Or in this case, a community has decided that the ravings of a few (OOTB, AJ, darryl, and hurricane head, among others) are to be hidden on sight because they are not relevant to the conversations at hand.
Long explanation: If the post by OOTB were censored, would you still be able to read it by clicking on a link? I would think not. The post in question has been downvoted by the community for ad-homs.
Let me phrase it for you again: You have no freedom of speech on a privately-operated website. If Mike wanted to, he could block you and you'd have no way to challenge it.
You are an idiot. You have no freedom of speech on a privately-operated website. If Mike wanted to, he could block you and you'd have no way to challenge it.
On the post: A 'Watershed' For The Internet, An Invitation To Use A N. Korean ISP And Other Fallout From The UK's Porn Filtering Plan
Re: Re:
On the post: The 217 Representatives Who Voted To Keep NSA Spying On All Your Data
Re: Re: Head hung in shame
On the post: NSA Defenders In The Senate Flip Out Over Amash Amendment To Stop Dragnet
Re:
On the post: MIT Trying To Block The Release Of Aaron Swartz's Secret Service File
Re: Re:
On the post: Benefits Of Synthetic Blood Could Be Squandered Thanks To Patents
Re: more dissembling by Masnick
On the post: Team Prenda Keeps Trying To Convince Judges That The Lawyers Who Exposed Them Are The Real Scammers
Re: Censorship
Long explanation: If the post by OOTB were censored, would you still be able to read it by clicking on a link? I would think not. The post in question has been downvoted by the community for ad-homs.
On the post: Team Prenda Keeps Trying To Convince Judges That The Lawyers Who Exposed Them Are The Real Scammers
Re: You tipped into obsession about 20 pieces back.
On the post: 7 Months Of Warrantless 'Just Metadata' Paints A Clear Picture Of Your Personal Life
Re: Re: Re: As does 7 months of site visited, as Google collects.
On the post: The Public Domain: Now Available For Only $165 An Hour!*
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You know what: go start your own blog.
On the post: Pulling Music Off Spotify Sends Exactly The Wrong Message
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Pulling Music Off Spotify Sends Exactly The Wrong Message
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: NSA Bosses Mantra: Who Cares What The Law Says, 'Collect It All'
Re: Never off topic
On the post: 'Anti-Propaganda' Ban Repealed, Freeing State Dept. To Direct Its Broadcasting Arm At American Citizens
Re:
On the post: When People From Oliver Stone To Famous Ex-Porn Stars Are Speaking Out About NSA Spying...
Re: Stick to serious, Masnick. Nothing funny about the NSA.
On the post: Gambia Passes Law That Gives Internet Activists 15 Year Jail Terms
Re: Re:
On the post: Gambia Passes Law That Gives Internet Activists 15 Year Jail Terms
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: In What World Is Having Three Judges Set The Price Of Streaming Music 'Free Market Capitalism'?
Re:
On the post: Anti-Piracy Agent Says Full Site Blocking Only Makes His Job Harder
Re:
Two words for you, moron: SPAM FILTER.
You spam, your message gets held in moderation. That fucking simple.
On the post: Contractors Providing Background Checks For NSA Caught Falsifying Reports, Interviewing The Dead
Re:
On the post: China, Once Again, Using Censorship Elsewhere To Justify Oppressive Great Firewall Of China
Re: censorship
Next >>