See, I’m not worried about AMC or Regal or the others.
It’s my opinion but:
I’m not sure much harm would be done to the industry as a whole if they simply died off. Leaving behind the hundreds of thousands of independents with 1 or 2 screens.
Before covid I would see more than 12 films in a year in theatres. I can’t remember the last time I was in a chain multiplex. Early 2010s?
Maybe a shake up could create some parity.
Because where are you going to spend your money.
A family of 4 with kids. Do you spend $19.99-29.99 opening night to stream it, or $20 a person to go to the theatre.
The theatre experience has now been surpassed by all but entry level home A/V.
That means the big theatres need to gimmick or lower the price to bring people in.
That’s why we get things like ‘stunning 4D 8K imax’ and the like.
Which is a good pull once or twice.
Covid only sped the process. Theatre attendance has been dropping for a LONG time. Well over a decade year over year.
It’s about time they start looking in the mirror to figure out why.
Again, I can't speak to the full issue here as I don't know the exact details of the project,
Actually in this case I probably can’t.
The 7z ports have been quite an issue mainly because competing compression algorithms are licensed differently.
The author of 7zip has already reached the most inclusion that is possible in binary form.
If I was smart I would have looked into things deeper. Instead I tried to route around it by including a compile/build command in the package to build on demand. And included the source.
I tried to mimic qqCompress but it turns out in typical fashion for less, er, regulated Chinese software qq just didn’t care about licensing.
QQ is quite complete but difficult to find on the open web.
And still fails to include a gui. Nor include xx, ux, ice, 7z, or pea.
So ultimately I submitted the gui alone to the Ports projects for testing and distribution.
And a compile on request source and string post.
But it leaves me shaking my head. Saying are you serious.
As I expected. You’re against the death penalty.
I support modified and more strict application uses.
Not preponderance. Absolute and undeniable. Video, photo, combined with eye witnesses? Absolutely zero doubt.
Yes, I absolutely believe some crimes are so egregious they deserve punishment more than just fines or prison.
And before you come back with another right wing platform quite: show me an atheist or agnostic, lgbt, social spending, corporate tax supporting American conservative.
Deserve? Maybe. Maybe not. But given the example of you drug someone with a rabid sex drug and then get raped by the same person I have zero sympathy for you.
Class me however you like. I don’t really care what you think.
If you think the men that brutalised those scofflaws in the parking lot absolutely should not face the same which they devised?
There is zero doubt what those men did. And they should face the same. When a murder is caught on video committing murder I have zero reluctance to the death penalty.
And yes, rape is a violent assault with permanent damage.
Anyone who committed such an act with undeniable evidence and with full wilful thought should be forced to suffer.
I take it you don’t know any rape survivors?
Because I guaran fucking tee you the vast majority would have zero reluctance in knowing the rapist was tied up and chopped into little pieces.
That you leave your car running, keys in the ignition, and it gets stolen? No pity.
If you drug someone and they rape you because of that drug, no sympathy.
And when you brutalise someone to the literal edge of their life and someone does the same to you… zero sympathy.
Yep. One of those bleeding hearts you are.
Cry for the criminals if the cops are worse.
what part hang the criminals that were on duty as police out to dry do you fail to understand.
Considering it was the first post on the topic I made and hasn’t changed.
That I came back and said , oh by the way, the victims, they’re still criminals… doesn’t lessen the situation or the crimes of the cops you everyone-I-disagree-with-is-q moron.
It simply points out a fact lost under the more drastic of the crimes in the series if events.
Though I shed no tear for the idiot who created a situation themselves, such as drugging the man who rapes her;
“absolutely nothing can justify or defend rape”. And proven rapists should be tortured.
I have not justified the illegal act. I will not seek to justify such an act.
I will however make a difference between a victim, and a martyr.
So did these men.
They fired in response to being fired upon.
Both are legal self defence cases.
Rittenhouse was travelling by foot; walking, as per court testimony and evidence, not running up on people, carrying a medical kit and offering first aid.
There wasn’t, that I recall, a curfew in place at the locations he was at.
If there was, he is less innocent. But still not guilty.
In this case Police case we have non-innocence. They had already broken the law.
Curfew law violation alone does not suggest the cops are innocent, or the men are guilty of anything else.
Here the men in the parking lot should STILL face whatever penalties they brought upon themselves under the law for the curfew violation.
The police should be tried and held accountable for the crimes they committed that evening.
Illicit discharge of a firearm
Assault with a deadly weapon
Assault
Battery
Attempted murder
And potentially a hate crime.
And in case the last sticks all others should be extended secondarily as separate
-during or in support of a hate crime
Charges as well.
The difference between you and I is I won’t ignore one criminal act in light of a graver criminal act carried out against the criminals.
The difference in the cases is we have a man thrice threatened without (legal) provocation
Vs
What appears to be an ongoing criminal act in the first place and a wholly overresponse to it by police.
I’m a huge fan of theatres that are not part of the chain multi-/mega-plexes.
I’ve been to pens ranging from turn of the century that hardly work to modern future-retro builds.
Where people care. The owners, the crew/staff, the movie goers.
This is totally the opposed of the chain system where it’s just a job from top to bottom.
Crowded, noisy, dirty. Over priced. The latest pos from Hollywood on half the screens.
They exist, but it’s rare to find owners/operators of megaplexes that care about the industry.
And film consumerism has slowly moved away from the forced environment of big chain screenings. Where you are herded like cattle. Searched on entry. Not for weapons but for a cell phone.
Paraded to the $10 hotdog and chips. Then marched across the sticky floor shoved into the porous “comfort” seat that hasn’t been cleaned in 6 months.
Where you sit through 15 minutes of trailers to watch a movie partly drowned out by the noise from the screen a room over and partly by the kids in the back making a running laugh track.
And when some arse throws popcorn or dumdums and wakes the sleeping baby we get 10 minutes of crying and pleading about not being tossed out after spending $50 and it’s really those meddling kids.
Or
Spend 14.99 at home, make a $2.00 bag of popcorn and pop the $12.99 case of beer and sit back and enjoy the spatial audio from the $299 40” screen you picked up on sale.
3 groups of people go to theatres today. (As an overgeneralisation).
Those who want to be part of the rowdy experience that it has become. The trouble makers.
Those that can’t afford modern-ish home a/v.
And those who can’t make the “80 mile” drive to an independent.
The latter two groups spend half their time bytching about the former.
Big chain shows just aren’t fun any more!
And here’s the thing with my sod off comment. My personal, but studied, opinion:
The current general clientele (outside of opening weekend) don’t give two shites about what they are going to see. Not ultimately. The actual profits won’t have much of a bump or dip for the actual location if they say fuck you over a film’s rules and rates. Loosing a film isn’t going to kill a chain.
And if multiple chains and chain franchises say go to hell?
Those collection prices will come down.
It’s not like they can go to an independent that makes $50k a year and offer a first run for $1mil up front!
You can’t stab the hand that feeds you if it doesn’t like being stabbed.
Look at the high drop in HBO views when it killed the prime contract.
If you don’t work in giving people what they want, you wind up alone.
When a theatre chain says sod off, the studio, not the chain, will be the one most hurt.
stealthing. The victim is completely and absolutely innocent. Terms and conditions were set up front.
If you go to a nude club and the sign say look but don’t touch and every entrant must acknowledge the sign/rule to enter… the terms and conditions are set.
When it says only cast can initiate contact…
When you walk into a free-for-all kink club and get raped… you got raped. You are a victim. But you are not without fault.
When you charge at police with a knife and get your chest blown in , you are definitely not without fault.
A victim of extreme force? Yes. A victim of excessive force? Maybe. But far from a victim without fault.
And when a group of men Stage an ambush in a parking lot, and get beaten for it…
These men are definitely victims. Of assault. Of battery. I’d go so far as say attempted manslaughter, or attempted murder, with the kicks and stomps to the head.
But they are not without fault.
And that is very much the premise of the lady stripping naked in a club, groping everyone in reach, and then getting raped.
I guess you could view it as a single level system.
The plans I get behind and would support always include a mega level corporate tax. And couple the tax plan with a tax funded social spending plan.
Such as, and including, health care and education.
Companies need employees. The fastest way to get someone in the door who already has the government depositing 25k per year in SSIG is to offer them more money and treat them with respect.
It converts need to drive. Must to want.
It transitions slave labour market into a volunteer work force.
An untouchable taxless base that, as far as the irs is concerned, doesn’t exist.
That eliminates the poverty line up front. And hence forth makes equal rates non-discriminatory.
Actually I was attacking licenses in relation to use of Unix derivative distributions.
In my very specific most recent case my inability to distribute a binary recomp of px7z with extensions and a rudimentary gui as a prebuilt binary for MacOS/i…
Though it’s a constant problem with A/V codecs
The idea of freedoms and liberty was lost along the way somewhere.
Because it turns double click into:
Fnd, cmp, mod, ext, bld, mv, reg, lnk,
Because that excludes the 99%: including my target who don’t want to use the terminal/command line.
Submission rejected: license incompatibility. Do you wish to continue.
Sure I can host the source but it generally totally defeats the purpose.
The difference is how we should respond to it as people.
I’m not a bleeding heart. Crime is crime and law is law.
The difference is when to make a poster child for the crime and when not to. For all the ‘innocent’ people brutalised by rogue groups of police this isn’t, apparently, the group of victims I’d be covering as the choice example.
They didn’t deserve to be beaten into the ground. They deserved to be arrested and fined.
What bothers me in such cases, beyond the actual final result, is how often the preceding illegal act is ignored or forgotten.
And once again, as you fully know by now, I don’t do “sounds like”.
I didn’t bring up rape. The article isn’t about a rape or any other sexual context.
What I was saying in al contexts is get over your myth of faultless victims.
When a lady walks into a club and strips naked in front of 20 men high on X and gets gangbanged she the victim. But she’s not without fault.
When a pillow case head walks into a new panther rally with a MAGA sign and gets the shite beat out of them their a victim, but not without fault.
And here. When a group of armed men gather on a parking lot in violation of a curfew to ambush a vehicle and get the crap kicked out of them: they are victims but not without fault.
I have not changed my comment that these cops need to be hit with every charge available and strung out.
God to reincarnate them as a mushroom so they can never die in a way that matters
Now, that! Is a just punishment. For so many crimes. Just make mushrooms.
To forever be forced to feed those you hurt.
What the fuck does that have to do with conservatives?
Tell me why there should be no penalty for filing a false crime report?
Tell me why the MAFIAA has no penalty for fake DMCA
And tell me why there is no penalty for intentionally ruining a person’s life.
Tell me why there’s no penalty for pointing and saying witch so the burn you at the stake!
Religious Right fuckbois who talk about modesty and purity and shit when they decry “loose” women
Oh no! Not at all!
I would prefer a society the gets beyond and over the middle ages purity and welcome all sex all the time. As long as it is willing.
Want to fuck on the dirty floor of the club? Have at it. That’s the way it should be.
We’d have less trouble if we openly welcomed free sex clubs. Legalised licensed prostitution.
And actually punished those who commit rape.
Rapists should be tortured.
But we should also have severe penalties for filing false reports.
I’m gonna have to ask you what reality you’re living in, because it sure as shit isn’t this one.
But simply raising taxes will get them to pay more than the fee percentage points they do now?
I mean, do you think the wealthiest members of Congress are about to risk their own earnings by passing laws that tax their wealth at higher rates than the poor…
Actually, I do. Since the largest pushers for tax reform are wealthy democrats. I have some, minimal, faith.
Not that you care to think about the actual humanity of the situation
Which is why you change it. To one that covers 100% of the social system. Education, health care, etc.
And therein lies the problem: A CEO could easily claim a huge “base level income”
No, they can’t. The law sets the base income. In this case 25,000. Anything above that is taxed.
It is the equivalent of the first 25k not existing at all. That is the base. Taxes start at that level, and only tax income above that level.
At 25,001: your taxable income is $1.
Stocks and bonds are taxed. I assume you don’t hold any.
I disagree with taxing unsold holdings. You tax sales. You tax when it is translated to money.
Nothing wrong with waiting on the sale.
The problem isn’t in the wait, it’s in the shite neutralisation of losses. Which are gone on flat taxes as a sale is income. No losses deduction.
I have no problem with rich dumb bull as long as the needs of the poor are met.
Not even the most extreme alt left progressive has put forth 45k but it’s just as nice a number as 25.
(I think you increasing the work vs sit in arse do nothing factor at that level).
You don’t tax a penny below the minimum guaranteed income rate. Any you tax every dollar over it. Earned or not.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re:
One problem with that;
More people died of covid during Biden’s term than Trump.
On the post: Ridley Scott Blames His Latest Movie Bombing At The Box Office On Facebook And Millennials, Rather Than Pandemic And Poor Marketing
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
See, I’m not worried about AMC or Regal or the others.
It’s my opinion but:
I’m not sure much harm would be done to the industry as a whole if they simply died off. Leaving behind the hundreds of thousands of independents with 1 or 2 screens.
Before covid I would see more than 12 films in a year in theatres. I can’t remember the last time I was in a chain multiplex. Early 2010s?
Maybe a shake up could create some parity.
Because where are you going to spend your money.
A family of 4 with kids. Do you spend $19.99-29.99 opening night to stream it, or $20 a person to go to the theatre.
The theatre experience has now been surpassed by all but entry level home A/V.
That means the big theatres need to gimmick or lower the price to bring people in.
That’s why we get things like ‘stunning 4D 8K imax’ and the like.
Which is a good pull once or twice.
Covid only sped the process. Theatre attendance has been dropping for a LONG time. Well over a decade year over year.
It’s about time they start looking in the mirror to figure out why.
On the post: Trump Given 30 Days To Have His Social Media Site Comply With Open Source License
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
;)
I’m with you across the board.
Actually in this case I probably can’t.
The 7z ports have been quite an issue mainly because competing compression algorithms are licensed differently.
The author of 7zip has already reached the most inclusion that is possible in binary form.
If I was smart I would have looked into things deeper. Instead I tried to route around it by including a compile/build command in the package to build on demand. And included the source.
I tried to mimic qqCompress but it turns out in typical fashion for less, er, regulated Chinese software qq just didn’t care about licensing.
QQ is quite complete but difficult to find on the open web.
And still fails to include a gui. Nor include xx, ux, ice, 7z, or pea.
So ultimately I submitted the gui alone to the Ports projects for testing and distribution.
And a compile on request source and string post.
But it leaves me shaking my head. Saying are you serious.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
As I expected. You’re against the death penalty.
I support modified and more strict application uses.
Not preponderance. Absolute and undeniable. Video, photo, combined with eye witnesses? Absolutely zero doubt.
Yes, I absolutely believe some crimes are so egregious they deserve punishment more than just fines or prison.
And before you come back with another right wing platform quite: show me an atheist or agnostic, lgbt, social spending, corporate tax supporting American conservative.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
Deserve? Maybe. Maybe not. But given the example of you drug someone with a rabid sex drug and then get raped by the same person I have zero sympathy for you.
Class me however you like. I don’t really care what you think.
If you think the men that brutalised those scofflaws in the parking lot absolutely should not face the same which they devised?
There is zero doubt what those men did. And they should face the same. When a murder is caught on video committing murder I have zero reluctance to the death penalty.
And yes, rape is a violent assault with permanent damage.
Anyone who committed such an act with undeniable evidence and with full wilful thought should be forced to suffer.
I take it you don’t know any rape survivors?
Because I guaran fucking tee you the vast majority would have zero reluctance in knowing the rapist was tied up and chopped into little pieces.
That you leave your car running, keys in the ignition, and it gets stolen? No pity.
If you drug someone and they rape you because of that drug, no sympathy.
And when you brutalise someone to the literal edge of their life and someone does the same to you… zero sympathy.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
Yep. One of those bleeding hearts you are.
Cry for the criminals if the cops are worse.
what part hang the criminals that were on duty as police out to dry do you fail to understand.
Considering it was the first post on the topic I made and hasn’t changed.
That I came back and said , oh by the way, the victims, they’re still criminals… doesn’t lessen the situation or the crimes of the cops you everyone-I-disagree-with-is-q moron.
It simply points out a fact lost under the more drastic of the crimes in the series if events.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
Men in the parking lot broke the law and should still face the consequences of doing so.
Men firing rounds from a panel van broke the law and should face the consequences for doing so.
Men who beat a bunch of people into the hospital broke the law and should be held accountable.
Feel feee to show I justified it, as in it was Ohkay, or proper, to beat a man into the hospital. Because such a statement doesn’t exist.
I see nobody innocent due for martyrdom though.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
Though I shed no tear for the idiot who created a situation themselves, such as drugging the man who rapes her;
“absolutely nothing can justify or defend rape”. And proven rapists should be tortured.
I have not justified the illegal act. I will not seek to justify such an act.
I will however make a difference between a victim, and a martyr.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Rittenhouse defended himself against a threat.
So did these men.
They fired in response to being fired upon.
Both are legal self defence cases.
Rittenhouse was travelling by foot; walking, as per court testimony and evidence, not running up on people, carrying a medical kit and offering first aid.
There wasn’t, that I recall, a curfew in place at the locations he was at.
If there was, he is less innocent. But still not guilty.
In this case Police case we have non-innocence. They had already broken the law.
Curfew law violation alone does not suggest the cops are innocent, or the men are guilty of anything else.
Here the men in the parking lot should STILL face whatever penalties they brought upon themselves under the law for the curfew violation.
The police should be tried and held accountable for the crimes they committed that evening.
Illicit discharge of a firearm
Assault with a deadly weapon
Assault
Battery
Attempted murder
And potentially a hate crime.
And in case the last sticks all others should be extended secondarily as separate
-during or in support of a hate crime
Charges as well.
The difference between you and I is I won’t ignore one criminal act in light of a graver criminal act carried out against the criminals.
The difference in the cases is we have a man thrice threatened without (legal) provocation
Vs
What appears to be an ongoing criminal act in the first place and a wholly overresponse to it by police.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
Oh ye of inference. I implied nothing.
I didn’t justify it. I simply won’t be shedding tears
not for the naked groper who supplied her rapist with x 15 minutes earlier.
The crime is still a crime. The difference is I won’t martyrise someone who set up the situation in the first place.
On the post: Ridley Scott Blames His Latest Movie Bombing At The Box Office On Facebook And Millennials, Rather Than Pandemic And Poor Marketing
Re: Re: Re:
No, I agree with you on multiple points here.
I’m a huge fan of theatres that are not part of the chain multi-/mega-plexes.
I’ve been to pens ranging from turn of the century that hardly work to modern future-retro builds.
Where people care. The owners, the crew/staff, the movie goers.
This is totally the opposed of the chain system where it’s just a job from top to bottom.
Crowded, noisy, dirty. Over priced. The latest pos from Hollywood on half the screens.
They exist, but it’s rare to find owners/operators of megaplexes that care about the industry.
And film consumerism has slowly moved away from the forced environment of big chain screenings. Where you are herded like cattle. Searched on entry. Not for weapons but for a cell phone.
Paraded to the $10 hotdog and chips. Then marched across the sticky floor shoved into the porous “comfort” seat that hasn’t been cleaned in 6 months.
Where you sit through 15 minutes of trailers to watch a movie partly drowned out by the noise from the screen a room over and partly by the kids in the back making a running laugh track.
And when some arse throws popcorn or dumdums and wakes the sleeping baby we get 10 minutes of crying and pleading about not being tossed out after spending $50 and it’s really those meddling kids.
Or
Spend 14.99 at home, make a $2.00 bag of popcorn and pop the $12.99 case of beer and sit back and enjoy the spatial audio from the $299 40” screen you picked up on sale.
3 groups of people go to theatres today. (As an overgeneralisation).
Those who want to be part of the rowdy experience that it has become. The trouble makers.
Those that can’t afford modern-ish home a/v.
And those who can’t make the “80 mile” drive to an independent.
The latter two groups spend half their time bytching about the former.
Big chain shows just aren’t fun any more!
And here’s the thing with my sod off comment. My personal, but studied, opinion:
The current general clientele (outside of opening weekend) don’t give two shites about what they are going to see. Not ultimately. The actual profits won’t have much of a bump or dip for the actual location if they say fuck you over a film’s rules and rates. Loosing a film isn’t going to kill a chain.
And if multiple chains and chain franchises say go to hell?
Those collection prices will come down.
It’s not like they can go to an independent that makes $50k a year and offer a first run for $1mil up front!
You can’t stab the hand that feeds you if it doesn’t like being stabbed.
Look at the high drop in HBO views when it killed the prime contract.
If you don’t work in giving people what they want, you wind up alone.
When a theatre chain says sod off, the studio, not the chain, will be the one most hurt.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re:
And new we have a logical place to go in terms.
stealthing. The victim is completely and absolutely innocent. Terms and conditions were set up front.
If you go to a nude club and the sign say look but don’t touch and every entrant must acknowledge the sign/rule to enter… the terms and conditions are set.
When it says only cast can initiate contact…
When you walk into a free-for-all kink club and get raped… you got raped. You are a victim. But you are not without fault.
When you charge at police with a knife and get your chest blown in , you are definitely not without fault.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7zSAsrA-K48
A victim of extreme force? Yes. A victim of excessive force? Maybe. But far from a victim without fault.
And when a group of men Stage an ambush in a parking lot, and get beaten for it…
These men are definitely victims. Of assault. Of battery. I’d go so far as say attempted manslaughter, or attempted murder, with the kicks and stomps to the head.
But they are not without fault.
And that is very much the premise of the lady stripping naked in a club, groping everyone in reach, and then getting raped.
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re: Re: Re:
I guess you could view it as a single level system.
The plans I get behind and would support always include a mega level corporate tax. And couple the tax plan with a tax funded social spending plan.
Such as, and including, health care and education.
Companies need employees. The fastest way to get someone in the door who already has the government depositing 25k per year in SSIG is to offer them more money and treat them with respect.
It converts need to drive. Must to want.
It transitions slave labour market into a volunteer work force.
An untouchable taxless base that, as far as the irs is concerned, doesn’t exist.
That eliminates the poverty line up front. And hence forth makes equal rates non-discriminatory.
On the post: Trump Given 30 Days To Have His Social Media Site Comply With Open Source License
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wrong li
Actually I was attacking licenses in relation to use of Unix derivative distributions.
In my very specific most recent case my inability to distribute a binary recomp of px7z with extensions and a rudimentary gui as a prebuilt binary for MacOS/i…
Though it’s a constant problem with A/V codecs
The idea of freedoms and liberty was lost along the way somewhere.
Because it turns double click into:
Fnd, cmp, mod, ext, bld, mv, reg, lnk,
Because that excludes the 99%: including my target who don’t want to use the terminal/command line.
Submission rejected: license incompatibility. Do you wish to continue.
Sure I can host the source but it generally totally defeats the purpose.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
The difference is how we should respond to it as people.
I’m not a bleeding heart. Crime is crime and law is law.
The difference is when to make a poster child for the crime and when not to. For all the ‘innocent’ people brutalised by rogue groups of police this isn’t, apparently, the group of victims I’d be covering as the choice example.
They didn’t deserve to be beaten into the ground. They deserved to be arrested and fined.
What bothers me in such cases, beyond the actual final result, is how often the preceding illegal act is ignored or forgotten.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
And once again, as you fully know by now, I don’t do “sounds like”.
I didn’t bring up rape. The article isn’t about a rape or any other sexual context.
What I was saying in al contexts is get over your myth of faultless victims.
When a lady walks into a club and strips naked in front of 20 men high on X and gets gangbanged she the victim. But she’s not without fault.
When a pillow case head walks into a new panther rally with a MAGA sign and gets the shite beat out of them their a victim, but not without fault.
And here. When a group of armed men gather on a parking lot in violation of a curfew to ambush a vehicle and get the crap kicked out of them: they are victims but not without fault.
I have not changed my comment that these cops need to be hit with every charge available and strung out.
Now, that! Is a just punishment. For so many crimes. Just make mushrooms.
To forever be forced to feed those you hurt.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re: Re: Re:
Use quotes please. Nobody has any idea who you are responding to at this point in the thread.
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
What the fuck does that have to do with conservatives?
Tell me why there should be no penalty for filing a false crime report?
Tell me why the MAFIAA has no penalty for fake DMCA
And tell me why there is no penalty for intentionally ruining a person’s life.
Tell me why there’s no penalty for pointing and saying witch so the burn you at the stake!
On the post: Minneapolis Man Acquitted Of Charges After Mistakenly Shooting At Cops Sues Officers For Violating His Rights
Re:
Oh no! Not at all!
I would prefer a society the gets beyond and over the middle ages purity and welcome all sex all the time. As long as it is willing.
Want to fuck on the dirty floor of the club? Have at it. That’s the way it should be.
We’d have less trouble if we openly welcomed free sex clubs. Legalised licensed prostitution.
And actually punished those who commit rape.
Rapists should be tortured.
But we should also have severe penalties for filing false reports.
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re:
But simply raising taxes will get them to pay more than the fee percentage points they do now?
Actually, I do. Since the largest pushers for tax reform are wealthy democrats. I have some, minimal, faith.
Which is why you change it. To one that covers 100% of the social system. Education, health care, etc.
No, they can’t. The law sets the base income. In this case 25,000. Anything above that is taxed.
It is the equivalent of the first 25k not existing at all. That is the base. Taxes start at that level, and only tax income above that level.
At 25,001: your taxable income is $1.
Stocks and bonds are taxed. I assume you don’t hold any.
I disagree with taxing unsold holdings. You tax sales. You tax when it is translated to money.
Nothing wrong with waiting on the sale.
The problem isn’t in the wait, it’s in the shite neutralisation of losses. Which are gone on flat taxes as a sale is income. No losses deduction.
I have no problem with rich dumb bull as long as the needs of the poor are met.
Not even the most extreme alt left progressive has put forth 45k but it’s just as nice a number as 25.
(I think you increasing the work vs sit in arse do nothing factor at that level).
You don’t tax a penny below the minimum guaranteed income rate. Any you tax every dollar over it. Earned or not.
Next >>