Can I ask you something: what is there to understand about copyright law? As far as I know, it's a jumble mess. Care to explain it as simply as possible?
Idiots do have minds, Joe. Albeit their intelligence isn't pretty high, they can think. Though I call myself an "idiot" sometimes (this is more than less me commenting on my lack of knowledge, of course), I do view myself as mindless or a true idiot.
You know, I got an idea for a story of my own... it deals with this vampire falling for a human girl and there's a love triangle and werewolves...
And that's all I have in common in Twilight. So what I have the same elements; I didn't go into any specifications on what I just said and I do have a plot going for my story that is, as far as I know, different than what is in Twilight. As far as anyone knows, I got my own twist to the idea and, as someone who calls himself a "salvager," could work until I get every detail fixed and perfect to my vision. From there, I'll let the public decide if it's worth reading or am I'm going to be the next butt of the joke (joining E.L. James alongside Meyer)
About the last sentence in your first paragraph... sure you have an opinion about how you view Mike (and some of the other writers), but... as you said, it is an OPINION. OPINIONS are not FACTS! Now we will see things differently, that's a fact, and I can say that you have some messed-up views... that is my opinion. It's also a fact that this is an opinion blog that put their own twists on other stories, but calling someone a "(bleeping) idiot)" (sorry, not good with swears) is not an honest opinion but an ad hom-laced opinion.
And somehow I'm missing the impact of your sarcastic "infamous ... masterpiece" line. Maybe a few italics might help, maybe a /s tag might do... no wait, that won't work.
We act like you're talking down to us? Boy, that seems like a understatement. We don't act like it... we KNOW it! The thing is, whenever I check any of your comments out, I see that you are attempting to make yourselves look bigger in the process, talking down to even Mike because how your views are radically different from his, and you're bullying him to get a "direct" answer to a loaded question that has been answered several times already! And for what? To make yourselves look better even more? As far as I know, you keep on attacking TechDirt with some personal intentions, ignoring answers so you can get a "simple" and "direct" answer, all for what goal? If it is to make you look better, you have a far, far way to go.
Of course Greevar asked a question... but that was for Joe about how he normally behaves in these comments. And he only commented three times in this particular thread, two are to Joe while only one is to you. In fact, most of his questions are to Joe, not you. (or are you Joe?) How can you ask a question to him when he's not asking you anything? And... this got started when you commented on Alana's comment, not what Greevar said first...
Though I have to disagree with Greevar on this: you're not the very soul of dishonesty. Don't get me wrong, you're completely dishonest, but not the very soul of it! Plus there are other factors that makes you up, like thick-headed, stubborn and arrogant, and there are many more other words that could be use to describe you!
"All you anger about people lashing out..."
First off, what are you saying right there?! No matter how many times I read it, it doesn't make any sense with that wording! And now I'm going to paraphrase Greevar's comment below this one:
"Lashing out? Some random, angry Anonymous Coward is accusing us of 'lashing out'? You are a hypocrite and a liar. If you actually believe what you say, you're delusional. If not, you're the saddest and most obsessed troll I've ever seen. Even if you do 'take him down', what have you really accomplished? You get some smug self satisfaction and everyone else, including Mike, goes about their lives just as they did before you became the persistent pain in the ass you've made yourself into."
Honestly your kind loves to point out the littlest and smallest error you can find and bring it out to make it a big deal. So what? If it's something small that could be fix, then fix it and don't deal with it any further. Continue to make it a big deal, and you're going to look like an idiot over arguing over a stupid point.
... And I fail to come up with something witty to say for the rest of your comment. It just screaming at me to hit a wall for just how stupid you are.
... It seems like every day, I am thinking about add-ons to this proposition that I have in my head at the moment, in hopes if that, one day, we can get rid of this sort of corruption and help give back to who really deserve nice stuff: the public. Thing is, who in this current government environment is going to listen from someone of the public that has a good idea for a law that could help the public, while making changes to our corrupted systems, and potentially save our country from stooping to a whole new level of stupid?
On the post: New Data Dump Shows Feds Massively Increased Spying On Who You're Talking To
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: GoDaddy Receives Patent On 'Announcing A Domain Name Registration On A Social Website'
Re: Re:
1) Well that explains a lot... a LOT, of what your comments are about.
2) Don't you have an spell checking on your computer? Your English is more broken than my speaking.
On the post: New Data Dump Shows Feds Massively Increased Spying On Who You're Talking To
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: New Data Dump Shows Feds Massively Increased Spying On Who You're Talking To
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Got another insult you can use on us, Joe?
On the post: New Data Dump Shows Feds Massively Increased Spying On Who You're Talking To
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Once Again: Just Because You Can Go Indie, Doesn't Mean You Need To
Whoa-- is that the sound of bob?
And an true estimated time: 16 years, or never. Money's on the latter.
On the post: Once Again, If Someone Has The Same Lame Story Idea You Had, It's Not Copyright Infringement
I Got an Idea
And that's all I have in common in Twilight. So what I have the same elements; I didn't go into any specifications on what I just said and I do have a plot going for my story that is, as far as I know, different than what is in Twilight. As far as anyone knows, I got my own twist to the idea and, as someone who calls himself a "salvager," could work until I get every detail fixed and perfect to my vision. From there, I'll let the public decide if it's worth reading or am I'm going to be the next butt of the joke (joining E.L. James alongside Meyer)
On the post: The Internet Savvy Appear To Agree On A Lot Of Policy Ideas
Re:
Really I do find this interesting and will be willing to try it out if something like this takes effect.
On the post: The Internet Savvy Appear To Agree On A Lot Of Policy Ideas
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Police Delete Aftermath Footage Of Suspect Shot 41 Times
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Once Again, If Someone Has The Same Lame Story Idea You Had, It's Not Copyright Infringement
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: The Internet Savvy Appear To Agree On A Lot Of Policy Ideas
Re:
On the post: Once Again, If Someone Has The Same Lame Story Idea You Had, It's Not Copyright Infringement
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Entertainment Industry Flips Out At The Good Parts Of Canada's New Copyright Law, Demands Changes Via TPP
Re:
On the post: Alana's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And somehow I'm missing the impact of your sarcastic "infamous ... masterpiece" line. Maybe a few italics might help, maybe a /s tag might do... no wait, that won't work.
We act like you're talking down to us? Boy, that seems like a understatement. We don't act like it... we KNOW it! The thing is, whenever I check any of your comments out, I see that you are attempting to make yourselves look bigger in the process, talking down to even Mike because how your views are radically different from his, and you're bullying him to get a "direct" answer to a loaded question that has been answered several times already! And for what? To make yourselves look better even more? As far as I know, you keep on attacking TechDirt with some personal intentions, ignoring answers so you can get a "simple" and "direct" answer, all for what goal? If it is to make you look better, you have a far, far way to go.
Of course Greevar asked a question... but that was for Joe about how he normally behaves in these comments. And he only commented three times in this particular thread, two are to Joe while only one is to you. In fact, most of his questions are to Joe, not you. (or are you Joe?) How can you ask a question to him when he's not asking you anything? And... this got started when you commented on Alana's comment, not what Greevar said first...
Though I have to disagree with Greevar on this: you're not the very soul of dishonesty. Don't get me wrong, you're completely dishonest, but not the very soul of it! Plus there are other factors that makes you up, like thick-headed, stubborn and arrogant, and there are many more other words that could be use to describe you!
"All you anger about people lashing out..."
First off, what are you saying right there?! No matter how many times I read it, it doesn't make any sense with that wording! And now I'm going to paraphrase Greevar's comment below this one:
"Lashing out? Some random, angry Anonymous Coward is accusing us of 'lashing out'? You are a hypocrite and a liar. If you actually believe what you say, you're delusional. If not, you're the saddest and most obsessed troll I've ever seen. Even if you do 'take him down', what have you really accomplished? You get some smug self satisfaction and everyone else, including Mike, goes about their lives just as they did before you became the persistent pain in the ass you've made yourself into."
(P.S: Sorry Greevar for taking your comment!)
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just to save time...
... And I fail to come up with something witty to say for the rest of your comment. It just screaming at me to hit a wall for just how stupid you are.
On the post: USTR: By Making People Testify About TPP Text They Cannot See... We're Being Transparent
Re:
On the post: USTR: By Making People Testify About TPP Text They Cannot See... We're Being Transparent
On the post: USTR: By Making People Testify About TPP Text They Cannot See... We're Being Transparent
Re:
On the post: Switzerland Questions Crazy Hollywood Claims About File Sharing... Ends Up On Congressional Watchlist
Re: Re: Re: Re: Can we get "kool-aid" trigger the comment spam-filter ? We're being flooded here!
Next >>