You beat me to it. I was going to say they should start an ad campaign that says we have the widest 3G coverage in the US but there is a lawsuit against that.
A large group of people in Northern Kentucky got together this Halloween dressed as Zombies walked around town then several of us went to see Zombie Land.
It was a lot of fun and the movie was good but reading Mr. Reese's thoughts I hope that he does not make a Zombieland 2.
Fire pits like have been on sale for years. The designs are nothing new and look very similar to designs etched and painted on ceramics that I have seen in a museum.
Or remove a finger for each judgement against him starting with the non-dominate index finger then the dominate index then move to the thumb and so on and so forth.
"Companies would lobby congress to suppress stories related to their company. Can you imagine the increase in lobbying this would bring."
At least their time and money would be well waisted, there are worse things they could be lobbying for/against. Also if they would do that to suppress stories in that way the main stream media will suffer and internet based news will more easily push to the forefront.
"[W]ho actually broke the law? The police, the judge, or both?"
I think this depends on what the judge was told the reason for the warrant was for. If he was lied to then it should only be the police, if the knowingly broke the law then I would say both.
You also do not account for Libraries borrowing books from other libraries. So as long as a library one free copy they could just "borrow" the digital copy.
On the post: Astroturf Health Insurance Lobbying Group Paying Social Gamers To Oppose Health Reform
Re:
On the post: Judge Says 'There's An Ad For That...' And It's Ok For Now
Re:
On the post: Jenzabar Finds 'Expert Witness' Who Will Claim Google Relies On Metatags, Despite Google Saying It Does Not
Re: Subpoena
On the post: China Says Microsoft Violates IP With Windows, Bars Sales
Re: Idea
On the post: MPAA/Sony Pictures Realizes That Shutting Down Muni-WiFi Over Single Download Was A Bad Thing
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Psystar Loses Big To Apple
Re: Re:
On the post: Massively Increasing Music Licensing Fees For Clubs Down Under Massively Backfires
Re: Re: Re: Wow
On the post: Zombieland Director Goes After Fans, Doesn't Understand Popularity
Re:
It was a lot of fun and the movie was good but reading Mr. Reese's thoughts I hope that he does not make a Zombieland 2.
On the post: Reason To Have A Distinct Ringtone? So You Can Find Your Mobile Phone At The Dump
Re: Re:
On the post: Firebowls, Copyright And Crowdfunding (Oh My)
Re: Bowls of Fire
On the post: Sanford Wallace Loses Again; Owes Facebook $711 Million
Re: Spammer Punishment
On the post: Sanford Wallace Loses Again; Owes Facebook $711 Million
Re: Re: A helpful suggestion from Lord Helmet
On the post: Study: More Gov't Funding Of The Press, Less Political Corruption Reporting
Re: Bad idea
At least their time and money would be well waisted, there are worse things they could be lobbying for/against. Also if they would do that to suppress stories in that way the main stream media will suffer and internet based news will more easily push to the forefront.
On the post: Songs Used In Promotions Get A Ton Of Sales... So Why Does The Music Industry Try To Make It Harder?
Re:
On the post: Shield Law? What Shield Law? Police Just Get Reporter's Phone Records
Re: more questions than answers
I think this depends on what the judge was told the reason for the warrant was for. If he was lied to then it should only be the police, if the knowingly broke the law then I would say both.
On the post: Chamber Of Commerce Uses DMCA Claim Against Yes Men Prank Site
Re:
On the post: Sequoia Accidentally Reveals (Potentially Illegal?) E-Voting Code
Re: Re: they will sue now
On the post: Monster Energy Drink Hires Trademark Bully To Go After Beverage Review Site
On the post: Do Libraries Need Permission To Lend Out Ebooks?
Re: Selling multiple copies to the libraries
On the post: Senate Judiciary Committee Approves RIAA Bailout Radio Tax
Re: Re:
Next >>