OK, 1) I'll accept the compliment about being adorable and 2) I like to play stupid. Because we want answers! How are we supposed to get those if we know them, hm? Can you please make a list so we might give a crap about your crazy idea? If not... then continue on attacking me. It appears you have nothing better to do.
If you have nothing, then say it. If you do, then say so. It's up to the others to decide whether or not to call you a liar or telling the truth.
Ugh, I'm getting sick of seeing money being an issue in this. If money that big of an issue to you idiots, then WORK FOR IT!! If I want to buy it, then I will buy it. If I can't try it out if I like it, then maybe I won't buy it. You cannot force or tell me to buy your product without knowing what it is or what it does. All your whining about "well you can't take it because you can't" is weak and is just a really bad model to follow. You can't force people to buy your stuff, otherwise you're going to lose that customer and have them go somewhere else. Trying to get people to buy your stuff is a desperate act for attention and it gives you a negative image to not yourself, but your model and your business. If you refuse to see that and continue to use your method of selling, then how are you still in business?
Hey, if you can find people that like you and buy your stuff, go ahead. There's a whole world that are against your model. If you can't get them on your side, then why bother trying to convert us?
"When you're ripping off music and movies there is metadata that is unique."
... Uh, so if I make my own cover of a song, then I'm... I'm sorry, but I don't get what you're saying. Metadata? What? Huh? Do you have any idea what you're talking about? Ripping off movies and songs isn't that hard to do, if you know what definition you're using. Ever heard of a parody? If you're talking about stealing, then... ow, my head...
Hey PETA, there's a guy on the line named "Ghetsis," saying he's looking for an opening. Plus he's saying about suing because Pokemon's his field, not yours.
So, random question, but is it possible to send a few copies of Black and White (not Black 2 and White 2) to members of PETA and have them play out the main story to see how dumb their attack is?
Um, you should know that with today's speech, it's guaranteed that you'll find hardly anyone using words by their original definition. There are many ways one word can be used for a different meaning, and some of these ways are picked up by the public and becomes a more popular use. Just because you're complaining about someone using a word from its original definition doesn't mean that the definition s/he's using is wrong. There's more to everything than just one source of information.
Hey, I prefer to use words by their original definition since I loathe slang, but I'm not going to waste all my time studying every single word in existence learning the original definitions. If anything... you're just stupid.
"... homosexuals are people too, no different to ..."
I'm going to stop right there because: NO. Just... NO. If you are desperate want the attention that badly, then here you go! You got my attention and I'm more than pleased to answer just how irritating your message is to me. Now personally I am against how you think. I don't speak for anyone except for myself, so I'll say this with my complete honesty:
Your ideals stink as bad as your reference to bathrooms.
I can tell you that homosexuals are not as evil as the people you are describing. Even then, those kind of people are far more despicable than evil, but homosexuals? NO! Homosexuals are some of the nicest people on the planet, and you're comparing them to adulterers? That made me sick to my stomach reading that! You're no better than Joe when it comes to comparing copyright infringement to rape (and hey, you mentioned it as well! That doesn't make you any more likable, though...).
"I think I must be a bit out there today..."
"A bit?" You think that you're "a bit" out there? ... *facepalms* Why did I response to you in the first place? ... Wait, I got it:
You're an idiot. That's the bottom line. Listen to That Anonymous Coward and seek help. Maybe they could knock some sense into that empty head of yours.
Well, when I think of that, I don't see Joe dressed up in a maroon suit and wearing the... what is around Edgeworth's neck again? I think he'll make a better student for von Karma than Edgeworth.
Plus considering with the talks of "guilty before innocent" in nearly every story relating to the law... I imagine we have adopted that belief from the games. Also when did the DL-6 case happened again? This year?
"Creators give stuff away for free all of the time..."
*raises finger and opens mouth* ... Well, I've been doing that since 2009, but I REALLY doubt every creator gives their stuff away (and the key word is "every")
"You should be honest about what you mean by 'free'."
Oh yeah, and do you mind telling us what your definition of "free" is, or don't you trust the Big Dictionary? ... Sorry, I got to take a moment to laugh. Also I'll give you a dollar if you say "Google" once. Go on, try it!
"These folks always pretend that money just falls from the sky every other Friday."
But for me... do I have to say it? And honestly do you think that people are seriously dumb enough to NOT know how a business is run outside of high school? ... Wait, I forget I'm talking to bob here... never mind, go about your crazy ranting. Next time I'll see you, I'll be on hand with some popcorn.
Here's a handy advice: don't forget to add a "/s" tag at the end, or anything relating to "/sarcasm". That way, you can get away with it without others jumping on you for the false thoughts.
"Remember, if there is no money in it, why bother?"
Every single time it is with money with you people... if this is about the money, then just say it! That way we could say "hey everyone! These guys only care about your money, not your personal needs, so please ignore them!" Ugh, I really hate that this is just about the money and nothing else.
"... what happens to almost everything in the public domain: it gets ignored."
OK, let's test that little theory. Why don't you put yourself in the public domain and we'll find out if people will ignore you.
B. Who care? If this is a copyright issue, it's not like I'm interested in using Mickey for any of my projects once he does hit public domain... that is, if he gets into public domain. It's also highly unlikely I'll touch Steamboat Willie other than watching because I am busying with my own work and I have no interest in messing around with the short.
C. With connections to your last sentence in B, keep slinging those ad homs out. I'm sure you're going to win this argument if you keeping bashing others with them.
On the post: Hollywood Star Rosario Dawson Speaks Out Against Hollywood's 'Six Strikes' Plan
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Hollywood Star Rosario Dawson Speaks Out Against Hollywood's 'Six Strikes' Plan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you have nothing, then say it. If you do, then say so. It's up to the others to decide whether or not to call you a liar or telling the truth.
On the post: But Of Course: Ridiculous ACTA Provisions Magically Appear In CETA
Re: Re: Re:
Hey, if you can find people that like you and buy your stuff, go ahead. There's a whole world that are against your model. If you can't get them on your side, then why bother trying to convert us?
On the post: But Of Course: Ridiculous ACTA Provisions Magically Appear In CETA
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
... Uh, so if I make my own cover of a song, then I'm... I'm sorry, but I don't get what you're saying. Metadata? What? Huh? Do you have any idea what you're talking about? Ripping off movies and songs isn't that hard to do, if you know what definition you're using. Ever heard of a parody? If you're talking about stealing, then... ow, my head...
On the post: Hollywood Star Rosario Dawson Speaks Out Against Hollywood's 'Six Strikes' Plan
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Auto Dealers Complain That Tesla Stores Are Illegal... Despite Not Actually Selling Anything
Re: Not "stupid protectionist regulations": cartel or crony capitalism.
On the post: PETA Vs. Pokemon
On the post: PETA Vs. Pokemon
Re: Re:
On the post: PETA Vs. Pokemon
On the post: PETA Vs. Pokemon
Re:
On the post: Judge Calls Copyright Troll's Bluff
Re: With you on view, except for spelling:
Hey, I prefer to use words by their original definition since I loathe slang, but I'm not going to waste all my time studying every single word in existence learning the original definitions. If anything... you're just stupid.
On the post: Judge Calls Copyright Troll's Bluff
Re: Re: With you on view, except for spelling:
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Summing Up
I'm going to stop right there because: NO. Just... NO. If you are desperate want the attention that badly, then here you go! You got my attention and I'm more than pleased to answer just how irritating your message is to me. Now personally I am against how you think. I don't speak for anyone except for myself, so I'll say this with my complete honesty:
Your ideals stink as bad as your reference to bathrooms.
I can tell you that homosexuals are not as evil as the people you are describing. Even then, those kind of people are far more despicable than evil, but homosexuals? NO! Homosexuals are some of the nicest people on the planet, and you're comparing them to adulterers? That made me sick to my stomach reading that! You're no better than Joe when it comes to comparing copyright infringement to rape (and hey, you mentioned it as well! That doesn't make you any more likable, though...).
"I think I must be a bit out there today..."
"A bit?" You think that you're "a bit" out there? ... *facepalms* Why did I response to you in the first place? ... Wait, I got it:
You're an idiot. That's the bottom line. Listen to That Anonymous Coward and seek help. Maybe they could knock some sense into that empty head of yours.
On the post: Justice Department Calls Megaupload Case A Success; Hands Out Cash To Cops To Do More Bogus Takedowns
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Plus considering with the talks of "guilty before innocent" in nearly every story relating to the law... I imagine we have adopted that belief from the games. Also when did the DL-6 case happened again? This year?
On the post: DOJ Lawyer Explores 'Copyright Freeconomics'; Suggests Copyright Needs To Change
Re: This blog is the one that's inflexible.
"Creators give stuff away for free all of the time..."
*raises finger and opens mouth* ... Well, I've been doing that since 2009, but I REALLY doubt every creator gives their stuff away (and the key word is "every")
"You should be honest about what you mean by 'free'."
Oh yeah, and do you mind telling us what your definition of "free" is, or don't you trust the Big Dictionary? ... Sorry, I got to take a moment to laugh. Also I'll give you a dollar if you say "Google" once. Go on, try it!
"These folks always pretend that money just falls from the sky every other Friday."
But for me... do I have to say it? And honestly do you think that people are seriously dumb enough to NOT know how a business is run outside of high school? ... Wait, I forget I'm talking to bob here... never mind, go about your crazy ranting. Next time I'll see you, I'll be on hand with some popcorn.
On the post: Can We Kill The Myth That The Constitution Guarantees Copyrights And Patents?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Can We Kill The Myth That The Constitution Guarantees Copyrights And Patents?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Why It's Tempting, But Troubling, To Use Copyright As A Stand In For Moral Rights
Re:
On the post: Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter The Public Domain? The Data Says... No
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Every single time it is with money with you people... if this is about the money, then just say it! That way we could say "hey everyone! These guys only care about your money, not your personal needs, so please ignore them!" Ugh, I really hate that this is just about the money and nothing else.
"... what happens to almost everything in the public domain: it gets ignored."
OK, let's test that little theory. Why don't you put yourself in the public domain and we'll find out if people will ignore you.
On the post: Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter The Public Domain? The Data Says... No
Re: Re: Re:
B. Who care? If this is a copyright issue, it's not like I'm interested in using Mickey for any of my projects once he does hit public domain... that is, if he gets into public domain. It's also highly unlikely I'll touch Steamboat Willie other than watching because I am busying with my own work and I have no interest in messing around with the short.
C. With connections to your last sentence in B, keep slinging those ad homs out. I'm sure you're going to win this argument if you keeping bashing others with them.
Next >>