The judge highlights a number of similarly applicable cases, first comparing Baidu to a newspaper...
Personally, I would have been happier if the judge compared Baidu to, say, a foreign company not subject to US laws, and furthermore ruled that accessibility of a webpage to a computer located in country X does not automatically make the website owner subject to country X jurisdiction.
The NSA, the FBI and a parakeet walk into a bar and...shit. I can't think of one goddamn thing that's funny about this.
I get it they don't HAVE to report to Congress; the whole thing's basically a dog-and-pony act to shut people up (although come to think of it, it IS often funny watching them testify to Congress - it's like watching juvenile delinquents handing in their punishment essays on the topic "Why The Law Is A Good Thing" - lots of ass-grabbing and sly nudges going on in the back row there).
What I DON'T get is, where are the adults in this fucked up gang of torturers and gleeful eavesdroppers? 'Lord Of The Flies' is NOT a how-to book.
Keep Calm And Carry On...shaping a tinfoil tricorn
The British Library obviously recognizes that taking pictures of people steals their souls. Who knew that taking a picture of a book steals its copyright?
There is no indication that people were somehow confusing hobbyist-level multimeters like Sparkfun's with Fluke's high-end versions, nor any indication that anyone was using the cheap multimeters in a manner that put people at risk.
This seems to be the crux of the problem in trademark enforcement - a perception of infringement by the application (or the misapplication) of the 'moron in a hurry' test.
That being said, I applaud Fluke's solution to this potential PR nightmare.
Ah yes, The Case Of The Funky Collages. In reviewing it, I'm shocked the copyright holders of other elements incorporated into the collages didn't dogpile on top of Prince as soon as that magic word - **!!MILLIONS!!** - was uttered.
"...the technology industry is driving the development of new internet standards with the goal of having all web activity encrypted, which will make the challenges of traditional telecommunications interception for necessary national security purposes far more complex."
What's driving the current push towards increased encryption is the knowledge that certain governments are more than willing to compromise their citizen's expectations of privacy and trust, NOT the tech sector. And as for making your job more complex than tapping cables and listening to unencrypted conversations? Too. Fucking. Bad.
The panel claimed that its pre-mandate removal order was the only way to “prevent a rush to copy and proliferate the film before Google can comply” with the injunction. That claim is unpersuasive. Google Response, p.12
So, saying 'your claim is unpersuasive' is the polite, lawyerly way to say "You're one crazy motherfucker, and everything that comes out of your crazy piehole is crazy." Who knew?
To the NSA: Your claim of 'because terrorism' is unpersuasive.
To my dog: Your claim of 'the cat made me poop on the rug' is unpersuasive.
To my ex-girlfriend: your claim of 'I'm leaving you because you say the dog talks to you' is unpersuasive.
I'm not making my point well today, but it's a point that should be stressed.
The NSA and other spy agencies deliberately perverted the collaborative nature of connected computing by short-circuiting the trusts built into the systems - trusts which are a reflection of the attitudes within the minds of the programmers.
Are these attitudes naive? Only in the very narrow sense of thinking that an ideal engineering solution is the one that's straight ahead ('charmingly naive' is how a front-office guy once characterized a young programmer I knew, who asked the perfectly logical question, "This is an integration problem with Company X's software. Why don't we call up the guys over at Company X and just ask them how they're working on it?").
Once trust is gone - trust in one's own government, trust in other programmers - what will replace it? I see the unfolding events around Snowden's revelations as a watershed moment, a moment when some of the collaborative spirit that made the internet possible has been killed off, leaving the world a darker place.
Oh, to be sure, and no doubt a security engineer would never make the call to send unencrypted data between centers. But software engineers would - at least, until very recently.
Agreed. I wonder, will historians look back at computer science before 2010 and marvel at the 'charming naivete' of engineers, and will this period be known as the start of the weaponization of one the most collaborative disciplines?
Do rights exist only at the whim of a government agency?
When, in the interests of 'national security', our freedoms are compromised, is there no contrary view in these agencies?
Do these people truly believe they are pure enough, their goals noble enough, to continually state that the data they collect will never be repurposed, in spite of what history teaches us?
On the post: US Judge: Baidu's Decision To Block Certain Sites Is Protected By The First Amendment
On the post: Senators Afraid Of 'Chilling Effects' On Those Poor, Poor Lobbyists If Scientists Disclose Which Large Company Funded Research
On the post: There Is No Oversight: The NSA Withheld Documents From Intelligence Committee Heads
I get it they don't HAVE to report to Congress; the whole thing's basically a dog-and-pony act to shut people up (although come to think of it, it IS often funny watching them testify to Congress - it's like watching juvenile delinquents handing in their punishment essays on the topic "Why The Law Is A Good Thing" - lots of ass-grabbing and sly nudges going on in the back row there).
What I DON'T get is, where are the adults in this fucked up gang of torturers and gleeful eavesdroppers? 'Lord Of The Flies' is NOT a how-to book.
On the post: Senator McCain Says Snowden Is Working For Putin Based On 'Timing' Of News Reports Snowden Has Nothing To Do With
Re: This Anti-Snowden propaganda is just getting silly now.
On the post: School Coughs Up $70k In Damages For Invading 13 Year Old's Social Media Space
...just not the one they thought they were teaching.
On the post: Girl Scouts Get A Badge In Intellectual Property Maximalism
On the post: UK Court Says Information Stored Electronically Is Not 'Property'
Re:
On the post: British Library Says It's Copyright Infringement To Take Photos Inside The Library; Demands Person Delete Tweet
Keep Calm And Carry On...shaping a tinfoil tricorn
On the post: Fluke Gives Sparkfun A Bunch Of Multimeters In Response To Trademark Mess
That being said, I applaud Fluke's solution to this potential PR nightmare.
On the post: Key Fair Use Case Settles, Rather Than Continue (And, No, It's Not The Beastie Boys)
On the post: Australian Attorney General Wants To Make It A Criminal Offense To Not Turn Over Private Encryption Keys
On the post: YouTube Gives UK Gov't Broad Powers To Censor Videos It Doesn't Like, Even If They're Legal [Update: Or Not]
Re: Re:
On the post: Google Points Out That Even The Copyright Office Thinks Judge Kozinski's 'Innocence Of Muslims' Ruling Is Wrong
The Things You Learn Online!
To the NSA: Your claim of 'because terrorism' is unpersuasive.
To my dog: Your claim of 'the cat made me poop on the rug' is unpersuasive.
To my ex-girlfriend: your claim of 'I'm leaving you because you say the dog talks to you' is unpersuasive.
On the post: On The Web's 25th Anniversary, Berners-Lee Calls For A Bill of Rights For Online Users
On the post: Government Employees Suddenly Worried About Surveillance As New Plans To Stop The Next Snowden Strip All Privacy
On the post: Google States Unequivocally It Was 'Attacked' By The Chinese... And By The United States
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The NSA and other spy agencies deliberately perverted the collaborative nature of connected computing by short-circuiting the trusts built into the systems - trusts which are a reflection of the attitudes within the minds of the programmers.
Are these attitudes naive? Only in the very narrow sense of thinking that an ideal engineering solution is the one that's straight ahead ('charmingly naive' is how a front-office guy once characterized a young programmer I knew, who asked the perfectly logical question, "This is an integration problem with Company X's software. Why don't we call up the guys over at Company X and just ask them how they're working on it?").
Once trust is gone - trust in one's own government, trust in other programmers - what will replace it? I see the unfolding events around Snowden's revelations as a watershed moment, a moment when some of the collaborative spirit that made the internet possible has been killed off, leaving the world a darker place.
On the post: Google States Unequivocally It Was 'Attacked' By The Chinese... And By The United States
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Google States Unequivocally It Was 'Attacked' By The Chinese... And By The United States
Re:
On the post: American Bar Assoc. Sends Letter To NSA Seeking Affirmation Of Attorney-Client Confidentiality
When, in the interests of 'national security', our freedoms are compromised, is there no contrary view in these agencies?
Do these people truly believe they are pure enough, their goals noble enough, to continually state that the data they collect will never be repurposed, in spite of what history teaches us?
On the post: South Park Video Game To Be
CensoredHeavily Pirated Outside North AmericaNext >>