I think you'd be surprised at how many people would make their photos freely available for a project that seemed interesting.
You touch on another issue that I wonder about--the effect of all this documentation on memory. I have very few memories of my childhood. I also have very few pictures (and those mostly contextless class photos), and no film whatsoever. My daughter, on the other hand, has a multitude of photos and vides documenting most of the events of her life.
How will all that evidence effect her memories of her childhood?
Not all seats are created equal. Even a half full stadium may not have had any $25,000 seats available. But great scott! A $25,000 seat with an obstructed view?!?
Here's the word that needs to be tossed about more in asshole owner sports stories: monopoly. Owners get away with treating fans like dirt because they have a monopoly on their product in their region.
The objections raised seem to me a bit of nibbling about the edges. A vast majority of children do not fall within these objections. Fine, you've identified some potential tweaks, but as an attack on the bill, it is weak tea indeed. This isn't protect the children, it's defend parental rights.
The cries of "nanny state" are laughable silliness, this the the opposite of nanny state.
have more cash & Gold in the bank than you can imagine
Did anyone else think of this?
Luke: Rich, powerful. Listen, if you were to rescue her. The reward would be...
Han: What?
Luke: Well more wealth than you can imagine.
Han: I don't know. I can imagine quite a lot.
Right now, things are simple. almost every address ends in [dot] three letters. If it's government, it's .gov, if it's nonprofit, it's .org, anything else is probably .com
How is the public served by all this extra crap they have to remember?
And I agree completely, I am far less likely to visit .transformers than I am .com. If I have to type it in, I'm not going to bother.
The problem in this case is that it wan't being used in commerce, but PNC's bigger problem, as you point out right at the end, is that it's descriptive. This term should be (and if challenged, probably will be found) untrademarkable.
To Canada, I can say this has been a big problem affecting nearly all online services. For now, my answer is unblock.ca
This service routes you through a US IP address so you can watch US Netflix (Netflix Canada is pretty much of a scam) and hulu. I haven't tried it with a kindle, but it's worth looking into.
So let me see if I have this straight: in response to the problem of people texting during movies, Cinemark creates a system that encourages people to text during movies.
People who don't have smart phones, turn their phones off, or simply don't use them are ineligible for the reward, but a portion of their ticket money will be ised to fund the incentive for bad behavior.
And this is proposed as a better alternative to kicking people out for rude and disruptive behavior?
Your takedown doesn't address the phrase as I've always understood it.
Businesses make their money somewhere. If you are using a service you don't pay for, it's because they're selling the information they collect about you and feel they make enough from that that it's worth it for them not to charge you. It is true quite literally.
But then, I've never thought it meant free means bad treatment. Apparently someone does think that's what it means.
I can't help but notice the every country that contributed to the creation of the internet is red. If the black countries wish to censor and/or tax an internet, I fully support their right to create one and do whatever they wish with it.
I can't help but notice the every country that contributed to the creation of the internet is red. If the black countries wish to censor and/or tax an internet, I fully support their right to create one and do whatever they wish with it.
I can't help but notice the every country that contributed to the creation of the internet is red. If the black countries wish to censor and/or tax an internet, I fully support their right to create one and do whatever they wish with it.
I can't help but notice the every country that contributed to the creation of the internet is red. If the black countries wish to censor and/or tax an internet, I fully support their right to create one and do whatever they wish with it.
Exactly. First, how is it possible something that important was on a laptop (of all things!) and nowhere else? Second, why would the jury have trouble with the amount? Leslie himself determined the amount.
I've google searched my name before, but never an image search
Mostly flowers for some reason. Very few people, none of whom are me. Can I sue?
Strangely, while I did not appear, my father in law did. Turned out to be from his obituary, which mentions me. That's my highest ranking--someone else's obituary. Can I sue over that?
On the post: What's Wrong With This Picture?
You touch on another issue that I wonder about--the effect of all this documentation on memory. I have very few memories of my childhood. I also have very few pictures (and those mostly contextless class photos), and no film whatsoever. My daughter, on the other hand, has a multitude of photos and vides documenting most of the events of her life.
How will all that evidence effect her memories of her childhood?
On the post: Not Connecting: Miami Marlins Organization Threatens Season Ticket Holders With Lawsuit Because They Want To Change Seats
Here's the word that needs to be tossed about more in asshole owner sports stories: monopoly. Owners get away with treating fans like dirt because they have a monopoly on their product in their region.
On the post: Proposed California Bill Would Require Sites To Hand Over Private Info On Kids To Their Parents
The cries of "nanny state" are laughable silliness, this the the opposite of nanny state.
On the post: The Insanity Of Making A 'Wizard Of Oz' Film In Today's IP Climate
Just kidding.
On the post: Bizarre Legal Threat Of The Day: Confused Zoo Owner Threatens Popehat Over... Well... Just Read It
have more cash & Gold in the bank than you can imagine
Luke: Rich, powerful. Listen, if you were to rescue her. The reward would be...
Han: What?
Luke: Well more wealth than you can imagine.
Han: I don't know. I can imagine quite a lot.
On the post: Should Google, Amazon And Others Be Able To Lock Up New Generic Top Level Domains For Their Own Use?
Re:
How is the public served by all this extra crap they have to remember?
And I agree completely, I am far less likely to visit .transformers than I am .com. If I have to type it in, I'm not going to bother.
On the post: How To Resolve A Trademark Issue Politely & Without Legal Threats
On the post: Bank Threatens Reporter Over Trademark For Using The Term 'Virtual Wallet'
On the post: Canadian Kindle Owners Forced To Leave American Kindle Content & Features Behind
Having reently moved from the US
This service routes you through a US IP address so you can watch US Netflix (Netflix Canada is pretty much of a scam) and hulu. I haven't tried it with a kindle, but it's worth looking into.
On the post: MTP's David Gregory Does Journalism, Some Citizens Want His Arrest
(By the way, NBC did contact DC police for permission and that permission was refused. They pulled this stunt knowing it was illegal.)
On the post: Rather Than Punishing Moviegoing Texters, Why Not Provide Incentives For Them To Put Down Their Phones?
People who don't have smart phones, turn their phones off, or simply don't use them are ineligible for the reward, but a portion of their ticket money will be ised to fund the incentive for bad behavior.
And this is proposed as a better alternative to kicking people out for rude and disruptive behavior?
On the post: Stop Saying 'If You're Not Paying, You're The Product'
Businesses make their money somewhere. If you are using a service you don't pay for, it's because they're selling the information they collect about you and feel they make enough from that that it's worth it for them not to charge you. It is true quite literally.
But then, I've never thought it meant free means bad treatment. Apparently someone does think that's what it means.
On the post: Who Signed The ITU WCIT Treaty... And Who Didn't
Re:
On the post: Who Signed The ITU WCIT Treaty... And Who Didn't
On the post: Who Signed The ITU WCIT Treaty... And Who Didn't
On the post: Who Signed The ITU WCIT Treaty... And Who Didn't
On the post: Who Signed The ITU WCIT Treaty... And Who Didn't
On the post: Don't Promise $1 Million For Your Lost Laptop Via YouTube & Twitter If You're Not Prepared To Pay
Re: Re:
On the post: App Developer Hijacks Customer Twitter Accounts In An Attempt To Shame Pirates
On the post: Australian Court: Google Must Pay Guy $200k Due To Image Search Turning Up Gangsters
I've google searched my name before, but never an image search
Strangely, while I did not appear, my father in law did. Turned out to be from his obituary, which mentions me. That's my highest ranking--someone else's obituary. Can I sue over that?
Next >>