That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Oct 2019 @ 7:43pm
So a big name in an industry that is known for fighting the future tooth and nail (is like the Boston Strangler!!!!!!!!!!!!) decides yet another new thing is the devil.
Many of the big chains are shitty places to go, imagine people who don't want to call for the jaws of life to pry their shoes off the floor after the movie ends.
Oh its all horrible blah blah... but then why does Alamo do such good business? The specifically target behaviors that are unacceptable & are strict about the policies. Big chains would rather have their ushers armed with nightvision looking for cammers than making sure that bitch 2 rows up stops texting & talking the entire movie.
If the Oscars don't want streaming content, fine.
The streamers can make their own awards, whats one more in the dozens of self congratulatory circle jerks we have now?
The upside would be the streamers would have a tight show & let people press a button to cue winners up on their to watch list.
Perhaps they need to admit its time to adapt & focus on that rather than pouring huge cash into efforts that only punish paying customers.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Oct 2019 @ 7:34pm
Re: I'm having problems seeing the issue...
They know you rang a phone sex service at 2:24 am and spoke for 18 minutes. But they don't know what you talked about.
They know you called the suicide prevention hotline from the Golden Gate Bridge. But the topic of the call remains a secret.
They know you spoke with an HIV testing service, then your doctor, then your health insurance company in the same hour. But they don't know what was discussed.
They know you received a call from the local NRA office while it was having a campaign against gun legislation, and then called your senators and congressional representatives immediately after. But the content of those calls remains safe from government intrusion.
They know you called a gynecologist, spoke for a half hour, and then called the local Planned Parenthood's number later that day. But nobody knows what you spoke about.
They know who you visit, they can construct an entire timeline of your movements, they know who answered the door & what was said. Its not directly supplied, but can be requested (if you say yes or no) and reviewed because they want it.
If Google wants to fulfill a warrant for everyone within range of a geographic point for a 36 hour period, why should we question that? Why be concerned that LEO's who have been shown to abuse private data for their own gain time and time and time again can fire up the app & see if their ex has a new man, if that cute girl they pulled over earlier lives alone & is home alone now.
The ability to abuse this system is huge, but pretending it is for our safety is supposed to make it okay. If a home owner wants to share video of a porch pirate that is one thing, it is another to pull video from an entire neighborhood just to take a peek.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Oct 2019 @ 12:14pm
Re:
Because the people deciding how much their budget should be only care about awards & wins.
This encourages them to pick off the low hanging fruit & pile on charges.
The IRS flat out admitted they only audit us poor folks because rich people can fight back, so they don't bother.
My favorite, Goldman Sachs got a pass for destroying the economy b/c the guy in charge decided it would be to hard to win. (The fact he left his job & landed at GS in a cushy job afterwards in no way should be viewed as a horrific thing where it looks like he was offered a golden parachute to just say oh to hard so we won't even try.)
Rewarding only wins is stupid, but we need easy metrics.
Imagine what might happen if they got close to convicting one of the high and mighty... that might cause a ripple that oh shit they are coming after us. But instead we need slam dunks so nothing improves, the untouchable stay untouchable.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Oct 2019 @ 9:48am
There was a comment from the cop who arrested the 13 year old for making a finger gun that I think is at the heart of this.
Overland Park Police Chief Frank Donchez insists that his officer did absolutely the right thing when he handcuffed and arrested a Shawnee Mission eighth-grader who formed her fingers into a pretend gun and aimed at her classmates.
“I’ll take the heat all day long for arresting a 13-year-old,” Donchez told The Star this past week. “I’m not willing to take the heat for not preventing a school tragedy.”
In a climate of heightened fear, where people wonder which school in suburban America will be the scene of the next mass shooting, that sort of vigilance makes sense to some.
Not willing to take the heat for not preventing it.
Because fingers guns lead always to real guns.
They are TERRIFIED they will miss the next twin towers attack if they can't look at every single thing they come across.
I'm reminded of "Thin Thread" which only needed a little information & when run after the fact would have identified the 9/11 hijackers, which was replaced with a much larger sinkhole of information where we don't see them coming but we totally can construct a file of all the things we missed after the fact.
They fear the unknown.
We need to look in every phone, every hard drive... just to be safe. Because if something bad happens, it'll be their ass for not having recruited the Amazing Kreskin to read their mind before hand.
They think the answer is more data added to the giant haystack of worthless crap that only cost us some of our rights for them to gather, but if they manage to stop 1 low iq person lead astray by a CI it was all worth it.
We can never be 100% safe & anyone who promises you that is lying. We can do something things to lower risks, but nothing will be 100%. We need to stop freaking out about possibilities & imagined dangers. 1 horrible event with a bodycount lower than a lot of preventable things in this country gets all of the attention and cash... b/c they promised us it would never happen again.
Somehow we hold them to those promises but not the promises to lower our taxes, provide better services, help the poor & needy, improve infrastructure. We need to let them off the hook for the stupid promise & tell them to stop wasting cash on chasing boogeymen.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 20 Oct 2019 @ 12:30am
Re: Re: Re: bogus notices
Another happy "accident" of the poorly written law.
It was designed from the ground up only to benefit corporations, b/c they are the only ones who can own copyrights. (Yes we all know thats wrong, but all must bow to protect the cartoon mouse)
You infringe, all sorts of punishments.
They screw up, nothing bad happens.
They lie repeatedly, nothing bad happens.
Scammers game the system, until now nothing bad ever happened.
No one would ever SWAT or take vengeance on someone fighting back... wanna buy a bridge in brooklyn?
The system is broken.
We can't even get heard or a seat at the table, and we're supposed to have just as large as a stake in these things.
There is change on the horizon, but it will not be beneficial for us. They will be able to extort money faster with less "evidence" (because the current system requires they have evidence beyond because we said so & payment for the courts time). The music companies are reaping the benefits of their unfettered insanity & where they used to enjoy demanding the lions share of money over a sample, now they are mad they have to pay for "stealing" sounds from others.
Maybe someday we can have law that makes sense, but I'm pretty sure that would require getting rid of a bunch of cartel members and their cronies in Washington.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 18 Oct 2019 @ 9:19pm
Notice the one constant through time has been those assigning blame to things as being the fault for moral decline... tend to have the worst morals themselves.
Somehow they get everyone looking over here at the problem and ignore them behaving in the ways they blame on the thing.
I highly doubt that GTA taught kids about hookers, how many moral upstanding leaders have been busted with them in the same time period?
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 18 Oct 2019 @ 1:47am
Re: Re: bogus notices
The victims get a message from YT telling them the strike will stand & to not do it again.
This is why the victims need to sue, its REALLY hard to spin actual creators who are being destroyed as pirates.
Even if the "penalty of perjury" was $5/$10/$20, it would create a ripple right quick.
Like when HBO demanded HBO.com be delisted for having pirate content... $5. Multiply that by the 90% of shitty notices they get from alleged rights holders suddenly those shitty notices are getting much better.
Yes someone can always find a way to game the system but many of these extortionists are saying send us money or we give you another strike creating a trail to show abuse & get that idiot blacklisted from using the system.
Because it will be hard is no reason to not fscking try.
When it becomes clear that they've actually tightened up the DMCA notice requirements, its harder for asshats.
Right now the system is ripe for abuse because it is completely unbalanced to assume anyone who says they are a rightsholder has to be assumed as such even when they don't even include the damn registration number.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 17 Oct 2019 @ 4:49pm
Ummm, question from the peanut gallery.
As he has admitted in writing to sending bogus notices, can't the recipients use that to bring a 512(f) claim & force a court to finally define the penalties we so desperately need?
Its nice that YouTube got paid, but how does that address any harms to the victims?
Possible loss of their income, branded as a thief, their voice silenced. People love to remember the allegations but the outcomes not so much.
Setting a standard, even a tiny one, would have huge benefits for everyone. Imagine the faucet pouring forth bogus notices suddenly being turned way down.
Imagine courts noticing that bogus takedowns are harmful & deciding that repeat abusers can legally be ignored for a period of time.
While courts don't like to make law, Congress screwed us over & it is apparent that there is not parity in the damages. It is well past time that the system actually be balanced & even small dings to those sending bogus notices would improve their behavior.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 17 Oct 2019 @ 1:44am
This will TOTES not draw more attention to us as the media looks into the history of the technique and compiles a long list of cases where this technique ended up convicting innocent people.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 12 Oct 2019 @ 4:31am
Re:
But in Hollywood where having 100 awards from things no one has ever heard of means people will come see it.
Or at least that used to work, until we were able to watch things in the comfort of our own homes & those companies started making their own content.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 11 Oct 2019 @ 4:18pm
Everyone wants to control their image, spin the narrative.
To make it in China, you have to play by China's rules.
At first it was little things (no skeletons in MTG sets for China as that offends people) & other small concessions.
Then the asks got a little bit bigger, but nothing to far.
Now that you are fully plugged in and wanting the cash the market offers, now you sell your soul to keep getting paid.
In France, someone in government does something dumb & people riot demanding change.
In China, no one gets to complain, no one gets to demand change, & they will not tolerate even a whiff of complaints fearing it will spur political overthrow.
The brands give in b/c well they exist to make money & can't think beyond the next check. Eurovision banned China from airing the show after they edited sections out. There was no fear about loss of the pay day, they were angry that "gay" content (which wasn't that over the top) was censored out. Hell even Russia lets the content air & they are still actively gathering people & killing them for the 'crime' of being gay.
People are far to used to brands standing up for things...
10 million moms (3 wacky chicks & a purse dog) threatened to boycott all sorts of brands for promoting teh gay, most of the brands were worried then realized its better to not give in to a few people demanding to control everything to make themselves happy in denying reality.
They overlook brands doing what they do not what they say...
Hobby Lobby, birth control is evil!! But hey our pension fund is heavily invested in it oh and we fund terrorists to steal artifacts for us. But a whole bunch of moral crusaders still support them.
Perhaps it is time to admit that corporate people aren't real people. They hold no opinions or morals. They want to get paid & the new market paying them matters more than you who paid for their new shiny stadiums. For every person yelling they are leaving Blizz, there is a nation with 10 people for every 1 of us who can replace your revenue stream.
But hey Blizzard shutting down the ability for people to leave & hastily demanding governmental IDs to be allowed to shut your account down is just them hedging their bet that you'll forget you were going to quit if they make it take long enough. Think I am wrong?? Notice beating your wife in the NFL still has a way lesser punishment than failing a test for pot.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 11 Oct 2019 @ 2:52pm
If we just impose more rules on how many refrigerators are allowed in a neighborhood during this time limit, our ice delivery sales will keep going strong.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 10 Oct 2019 @ 10:28pm
Pity she promised her client the sun, moon, & stars.
He had a story that magically got more sympathetic towards him as long as you didn't look to closely.
Her actual goal was to over turn 230, she claims her next stop is Congress to lobby them.
Sending sex crazed men to him & Grindr did nothing to help!!!
We wanted to hold them responsible for these things we imaged they could have been doing while ignoring what was really happening but the law stopped us. Get rid of this bad law!!!
Of course the real story is something none of us know, the narrative we do have is cleaned up to present him as the victim of an evil corporation with deep pockets... ignoring that his ex is super crazy & perhaps someone kept poking the bear to get more "evidence" of Grindr being evil.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 10 Oct 2019 @ 3:32pm
"NYPD cops are the best in the country"
Citation needed, mainly because we know how many terrorism sites they were run out of around the globe b/c they showed up & pretended they were experts.
On the post: Ed Norton Calls Out Steven Spielberg & Hollywood For Demonizing Netflix
So a big name in an industry that is known for fighting the future tooth and nail (is like the Boston Strangler!!!!!!!!!!!!) decides yet another new thing is the devil.
Many of the big chains are shitty places to go, imagine people who don't want to call for the jaws of life to pry their shoes off the floor after the movie ends.
Oh its all horrible blah blah... but then why does Alamo do such good business? The specifically target behaviors that are unacceptable & are strict about the policies. Big chains would rather have their ushers armed with nightvision looking for cammers than making sure that bitch 2 rows up stops texting & talking the entire movie.
If the Oscars don't want streaming content, fine.
The streamers can make their own awards, whats one more in the dozens of self congratulatory circle jerks we have now?
The upside would be the streamers would have a tight show & let people press a button to cue winners up on their to watch list.
Perhaps they need to admit its time to adapt & focus on that rather than pouring huge cash into efforts that only punish paying customers.
On the post: Civil Rights Groups Ask Legislators To Block Ring's Surveillance Partnerships With Law Enforcement
Re: I'm having problems seeing the issue...
They know you rang a phone sex service at 2:24 am and spoke for 18 minutes. But they don't know what you talked about.
They know you called the suicide prevention hotline from the Golden Gate Bridge. But the topic of the call remains a secret.
They know you spoke with an HIV testing service, then your doctor, then your health insurance company in the same hour. But they don't know what was discussed.
They know you received a call from the local NRA office while it was having a campaign against gun legislation, and then called your senators and congressional representatives immediately after. But the content of those calls remains safe from government intrusion.
They know you called a gynecologist, spoke for a half hour, and then called the local Planned Parenthood's number later that day. But nobody knows what you spoke about.
They know who you visit, they can construct an entire timeline of your movements, they know who answered the door & what was said. Its not directly supplied, but can be requested (if you say yes or no) and reviewed because they want it.
If Google wants to fulfill a warrant for everyone within range of a geographic point for a 36 hour period, why should we question that? Why be concerned that LEO's who have been shown to abuse private data for their own gain time and time and time again can fire up the app & see if their ex has a new man, if that cute girl they pulled over earlier lives alone & is home alone now.
The ability to abuse this system is huge, but pretending it is for our safety is supposed to make it okay. If a home owner wants to share video of a porch pirate that is one thing, it is another to pull video from an entire neighborhood just to take a peek.
On the post: DOJ's Latest Child Porn Site Takedown Shows Encryption Isn't Really Stopping The Feds From Fighting Child Porn
Re:
Because the people deciding how much their budget should be only care about awards & wins.
This encourages them to pick off the low hanging fruit & pile on charges.
The IRS flat out admitted they only audit us poor folks because rich people can fight back, so they don't bother.
My favorite, Goldman Sachs got a pass for destroying the economy b/c the guy in charge decided it would be to hard to win. (The fact he left his job & landed at GS in a cushy job afterwards in no way should be viewed as a horrific thing where it looks like he was offered a golden parachute to just say oh to hard so we won't even try.)
Rewarding only wins is stupid, but we need easy metrics.
Imagine what might happen if they got close to convicting one of the high and mighty... that might cause a ripple that oh shit they are coming after us. But instead we need slam dunks so nothing improves, the untouchable stay untouchable.
On the post: DOJ's Latest Child Porn Site Takedown Shows Encryption Isn't Really Stopping The Feds From Fighting Child Porn
There was a comment from the cop who arrested the 13 year old for making a finger gun that I think is at the heart of this.
Overland Park Police Chief Frank Donchez insists that his officer did absolutely the right thing when he handcuffed and arrested a Shawnee Mission eighth-grader who formed her fingers into a pretend gun and aimed at her classmates.
“I’ll take the heat all day long for arresting a 13-year-old,” Donchez told The Star this past week. “I’m not willing to take the heat for not preventing a school tragedy.”
In a climate of heightened fear, where people wonder which school in suburban America will be the scene of the next mass shooting, that sort of vigilance makes sense to some.
Not willing to take the heat for not preventing it.
Because fingers guns lead always to real guns.
They are TERRIFIED they will miss the next twin towers attack if they can't look at every single thing they come across.
I'm reminded of "Thin Thread" which only needed a little information & when run after the fact would have identified the 9/11 hijackers, which was replaced with a much larger sinkhole of information where we don't see them coming but we totally can construct a file of all the things we missed after the fact.
They fear the unknown.
We need to look in every phone, every hard drive... just to be safe. Because if something bad happens, it'll be their ass for not having recruited the Amazing Kreskin to read their mind before hand.
They think the answer is more data added to the giant haystack of worthless crap that only cost us some of our rights for them to gather, but if they manage to stop 1 low iq person lead astray by a CI it was all worth it.
We can never be 100% safe & anyone who promises you that is lying. We can do something things to lower risks, but nothing will be 100%. We need to stop freaking out about possibilities & imagined dangers. 1 horrible event with a bodycount lower than a lot of preventable things in this country gets all of the attention and cash... b/c they promised us it would never happen again.
Somehow we hold them to those promises but not the promises to lower our taxes, provide better services, help the poor & needy, improve infrastructure. We need to let them off the hook for the stupid promise & tell them to stop wasting cash on chasing boogeymen.
On the post: Guy Who Tried To Extort YouTubers With Bogus DMCA Takedowns Agrees To Settlement
Re: Re: Re: bogus notices
Another happy "accident" of the poorly written law.
It was designed from the ground up only to benefit corporations, b/c they are the only ones who can own copyrights. (Yes we all know thats wrong, but all must bow to protect the cartoon mouse)
You infringe, all sorts of punishments.
They screw up, nothing bad happens.
They lie repeatedly, nothing bad happens.
Scammers game the system, until now nothing bad ever happened.
No one would ever SWAT or take vengeance on someone fighting back... wanna buy a bridge in brooklyn?
The system is broken.
We can't even get heard or a seat at the table, and we're supposed to have just as large as a stake in these things.
There is change on the horizon, but it will not be beneficial for us. They will be able to extort money faster with less "evidence" (because the current system requires they have evidence beyond because we said so & payment for the courts time). The music companies are reaping the benefits of their unfettered insanity & where they used to enjoy demanding the lions share of money over a sample, now they are mad they have to pay for "stealing" sounds from others.
Maybe someday we can have law that makes sense, but I'm pretty sure that would require getting rid of a bunch of cartel members and their cronies in Washington.
On the post: Games Blamed For Moral Decline And Addiction Throughout History
Notice the one constant through time has been those assigning blame to things as being the fault for moral decline... tend to have the worst morals themselves.
Somehow they get everyone looking over here at the problem and ignore them behaving in the ways they blame on the thing.
I highly doubt that GTA taught kids about hookers, how many moral upstanding leaders have been busted with them in the same time period?
On the post: Guy Who Tried To Extort YouTubers With Bogus DMCA Takedowns Agrees To Settlement
Re: Re: bogus notices
The victims get a message from YT telling them the strike will stand & to not do it again.
This is why the victims need to sue, its REALLY hard to spin actual creators who are being destroyed as pirates.
Even if the "penalty of perjury" was $5/$10/$20, it would create a ripple right quick.
Like when HBO demanded HBO.com be delisted for having pirate content... $5. Multiply that by the 90% of shitty notices they get from alleged rights holders suddenly those shitty notices are getting much better.
Yes someone can always find a way to game the system but many of these extortionists are saying send us money or we give you another strike creating a trail to show abuse & get that idiot blacklisted from using the system.
Because it will be hard is no reason to not fscking try.
When it becomes clear that they've actually tightened up the DMCA notice requirements, its harder for asshats.
Right now the system is ripe for abuse because it is completely unbalanced to assume anyone who says they are a rightsholder has to be assumed as such even when they don't even include the damn registration number.
On the post: Adobe Announces Plan To Essentially Steal Money From Venezuelans Because It 'Has To' Due To US Sanctions
Re: They are, in fact, offering refunds
I wonder if China reached out and told them it made them sad to not see refunds given.
On the post: Guy Who Tried To Extort YouTubers With Bogus DMCA Takedowns Agrees To Settlement
Ummm, question from the peanut gallery.
As he has admitted in writing to sending bogus notices, can't the recipients use that to bring a 512(f) claim & force a court to finally define the penalties we so desperately need?
Its nice that YouTube got paid, but how does that address any harms to the victims?
Possible loss of their income, branded as a thief, their voice silenced. People love to remember the allegations but the outcomes not so much.
Setting a standard, even a tiny one, would have huge benefits for everyone. Imagine the faucet pouring forth bogus notices suddenly being turned way down.
Imagine courts noticing that bogus takedowns are harmful & deciding that repeat abusers can legally be ignored for a period of time.
While courts don't like to make law, Congress screwed us over & it is apparent that there is not parity in the damages. It is well past time that the system actually be balanced & even small dings to those sending bogus notices would improve their behavior.
On the post: Tennessee Deputy Sued Twice In The Same Day Over A Roadside Anal Search And A Forced Baptism
Re: what did courts expect
Sure there is... they get to be boss of the union & say stupid shit on tv.
On the post: Infamous Police Interrogation Firm Sues Netflix For Defamation Over Criticism Of Its Interrogation Technique
This will TOTES not draw more attention to us as the media looks into the history of the technique and compiles a long list of cases where this technique ended up convicting innocent people.
Oh the upside Babs in in the wings warming up.
On the post: The City Of Baltimore Blew Off A $76,000 Ransomware Demand Only To Find Out A Bunch Of Its Data Had Never Been Backed Up
We we're saving money!!
Backups are just ways to burn money!
It'll never happen to us.
On the post: 'The Irishman' Ban Once Again Shows Hollywood's Disdain For Netflix is Stupid & Counterproductive
Re:
But in Hollywood where having 100 awards from things no one has ever heard of means people will come see it.
Or at least that used to work, until we were able to watch things in the comfort of our own homes & those companies started making their own content.
On the post: More Fallout From The Hong Kong Protests Hitting eSports
Re: Re:
I am not fully versed in the law there, IIRC what I heard is it was insulting to ancestors so they made changes. It very well could be illegal.
On the post: More Fallout From The Hong Kong Protests Hitting eSports
Everyone wants to control their image, spin the narrative.
To make it in China, you have to play by China's rules.
At first it was little things (no skeletons in MTG sets for China as that offends people) & other small concessions.
Then the asks got a little bit bigger, but nothing to far.
Now that you are fully plugged in and wanting the cash the market offers, now you sell your soul to keep getting paid.
In France, someone in government does something dumb & people riot demanding change.
In China, no one gets to complain, no one gets to demand change, & they will not tolerate even a whiff of complaints fearing it will spur political overthrow.
The brands give in b/c well they exist to make money & can't think beyond the next check. Eurovision banned China from airing the show after they edited sections out. There was no fear about loss of the pay day, they were angry that "gay" content (which wasn't that over the top) was censored out. Hell even Russia lets the content air & they are still actively gathering people & killing them for the 'crime' of being gay.
People are far to used to brands standing up for things...
10 million moms (3 wacky chicks & a purse dog) threatened to boycott all sorts of brands for promoting teh gay, most of the brands were worried then realized its better to not give in to a few people demanding to control everything to make themselves happy in denying reality.
They overlook brands doing what they do not what they say...
Hobby Lobby, birth control is evil!! But hey our pension fund is heavily invested in it oh and we fund terrorists to steal artifacts for us. But a whole bunch of moral crusaders still support them.
Perhaps it is time to admit that corporate people aren't real people. They hold no opinions or morals. They want to get paid & the new market paying them matters more than you who paid for their new shiny stadiums. For every person yelling they are leaving Blizz, there is a nation with 10 people for every 1 of us who can replace your revenue stream.
But hey Blizzard shutting down the ability for people to leave & hastily demanding governmental IDs to be allowed to shut your account down is just them hedging their bet that you'll forget you were going to quit if they make it take long enough. Think I am wrong?? Notice beating your wife in the NFL still has a way lesser punishment than failing a test for pot.
On the post: 'The Irishman' Ban Once Again Shows Hollywood's Disdain For Netflix is Stupid & Counterproductive
If we just impose more rules on how many refrigerators are allowed in a neighborhood during this time limit, our ice delivery sales will keep going strong.
On the post: Attorney Who Sued Grindr Responds Extremely Poorly To The Supreme Court's Rejection Of Her Section 230 Lawsuit
Re: Re: Re: Do as I say...
Suing Snapchat for a filter you tried to activate by speeding.
Suing Apple for not making it impossible for you to not text & drive.
Suing Twitter b/c you skipped that class in law school that explains how data requests work & claim its all a terrorist plot.
Suing Whirlpool b/c after you set your breakfast on fire you slammed your head into the vent hood.
Suing Fortnite b/c you refuse to take away your kids device when they ignore your rules.
Suing a dry cleaner for 50 billion dollars over lost pants.
Y'all meant to be funny... but this is actually the world today.
I never would have done those things if you had stopped me deep pockets inc, pay me.
On the post: Attorney Who Sued Grindr Responds Extremely Poorly To The Supreme Court's Rejection Of Her Section 230 Lawsuit
Pity she promised her client the sun, moon, & stars.
He had a story that magically got more sympathetic towards him as long as you didn't look to closely.
Her actual goal was to over turn 230, she claims her next stop is Congress to lobby them.
Sending sex crazed men to him & Grindr did nothing to help!!!
We wanted to hold them responsible for these things we imaged they could have been doing while ignoring what was really happening but the law stopped us. Get rid of this bad law!!!
Of course the real story is something none of us know, the narrative we do have is cleaned up to present him as the victim of an evil corporation with deep pockets... ignoring that his ex is super crazy & perhaps someone kept poking the bear to get more "evidence" of Grindr being evil.
On the post: Attorney Who Sued Grindr Responds Extremely Poorly To The Supreme Court's Rejection Of Her Section 230 Lawsuit
Re: Re: IMHO...
JFC... I missed the site signed me out...
The above is me.
On the post: NYPD Slows Down Law Enforcement, Increases Citizen Complaints
"NYPD cops are the best in the country"
Citation needed, mainly because we know how many terrorism sites they were run out of around the globe b/c they showed up & pretended they were experts.
Next >>