School Coughs Up $70k In Damages For Invading 13 Year Old's Social Media Space
from the everwhere-is-the-campus? dept
A couple of years ago, Tim Cushing wrote up the story of a Minnesota student who was forced to give her social media passwords to a school so they could snoop through her off-campus life and develop a couple of life-lessons for her. Those life lessons appeared to have essentially amounted to recognizing that school administrators too often see themselves as parents and they think students' free speech rights end where an administrator's interest in his/her students' lives begin. Fortunately, a judge disabused them of their misconceptions, stating in no uncertain terms that forcing a student to give up their social media passwords is a violation of the First Amendment. Common sense, how little we see of ye.
And now, to bring some closure to this story, the school is coughing up $70,000 in damages and rewriting their policies to prevent further abuse.
Minnewaska Area Schools agreed to pay $70,000 in damages and rewrite its policies to limit how intrusive the school can be when searching a student’s e-mails and social media accounts created off school grounds. The federal court settlement comes just after Rogers High School senior Reid Sagehorn, a 17-year-old honor student and football captain, was suspended for seven weeks for a two-word Internet posting in a case that created a community uproar.While it would be quite easy to see the restitution as an "all good" ending to this story, the article unfortunately then goes on to quote Minnewaska school district administrators who still can't seem to wrap their heads around the idea that it isn't their job to police students' off-campus behavior. Chief amongst them is Greg Schmidt, Superintendent, who wasn't in that position when the snooping occurred but did work on the settlement.
“A lot of schools, like the folks at Minnewaska, think that just because it’s easier to know what kids are saying off campus through social media somehow means the rules have changed, and you can punish them for what they say off campus,” said attorney Wallace Hilke, who helped lead Riley’s case from the Minnesota branch of the American Civil Liberties Union.
“Some people think schools go too far and I get that,” Schmidt said. “But we want to make kids aware that their actions outside school can be detrimental.”Unfortunately for Mr. Schmidt, the general public doesn't much care that he wants to teach kids all kinds of lessons about their personal lives. That isn't a public school's role, never has been, and never should be. Parents parent and schools...er, school? Regardless, getting involved in students' private lives is a gross misstep. The student's mother agrees.
“They never once told me they were going to bring her into the room and demand her Facebook password,” Sandra said. “I’m hoping schools kind of leave these things alone so parents can punish their own kids for things that happen off school grounds.”.Hope? Hope!?! How about demand? While the new rules crafted by the district limit school's from looking into social media exchanges unless there's a "reasonable suspicion" they will find actions or speech that violates school rules, how quickly do you think we'll hear a story about that leeway being abused? It's high time for parents to insist that they be allowed to parent their own children and for schools to focus on teaching academics, rather than life lessons.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: damages, parenting, schools, social media
Reader Comments
The First Word
“If the teacher asks, the student should refer the teacher to the parent, who can then refer the teacher to their lawyer.
Unless of course the "child" is 18 or over. Then they make their own choice.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
doesn't work...
People in power not going to jail or being publicly shamed AND removed from power is the only way to reasonably mitigate this crap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: doesn't work...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Parents need to make school officials aware that their actions inside the school can likewise be detrimental. I doubt it ever occurred to Schmidt that he was ignoring the very "lesson" he was trying to teach.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...just not the one they thought they were teaching.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
2. The teachers and administrators involved would simply leave to take a job in a different school district to escape paying the money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The tax payers picking up th bills suck, but do the damages cover the families legal bills, or have they won a somewhat pyrrhic victory?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Questions
What if the 'school rules' violate the First Amendment?
What is the definition of "reasonable suspicion" in their eyes?
Why do institutions feel they are above the law, and not report crimes to authorities claiming to adjudicate things themselves? Churches, Universities, some large companies all think internal investigations are sufficient, resulting in at least the unreported rapes on college campuses and the Catholic Churches debacle with priests and children, and the failure of the banks, just for starters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Questions
Because authoritarians will not acknowledge that anybody has power over them, whilst at the same time claiming power over others. This leads to a state of anarchy, because they claim a right they will not grant others, and they fall to fighting amongst themselves to see who can come out on top.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Questions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Questions
A: NSA's definition: Being alive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Policy changes...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Weird equivalency
So in their minds "making aware of" and "punishing" are the same thing? I think someone needs a remedial logic class.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A little confused...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A little confused...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is going a bit far. I'd say acculturation is one of the main purposes of school, and part of that is learning how to deal with your "personal life." Kids spend a ton of time at school, and teachers do plenty of what you're calling parenting. I don't think you can avoid it. Yes, in this case the district went too far, but it's a matter of degree. Finding the right spots to intervene is what makes a good teacher.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Either this is a free country or it is not. Right now it is anything but free for the individual with all this presumption that it is ok to access private effects because the school administration some how is really sensitive to it's reputation as viewed by the public. This is exactly the same lesson being shown citizens from our government officials going all the way to the top.
It is also precisely what news is supposed to be about, is pulling in the excesses and exposing them for what they are.
I'd also like to point out that these schools can no longer administer corporal punishment precisely because parents object to it. This is a point of being far over the line in regards to the schools actions. When kids are off the school property what they do is not the schools concern unless it is a school sponsored event.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the teacher asks, the student should refer the teacher to the parent, who can then refer the teacher to their lawyer.
Unless of course the "child" is 18 or over. Then they make their own choice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
********* see.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So that what all this zero tolerance is about, creating work for lawyers!!!
(Something has gone badly wrong in a society when you suggestion actually seems reasonable.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
School Rules
The problem is that actions and speech that violate school rules when they happen on school grounds or during school activities are not to be considered rule violations outside of that context. The school's authority over student speech ends outside of school grounds and activities, as required by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The same should be true of student actions: actions that don't significantly involve the school should never be considered rule violations.
In other words, there's generally no such thing as "actions or speech that violates school rules" when students are not in school.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Everybody wants to rule their world...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As there is no reason to believe that a password would be given up without coercion, such behavior is likely to fall under criminal laws. But it seems unlikely that the criminal code will be applied to these molestations of children.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm sure a photo of one of the drinking can be spun into why they might not be a good teacher or shouldn't be around impressionable children.
If you want to play the over reach game, lets make it a 2 way street.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Education
The failings of US education are plain to see. According to the triennial international comparisons, US students rank 29th in Math and 22 in Science. This is below Estonia, and between Lithuania and the Slovak Republic. Teachers need to return to teaching, not "playing spy."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]