Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 23 Jun 2012 @ 5:05am
legal .....but illegal for dirty poor people types
There is a "moral argument"
How is it morally justifiable to restrict people from accessing LEGAL content, based on how rich they are, WHEN that legal content can be copied endlessly at no cost ?
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 22 Jun 2012 @ 5:51pm
Re: Re: The truly sad thing is...
Still conflicted ?
NO: you want to abolish digital copyright. ( shame Danger Mouse is hypocrite )
YES: (Danger Mouse owes something to the original creators )
Maybe copyright should allow Danger Mouse to make and sell his wares that use other creators ingredients.
BUT he should have to pay a small percentage of the money he makes to the creators of those ingredients.
That seems fair, only pay on the profit he makes.
But copyright does not exist in that form.
You need permission. You have to pay an upfront fee that usually removes ALL remixes from ever existing at all.
Danger Mouse's wares would not exist if he didn't breach copyright.
Copyright is the problem, if it's form changed to allow Danger Mouse to produce AND the creators of the ingredients he used to also get payed a small percentage of profits, Danger Mouse would never have had to breach copyright in the first place.
Personally, I think copyright should be completely reworked into a workable form of exploitation preference (within reason) to the creator.
If someone does the exploitation better, then tough you have no choice BUT they still have to pay you. Eg.. torrent site has to give you a percentage of ad revenue for the pages your indexed on. If itunes does a better job exploiting, then so be it, but that does not mean monopoly time.
Anyway, you are right to be conflicted, it is a fucking mess of rules and monopolies, limitations and infringements.
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 22 Jun 2012 @ 5:03pm
Re: Re:
The court of public opinion is irrelevant unless your business relies on public opinion.
Has Charles Carreon not taught you that ?
That guy doesn't give a shit about public opinion.
(I understate that by a large factor)
Why should he ?, his battles are in law, not opinion.
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 22 Jun 2012 @ 4:19pm
Re: Re:
oh but we do, we do. Your avatar irritates me... it's those fuckin eyebrows.
You are a balding man with a Brazilian-wax-goatee-beard and a weird fucking grin on your face. Your eyebrows are bloody ginormous and your head is so big it stretches across the whole freekin page. Where the fuck are your ears ? I changed my resolution to 9001-X-9001 and still my screen is too small.
point: Doing my avatar proud... I am doing it right ! amirite ?
As for pointless trolly /b/... blame the roll of the OP.
stupid kids posting , "post ending on 99 decides a page to go call the user a pedophile"
Random trolling for no fucking reason other than randomly being dickish to a majority of really decent people. The cancer that killed /b/ is still killing /b/
Some of the OP's have great, deserving peoples, needing trolled for great reasons. Ignored because lulz is now being a dick for no reason.
Cheek is now a joke....wtf /b/ , cheeky is not funny, funny is.
Scientology was funny because of the cult people being trolled. Call me a moralfag but...
Baiting pedophiles in chat and posting their dox online for the cops, after sending gifts of delicious pizza etc...
V
Posting peedo on a random users youtube page
One is lulz....the other is fucking pointless, stupid and cruel to innocent people.
The cancer that killed /b/... that's it right there.
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 22 Jun 2012 @ 3:31pm
Re: Jason McElwain's School District
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fw1CcxCUgg That was epic nice video. (whatever your negative slant was)
thx... balances out all mad shit you see online.
Bit like the donation page for this story.
Seen it at $45,000 ... now its $500,000 and growing.
Another epic nice outcome.
Much better than the "fabricated to give a shit" Inman story.
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 22 Jun 2012 @ 12:25pm
Re: Re: Re:
Yeah....The math will win.
They will still try, and record fucking everything in the process.
protocols:
If they filter all encrypted traffic out ( the ones without their backdoors in ) ?
They won't need, to be able to crack it.
But encryption via non encrypted protocols is a completely different story, then they need to scan and decide what is just gobbledegook and what is actual encryption.
eg...vtoiujhmvdth789534ciuj4985mxjxla534780c5nm
encrypted or just nonsense ?
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 22 Jun 2012 @ 12:09pm
Re: Re: Re:
Do you think that the US only spies on the US ? really ?
Do you know where your encrypted email goes en-route ? IF it gets to the destination at all. US spies on Britons from UK soil
An investigative report has accused the U.S. government of using a controversial spy station in Yorkshire, Britain to “subvert and destroy democracy”. http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/02/27/spies-britons-uk-soil-86461/
But America wouldn't do it when your encrypted traffic already bounces through their interceptors ?
They also would never give access to the UK officials.
Video: relevant Jacob Appelbaum, Dmitry Kleiner: Resisting the Surveillance State and its network effects http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3h46EbqhPo No one would sell encryption cracking technology to other governments.(or the UK)
Countries don't already intercept ALL internet activity crossing their borders.
Yeah... that's why Tunisia bought that tech and Syria also has it, it doesn't exist.
How governments have tried to block Tor http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwMr8Xl7JMQ
The smoking gun of UK encryption cracking may not be there... but IF they can, they WILL, that is certain.
"BACKDOOR's" in propriety software encryption !
Who needs to do impossible math and crack it anyway !
Cyber threats, hacker attacks and laws officially aiming to tackle internet piracy, but in fact infringing people's rights to online privacy. It's an increasingly topical subject - and the world's most famous whistleblower is aiming to get to the heart of it. In the latest edition of his interview program here on RT, Julian Assange gets together with activists from the Cypherpunk movement - Andy Müller-Maguhn, Jeremie Zimmermann, and Jacob Appelbaum.
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 20 Jun 2012 @ 1:37pm
Nice premise, nice conclusion, feel the same.
"I know that I'm infringing copyright and I don't apologize for it."
"I guess I'm going to be conscientiously violating the law because there's no way to comply with the law and remain a free human being."
Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), 20 Jun 2012 @ 5:33am
seems a legit response
"Did the woman's boss tell her she wasn't qualified only AFTER starting her job?"
The article highly suggests it is YES, it practically states it.
After starting teaching
"the principal informed Leah that she did not have a "middle-school math endorsement,""
#BORING way to answer, amiriteAlso YES... It looked like a brain fart, get real!
That makes you human not stupid, we all do it. If you read all my comments you will get a disease from all the brain-farts polluting your eye balls.
Seriously tho... get a vaccination before reading all my comments.
It was my intention to have a laugh with it, but you took offense. Maybe I am wrong, and you misrepresented your real question ?
IF THE QUESTION WAS..... Did the woman's boss KNOW she wasn't qualified BEFORE she started her job?
Legit question
There you go, a way out. An accident in asking the question
( not a "stupid implying" brain-fart )
It was no way designed to make YOU look stupid.
It was designed to have a laugh.
Again, not personal.
Don't think that, it is a comment on the internet.
If you where offend, know it wasn't my intention.
Do you forgive me ?
I promise to be nicer in the future.
my inner thought... the future is never now...maauhhaahha
On the post: A Business Model Failure Is Not A Moral Issue
legal .....but illegal for dirty poor people types
How is it morally justifiable to restrict people from accessing LEGAL content, based on how rich they are, WHEN that legal content can be copied endlessly at no cost ?
On the post: Disappointing: Famed Copyright Rogue Danger Mouse Sues Home Depot And Pizza Hut... Over Copyright
Re: Re: The truly sad thing is...
NO: you want to abolish digital copyright. ( shame Danger Mouse is hypocrite )
YES: (Danger Mouse owes something to the original creators )
Maybe copyright should allow Danger Mouse to make and sell his wares that use other creators ingredients.
BUT he should have to pay a small percentage of the money he makes to the creators of those ingredients.
That seems fair, only pay on the profit he makes.
But copyright does not exist in that form.
You need permission. You have to pay an upfront fee that usually removes ALL remixes from ever existing at all.
Danger Mouse's wares would not exist if he didn't breach copyright.
Copyright is the problem, if it's form changed to allow Danger Mouse to produce AND the creators of the ingredients he used to also get payed a small percentage of profits, Danger Mouse would never have had to breach copyright in the first place.
Personally, I think copyright should be completely reworked into a workable form of exploitation preference (within reason) to the creator.
If someone does the exploitation better, then tough you have no choice BUT they still have to pay you. Eg.. torrent site has to give you a percentage of ad revenue for the pages your indexed on. If itunes does a better job exploiting, then so be it, but that does not mean monopoly time.
Anyway, you are right to be conflicted, it is a fucking mess of rules and monopolies, limitations and infringements.
On the post: Disappointing: Famed Copyright Rogue Danger Mouse Sues Home Depot And Pizza Hut... Over Copyright
Re: The truly sad thing is...
"Public performance" is NOT a "worthless copy"
On the post: Disappointing: Famed Copyright Rogue Danger Mouse Sues Home Depot And Pizza Hut... Over Copyright
Re: Re:
Has Charles Carreon not taught you that ?
That guy doesn't give a shit about public opinion.
(I understate that by a large factor)
Why should he ?, his battles are in law, not opinion.
On the post: Epic Win/Fail: Bullied Bus Monitor Sparks Overwhelming Support, But Also Death Threats To Kids
Re: Re:
Your avatar irritates me... it's those fuckin eyebrows.
You are a balding man with a Brazilian-wax-goatee-beard and a weird fucking grin on your face. Your eyebrows are bloody ginormous and your head is so big it stretches across the whole freekin page. Where the fuck are your ears ? I changed my resolution to 9001-X-9001 and still my screen is too small.
point: Doing my avatar proud... I am doing it right ! amirite ?
As for pointless trolly /b/... blame the roll of the OP.
stupid kids posting , "post ending on 99 decides a page to go call the user a pedophile"
Random trolling for no fucking reason other than randomly being dickish to a majority of really decent people.
The cancer that killed /b/ is still killing /b/
Some of the OP's have great, deserving peoples, needing trolled for great reasons. Ignored because lulz is now being a dick for no reason.
Cheek is now a joke....wtf /b/ , cheeky is not funny, funny is.
Scientology was funny because of the cult people being trolled.
Call me a moralfag but...
Baiting pedophiles in chat and posting their dox online for the cops, after sending gifts of delicious pizza etc...
V
Posting peedo on a random users youtube page
One is lulz....the other is fucking pointless, stupid and cruel to innocent people.
The cancer that killed /b/... that's it right there.
On the post: Epic Win/Fail: Bullied Bus Monitor Sparks Overwhelming Support, But Also Death Threats To Kids
Re: Jason McElwain's School District
That was epic nice video. (whatever your negative slant was)
thx... balances out all mad shit you see online.
Bit like the donation page for this story.
Seen it at $45,000 ... now its $500,000 and growing.
Another epic nice outcome.
Much better than the "fabricated to give a shit" Inman story.
On the post: Epic Win/Fail: Bullied Bus Monitor Sparks Overwhelming Support, But Also Death Threats To Kids
Re: Re:
bus idea- good.
Make them walk to and from school.
Not being allowed to speak.
That seems like a suitable punishment.
On the post: Epic Win/Fail: Bullied Bus Monitor Sparks Overwhelming Support, But Also Death Threats To Kids
You being played ! open your eyes ffs
Occupy is apolitical, unlike you and your one-sided ramblings.
NEWSFLASH:
Your political ideology don't mean shit !
ALL the politicians have been bought by corporations and private interests.
Keep watching FOX news!
On the post: Get Ready For The Political Fight Against Encryption
Re: Re:
That stinks !
enjoy the pun.
On the post: Get Ready For The Political Fight Against Encryption
Re: Re: Re:
They will still try, and record fucking everything in the process.
protocols:
If they filter all encrypted traffic out ( the ones without their backdoors in ) ?
They won't need, to be able to crack it.
But encryption via non encrypted protocols is a completely different story, then they need to scan and decide what is just gobbledegook and what is actual encryption.
eg...vtoiujhmvdth789534ciuj4985mxjxla534780c5nm
encrypted or just nonsense ?
On the post: Get Ready For The Political Fight Against Encryption
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Not sure, IF Time Traveler, or Mikes Puppeteer
On the post: Get Ready For The Political Fight Against Encryption
Re: Re: Re:
Do you know where your encrypted email goes en-route ? IF it gets to the destination at all.
US spies on Britons from UK soil
An investigative report has accused the U.S. government of using a controversial spy station in Yorkshire, Britain to “subvert and destroy democracy”.
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/02/27/spies-britons-uk-soil-86461/
But America wouldn't do it when your encrypted traffic already bounces through their interceptors ?
They also would never give access to the UK officials.
Video: relevant
Jacob Appelbaum, Dmitry Kleiner: Resisting the Surveillance State and its network effects
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3h46EbqhPo
No one would sell encryption cracking technology to other governments.(or the UK)
Countries don't already intercept ALL internet activity crossing their borders.
Yeah... that's why Tunisia bought that tech and Syria also has it, it doesn't exist.
Former Tunisian Regime Goes Beyond Spying On Internet Traffic... To Rewriting Emails & More
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111213/11181117066/former-tunisian-regime-goes-beyond-spyin g-internet-traffic-to-rewriting-emails-more.shtml
Finally some MOARRRR videos , Highly related.
How governments have tried to block Tor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwMr8Xl7JMQ
The smoking gun of UK encryption cracking may not be there... but IF they can, they WILL, that is certain.
"BACKDOOR's" in propriety software encryption !
Who needs to do impossible math and crack it anyway !
On the post: Get Ready For The Political Fight Against Encryption
Re: Re: Re:
Videos-relevant
The Julian Assange Show: Cypherpunks, Part 1 (E8, p.1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eil_1j72LOA
The Julian Assange Show: Cypherpunks, Part 2 (E8, p.2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DQghUChYtk
Cyber threats, hacker attacks and laws officially aiming to tackle internet piracy, but in fact infringing people's rights to online privacy. It's an increasingly topical subject - and the world's most famous whistleblower is aiming to get to the heart of it. In the latest edition of his interview program here on RT, Julian Assange gets together with activists from the Cypherpunk movement - Andy Müller-Maguhn, Jeremie Zimmermann, and Jacob Appelbaum.
On the post: Get Ready For The Political Fight Against Encryption
Re:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/03/16/nsas-new-data-center-and-ultra-fa st-supercomputer-aim-to-crack-worlds-strongest-crypto/
There you go.
On the post: Nina Paley Explains Intellectual Disobedience
Re: Re:
NoScript, Ghostery, Adblock plus.... a tight combination.
unrelated: you forgive me yet Rikuo : )
On the post: Nina Paley Explains Intellectual Disobedience
On the post: Police Ticketing Informal Rideshare Participants Based On No Law, But To Protect Port Authority Revenue
Re: Re:
It was pretty bad :)
On the post: Should We Want A 'Cyberwar'? It's A Lot Less Bloody Than A Real War
Cyber ? anyone else feel horny ?
Originating from sexual deviants who go online and ask "Cyber ?" to grown men pretending to be young women.
True story about it's first appearance in politics.
Politicians Wife:
"what was that you typed into the computer dear husband ?"
Politician:
"Cyber... mmm it means...mmmm...internet ... yeah that's it"
Getting caught being deviant... AVERTED
As for Cyber-War...
The "fed heavy" panel.
Defcon 19: Dark Tangent, Rod Beckstrom, Jerry Dixon, Tony Sager, Linton Wells II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT3iQovxy2U
A better Anonymous ?
Defcon 19: Paul Roberts, Aaron Barr, Joshua Corman and Jericho
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh_sKKf2hDs
On the post: A Broken System: Einstein Wouldn't Have Been 'Qualified' To Teach High School Physics
get out of my head-- Bengie
I want them too...
One last question.
Is there a newer version that actually works ?
On the post: A Broken System: Einstein Wouldn't Have Been 'Qualified' To Teach High School Physics
seems a legit response
The article highly suggests it is YES, it practically states it.
After starting teaching
"the principal informed Leah that she did not have a "middle-school math endorsement,""
#BORING way to answer, amirite
Also YES... It looked like a brain fart, get real!
That makes you human not stupid, we all do it.
If you read all my comments you will get a disease from all the brain-farts polluting your eye balls.
Seriously tho... get a vaccination before reading all my comments.
It was my intention to have a laugh with it, but you took offense.
Maybe I am wrong, and you misrepresented your real question ?
IF THE QUESTION WAS.....
Did the woman's boss KNOW she wasn't qualified BEFORE she started her job?
Legit question
There you go, a way out. An accident in asking the question
( not a "stupid implying" brain-fart )
It was no way designed to make YOU look stupid.
It was designed to have a laugh.
Again, not personal.
Don't think that, it is a comment on the internet.
If you where offend, know it wasn't my intention.
Do you forgive me ?
I promise to be nicer in the future.
my inner thought... the future is never now...maauhhaahha
Next >>