So we either have a group of government agencies out control acting on their own initiative because they know the vast majority of the checks and balances are corrupted and they won't be held accountable for whatever they do. or we have some behind all this directing them on what to do.
when the DoJ stops protecting the pedophiles in their ranks as well as the ranks of all the other government agencies maybe we will believe the crap they spew out.
Care to point out which governments in history have used the power of censoring hate speech responsibly, and never used it to restrict speech as well as arresting anyone they do not like be it a person or a group of people.
As I cannot think of any, but I do know a few that used it to suppress dissent and form dictatorships. As they gave themselves the power to shut down and criminalize anyone that they did not like. Until eventually people feared them enough to do whatever they were told to.
Makes it hard to create fake terrorism plots to garnish support for anti freedom laws, If the tools to create said "terror" plots are no longer be given freely to those in charge.
How long until they decide to start seizing uninsured homes, or even better arresting sending to prison anyone that refuses to have life insurance for themselves.
because they are obviously a danger to everyone around them, and dangerous precedents never happen when you give dictatorial powers to people that constantly abuse the power they have
They view themselves as being above the petty laws, their wealth priviledge and power has gone to their heads. They do what they want, when they want to and screw anyone that gets in their way.
What does a tyrant care for the law, he has the ability to ignore it and do what he wants anyway
would you have the force of arms to force them to obey such a stipulation? The question we should ask is if this goes through. Will it come down to military intervention to force it on anyone that refuses to play ball as it were
he is already too late on that front considering ISIS was created by the CIA to fight against Assad, and look that backfired just like the creation of Al Qaeda did.
On the post: DEA Collecting Massive Database Of Your Driving Habits In Secret, Using License Plate Readers
Which seems more likely.
On the post: DOJ's Attempt To Turn 4th Amendment Into A 'Useless Piece Of Paper' Called Out By Justice Sotomayor
On the post: Tor Isn't A Child Porn Enthusiast's Best Friend, No Matter What The DOJ Claims
On the post: Spying On Sharing: Canada's Intelligence Agency Collecting Data And IP Addresses From Free File-Sharing Sites
On the post: Je Suis Disappoint: French Court Convicts Idiots For Homophobic Stupidity
Re: Re: Uh what?
As I cannot think of any, but I do know a few that used it to suppress dissent and form dictatorships. As they gave themselves the power to shut down and criminalize anyone that they did not like. Until eventually people feared them enough to do whatever they were told to.
On the post: Je Suis Disappoint: French Court Convicts Idiots For Homophobic Stupidity
Re:
On the post: Je Suis Disappoint: French Court Convicts Idiots For Homophobic Stupidity
Re:
Take Russia for example those currently in charge find promoting being gay and lesbian hate speech as it were against the man wife marriage version.
If we arrest people for saying things even in public as opposed to doing those things we lose our rights for basically anything.
We give up the right to say what we like at first then the people start more rights, saying it's for the good of everyone.
In short we need to defend the rights of everyone to preserve our own rights, even if we despise them for it.
On the post: Law Enforcement Wants Google To Cripple Waze Because It Lets The Mean Old Public 'Stalk' Police Officers
Re: Re: I wonder...
On the post: Law Enforcement Wants Google To Cripple Waze Because It Lets The Mean Old Public 'Stalk' Police Officers
There is your basic police officer mentality in a nutshell
On the post: France Announces Plans To Hold The Internet Responsible For Terrorism
On the post: EU's 'Counter-Terrorism Co-ordinator' Finally Says It: Force Internet Companies To Hand Over Their Crypto Keys
On the post: President Obama Drops His Promise To Take Phone Metadata Away From NSA... But Perhaps That's Fine [Updated]
people should know better than trust someone that only tells them what they want to hear.
On the post: Former Head of GCHQ Warns Of 'Ethically Worse' Kinds Of Spying If Unbreakable Encryption Is Allowed
On the post: DOJ Pays $134,000 To Settle Case Of DEA Agents Impersonating A Woman On Facebook
Re: Wondering...
It is not like that's never happened before with criminal out of control government agents
On the post: New Utah Law Instructs Cops To Seize Uninsured Vehicles
because they are obviously a danger to everyone around them, and dangerous precedents never happen when you give dictatorial powers to people that constantly abuse the power they have
On the post: European Commission's Clever Ruse To Introduce Corporate Sovereignty Regardless Of Ratification Votes In EU
Re: Is this even legal?
They view themselves as being above the petty laws, their wealth priviledge and power has gone to their heads. They do what they want, when they want to and screw anyone that gets in their way.
What does a tyrant care for the law, he has the ability to ignore it and do what he wants anyway
On the post: European Commission's Clever Ruse To Introduce Corporate Sovereignty Regardless Of Ratification Votes In EU
Re:
On the post: European Commission's Clever Ruse To Introduce Corporate Sovereignty Regardless Of Ratification Votes In EU
Re: Why bother voting at all?
On the post: New Senate Intelligence Boss Demands That White House 'Return' CIA Torture Report Copies
Re:
On the post: New Senate Intelligence Boss Demands That White House 'Return' CIA Torture Report Copies
Re:
Next >>