That Anonymous Coward (profile), 27 Mar 2019 @ 6:04pm
Re:
Rightscorp. The labels keep pouring money into the latest snakeoil salvation (I mean a penny stock that pays its execs more than the company has taken in...) & are angry its not working out for them.
ISPs stopped forwarding the "DMCA" notices Rightscorp generated, because they were not so much a DMCA notice as a carrier for threat letters demanding the account holder pay them or be financially ruined.
Rightscorp defied a courts instructions & deleted code, to protect the super secret black box from outside review. So these untested, unvetted notices continue. ISPs get calls from accountholders who are scared by the message claiming unless they pay this random firm a few hundred/thousand they will end up in court owing $150K. Sometimes when an accountholder decides to pay up, not motivated by guilt but by fear, magically they triple the size of the list you owe for.
Rightscorp convinced the music labels the fact their returns sucked was because the ISPs stopped forwarding the letters. They then decided that since the ISPs refused to terminate service to 'repeat infringers' (as identified by a magical box) stripped their protections under the DMCA & they found a Judge who decided that 2 guys responsible for 3 different failed snakeoil setups to 'save' the music industry from piracy were good upstanding people and we can accept their magic black box output as proof positive.
The problem is Congress failed to define these terms leaving it to lifetime appointees who still own VCRs blinking 12:00 to understand that sometimes the technology isn't always right.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 27 Mar 2019 @ 5:53pm
Re: Re: Amicus Curiae for Copyright Cases.
An IP address is not evidence.
It is a series of numbers assigned at random to users on a network.
If the clock in the detection machine is off, it can point to an entirely different subscriber.
As to 'shifting' the burden of truth, as you fscking high?
Once they have a name associated with the account, they troll facebook... oh you liked a post about 'Game of Thrones' and our super secret tracking software shows the same downloader downloaded Game of Thrones episodes!!!!
The accountholder is male, a penis means they downloaded the porn.
They didn't turn over a flash drive that was once plugged into their computer 2 years ago, this is evidence they are guilty!!!
Our expert was unable to find any evidence of our content, lack of evidence is evidence of them being smarter than our expert and having wiped the evidence away!! Make them pay us now!
We saw a blue car drive past the bank that was robbed, we do not know who was inside, who was driving, or if anyone in that car robbed the bank but we saw a blue car... let us tear his persons life apart in a CIVIL matter that at BEST is worth a few thousand dollars, not the $150K we told them we could win, & connect their name is scandalous porn titles (and until the "MASSIVE" $250 penalty stopped them child porn & beastiality films).
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 26 Mar 2019 @ 11:41pm
Amicus Curiae for Copyright Cases.
Congress has failed to provide adequate direction with laws about copyright.
False DMCA notices are supposed to be punished, but the punishment was not defined beyond perjury.
A recipient risks very clear and massive punishment for not acting fast enough to appease the sender, but even if they know the sender has sent 3 million faulty or fake notices they still have to act or else.
Even "legitimate" groups fail spectacularly, an 'anti-piracy' company in the employee of HBO demanded Google delist HBO.com from their index for offering pirated material.
Google bears all the costs & punishments in this example, firms sending non-existent links to be delisted face none.
One is left how to wonder how a law that instructs rightsholders to send notices to the site hosting the content decided that Google controls the entire internet.
While Google is a very good search engine, they have no control over the sites in question, they can only remove them from their index, after making sure they are valid, which is not a right listed in the law.
Google must deal with millions of these requests each day & when trying to provide details of how often these notices were wrong, were threatened with lawsuits.
Congress has failed to define 'repeat infringer' which has left courts confused & making rulings of questionable merit given how the law is supposed to work. As it stands now music labels are suing Internet Service Providers for not disconnecting 'repeat infringers' notice of these repeat infringers is provided by firms who actively seek to block anyone examining their methods to see if they are accurate.
All they can provide is that they 'saw' an IP address get a piece of a file. They can not say the account holder or anyone in the household was the party responsible for the download.
Trying to sue responsible parties is costly, it is much easier to flood the ISP with 'notices' then claim they didn't remove the repeat infringer & sue in court for insane damages.
I personally have seen notices from an anti-piracy company of over 100 notices for 1 alleged download of a file. These notices were generated milliseconds apart and make it appear that IP address is a 'repeat infringer' but were just to scare them with extortive threats to pay them or else.
Until Congress changes the law to clarify, no court should consider notices to be enough to prove repeat infringement. If your child knows they get a cookie for tattling, they will tell on everything in the hopes of more cookies.
Courts should not reward the system being gamed.
If an IP address is not enough to begin a copyright infringement lawsuit, as is happening in several districts nationwide, how can it be 'evidence' in any sort of legal proceeding? Why should the court keep rewarding the bad behavior of the rightsholders by allowing them to collect damages well in excess of any actual suffered harm by manufacturing 'evidence' that other courts have rejected & they are unwilling to have certified as being factual?
Courts will not convict someone based on the word of a mysterious witness no one is allowed to see, cross-examine, or investigate the motives of... yet there are several lawsuits doing just this targeting ISP's for not having a policy to deal with an undefined terminology.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 26 Mar 2019 @ 11:33pm
One goes have to wonder if the Judge visits the brothel often.
He's either getting a piece... of the action or he is just to old to understand we don't HAVE the pony express anymore.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 25 Mar 2019 @ 11:51am
And I am SURE (/s) that there is no truth to the statement floating around attributed to the cops on scene saying, as teachers were shot, that this is what happens when you don't fight back.
Yep no way the cops decided to flex their muscle & punish the teachers for not going crazy commando and overthrowing the armed invading force to save the kids.
We managed to hand out hundreds of millions in gear that we didn't have a need for to cops, but we can't pay to make sure there is mental health help & training in the schools.
I guess if school shooting counted for anything but props to use to get soundbites to get reelected & the support of lobbyists, we'd consider that we don't need 100 more MCATs than we have people to drive.. and that money might be spent to deal with the real problems with mental health issues. But that doesn't get them donations to keep protecting the guns & stop people from murdering the unborn... of course once your born, you are on your own.... so get a gun & solve your problems that way.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 23 Mar 2019 @ 12:26pm
The ends justify the means...
Decades of BS 'science' getting the result we need to lock the guilty away, refusal to rehear cases even after its proven it is all based on BS because our record needs to be protected.
Now we overlook our taxdollars helping spread and encourage CP being produced.
Our taxdollars pay off women 'arrested' & forced to service cops.
Our taxdollars pay off families to avoid trials showing they planted the gun used to justify the shooting.
Our taxdollars pay off families to avoid the public learning they spent 20 minutes consoling the officer who just shot an unarmed man in the head rather than call for medical assistance.
We really need to demand that they start upholding the law & base things on science... I mean we excused the murder of a child because he was 'demon powering up' to harm the officer.
When you get carjacked there is less of a chance of the criminal hurting you than a cop just shooting to speed along stealing your stuff.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 22 Mar 2019 @ 11:11am
And fuck all will change... because that is how we roll.
It would be nice if we gave up on this whole if we don't violate our most sacred rules the bad guys will win, ignoring those 'protecting us' are much worse than the bad guys.
The war on drugs did nothing useful, except make sure we ignored the pushers inside our own borders getting us hooked on prescription drugs so they could profit.
The war on AIDs was hamstrung by pretending the flu is the same & cutting aid to developing nations if anyone dared mention birth control... despite many women forced into survival sex. Who cares if they die & the epidemic gets worse, we forced our morals onto them. (cut away to every sex scandal involving church leaders & politicians who demanded this).
The war on Wilding only helped prejudice public perception increasing the fear & distrust, helping make sure there was a nice pipeline of bodies to keep private prisons profitable.
We believe lies & fairytales & then contort reality to fit it.
CBP has employed rapists & a serial killer or 2...
We've paid billions for background checks on them... like 1% have been completed...
We have children being raped in custody.
We have men deciding that a 14 yr old should be forced to have the baby she is carrying... because his morality says abortion is a huge crime... and even after a Judge told him to stop... hes still doing it.
We feel up little kids at airports.
We embarrass cancer patients.
We do this so we can be safe!
Yet TSA robs us, sells access secure areas to drug dealers & worse. Its always an isolated incident or any other downplaying tactic. And we wonder why TSA agents have no fear of abusing the public, flexing their muscle to make our lives hell b/c we have to respect their authority!
We're not a supertanker, it isn't impossible to correct the course, we just need the will to admit we screwed up & took the wrong course but we're going back to the right course.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 21 Mar 2019 @ 6:40am
Is it a form of brain damage at google?
They did Google Fiber, ended it but in their minds they changed everything so we all have fast internet now.
They did ContentID, and its a complete clusterfuck but they pretend its super effective doing its job.
They improved YouTube, and magically creators are getting screwed left & right.
We did a thing!!!! Everything will magically align to make it the best thing ever, if you need us we'll be over here working on the newest bestest thing while this one takes care of itself.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 19 Mar 2019 @ 11:39am
Re: Re:
We allowed the FBI to run, maintain, & encourage the production of new child porn. The courts gave their actions cover b/c the ends justified the means... if if those means mock the very law they are charged with upholding.
Silencing whistleblowers is supposed to be a crime, but the only ones punished are the whistleblowers. Whistleblowers don't do it to get a benefit for themselves, they know exactly how they will be degraded & the dirty tricks used to protect the image of what they are reporting.
To pretend that they are all just trying to get ahead by selling out others who got a break they didn't get is sad.
Prison guards boiled a man to death, they faced no charges.
Society just wanted to ignore it & defer to a prosecutor who needs cop support more than to uphold the law & do the job.
We are at a point where people can be murdered for sport & as long as they had a badge we'll find a way to let them have a pass.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 19 Mar 2019 @ 9:43am
Something something if the law doesn't apply to everyone, then people ignore the law.
The ends should never justify the means & when they violate the law there needs to be punishment, not QI and trying to twist the law to fit & salvage the case.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 18 Mar 2019 @ 9:49am
Second verse, same as the first, a whole lot louder, with tears at worst!
They will play this as the Deep State conspiracy to silence them, hit up donors for more money, that they will immediately be parted from by lawyers who like money.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 15 Mar 2019 @ 9:23pm
If only there were penalties in the law for misusing it... but the penalties are always only for the recipients never the senders who often are full of shit & using this as a cog in their scheme to get paid protecting the 'reputations' of scammers who are willing to pay scammers to hide their scams so they can keep scamming.
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 15 Mar 2019 @ 9:20pm
At some point we allowed them to switch the business model to allow them to make even more & when it no longer earns them enough they can walk away.
Smart tvs are so cheap, a CEO admitted this (article here somewhere I had finding links), because their model is making cash off of the data they hoover up. People would freak if they had to pay full price is the claim, but how much does it actually cost to make the device?
How much of their model is shifted to take advantage of hoovering up data?
Why do we keep allowing them to create devices that require an outside server to function? They can shut down the servers with no notice, brick your device, then offer you a new version with 1 new feature & a new server login on the same servers.
Its not like there is any real choice, all of the manufacturers do this... they keep mining you for that sweet data cash & when they aren't earning enough we'll force a new device that can gather more. They claim they offer these 'great' features which often seem to be walled garden versions of things that already exist online... I mean really why does each maker need a program guide provider other than to lock you into the model so they can earn a few cents knowing what programs you watch or thought about watching? Its not like there is a signal on each transmission that tells you whats on now, and whats on next for a timeblock or 3 ... how hard would it be to just capture & present that data without requiring me to waste bandwidth to download it over & over so they can make a bit more cash?
On the post: RIAA Continues Its Legal War To Turn ISPs Into The Copyright Police: Sues Charter Communications
Re:
Bit late the the party aren't ya?
On the post: RIAA Continues Its Legal War To Turn ISPs Into The Copyright Police: Sues Charter Communications
Re:
Rightscorp. The labels keep pouring money into the latest snakeoil salvation (I mean a penny stock that pays its execs more than the company has taken in...) & are angry its not working out for them.
ISPs stopped forwarding the "DMCA" notices Rightscorp generated, because they were not so much a DMCA notice as a carrier for threat letters demanding the account holder pay them or be financially ruined.
Rightscorp defied a courts instructions & deleted code, to protect the super secret black box from outside review. So these untested, unvetted notices continue. ISPs get calls from accountholders who are scared by the message claiming unless they pay this random firm a few hundred/thousand they will end up in court owing $150K. Sometimes when an accountholder decides to pay up, not motivated by guilt but by fear, magically they triple the size of the list you owe for.
Rightscorp convinced the music labels the fact their returns sucked was because the ISPs stopped forwarding the letters. They then decided that since the ISPs refused to terminate service to 'repeat infringers' (as identified by a magical box) stripped their protections under the DMCA & they found a Judge who decided that 2 guys responsible for 3 different failed snakeoil setups to 'save' the music industry from piracy were good upstanding people and we can accept their magic black box output as proof positive.
The problem is Congress failed to define these terms leaving it to lifetime appointees who still own VCRs blinking 12:00 to understand that sometimes the technology isn't always right.
On the post: RIAA Continues Its Legal War To Turn ISPs Into The Copyright Police: Sues Charter Communications
Re: Re: Amicus Curiae for Copyright Cases.
An IP address is not evidence.
It is a series of numbers assigned at random to users on a network.
If the clock in the detection machine is off, it can point to an entirely different subscriber.
As to 'shifting' the burden of truth, as you fscking high?
Once they have a name associated with the account, they troll facebook... oh you liked a post about 'Game of Thrones' and our super secret tracking software shows the same downloader downloaded Game of Thrones episodes!!!!
The accountholder is male, a penis means they downloaded the porn.
They didn't turn over a flash drive that was once plugged into their computer 2 years ago, this is evidence they are guilty!!!
Our expert was unable to find any evidence of our content, lack of evidence is evidence of them being smarter than our expert and having wiped the evidence away!! Make them pay us now!
We saw a blue car drive past the bank that was robbed, we do not know who was inside, who was driving, or if anyone in that car robbed the bank but we saw a blue car... let us tear his persons life apart in a CIVIL matter that at BEST is worth a few thousand dollars, not the $150K we told them we could win, & connect their name is scandalous porn titles (and until the "MASSIVE" $250 penalty stopped them child porn & beastiality films).
On the post: RIAA Continues Its Legal War To Turn ISPs Into The Copyright Police: Sues Charter Communications
Re: Re: Amicus Curiae for Copyright Cases.
Did your mom have any kids that lived?
Every other regular reader is rolling their eyes at you for not bothering to look at who I am.
Last people that accused me of being a lawyer are under federal indictment for their copyright trolling scheme.
People playing the home game will point out that unlike lawyers, I have ethics & stick to them.
On the post: RIAA Continues Its Legal War To Turn ISPs Into The Copyright Police: Sues Charter Communications
Amicus Curiae for Copyright Cases.
Congress has failed to provide adequate direction with laws about copyright.
False DMCA notices are supposed to be punished, but the punishment was not defined beyond perjury.
A recipient risks very clear and massive punishment for not acting fast enough to appease the sender, but even if they know the sender has sent 3 million faulty or fake notices they still have to act or else.
Even "legitimate" groups fail spectacularly, an 'anti-piracy' company in the employee of HBO demanded Google delist HBO.com from their index for offering pirated material.
Google bears all the costs & punishments in this example, firms sending non-existent links to be delisted face none.
One is left how to wonder how a law that instructs rightsholders to send notices to the site hosting the content decided that Google controls the entire internet.
While Google is a very good search engine, they have no control over the sites in question, they can only remove them from their index, after making sure they are valid, which is not a right listed in the law.
Google must deal with millions of these requests each day & when trying to provide details of how often these notices were wrong, were threatened with lawsuits.
Congress has failed to define 'repeat infringer' which has left courts confused & making rulings of questionable merit given how the law is supposed to work. As it stands now music labels are suing Internet Service Providers for not disconnecting 'repeat infringers' notice of these repeat infringers is provided by firms who actively seek to block anyone examining their methods to see if they are accurate.
All they can provide is that they 'saw' an IP address get a piece of a file. They can not say the account holder or anyone in the household was the party responsible for the download.
Trying to sue responsible parties is costly, it is much easier to flood the ISP with 'notices' then claim they didn't remove the repeat infringer & sue in court for insane damages.
I personally have seen notices from an anti-piracy company of over 100 notices for 1 alleged download of a file. These notices were generated milliseconds apart and make it appear that IP address is a 'repeat infringer' but were just to scare them with extortive threats to pay them or else.
Until Congress changes the law to clarify, no court should consider notices to be enough to prove repeat infringement. If your child knows they get a cookie for tattling, they will tell on everything in the hopes of more cookies.
Courts should not reward the system being gamed.
If an IP address is not enough to begin a copyright infringement lawsuit, as is happening in several districts nationwide, how can it be 'evidence' in any sort of legal proceeding? Why should the court keep rewarding the bad behavior of the rightsholders by allowing them to collect damages well in excess of any actual suffered harm by manufacturing 'evidence' that other courts have rejected & they are unwilling to have certified as being factual?
Courts will not convict someone based on the word of a mysterious witness no one is allowed to see, cross-examine, or investigate the motives of... yet there are several lawsuits doing just this targeting ISP's for not having a policy to deal with an undefined terminology.
On the post: Nevada Judge Says Online News Publications Aren't Protected By The State's Journalist Shield Law
One goes have to wonder if the Judge visits the brothel often.
He's either getting a piece... of the action or he is just to old to understand we don't HAVE the pony express anymore.
On the post: Sheriff Decides The Best Way To Prep Teachers For School Shootings Is To Frighten And Injure Them
Huh, it occurs to me that the teachers in Indiana were thinking about a walk out over their lack of pay...
On the post: Sheriff Decides The Best Way To Prep Teachers For School Shootings Is To Frighten And Injure Them
And I am SURE (/s) that there is no truth to the statement floating around attributed to the cops on scene saying, as teachers were shot, that this is what happens when you don't fight back.
Yep no way the cops decided to flex their muscle & punish the teachers for not going crazy commando and overthrowing the armed invading force to save the kids.
We managed to hand out hundreds of millions in gear that we didn't have a need for to cops, but we can't pay to make sure there is mental health help & training in the schools.
I guess if school shooting counted for anything but props to use to get soundbites to get reelected & the support of lobbyists, we'd consider that we don't need 100 more MCATs than we have people to drive.. and that money might be spent to deal with the real problems with mental health issues. But that doesn't get them donations to keep protecting the guns & stop people from murdering the unborn... of course once your born, you are on your own.... so get a gun & solve your problems that way.
On the post: FBI's 'Clothing Match' Expert Changed Testimony To Better Serve Prosecutors, Co-Chairs Nat'l Forensic Committee
The ends justify the means...
Decades of BS 'science' getting the result we need to lock the guilty away, refusal to rehear cases even after its proven it is all based on BS because our record needs to be protected.
Now we overlook our taxdollars helping spread and encourage CP being produced.
Our taxdollars pay off women 'arrested' & forced to service cops.
Our taxdollars pay off families to avoid trials showing they planted the gun used to justify the shooting.
Our taxdollars pay off families to avoid the public learning they spent 20 minutes consoling the officer who just shot an unarmed man in the head rather than call for medical assistance.
We really need to demand that they start upholding the law & base things on science... I mean we excused the murder of a child because he was 'demon powering up' to harm the officer.
When you get carjacked there is less of a chance of the criminal hurting you than a cop just shooting to speed along stealing your stuff.
On the post: CBP Detains 9-Year-Old US Citizen For 36 Hours, Accuses Her 14-Year-Old Brother Of Sex Trafficking
And fuck all will change... because that is how we roll.
It would be nice if we gave up on this whole if we don't violate our most sacred rules the bad guys will win, ignoring those 'protecting us' are much worse than the bad guys.
The war on drugs did nothing useful, except make sure we ignored the pushers inside our own borders getting us hooked on prescription drugs so they could profit.
The war on AIDs was hamstrung by pretending the flu is the same & cutting aid to developing nations if anyone dared mention birth control... despite many women forced into survival sex. Who cares if they die & the epidemic gets worse, we forced our morals onto them. (cut away to every sex scandal involving church leaders & politicians who demanded this).
The war on Wilding only helped prejudice public perception increasing the fear & distrust, helping make sure there was a nice pipeline of bodies to keep private prisons profitable.
We believe lies & fairytales & then contort reality to fit it.
CBP has employed rapists & a serial killer or 2...
We've paid billions for background checks on them... like 1% have been completed...
We have children being raped in custody.
We have men deciding that a 14 yr old should be forced to have the baby she is carrying... because his morality says abortion is a huge crime... and even after a Judge told him to stop... hes still doing it.
We feel up little kids at airports.
We embarrass cancer patients.
We do this so we can be safe!
Yet TSA robs us, sells access secure areas to drug dealers & worse. Its always an isolated incident or any other downplaying tactic. And we wonder why TSA agents have no fear of abusing the public, flexing their muscle to make our lives hell b/c we have to respect their authority!
We're not a supertanker, it isn't impossible to correct the course, we just need the will to admit we screwed up & took the wrong course but we're going back to the right course.
On the post: Slow Broadband, Usage Caps Could Mar Google Stadia's Game Streaming Ambitions
Is it a form of brain damage at google?
They did Google Fiber, ended it but in their minds they changed everything so we all have fast internet now.
They did ContentID, and its a complete clusterfuck but they pretend its super effective doing its job.
They improved YouTube, and magically creators are getting screwed left & right.
We did a thing!!!! Everything will magically align to make it the best thing ever, if you need us we'll be over here working on the newest bestest thing while this one takes care of itself.
On the post: ICE Officers Forging Signatures, Deploying Pre-Signed Warrants To Detain Immigrants
Re: Re:
We allowed the FBI to run, maintain, & encourage the production of new child porn. The courts gave their actions cover b/c the ends justified the means... if if those means mock the very law they are charged with upholding.
Silencing whistleblowers is supposed to be a crime, but the only ones punished are the whistleblowers. Whistleblowers don't do it to get a benefit for themselves, they know exactly how they will be degraded & the dirty tricks used to protect the image of what they are reporting.
To pretend that they are all just trying to get ahead by selling out others who got a break they didn't get is sad.
Prison guards boiled a man to death, they faced no charges.
Society just wanted to ignore it & defer to a prosecutor who needs cop support more than to uphold the law & do the job.
We are at a point where people can be murdered for sport & as long as they had a badge we'll find a way to let them have a pass.
On the post: Rep. Devin Nunes Sues Internet Cow For Saying Mean Things About Him Online
I miss when people were taught civics & it was required to get elected.
On the post: ICE Officers Forging Signatures, Deploying Pre-Signed Warrants To Detain Immigrants
Something something if the law doesn't apply to everyone, then people ignore the law.
The ends should never justify the means & when they violate the law there needs to be punishment, not QI and trying to twist the law to fit & salvage the case.
On the post: Court Dismissed Lawsuit Brought Against Social Media Companies Alleging An Anti-Conservative Conspiracy
Re: Re:
Hey now, Sofie was a great grifter.
On the post: Court Dismissed Lawsuit Brought Against Social Media Companies Alleging An Anti-Conservative Conspiracy
Second verse, same as the first, a whole lot louder, with tears at worst!
They will play this as the Deep State conspiracy to silence them, hit up donors for more money, that they will immediately be parted from by lawyers who like money.
On the post: Online 'Reputation Management' Company Brags About Abusing Copyright Law To Take Down Bad Reviews
If only there were penalties in the law for misusing it... but the penalties are always only for the recipients never the senders who often are full of shit & using this as a cog in their scheme to get paid protecting the 'reputations' of scammers who are willing to pay scammers to hide their scams so they can keep scamming.
On the post: $900 Robot Commits Adorable Seppuku, Showing Again How In The Modern Era You Don't Own What You Buy
At some point we allowed them to switch the business model to allow them to make even more & when it no longer earns them enough they can walk away.
Smart tvs are so cheap, a CEO admitted this (article here somewhere I had finding links), because their model is making cash off of the data they hoover up. People would freak if they had to pay full price is the claim, but how much does it actually cost to make the device?
How much of their model is shifted to take advantage of hoovering up data?
Why do we keep allowing them to create devices that require an outside server to function? They can shut down the servers with no notice, brick your device, then offer you a new version with 1 new feature & a new server login on the same servers.
Its not like there is any real choice, all of the manufacturers do this... they keep mining you for that sweet data cash & when they aren't earning enough we'll force a new device that can gather more. They claim they offer these 'great' features which often seem to be walled garden versions of things that already exist online... I mean really why does each maker need a program guide provider other than to lock you into the model so they can earn a few cents knowing what programs you watch or thought about watching? Its not like there is a signal on each transmission that tells you whats on now, and whats on next for a timeblock or 3 ... how hard would it be to just capture & present that data without requiring me to waste bandwidth to download it over & over so they can make a bit more cash?
On the post: Ninth Circuit Tells Online Services: Section 230 Isn't For You
We want money, you will give it to us!
You will bear all the costs to get us the money!
Who do they think they are? A copyright cartel?
On the post: Security Researcher Discovers Flaws In Yelp-For-MAGAs App, Developer Threatens To Report Him To The Deep State
Re: Re: Re:
Ask that guy who found all those dental records on an open server how well that fscking works out...
Next >>