I wonder how simple of a "encryption" scheme is needed for that... Would a signup tracker that used a modified client to apply priv/pub key encryption to the data would work.
I have something like broadband... 400-500KB/sec down, and 40KB/sec up. Should i decide to use that whole 40KB up, my pings go out to 1200ms. Since I live in an apartment and the complex has agreements with 2 providers, thats all I get, local telco, and local cable co. I could probably pay for a higher tier of my DSL service, but when it's already $70/month as you have to have phone service and dsl service with them minimum(the dsl service is what limits the speed, not the ISP), then a ISP on top of that. I'd like to get FIOS, or business cable or something, but i'm not sure comcast will just sell it to me without a business license.
well I loaded this page around an hour ago. I'm just now finishing "SIGNS : HOW THEY TELL US WHERE TO GO." series, including all of the hand drawn maps.
if the original contract does state that this was for only the Denmark market, i'm not sure what the issue is here, They are suing Carslberg for breach of contract. I'm not sure how this made up here, seems(with out reading their contract) to be open and shut.
Granted it being up on Youtube by some random person isn't really Carlsberg's fault.
It's more that some people's names may be in their account e-mails, and thus mean that a hacker(common in wow), has a better chance to guess your account name, and then simply has to guess your password. As for why some people would have their real names in e-mail addresses, it looks bad to mail prospective employers from the address "Lolpenis_Roflnuts@gmail.com". They could force you to choose a nick on the battle.net page(unchangeable) and use that on the forums. That would provide a similar tie to your account. Blizzard could also just perma-ban accounts for trolling in a hurtful way. Belair-ing* is simply annoying and not hurtful, or for that mater, any topic that is deemed offtopic or a troll will be given a warning, after 6 months the warning goes away, if you have 3 warnings you are baned from posting.
*For those unaware, it's the practice of starting a semi constructive post and then transitioning to the lyrics to the theme for "The fresh prince of Bel-Air"
depends IMO, is it "Press button to hear cardinal" or is the app, "Listen to the birds of the woods"? if it's the second one, sure give him his copyright if it isn't just a 10 hour recording of a particular place with minimal editing, but the first is just facts. facts cannot be copyrighted. see a phonebook, the layout could be(if it is creative and not simply a listing), but the numbers cannot.
yes. if the store has policies about what the label needs to look like, if the store simple samples for the quality of the product only, then no.
Apple seems to vet the entire app, and with a non open process, it seems to have complete control over the apps. Will apple allow anything that breaks the US law into the store? say a copy of a banned book? if not, then yes, they have stated "we vet apps for legality, and this one we said was legal, so opps our fault"
but i thought that to get a copyright they had to artistic in some way, the specific sounds a particular bird makes seems like it is a "fact" and not "art" and therefor shouldn't be copyright-able. Like phone number in the phone book, maybe he then uses the sounds to play songs, great, but if it is "press button to hear a cardinal" then i don't think he should have a claim.
Sure if they want to be individuals, thats fine, but they are subject to all the laws I am. Someone speeds while "on the job", company gets the speeding ticket. Product unintentionally kills some one, manslaughter charges and "incarceration"(freeze assets/accounts, deny shipments, stocks stop trading, etc). You want to be people, fine, but you get the same rules, otherwise you are not people, and get your different rules.
More sanely, any dealing with the government are/should be available to all citizens/taxpayers, trade secrets(real ones, not client lists) excepted.
That would hold water if there was a contract, i.e. a piece of paper dictating the terms in a language both parties can understand clearly outlining the terms of the contract and what was being purchased, or if there was such a thing as "standard agreement". The problem is that when i buy a DVD, I plan on watching it in my own home in what ever way i want. I've never seen a contract pre purchase of a DVD. Now i understand that redistribution of copies is disallowed by copyright law. How is watching the DVD(from a rip) a different purpose than what the DVD was sold for, watching it in my home.
Would you be ok, if a dvd came with a licenses to only one viewer at a time, but with a bit about how multiple licenses would allow for multiple viewers at once? if you wanted to show the dvd to a family of 4, you need to buy the dvd 4 times. just stick it in 3pt font in the back of the brown label in black text right now and BAM! "but you should have read the terms and conditions on the back, WAAA!!!".
Does craftsman say that you can't use a wrench as a hammer? nope, they sold me a hunk of steel, and I can do what i like with it.
NOt only that but all of the current hacking on the cousole would not allow the running of pirate games, as you needed to be in "GameOS" for the correct environment to work. This did allow the use of the full hardware(in time) from inside of the OtherOS(linux), allowing highend homebrew, or *GASP* more codec support or even regular dvd upscaling...
Of course, the problem is that there may be legitimate reasons to use a mobile phone (emergencies, anyone?)
OMG! what ever shall we do?! surly not use "emergency" phones that could be installed outside the door of each screen in a bright yellow box? these phones could even have a nice connection direct to 911 and 911 could even know which screen goes with which phone. So really no good reason to have a (working) phone in a movie.
I wonder if you can apply to have an open wifi network if it is part of a business, or though some other means. It would probably require locking down some aspects of the service and logging data.
Sounds like the whistleblowers and journalists need to stop giving each other contact info. Or at least only the minimal amount of info, "Bob from Foo Corp", or "Mr S. From Bar LLC" as the max amount of info.
wouldn't the customer be able to say "we bought it from XYZ, talk to them"? or be able to then turn around and sue the manufacturer for the costs+legal fees?
Would having a publicly available parts list help the case at all? "why are you sueing us, you knew we got it from XYZ, and we were assured that it was fine to use by XYZ, we'd like our legal fees now"?
On the post: Author Claims Patents Made Industrial Revolution Possible; Then Shows Why He's Wrong
Re: Re: BRITAIN'S GREATEST MACHINES WITH CHRIS BARRIE
On the post: So What DMCA Exemption Requests Got Rejected?
Re: Win/Win
On the post: FCC Finally Admits US Broadband Competitiveness Sucks; Broadband Co's Then Order Their Favorite Politicians To Trash FCC
Re:
On the post: Massachusetts May Be The First To Get A Right To Repair Law
Re: Re: What gives non oem dealers any right
On the post: Massachusetts May Be The First To Get A Right To Repair Law
Re: Sounds like an advertisement to me
On the post: Turns Out People Actually Do Like Smart, Long Form Content Online
Thank you for the link to slate!
On the post: Beer Pong Players Upset Their Beer Commercial Has Gone Viral... Sue Over Inclusion In World's Funniest Commercials
Granted it being up on Youtube by some random person isn't really Carlsberg's fault.
On the post: Users Revolt Over Blizzard's Requirement Of 'Real Names' In Forum Comments
Re:
*For those unaware, it's the practice of starting a semi constructive post and then transitioning to the lyrics to the theme for "The fresh prince of Bel-Air"
On the post: FAA Gives Approval To Flying Car?
Re: Re: Can I text while flying?
On the post: Apple Sued For Copyright Infringement Because Third Party App Has Someone Else's Bird Sounds
Re: hey guys, wrong target
On the post: Apple Sued For Copyright Infringement Because Third Party App Has Someone Else's Bird Sounds
Re: Re: Apple Isn't Neutral
Apple seems to vet the entire app, and with a non open process, it seems to have complete control over the apps. Will apple allow anything that breaks the US law into the store? say a copy of a banned book? if not, then yes, they have stated "we vet apps for legality, and this one we said was legal, so opps our fault"
On the post: Apple Sued For Copyright Infringement Because Third Party App Has Someone Else's Bird Sounds
Re: Re: What????
On the post: Should Companies Have A 'Privacy' Right To Shield The Release Of Damaging Info?
sure they can...
More sanely, any dealing with the government are/should be available to all citizens/taxpayers, trade secrets(real ones, not client lists) excepted.
On the post: UK Regulator Says Digital Economy Act Only Applies To Big Wireline ISPs
On the post: Can Someone Explain Why Circumvention For Non-Infringing Purposes Is Illegal?
Re: Re: Re: Devil's Advocate
Would you be ok, if a dvd came with a licenses to only one viewer at a time, but with a bit about how multiple licenses would allow for multiple viewers at once? if you wanted to show the dvd to a family of 4, you need to buy the dvd 4 times. just stick it in 3pt font in the back of the brown label in black text right now and BAM! "but you should have read the terms and conditions on the back, WAAA!!!".
Does craftsman say that you can't use a wrench as a hammer? nope, they sold me a hunk of steel, and I can do what i like with it.
On the post: Air Force PS3 Supercomputer Screwed By Sony Killing Off Linux Support
Re: Re:
On the post: Feds Look At Jamming Mobile Phones In Prison
OMG! what ever shall we do?! surly not use "emergency" phones that could be installed outside the door of each screen in a bright yellow box? these phones could even have a nice connection direct to 911 and 911 could even know which screen goes with which phone. So really no good reason to have a (working) phone in a movie.
On the post: German Court Says You Must Secure Your WiFi Or You May Get Fined
i wonder
On the post: Canadian Supreme Court Says Press Have No Right To Hide Sources
On the post: Will Cloud Computing Lead To Patent Liability For End Users?
wouldn't the customer be able to...
Would having a publicly available parts list help the case at all? "why are you sueing us, you knew we got it from XYZ, and we were assured that it was fine to use by XYZ, we'd like our legal fees now"?
Next >>