ARE YOU CERTIFIABLY, PSYCHOLOGICALLY, CRIMINALLY INSANE? If there is ONE person in this world that these kinds of powers should NOT be given to, It is Trump. He has demonstrated he is NOT responsible with such power, and you just handed these powers over to him on a silver platter with a golden spoon. That is THE most boneheaded move you could have done, and here we are.
the problem is that companies, gamers, and a hot of other services cannot work on a wireless network designed for phones. They need a fixed line internet, which is something that ISP's are increasingly refusing to build. You cannot play WoW over an iphone network, you just can't. So why are they pushing for it? Why are they willing to destroy an entire market, a successful market for the name of "broadband"?
not being from Maine myself, I can only imagine the meteorological impact itself can have. What I mean is the weather, school closing due to excessive cold/snow. Pretty sure LePage wants kids to school, in 6 feet of snow, uphill, both ways, just to find out school's been cancelled.
okay so the problem is, that Content CARRIERS are also Content PROVIDERS. what I mean is that those who carry the content, also make some content. This would again, be akin to Railroad companies owning the iron mines, the steel mills, AND the factories. Content providers should NOT be content carriers.
Unfavorable speech is still protected free speech: See - Snyder vs Phelps.
also, according to HuffPo, DC courts handle both federal and local cases, so the federal prosecutors also have a certain... bias? In the case? as in they work for the govt, who the protesters happen to be protesting about. if that makes sense.
On the post: Copyright Troll Gets Smacked Around By Court, As Judge Wonders If Some Of Its Experts Even Exist
On the post: Blackburn Doubles Down On A Decade Of Lies As She Pushes Fake Net Neutrality Law
Re: Re:
On the post: Trump's Personal Lawyer Sues Buzzfeed For Publishing Allegedly False Statements Written By Someone Else
On the post: Appeals Court OKs F-Bombs For Federal Trademark Protection
On the post: Trump Doesn't Understand Surveillance Powers; House Votes To Give Him More Of It
ARE YOU CERTIFIABLY, PSYCHOLOGICALLY, CRIMINALLY INSANE? If there is ONE person in this world that these kinds of powers should NOT be given to, It is Trump. He has demonstrated he is NOT responsible with such power, and you just handed these powers over to him on a silver platter with a golden spoon. That is THE most boneheaded move you could have done, and here we are.
On the post: Nebraska The First 'Red' State To Craft Its Own Net Neutrality Law
Re: Re:
On the post: Trump's New Rural Broadband Executive Order Doesn't Actually Do Much Of Anything
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Trump's New Rural Broadband Executive Order Doesn't Actually Do Much Of Anything
Re:
On the post: Copyright Maximalists Throw In The Towel On Term Extension; Admit That Maybe Copyright Is Too Long
On the post: It Took Only Three Days For Germany's New Hate Speech Law To Cause Collateral Damage
On the post: Indiana Legislator Wants To Force NFL Team To Hand Out Refunds To Fans 'Offended' By Kneeling Players
Re: Re:
On the post: New York State Appellate Court Says Cell Site Location Records Have No Expectation Of Privacy
On the post: California The Latest State To Propose Its Own Net Neutrality Rules
On the post: Maine Governor Tells 16-Year-Old Worried About Net Neutrality Repeal To 'Pick Up A Book And Read'
Re:
Just like he did when he was a kid!
On the post: Indiana Legislator Wants To Force NFL Team To Hand Out Refunds To Fans 'Offended' By Kneeling Players
On the post: No, The Death Of Net Neutrality Will Not Be Subtle
On the post: Months Later, And People Are Still Discovering Their Dead Loved Ones Were Used To Support Killing Net Neutrality
Re: Re: Forensic analysis of the data set?
On the post: Good News: Trump Protestors Accused Of 'Hiding Behind The First Amendment' Acquitted
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I don't think one of those words means what you think it means.
On the post: CenturyLink Pushed For Net Neutrality Repeal, Now Adorably Calls For FCC To Police Interconnection
okay so the problem is, that Content CARRIERS are also Content PROVIDERS. what I mean is that those who carry the content, also make some content. This would again, be akin to Railroad companies owning the iron mines, the steel mills, AND the factories. Content providers should NOT be content carriers.
On the post: Good News: Trump Protestors Accused Of 'Hiding Behind The First Amendment' Acquitted
Unfavorable speech is still protected free speech: See - Snyder vs Phelps.
also, according to HuffPo, DC courts handle both federal and local cases, so the federal prosecutors also have a certain... bias? In the case? as in they work for the govt, who the protesters happen to be protesting about. if that makes sense.
Next >>