Wait. They don't want to give them the information, but if they charge them it all becomes discoverable and they would have to give it to them. Genius.
My guess: Trying not to piss off the candidates for 2016. Stay on their good side so they can minimize the contributions they need to make to get what they want.
So why are they not using a USB port blocker to lock all of the open ports? Require 2 or more people to get the key out of a safe and this would have been harder to pull off.
I loved they said they were going to post the emails, but they needed to go through and redact them for security purposes. If nothing sent by it was classified, why is there a need to redact anything.
There is already a root certificate in our certificate stores listed as belonging to the US government. I'm sure there are others in there we don't know about.
Every active exploit was at one point simply theoretical. Since this is such a juicy vector, I can't imagine it will be long before it's part of the standard toolkit. If it isn't already.
I can't even get the website to let me opt out even once. I've been trying for months. Even tried today, just get the "whoops, something went wrong" error. I'm sure they are taking it seriously.
How many stories have we seen where a virus was distributed by an online ad? No thank you. It is my job as a user to minimize the vectors that malware can creep into my system. Since ad networks have proven to be a vector, it is not only my prerogative, but perhaps my duty as a responsible user, to block them.
First item up for business in the next congress. Pass a law forbidding citizens from contacting their representatives or senators. Because, heck, it must be ok since it's all the way at the end of the first amendment.
On the post: St. Louis County Still Considering Bringing Trespassing Charges Against Journalists Police Arrested In Ferguson
Discovery
On the post: Twitter Just Cut Off Politwoops In Another Effort To Keep The Platform Closed
On the post: Facebook's Zuckerberg Thinks Aggressively Violating Net Neutrality Is Fine...If You Just Mean Well
On the post: TSA's Investigation Into Groping Agents Ensured They Wouldn't Be Prosecuted
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-victims-denver-airport-groping-scandal-2015 0415-story.html
On the post: Homeland Security Will Finally Admit To Banned Flyers That They're On The No Fly List
On the post: Former Security Director For Lottery Charged With Tampering Equipment Before Secretly Buying $14.3 Million Winning Ticket
On the post: Former Security Director For Lottery Charged With Tampering Equipment Before Secretly Buying $14.3 Million Winning Ticket
Re: Re: I'm surprised they use computers for the drawing
On the post: Google's Ridiculous AdSense Morality Police Strike Again
On the post: State Of Tennessee Sues The FCC For Daring To Step In And Block Its Law Blocking Muni-Broadband
On the post: NY Court Orders Sheriff To Reveal Details On Stingray Mobile Phone Surveillance
On the post: Hillary Clinton Finally Answers Questions About Her Email... And It Only Raises More Questions
On the post: Rogers Exec Pouts About VPNs, Publicly Dreams Of Canadian Ban
On the post: Lenovo CTO Claims Concerns Over Superfish Are Simply 'Theoretical'
Re: Re:
On the post: Lenovo CTO Claims Concerns Over Superfish Are Simply 'Theoretical'
On the post: Comcast Sued Over Router Update That Makes Your Wi-Fi Hotspot Public, Ignores Your Opt-Out Preferences
On the post: French Publishers Think They Can Fix Online Advertising By Suing The Company Behind AdBlockPlus
On the post: Labels Barely Release 1964 Dylan, Beach Boys Archive Materials Solely To Get Extended Copyrights
On the post: FISA Judge To Yahoo: If US Citizens Don't Know They're Being Surveilled, There's No Harm
On the post: Broadcasters And Cable Companies Trying Harder Than Ever To Annoy Paying Customers With Ugly Public Contract Disputes
On the post: The NYPD Apparently Doesn't Have Any Rules Governing Its In-House Classification Of Documents
Next >>