Can you define the difference between political speech and hate speech, or is hate speech a subset of political speech? Also, when does political speech become misinformation? Without clear and bright definitions decision about such speech is always going to be subjective,
They're literally doing the same thing other platforms are doing.
There seem to be a decent amount of folks who would like to transition away from twitter, if an alternative could reach critical mass for its user base. It's difficult to reconcile why folks want to move out, with another platform if it's just doing the same thing.
As I’ve stated my problem is not so much with censoring/moderating/your-term-here politicians; rather that politicians shouldn’t be using social media, another company’s private property, for official communication.
Despite my nostalgia for the good-old-days of open use and moderation by categorisation eg compuserve, it’s not a practical reality today.
You have a service that's run by a spineless shitbag who's spent countless amounts of other people's money to sue a fictitious cow, who reports to the loofa-faced orange shit-gibbon who's supposedly both a real tough guy and a perpetual victim.
Nobody's perfect and no president have ever claimed to be perfect - until Trump. If you think the character flaws Trump flaunt every fucking day isn't a deal-breaker, what else are you prepared to sacrifice so you can "vote on important things". The enduring legacy of Trump will be his assault on US democracy, the enabling of the idiots, yes men, power hungry grifters and crazies.
This is the man who thinks Putin is a genius for invading Ukraine. How mentally deficient do you have to be to cheer on an autocrat destroying a country?
Once again we are agreeing.
Personally I have a serious dislike for the consolidation to a touch interface a single controlling computer. — when there is no manual alternative or override!
Let’s take some current gm products, in the higher level packages.
The primary infotainment computer also handles the car’s internal and external sensors. Such as seat weight sensors. This could change how airbags are deployed!
You joke, but the “Worst People” Problem is ultimately why the growth of right-wing platforms like Gab and Parler end up stalling. It will be among the reasons Trump Social will eventually shut down.
Whatever lawyers are giving him advice need to be fired, from a cannon, into the sun, because that's not how anything works. You don't get to turn something you don't own into an NFT and then act as though that's the equivalent of owning the copyright on it, and if this ends up in court I don't see that going well for him in the slightest, sympathetic story or not.
Well it’s hundreds of sales in resale, per day. As I linked to. That would be thousands per month.
There’s a few dozen to a few hundred new releases per year.
As for the derogatory use of gimmick:
When applied to retail marketing, it is a unique or quirky feature designed to make a product or service "stand out" from its competitors.~ Wikipedia
I acknowledge you may me partly correct. Despite the antagonistic choice of wording.
Given the general support on TD for the cow account mocking Nunes I strongly suspect that when it said that sites need to do that it was talking more about moderation in general rather than that specific type, as no moderation and you quickly have a useless cesspit of a site filled with spam and worse.
They're literally doing the same thing other platforms are doing.
As someone said a couple of weeks ago (paraphrased): It doesn't matter what is said or done for a "conservative", what matters is who the actor is. If the actor is "conservative" it's good, if the actor isn't "conservative" it's bad.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Some AI generated works shouldn't be public
How is public domain going to hurt software by locking it up when it’s literally not happened with other offerings?
Are you referring to this?
"I'm worried about the potentially devastating harm that the relationship between AI and copyright will have on copyleft free culture licenses. "
That's not a concern about public domain software being locked up, it's a concern about a desire to apply copyright and an open source license to some software, and whether that will be possible if the software is partially written by AI.
You’ll need to define what I agree with him on.
If it’s Ukraine, my comment history proves my opinion predates any comments by him on it.
As I pointed to Clinton and her standing by silently during the Ukrainian genocides as one of the reasons I’d never vote for her.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
And fascist terrorist riots.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
Tax and border policy, for starters.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
A Libertarian is just a Republican who knows the age of consent in all 50 states.
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Re: Re: Re: Clearly
Can you define the difference between political speech and hate speech, or is hate speech a subset of political speech? Also, when does political speech become misinformation? Without clear and bright definitions decision about such speech is always going to be subjective,
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Re: Re: Clearly
There seem to be a decent amount of folks who would like to transition away from twitter, if an alternative could reach critical mass for its user base. It's difficult to reconcile why folks want to move out, with another platform if it's just doing the same thing.
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Re: Re:
That is a valid point. Hopefully aside from that, what I had stated still holds water.
On the post: How Our Convoluted Copyright Regime Explains Why Spotify Chose Joe Rogan Over Neil Young
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes.
As I’ve stated my problem is not so much with censoring/moderating/your-term-here politicians; rather that politicians shouldn’t be using social media, another company’s private property, for official communication.
Despite my nostalgia for the good-old-days of open use and moderation by categorisation eg compuserve, it’s not a practical reality today.
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Re: Clearly
For now, Truth has a superior moderation format.
You have a service that's run by a spineless shitbag who's spent countless amounts of other people's money to sue a fictitious cow, who reports to the loofa-faced orange shit-gibbon who's supposedly both a real tough guy and a perpetual victim.
Continue to not learn, dipshit.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Nobody's perfect and no president have ever claimed to be perfect - until Trump. If you think the character flaws Trump flaunt every fucking day isn't a deal-breaker, what else are you prepared to sacrifice so you can "vote on important things". The enduring legacy of Trump will be his assault on US democracy, the enabling of the idiots, yes men, power hungry grifters and crazies.
This is the man who thinks Putin is a genius for invading Ukraine. How mentally deficient do you have to be to cheer on an autocrat destroying a country?
On the post: Seattle Public Radio Station Manages To Partially Brick Area Mazdas Using Nothing More Than Some Image Files
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Weighted fault
Once again we are agreeing.
Personally I have a serious dislike for the consolidation to a touch interface a single controlling computer. — when there is no manual alternative or override!
Let’s take some current gm products, in the higher level packages.
The primary infotainment computer also handles the car’s internal and external sensors. Such as seat weight sensors. This could change how airbags are deployed!
Etc.
On the post: No, Creating An NFT Of The Video Of A Horrific Shooting Will Not Get It Removed From The Internet
Can someone please explain the following to Mr Parker:
a) the Internet
b) Section 230
c) DMCA
d) Blockchain
e) NFTs
Because he completely misinformed.
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
You joke, but the “Worst People” Problem is ultimately why the growth of right-wing platforms like Gab and Parler end up stalling. It will be among the reasons Trump Social will eventually shut down.
On the post: No, Creating An NFT Of The Video Of A Horrific Shooting Will Not Get It Removed From The Internet
Not how any of that works
Whatever lawyers are giving him advice need to be fired, from a cannon, into the sun, because that's not how anything works. You don't get to turn something you don't own into an NFT and then act as though that's the equivalent of owning the copyright on it, and if this ends up in court I don't see that going well for him in the slightest, sympathetic story or not.
On the post: Analog Books Go From Strength To Strength: Helped, Not Hindered, By The Digital World
Re:
Well it’s hundreds of sales in resale, per day. As I linked to. That would be thousands per month.
There’s a few dozen to a few hundred new releases per year.
As for the derogatory use of gimmick:
I acknowledge you may me partly correct. Despite the antagonistic choice of wording.
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Sweet Jebus
If you ban the libs who are you going to own? eyeroll
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Re:
Given the general support on TD for the cow account mocking Nunes I strongly suspect that when it said that sites need to do that it was talking more about moderation in general rather than that specific type, as no moderation and you quickly have a useless cesspit of a site filled with spam and worse.
On the post: How Our Convoluted Copyright Regime Explains Why Spotify Chose Joe Rogan Over Neil Young
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I can't remember, is that your position on social media moderation as well?
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Re: Re: Clearly
As someone said a couple of weeks ago (paraphrased): It doesn't matter what is said or done for a "conservative", what matters is who the actor is. If the actor is "conservative" it's good, if the actor isn't "conservative" it's bad.
Koby's behavior is a prime example of this.
On the post: US Copyright Office Gets It Right (Again): AI-Generated Works Do Not Get A Copyright Monopoly
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Some AI generated works shouldn't be public
Are you referring to this?
"I'm worried about the potentially devastating harm that the relationship between AI and copyright will have on copyleft free culture licenses. "
That's not a concern about public domain software being locked up, it's a concern about a desire to apply copyright and an open source license to some software, and whether that will be possible if the software is partially written by AI.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Wait…
You’ll need to define what I agree with him on.
If it’s Ukraine, my comment history proves my opinion predates any comments by him on it.
As I pointed to Clinton and her standing by silently during the Ukrainian genocides as one of the reasons I’d never vote for her.
Next >>