What would appear to be at issue here is the ultra hysterical claim that it was a "far" right anything at all. That kind of false claim could be damaging and might warrant a cost to the liar who would call itself a journalist.
You should look more carefully to the motives for the suits. In all the cases recently (incl. Nunes) you find people lying in order to smear.
Look to the motives b before you defend the enemies of speech and free thought.
Since the climate isn't changing and has nothing to do with human input nor fossil fuels, it is shockingly Great to see ignorant politicians not force companies into meaningless, ineffective, expensive measures solely for the purpose of virtual signaling.
Since Floyd died of a frenatnyl overdose and it was conclusively proved in Chauvin's trial that he did not hamper in any way the overdosing drug addict Floyd from breathing (as the chief of police had to admit on the stand), the police are prudently realizing that they can never get a fair trial in the city and that they will be charged at any time for anything that the mob deems chargible, why would they put much effort into police work.
Add to that the proven fact that the coroner was pressured by the prosecutors to change his autopsy conclusions (the basis for legal action being taken by the remaining defendants) and the recent higher court's reversal of that Somali cop's murder conviction, and you can easily understand it.
In short, it's very hard for the human beings who work in law enforcement to do their jobs without risking death or injury or the loss of their freedom from juries afraid to acquit lest the mob dox and hurt them, with Maxine coming into town demanding they convict.
It's obvious that Chauvin will be reversed, but it may take several years. He did nothing but his job, and the prosecutors again as in so many other cases in the past few years, cheated in order to convict. That's not justice. The cops and everyone else can see it. Who'd want to go to one's work one day and never return for 35 years because a stoned out overdosing drug addict resists arrest?
Uh, it's not racist to realize reality: blacks are much more violent than other races. AI and programming data quickly realize this. Idiots call that racist. Obviously it's just the truth. Machines don't lie. They ain't racist.
Those that deny the reality of black violence, like you, are the true racists. You are anti-white racists, and I'm betting you are white, It's a mental illness in many white people.
They call frank reporting and studies as racists because they show the truth, Time for you to get back to the science.
The FBI should never have been started, it was a blackmail operation for decades, it has done nothing other than gin up cases--either via entrapment schemes or agents provacateur--for its entire existence. They are inept in every way. And have been for 100 years.
What act like this one will be the end of them? Depends on the stupidity of the American people.
Warren is one of the many school marms (e.g. Susan Wojicki) who have invaded American society.
She thinks she is so right that it's now cool for her and the other school marms to prevent the rest of us from reading or seeing anything they deem yucky.
Even liberals I know who have had contact with Warren say she is an insufferable bitch.
This book banning, anti Free Speech stuff is all her, baby, all she is about. Forget about Big Brother. It's really all Big Sister.
Well, it's obvious, isn't it? to anyone with a brain. So-called fact checking is censorship. You are saying your facts are the TRUTH while my facts are DISINFORMATION.
Newsflash: Chauvin killed no one. As was proved in court. So that nonsense at the beginning of the article makes suspect this other cop. When the Chief of Police think he wasn't guilty? We should go with that. Hindsight is always wrong. The lady cop thought she had the suicidal man with the gun under control? Is that the same as sending a social worker out?
I have got a hot tip: don't walk around with a loaded gun if you don't want to get shot. And here's the obvious fact: the guy wanted to commit suicide by cop. He got his wish. The lady cop had to leave town as she should have left. She's a terrible cop and should go back to waiting tables.
Meanwhile, just another step in destroying any form of law enforcement in the United States. What cop is going to do anything to any violent lunatic with a gun if it means he will suffer the insane hatred of cop haters (like those on Tech Dirt)?
Answer: few. Meaning kiss any law enforcement at all good bye. This is the weirdest experiment in social engineering of all times. Let's just see how it goes, shall we? All the cops are in prison and all the criminals run free (Sympathy for the Devil --Rolling Stones).
Keep going with this lunacy. Hope you have a gun or two.
This is the greatest news I've heard all evening! An order that totalitarian censors of social media can't censor! Who could have any problem with that? No one but totalitarians. since there is no such thing as dis or mis information--only a different opinion than yours--this is perfect.
This is what you get when you do not support Free Speech if you are a writer for Tech Dirt or you are a social media monopoly: politicians trying to fix it.
It needs fixing. You don't like how they are trying to fit it Free speech means all speech. There is no sucha thing as hate speech (as the Supreme Court correctly says) so that means all speech by all people should be on social media all the time.
Don't want to do that? Thank you're snarky smart writing about content moderation and dissing conservatives who want free speech? What goes around comes around. At this point few care what politicians do to bring these totalitarian lunatics to heel.
Change it or Lose it. Do it voluntarily or we gonna figure out how to make you allow American values back into social media and the town square.
Reading this makes me sad that you don't push for public utility of all social media. You just keep on with that right-wing talking point that "it's a private company" nonsense. And then put down anyone that tries to seek remedy for the totalitarian anti-American discrimination, censorship and smearing that goes on routinely.
I mean why. The laptop was "apparently" Hunter's? Are you high?
And not a word about the suppression of it all before the election by your BFFs the social media totalitarians.
Wow. someone who can believe that and could write like that must not realize: they coming for you next.
Phony trial on a phony law that was bogus from the git. It's remarkable how simple prostitution got relabeled sex trafficking. It all depended on Puritan American culture. It shuts people up. My best wishes to the victims of this show trial.
I am confused. I know that there were rioters that destroyed property and people in Kenosha last year. It was just after another black man resisted arrest and acted violent, something that no one does who wants to survive an encounter with the police anywhere on earth.
I can't remember when and where there were simple "protesters" and most especially any incident of police "brutality."
Rioting and destruction are crimes. If they have innovative and effective ways of arresting, charging, convicting rioters who destroy property? Who on Earth would not be for that?
You know? When I read this article with its smearing, sniggering snarky depiction of Sydney Powerll and Lin Wood and then read the corrupt judge's pages of nonsense, which nevertheless, could have some important consequences for that hateful corruption, I started to wonder how Sydney Powell was reacting these threats to her vocation.
So I went on a search for recent video of her and I do mean recent. Like in the last week.
And what did I find? Sydney Powell without a care in the world. She (and Lin) know what is right and just.And if some corrupt and hateful AG wants to enlist her BBF judge to mount a hate campaign that has nothing to do with justice, fairness or American style decency?
Looks like Sydney is saying: bring it.
Your article is nonsense. You should be questioning like journalists do. Instead you are applauding like tainted corrupt fools do.
It never fails to astound me at your sadistic glee in chronicling the latest ruling from the corrupt District Courts, but only if it's against voters and vote fraud.
Your rousing embrace of the corrupt court's assertion that 150 million voters have no interest in honest, fraud-free elections, and thus have no "standing" and cannot be represented in a suit is similarly comical.
As usual I am mystified by your promiscuous of the Antifa word "grifter." In this case you seem to think that lawyers who raised money for their case spent it instead of on expert witnesses (or other legal costs) but really must have spent it on hookers and blow in Aruga.
Of course, neither you nor the court knows what it was spent on and therefore it is obviously not a grift and attorneys are not grifters but for unknown reasons you guys seem to think that the term is a damning indictment that proves in your mind, everything whatever that is.
Your article also claimed that Powell and Wood were sanctioned but your lead back to your own articles claiming that they might be. It's remarkable to watch all of the back-flips you do especially on the reputations of these esteemed Esq's.
Obviously there's no shame in your persona. You'll write anything if Trump has anything to do with it. Anything.
On the post: RFK Jr. Abusing The Courts To Harass Pseudonymous Blogger For Pointing Out RFK Spoke At German Event Organized By Far Right Extremists
the Issue
What would appear to be at issue here is the ultra hysterical claim that it was a "far" right anything at all. That kind of false claim could be damaging and might warrant a cost to the liar who would call itself a journalist.
You should look more carefully to the motives for the suits. In all the cases recently (incl. Nunes) you find people lying in order to smear.
Look to the motives b before you defend the enemies of speech and free thought.
On the post: Texas Pols Shocked To Learn Their Bill Let Gas Companies Off The Hook For Climate Change Preparedness
Shock and Awe
Since the climate isn't changing and has nothing to do with human input nor fossil fuels, it is shockingly Great to see ignorant politicians not force companies into meaningless, ineffective, expensive measures solely for the purpose of virtual signaling.
Best news I've heard all morning!
On the post: Trump Asks Court To Reinstate His Twitter Account ASAP
A Travesty
Twitter should be banned worldwide unless and until it agrees to stop censoring anyone for any reason ever.
On the post: Should Information Flows Be Controlled By The Internet Plumbers?
Short Ansser
NO, NEVER!
On the post: Investigation: Minneapolis Cops Responded To George Floyd's Murder By Refusing To Do Their Jobs While Still Collecting Their Paychecks
Bravo
Since Floyd died of a frenatnyl overdose and it was conclusively proved in Chauvin's trial that he did not hamper in any way the overdosing drug addict Floyd from breathing (as the chief of police had to admit on the stand), the police are prudently realizing that they can never get a fair trial in the city and that they will be charged at any time for anything that the mob deems chargible, why would they put much effort into police work.
Add to that the proven fact that the coroner was pressured by the prosecutors to change his autopsy conclusions (the basis for legal action being taken by the remaining defendants) and the recent higher court's reversal of that Somali cop's murder conviction, and you can easily understand it.
In short, it's very hard for the human beings who work in law enforcement to do their jobs without risking death or injury or the loss of their freedom from juries afraid to acquit lest the mob dox and hurt them, with Maxine coming into town demanding they convict.
It's obvious that Chauvin will be reversed, but it may take several years. He did nothing but his job, and the prosecutors again as in so many other cases in the past few years, cheated in order to convict. That's not justice. The cops and everyone else can see it. Who'd want to go to one's work one day and never return for 35 years because a stoned out overdosing drug addict resists arrest?
Answer: very few.
On the post: New Report On Predictive Policing Shows How New Tech Is Giving Us Little More Than The Same Old Racism
Stating the obvious
Uh, it's not racist to realize reality: blacks are much more violent than other races. AI and programming data quickly realize this. Idiots call that racist. Obviously it's just the truth. Machines don't lie. They ain't racist.
Those that deny the reality of black violence, like you, are the true racists. You are anti-white racists, and I'm betting you are white, It's a mental illness in many white people.
They call frank reporting and studies as racists because they show the truth, Time for you to get back to the science.
On the post: Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Changes
This should read: Minnesota Dept. of Safety now mandating that all black people take training in how to behave during traffic stops.
No black person I've even known who knows how to behave (while also maintaining their rights) has ever had a problem with a cop.
Stop catering to the victim nonsense.
On the post: FBI Sat On Ransomware Decryption Key For Weeks As Victims Lost Millions Of Dollars
The Bureau
The FBI should never have been started, it was a blackmail operation for decades, it has done nothing other than gin up cases--either via entrapment schemes or agents provacateur--for its entire existence. They are inept in every way. And have been for 100 years.
What act like this one will be the end of them? Depends on the stupidity of the American people.
Time will tell.
On the post: Elizabeth Warren Threatens Amazon For Selling Books Containing Misinformation; Perhaps Forgetting The 1st Amendment
Perhaps?
There's no perhaps about it.
Warren is one of the many school marms (e.g. Susan Wojicki) who have invaded American society.
She thinks she is so right that it's now cool for her and the other school marms to prevent the rest of us from reading or seeing anything they deem yucky.
Even liberals I know who have had contact with Warren say she is an insufferable bitch.
This book banning, anti Free Speech stuff is all her, baby, all she is about. Forget about Big Brother. It's really all Big Sister.
On the post: Commentator Insists That Fact Checking Is An Attack On Free Speech
Insisting
Well, it's obvious, isn't it? to anyone with a brain. So-called fact checking is censorship. You are saying your facts are the TRUTH while my facts are DISINFORMATION.
How on Earth can you accept that as an American?
On the post: Cop Who Killed A Suicidal Man Less Than 11 Seconds After Entering His House Convicted Of Murder
A Pail of Cold Water
Newsflash: Chauvin killed no one. As was proved in court. So that nonsense at the beginning of the article makes suspect this other cop. When the Chief of Police think he wasn't guilty? We should go with that. Hindsight is always wrong. The lady cop thought she had the suicidal man with the gun under control? Is that the same as sending a social worker out?
I have got a hot tip: don't walk around with a loaded gun if you don't want to get shot. And here's the obvious fact: the guy wanted to commit suicide by cop. He got his wish. The lady cop had to leave town as she should have left. She's a terrible cop and should go back to waiting tables.
Meanwhile, just another step in destroying any form of law enforcement in the United States. What cop is going to do anything to any violent lunatic with a gun if it means he will suffer the insane hatred of cop haters (like those on Tech Dirt)?
Answer: few. Meaning kiss any law enforcement at all good bye. This is the weirdest experiment in social engineering of all times. Let's just see how it goes, shall we? All the cops are in prison and all the criminals run free (Sympathy for the Devil --Rolling Stones).
Keep going with this lunacy. Hope you have a gun or two.
On the post: Brazilian President Bans Social Media Companies From Removing Disinformation & Abuse
Hear ye
This is the greatest news I've heard all evening! An order that totalitarian censors of social media can't censor! Who could have any problem with that? No one but totalitarians. since there is no such thing as dis or mis information--only a different opinion than yours--this is perfect.
They should leave in the nudity tho.
On the post: Impossibility Of Content Moderation: Scientist Debunking Vaccine Myths Gets A YouTube Strike For Medical Misinfo
Myths
What part of 5 million injured from the vaccines is a myth? What part of 1,000s died from vaccines is a myth? Is VAERS a myth?
Moderation is anti-American. Stop doing it.
On the post: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Announces On Twitter The Livestreaming On Facebook Of His Signing Of A Bill That Removes 1st Amendment Rights For Both
Coming Around
This is what you get when you do not support Free Speech if you are a writer for Tech Dirt or you are a social media monopoly: politicians trying to fix it.
It needs fixing. You don't like how they are trying to fit it Free speech means all speech. There is no sucha thing as hate speech (as the Supreme Court correctly says) so that means all speech by all people should be on social media all the time.
Don't want to do that? Thank you're snarky smart writing about content moderation and dissing conservatives who want free speech? What goes around comes around. At this point few care what politicians do to bring these totalitarian lunatics to heel.
Change it or Lose it. Do it voluntarily or we gonna figure out how to make you allow American values back into social media and the town square.
On the post: Computer Repair Shop Owner Has To Pay Twitter's Legal Fees Over Bogus SLAPP Suit Regarding Hunter Biden's Laptop
Pity
Reading this makes me sad that you don't push for public utility of all social media. You just keep on with that right-wing talking point that "it's a private company" nonsense. And then put down anyone that tries to seek remedy for the totalitarian anti-American discrimination, censorship and smearing that goes on routinely.
I mean why. The laptop was "apparently" Hunter's? Are you high?
And not a word about the suppression of it all before the election by your BFFs the social media totalitarians.
Wow. someone who can believe that and could write like that must not realize: they coming for you next.
On the post: Backpage Founders Trial Finally Begins
All for Show
Phony trial on a phony law that was bogus from the git. It's remarkable how simple prostitution got relabeled sex trafficking. It all depended on Puritan American culture. It shuts people up. My best wishes to the victims of this show trial.
On the post: Reverse Warrants Show Feds Sought Data On Thousands Of Police Brutality Protesters In Kenosha, Wisconsin
Confused
I am confused. I know that there were rioters that destroyed property and people in Kenosha last year. It was just after another black man resisted arrest and acted violent, something that no one does who wants to survive an encounter with the police anywhere on earth.
I can't remember when and where there were simple "protesters" and most especially any incident of police "brutality."
Rioting and destruction are crimes. If they have innovative and effective ways of arresting, charging, convicting rioters who destroy property? Who on Earth would not be for that?
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Better Late than Never
You know? When I read this article with its smearing, sniggering snarky depiction of Sydney Powerll and Lin Wood and then read the corrupt judge's pages of nonsense, which nevertheless, could have some important consequences for that hateful corruption, I started to wonder how Sydney Powell was reacting these threats to her vocation.
So I went on a search for recent video of her and I do mean recent. Like in the last week.
And what did I find? Sydney Powell without a care in the world. She (and Lin) know what is right and just.And if some corrupt and hateful AG wants to enlist her BBF judge to mount a hate campaign that has nothing to do with justice, fairness or American style decency?
Looks like Sydney is saying: bring it.
Your article is nonsense. You should be questioning like journalists do. Instead you are applauding like tainted corrupt fools do.
On the post: More Pro-Trump Lawyers Sanctioned For BS Election Fraud Lawsuits
Glee
It never fails to astound me at your sadistic glee in chronicling the latest ruling from the corrupt District Courts, but only if it's against voters and vote fraud.
Your rousing embrace of the corrupt court's assertion that 150 million voters have no interest in honest, fraud-free elections, and thus have no "standing" and cannot be represented in a suit is similarly comical.
As usual I am mystified by your promiscuous of the Antifa word "grifter." In this case you seem to think that lawyers who raised money for their case spent it instead of on expert witnesses (or other legal costs) but really must have spent it on hookers and blow in Aruga.
Of course, neither you nor the court knows what it was spent on and therefore it is obviously not a grift and attorneys are not grifters but for unknown reasons you guys seem to think that the term is a damning indictment that proves in your mind, everything whatever that is.
Your article also claimed that Powell and Wood were sanctioned but your lead back to your own articles claiming that they might be. It's remarkable to watch all of the back-flips you do especially on the reputations of these esteemed Esq's.
Obviously there's no shame in your persona. You'll write anything if Trump has anything to do with it. Anything.
On the post: Trumpist Gettr Social Network Continues To Speed Run Content Moderation Learning Curve: Bans, Then Unbans, Roger Stone
Unenlightened
I really do not understand what is that you think there must be content moderation for.
You write snarky articles like this which are little more than "see, I told ya so" screeds.
Because after all, doncha know, you just have to censor free speech on the internet. Silly rabbit, free speech is for naive dolts.
Look at you. Content moderation is never ever ever good. Wake up.
Next >>