something almost the exact opposite of what he asked for funds to create.
Then there is the multimillionaire who asked for funds to send her daughter to camp, then used the 20 odd grand she got on something else. The story gets more interesting as she responded to the criticism by offering to make her sons write an apology for more money.
basically she used her children to scam money off kickstarter donaters
lets hope for the best. Though I would not be surprised if this has all been a smokescreen and what people said they would do, they instead did what they were paid off to do.
How is Crovitz not a politician already? he has the most basic tenant down, always lie to support whatever your argument is. Never let true facts get in your way and always assume the people that watch and listen to you are idiots.
Nothing like having an out of control government ignore its own laws just to inflict petty revenge against anyone that defies it in any way.
Even better when they have access to weapons that could destroy the planet. I know that won't happen, but it is a rather big card to play to prevent anyone from taking said bully to task over their unlawful actions.
If someone is beating you up, most people are unlikely to fight back if he also has a gun pointed at you by his friend the cop.
the department of justice decided the bribes they received from said bankers decreed they were too big to jail. Though next time they cause a financial meltdown they will have to pay off trillions instead of just billions
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: This is chilling, and not just for Dotcom
Just wait until it comes out they are openly assassinating people because they don't like them and not because they are a criminal or a terrorist or whatever.
To any rebuttals about the US government not killing off people that portray them in a bad light.
Awful lot of murder suicides happening lately to the most vocal of critics. As well as "the USA does not torture people, we condone torture" well, up until about several months ago when people found they were lying yet again to save face and hide their war crimes.
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: I certainly hope the outrage in response to case isn't limited to TechDirt.
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: Re: Greece's Finacial Solution
happens to a lot of people in positions of foreign power that oppose Us interests lately
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: Re:
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: Um...
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: Re: Re:
So you think that if people were disarmed your government would have no reason to spy, torture and militarize to compensate?
On the post: Not So Awesome Stuff: Your Worst Crowdfunding Project?
Re: Re: [investment]
On the post: Not So Awesome Stuff: Your Worst Crowdfunding Project?
First there is Godus where Molyneux used the funds to create something almost the exact opposite of what he asked for funds to create.
Then there is the multimillionaire who asked for funds to send her daughter to camp, then used the 20 odd grand she got on something else. The story gets more interesting as she responded to the criticism by offering to make her sons write an apology for more money.
basically she used her children to scam money off kickstarter donaters
On the post: Wall Street Journal Upset That Wall Street Isn't Upset About Net Neutrality
Re: I'm curious
On the post: Wall Street Journal Upset That Wall Street Isn't Upset About Net Neutrality
On the post: Paypal Cuts Off Mega Because It Actually Keeps Your Files Secret
Even better when they have access to weapons that could destroy the planet. I know that won't happen, but it is a rather big card to play to prevent anyone from taking said bully to task over their unlawful actions.
If someone is beating you up, most people are unlikely to fight back if he also has a gun pointed at you by his friend the cop.
On the post: We Now Know The NSA And GCHQ Have Subverted Most (All?) Of The Digital World: So Why Can't We See Any Benefits?
Re:
They had police, snipers, guard dogs, military units even Craft mercenaries (private military contractors) all there to participate in it.
On the post: We Now Know The NSA And GCHQ Have Subverted Most (All?) Of The Digital World: So Why Can't We See Any Benefits?
Re: Worth repeating:
On the post: We Now Know The NSA And GCHQ Have Subverted Most (All?) Of The Digital World: So Why Can't We See Any Benefits?
Re: Re: It's Obvious
http://bigthink.com/think-tank/pre-crime-detection-system-now-being-tested-in-the-us
My apologies if this gets posted twice I had an error when I tried to post it
On the post: We Now Know The NSA And GCHQ Have Subverted Most (All?) Of The Digital World: So Why Can't We See Any Benefits?
How else can they remove people's rights and liberties if they don't have a boogeyman to hang over them.
Look at how most of the "high profile" terrorist acts have all turned out to be created by the FBI and the GCHQ respectivly
On the post: If You Want To See What The U.S. Broadband Market Really Looks Like, Take A Close Look At West Virginia
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: I request clarification:
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re:
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re:
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: Re: Re: Hells bells!
bombs get dropped on cities in the worst cases
Next >>