what's the point really. 9 times out of ten the judge believes the cop's word over the video evidence that contradicts his version of what happened.
Will having access to their recorded actions do us any good if the police and courts ignore said evidence and instead only believe what their fellow officers tell them happened.
We need to root out the corruption in this system as a priority. Not try and amend it with little things here and there. As making laws that require the criminal to support rarely work.
Or in this case requiring murdering dirty cops to wear and share their video footage of their crimes. When they have no incentive to do so, as they have proven their oaths and the laws don't matter to them at all.
Yes rescuing the homeless and any other desirables from cluttering up the streets. Keeping them safely locked away behind barbed wire fences and armed guards. The only way they are allowed to leave is if they ask and are given permission
red bull plans to start adding alchohol to their drinks then? as it makes zero sense to go after a competitor that doesn't even sell the same type of product you do
"Snowden's leaks have shown us to be acting in a way more common with Nazi Germany than what we pretend we represent ie the last bastion of freedom for the tired oppressed masses.
This has hurt our public image and has made those we have committed war crimes against aware of such things.
By exposing our evil to the light Snowden has made this country a target"
I am sure if they plan another "staged" terrorism attack with over 800 cops to "catch" them. The people of Australia will support anything without thinking much about it aside from what they are told to think.
the current things that make an American citizen a "possible domestic terrorist" would have 90% of the population arrested as terrorists if they followed through on it.
You need to stop viewing this government as one that cares for the constitution or the laws they create themselves.
They act as if the laws do not apply to them. That if they decide someone has no constitutional rights, then they treat them as if they have no constitutional rights.
Your constitution only protects you if the people in charge of your country upholds it. It is currently toilet paper in the eyes of those entrusted to pass judgment.
Simple enough, If they are foolish enough to pass a law requiring companies to do this or have all their assets seized because aiding and abetting terrorism if you don't do what the government tells you to.
Does this idea really sound all that farfetched considering how these governments act and the complete lack of respect they have towards human rights or even the rights their country was founded on.
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re:
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
Re: glad thats over
On the post: US Court Rules That Kim Dotcom Is A 'Fugitive' And Thus DOJ Can Take His Money
On the post: Evidence Copy Of 'CitizenFour' Needs To Be 'Locked Up' Claims Plaintiff Suing Snowden, Filmmakers For Billions
Re:
Having over 7 days of food in your home makes you a threat to the DHS I kid you not
On the post: Evidence Copy Of 'CitizenFour' Needs To Be 'Locked Up' Claims Plaintiff Suing Snowden, Filmmakers For Billions
Re: "I reject your reality..."
On the post: Senator Asks FCC To Explain Its Involvement In The Proliferation Of Stingray Devices
The laws don't apply to you, because your a cop now.
On the post: Minnesota Legislators, Law Enforcement Trying To Strip The 'Public Accountability' Out Of State's Body Camera Program
Will having access to their recorded actions do us any good if the police and courts ignore said evidence and instead only believe what their fellow officers tell them happened.
We need to root out the corruption in this system as a priority. Not try and amend it with little things here and there. As making laws that require the criminal to support rarely work.
Or in this case requiring murdering dirty cops to wear and share their video footage of their crimes. When they have no incentive to do so, as they have proven their oaths and the laws don't matter to them at all.
On the post: After Open Source, Open Access, Open Data And The Rest, Here Comes The Open Jihad
Re:
If we did not have a constant state of war their crimes would undo them instead of providing cover for treasonous acts
On the post: The Guardian Details The Horrors Of Chicago Police's 'CIA-Style Black Site'
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: DOJ Inspector General Tells Congress That FBI Isn't Letting His Office Do Its Job... Again
But how is this not illegal or at worst treason?
On the post: Red Bull Disputes Old Ox Brewery Trademarked Logo/Name Because, Seriously, An Ox Is Just A Castrated Bull
Re: Does it give you wings?
That what red bull claimed their product did, did not work for him.
Personally the stuff has no effect on me, but I wouldn't sue. I would just find a product that worked.
On the post: Red Bull Disputes Old Ox Brewery Trademarked Logo/Name Because, Seriously, An Ox Is Just A Castrated Bull
On the post: Mandatory Sentencing Guidelines Have Nothing To Do With 'Justice'
On the post: Here's 140 Fully-Redacted Pages Explaining How Much Snowden's Leaks Have Harmed The Nation's Security
"Snowden's leaks have shown us to be acting in a way more common with Nazi Germany than what we pretend we represent ie the last bastion of freedom for the tired oppressed masses.
This has hurt our public image and has made those we have committed war crimes against aware of such things.
By exposing our evil to the light Snowden has made this country a target"
On the post: Despite Losing Money Year After Year, States Still Wondering How They Can Hand Out BIGGER Subsidies To Hollywood
I am not surprised by anything except people expecting honesty from corrupt politicians
On the post: Despite Lack Of Evidence It Will Help, Australia Still Planning To Bring In Data Retention, Still Not Clear If It Could Be Used Against Copyright Infringement
On the post: The FCC's Historic Day: Voting Yes For Net Neutrality, Voting No On Protectionist State Telecom Law
On the post: NSA Director: If I Say 'Legal Framework' Enough, Will It Convince You Security People To Shut Up About Our Plan To Backdoor Encryption?
Re: Re:
You need to stop viewing this government as one that cares for the constitution or the laws they create themselves.
They act as if the laws do not apply to them. That if they decide someone has no constitutional rights, then they treat them as if they have no constitutional rights.
Your constitution only protects you if the people in charge of your country upholds it. It is currently toilet paper in the eyes of those entrusted to pass judgment.
On the post: NSA Director: If I Say 'Legal Framework' Enough, Will It Convince You Security People To Shut Up About Our Plan To Backdoor Encryption?
Re: Re: Re:
Why would an openly corrupt government care for laws when its clear most of their citizens are apathetic to their government breaking said laws
On the post: NSA Director: If I Say 'Legal Framework' Enough, Will It Convince You Security People To Shut Up About Our Plan To Backdoor Encryption?
Re:
Does this idea really sound all that farfetched considering how these governments act and the complete lack of respect they have towards human rights or even the rights their country was founded on.
Next >>